This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
60 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 60
  1. Brent Adkins (1999). The Satisfaction of Reason: The Mathematical/Dynamical Distinction in the Critique of Pure Reason. Kantian Review 3:64-80.
  2. Gary Banham (2010). Scepticism, Causation and Cognition. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):507-520.
  3. Nathan Bauer (2012). A Peculiar Intuition: Kant's Conceptualist Account of Perception. Inquiry 55 (3):215-237.
    Abstract Both parties in the active philosophical debate concerning the conceptual character of perception trace their roots back to Kant's account of sensible intuition in the Critique of Pure Reason. This striking fact can be attributed to Kant's tendency both to assert and to deny the involvement of our conceptual capacities in sensible intuition. He appears to waver between these two positions in different passages, and can thus seem thoroughly confused on this issue. But this is not, in fact, the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Robert J. Benton (1980). Kant's Categories of Practical Reason as Such. Kant-Studien 71 (1-4):181-201.
  5. Ian Blecher, Anil Gomes, Joel Thiago Klien, Alexei N. Krouglov, Samuel Loncar & Colin Marshall (2013). Jahresinhalt Kant-Studien. Kant-Studien 104 (4):563-566.
  6. Susanne Bobzien (2013). Kant's Categories of Freedom. In Kant - Analysen, Probleme, Kritik (English translation of 1988 article).
    ABSTRACT: A general interpretation and close textual analysis of Kant’s theory of the categories of freedom (or categories of practical reason) in his Critique of Practical Reason. My main concerns in the paper are the following: (1) I show that Kant’s categories of freedom have primarily three functions: as conditions of the possibility for actions (i) to be free, (ii) to be comprehensible as free and (iii) to be morally evaluated. (2) I show that for Kant actions, although qua theoretical (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Nathan Brett (1983). Hume's Debt to Kant. Hume Studies 9 (1):59-73.
  8. William F. Bristow (2002). Are Kant's Categories Subjective? Review of Metaphysics 55 (3):551-580.
    Argues that there is a significant respect in which Kant's categories are to be understood as subjective, namely, in the sense that they are to be understood as the self-legislated rules of our understanding. Argues that the subjectivism of Kant's idealism, by which is meant the relativization of knowledge of objects to our standpoint, is a consequence of the subjectivity of the categories, on this interpretation of their subjectivity. On the reading opposed here, Kant's subjectivism is strictly a consequence of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Clive Cazeaux (2001). Review: Banham, Kant and the Ends of Aesthetics. Kantian Review 5:141.
  10. Lauchlan Chipman (1982). Kant's Categories and Their Schematism. In Ralph Charles Sutherland Walker (ed.), Kant on Pure Reason. Oxford University Press. 36-50.
  11. Daniel O. Dahlstrom (1984). Transzendentale Schemata, Kategorien und Erkenntnisarten. Kant-Studien 75 (1-4):38-54.
  12. Hans Ehrenberg (1909). Kants Kategorientafel und der systematische Begriff der Philosophie. Kant-Studien 14 (1-3):392-439.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Fiona Ellis (2005). Concepts and Reality in the History of Philosophy: Tracing a Philosophical Error From Locke to Bradley. Routledge.
    This book traces a deep misunderstanding about the relation of concepts and reality in the history of philosophy. It exposes the influence of the mistake in the thought of Locke, Berkeley, Kant, Nietzche and Bradley, and suggests that the solution can be found in Hegelian thought. Ellis argues that the treatment proposed exemplifies Hegel's dialectical method. This is an important contribution to this area of philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. António Fragoso Fernandes (2006). Da Aporia à Cisão: Uma Interpretação Do Opus Postumum Kantiano. Imprensa Nacional-Casa da Moeda.
  15. Patrick Fleming (2004). Kant and Strawson on the Objectivity Thesis. Idealistic Studies 34 (2):173-180.
    In the Transcendental Deductions, Kant attempts to establish the necessary applicability of the categories to what is encountered in experience. As I see it, the argument is intended to deduce two distinct, but, in Kant’s eyes, interrelated, claims. The first is that it is a necessity that experience be of an objective world. Call this rough idea the objectivity thesis. The second thesis is that the categoriesapply only to mere appearances, that is, the world insofar as we structure it. Call (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Michael Friedman (1989). Kant on Space, the Understanding, and the Law of Gravitation. The Monist 72 (2):236-284.
