This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
110 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 110
  1. Brent Adkins (1999). The Satisfaction of Reason: The Mathematical/Dynamical Distinction in the Critique of Pure Reason. Kantian Review 3:64-80.
  2. Henry E. Allison (2000). Where Have All the Categories Gone? Reflections on Longuenesse's Reading of Kant's Transcendental Deduction. Inquiry 43 (1):67 – 80.
    This paper contains a critical analysis of the interpretation of Kant's second edition version of the Transcendental Deduction offered by Béatrice Longuenesse in her recent book: Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Though agreeing with much of Longuenesse's analysis of the logical function of judgment, I question the way in which she tends to assign them the objectifying role traditionally given to the categories. More particularly, by way of defending my own interpretation of the Deduction against some of her criticisms, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Karl Ameriks (1985). Hegel's Critique of Kant's Theoretical Philosophy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (1):1-35.
    This paper analyzes hegel's critique of kant's theoretical philosophy in terms of three specific objections to kant's transcendental deduction (concerning the representation of the i, The necessity of the categories, And the problem of a preliminary epistemology) and three specific objections to kant's transcendental idealism (concerning the thing in itself, The antinomies, And other specific problems of the transcendental dialectic).
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Gary Banham (2010). Scepticism, Causation and Cognition. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):507-520.
  5. Nathan Bauer (2012). A Peculiar Intuition: Kant's Conceptualist Account of Perception. Inquiry 55 (3):215-237.
    Abstract Both parties in the active philosophical debate concerning the conceptual character of perception trace their roots back to Kant's account of sensible intuition in the Critique of Pure Reason. This striking fact can be attributed to Kant's tendency both to assert and to deny the involvement of our conceptual capacities in sensible intuition. He appears to waver between these two positions in different passages, and can thus seem thoroughly confused on this issue. But this is not, in fact, the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Peter Baumanns (1992). Kants transzendentale Deduktion der reinen Verstandesbegriffe (B). Ein kritischer Forschungsbericht. Vierter Teil. Kant-Studien 83 (2):185-207.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Robert J. Benton (1980). Kant's Categories of Practical Reason as Such. Kant-Studien 71 (1-4):181-201.
  8. Ian Blecher, Anil Gomes, Joel Thiago Klien, Alexei N. Krouglov, Samuel Loncar & Colin Marshall (2013). Jahresinhalt Kant-Studien. Kant-Studien 104 (4):563-566.
  9. Henny Blomme (2014). L'être de l'ombre. In Philosophie nach Kant. Neue Wege zum Verständnis von Kant's Transzendental- und Moralphilosophie. 107-126.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Susanne Bobzien (2013). Kant's Categories of Freedom. In Kant - Analysen, Probleme, Kritik (English translation of 1988 article).
    ABSTRACT: A general interpretation and close textual analysis of Kant’s theory of the categories of freedom (or categories of practical reason) in his Critique of Practical Reason. My main concerns in the paper are the following: (1) I show that Kant’s categories of freedom have primarily three functions: as conditions of the possibility for actions (i) to be free, (ii) to be comprehensible as free and (iii) to be morally evaluated. (2) I show that for Kant actions, although qua theoretical (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Nathan Brett (1983). Hume's Debt to Kant. Hume Studies 9 (1):59-73.
  12. William F. Bristow (2002). Are Kant's Categories Subjective? Review of Metaphysics 55 (3):551-580.
    Argues that there is a significant respect in which Kant's categories are to be understood as subjective, namely, in the sense that they are to be understood as the self-legislated rules of our understanding. Argues that the subjectivism of Kant's idealism, by which is meant the relativization of knowledge of objects to our standpoint, is a consequence of the subjectivity of the categories, on this interpretation of their subjectivity. On the reading opposed here, Kant's subjectivism is strictly a consequence of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. John J. Callanan (2011). Normativity and the Acquisition of the Categories. Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 63:1-26.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Emily Carson (2006). Review: Longuenesse, Kant on the Human Standpoint. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (9).
  15. Clive Cazeaux (2001). Review: Banham, Kant and the Ends of Aesthetics. Kantian Review 5:141.
  16. Lauchlan Chipman (1982). Kant's Categories and Their Schematism. In Ralph Charles Sutherland Walker (ed.), Kant on Pure Reason. Oxford University Press. 36-50.
  17. Daniel O. Dahlstrom (1984). Transzendentale Schemata, Kategorien und Erkenntnisarten. Kant-Studien 75 (1-4):38-54.
  18. Hans Ehrenberg (1909). Kants Kategorientafel und der systematische Begriff der Philosophie. Kant-Studien 14 (1-3):392-439.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Fiona Ellis (2005). Concepts and Reality in the History of Philosophy: Tracing a Philosophical Error From Locke to Bradley. Routledge.
    This book traces a deep misunderstanding about the relation of concepts and reality in the history of philosophy. It exposes the influence of the mistake in the thought of Locke, Berkeley, Kant, Nietzche and Bradley, and suggests that the solution can be found in Hegelian thought. Ellis argues that the treatment proposed exemplifies Hegel's dialectical method. This is an important contribution to this area of philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. J. Claude Evans (1990). Two-Steps-in-One-Proof: The Structure of the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories. Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (4):553-570.
  21. Norman Fischer (1978). The Concept of Community in Kant's Architectonic. Man and World 11 (3-4):372-391.
  22. Patrick Fleming (2004). Kant and Strawson on the Objectivity Thesis. Idealistic Studies 34 (2):173-180.
    In the Transcendental Deductions, Kant attempts to establish the necessary applicability of the categories to what is encountered in experience. As I see it, the argument is intended to deduce two distinct, but, in Kant’s eyes, interrelated, claims. The first is that it is a necessity that experience be of an objective world. Call this rough idea the objectivity thesis. The second thesis is that the categoriesapply only to mere appearances, that is, the world insofar as we structure it. Call (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Eckart Förster (2000). Kant's Final Synthesis: An Essay on the Opus Postumum. Harvard University Press.
  24. Michael Friedman (2012). Kant on Geometry and Spatial Intuition. Synthese 186 (1):231-255.
    I use recent work on Kant and diagrammatic reasoning to develop a reconsideration of central aspects of Kant’s philosophy of geometry and its relation to spatial intuition. In particular, I reconsider in this light the relations between geometrical concepts and their schemata, and the relationship between pure and empirical intuition. I argue that diagrammatic interpretations of Kant’s theory of geometrical intuition can, at best, capture only part of what Kant’s conception involves and that, for example, they cannot explain why Kant (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Michael Friedman (2001). Matter and