  17. Mainz Funke, M. Lauth, F. Bern, La Rocca, Robinson, Brandt, Schulze, Bondeli, Dancy, Plerobon & Chenet (1996). Kant-Studien, Begründet von Hans Vaihinger; neubegründet von Paul Menzer und Gottfried Martin. Kant-Studien 1896:385.
  18. Hannah Ginsborg, Qu'est-Ce Que la Faculté de Juger?
    L’idée d’un jugement [Urteil], et du pouvoir de juger [Vermögen zu urteilen], joue un rôle cardinal dans l’argumentation de la Critique de la raison pure. L’argument central de la première Critique vise à montrer comment les concepts purs de l’entendement peuvent s’appliquer aux objets qui nous sont donnés dans l’expérience. Cet argument dépend de l’idée que l’expérience n’est pas l’affaire de la sensibilité à elle seule, mais qu’elle implique, dès le début, le concours de l’entendement. Or, l’entendement n’est rien d’autre (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Constanze Glaser (1933). Realisten und idealisten, die menschlichen grundtypen. Kant-Studien 38 (1-2):118-152.
  20. Wolfgang Gramer (1961). Aufgaben und methoden einer kategorienlehre. Kant-Studien 52 (1-4):351-368.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Paul Guyer (2010). The Deduction of Categories: The Metaphysical and Transcendental Deductions. In , The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Paul Guyer (2005). Review: Dickerson, Kant on Representation and Objectivity. Philosophical Books 46 (2):113-117.
  23. Alma Hartmann (1912). Chronologische Übersicht der Schriften von Eduard von Hartmann. Kant-Studien 17 (1-3):501-520.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Ingeborg Heidemann (1966). Prinzip und wirklichkeit in der kantischen ethik. Kant-Studien 57 (1-4):230-250.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Heinz Heimsoeth (1963). Zur herkunft und entwicklung Von kants kategorientafel. Kant-Studien 54 (1-4):376-403.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Johannes Heinrichs (2004). Das Geheimnis der Kategorien: Die Entschlüsselung von Kants Zentralem Lehrstück. Maas.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Heinrich Hempel (1957). Konkretum und abstraktum AlS sprachliche kategorien. Kant-Studien 48 (1-4):134-160.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Harald Höffding (1930). Zur stellung der erkenntnistheorie in unserer zeit. Kant-Studien 35 (1-4):480-495.
  29. Malte Hossenfelder (1990). Review: Allison, Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. [REVIEW] Inquiry 33 (4):467 – 479.
  30. Philip J. Kain (1989). Kant and the Possibility of Uncategorized Experience. Idealistic Studies 19 (2):154-173.
  31. Immanuel Kant (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge.
    This entirely new translation of Critique of Pure Reason by Paul Guyer and Allan Wood is the most accurate and informative English translation ever produced of this epochal philosophical text. Though its simple, direct style will make it suitable for all new readers of Kant, the translation displays a philosophical and textual sophistication that will enlighten Kant scholars as well. This translation recreates as far as possible a text with the same interpretative nuances and richness as the original.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Hinrich Knittermeyer (1954). Von der klassischen zur kritischen transzendentalphilosophie. Kant-Studien 45 (1-4):113-131.
  33. Peter Krausser (1976). Zu einer systematischen Rekonstruktion der Erkenntnis- und Wissenschaftstheorie in Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Teil VI: Zum Verhältnis von Kategorien, Schemata und Grundsätzen und der Rolle der Analogien-Kapitel in der sogenannten 'Deduktion'. Kant-Studien 67 (1-4):141-155.
  34. Alexei N. Krouglov (2013). Tetens und die Deduktion der Kategorien bei Kant. Kant-Studien 104 (4):466-489.
  35. Yoichi Kubo (2003). Transformation der Deduktion der Kategorien Fichte in Hegel. Fichte-Studien 21:73-87.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Reinhard Kynast (1925). Zur Synthesis in der reinen Logik. Kant-Studien 30 (1-2):135-148.
  37. D. Hinloopen Labbertovann (1936). De Kategorieënleer der Hindhu-Wijsbegeerte in Vergelijking Met Die Van Plato, Aristoleles En Kant. Synthese 1 (1).
  38. Chong-Fuk Lau (2008). The Aristotelian-Kantian and Hegelian Approaches to Categories. The Owl of Minerva 40 (1):77-114.
    This paper analyzes and compares the doctrines of categories of Aristotle, Kant and Hegel, each of which is first discussed separately. The paper explains the essential double perspective of the problem, showing how a logico-linguistic analysis of the form of rational discourse serves for them as an important clue to ontological problems. Although Aristotle and Kant’s doctrines differ significantly, they both endorse a kind of isomorphism between language/thought and reality. By contrast, Hegel, who takes a critical attitude toward the capability (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Harold N. Lee (1954). The Rigidity of Kant's Categories. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 3:113-121.
    Kant's transcendental deduction yields twelve and only twelve categories, but behind the argument lie two assumptions: 1) newtonian physics gives unalterable and certain knowledge of phenomena; 2) the subject-predicate logic is the correct tool for the analysis of knowledge. this article examines the place of both assumptions in kant's doctrine and the relevance of each today. both assumptions must be discarded, and with them goes the rigidity of the categories; but the article shows how kant's important insights into the place (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. T. Leiber (1996). Categories, Schemata and Empirical Concepts-Kant Contribution to Cognitive Psychology. Kant-Studien 87 (1):1-41.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Theodor Leiber (1996). Kategorien, Schemata und empirische Begriffe: Kants Beitrag zur kognitiven Psychologie. Kant-Studien 87 (1):1-41.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Hans Leisegang (1915). Über die Behandlung des scholastischen Satzes: „Quodlibet ens est unum, verum, bonum seu perfectum“, und seine Bedeutung in Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Kant-Studien 20 (1-3):403-421.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Alfred H. Lloyd (1915). Kant and After Kant. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 12 (14):373-381.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Béatrice Longuenesse (2001). Synthesis, Logical Forms, and the Objects of Our Ordinary Experience: Response to Michael Friedman. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 83 (2):199-212.
    In the 82/2 (2000) issue of this journal, Michael Friedman has offered a stimulating discussion of my recent book, Kant and the Capacity to Judge. His conclusion is that on the whole I fail to do justice to what is most revolutionary about Kant's natural philosophy, and instead end up attributing to Kant a pre-Newtonian, Aristotelian philosophy of nature. This is because, according to Friedman, I put excessive weight on Kant's claim to have derived his categories from a set of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Huaping Lu-Adler (forthcoming). Kant on the Logical Form of Singular Judgements. Kantian Review.
    At A71/B96-7 Kant explains that singular judgements are ‘special’ because they stand to the general ones as Einheit to Unendlichkeit. The reference to Einheit brings to mind the category of unity and hence raises a specter of circularity in Kant’s explanation. I aim to remove this specter by interpreting the Einheit-Unendlichkeit contrast in light of the logical distinctions among universal, particular and singular judgments shared by Kant and his logician predecessors. This interpretation has a further implication for resolving a controversy (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Viktor Nowotny (1981). Die Struktur der Deduktion bei Kant. Kant-Studien 72 (1-4):270-279.
  47. Michael Pendlebury (1995). Making Sense of Kant's Schematism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (4):777-797.
  48. Klaus Reich (2002). Rousseau and Kant. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 23 (2):35-54.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Dennis Schulting (2012). Kant's Deduction and Apperception. Explaining the Categories. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Dennis Schulting offers a thoroughgoing, analytic account of the first half of the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories in the B-edition of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason that is different from existing interpretations in at least one important aspect: its central claim is that each of the 12 categories is wholly derivable from the principle of apperception, which goes against the current view that the Deduction is not a proof in a strict philosophical sense and the standard reading that in (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Dennis Schulting (2012). Kant's Deduction and Apperception. Palgrave Macmillan.
    This book offers a thoroughgoing, analytic account of the first half of the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories in the B-edition of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason that is different from existing interpretations in at least one important aspect: its central claim is that each of the 12 categories is wholly derivable from the principle of apperception, which goes against the current view that the Deduction is not a proof in a strict philosophical sense and the standard reading that in (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 60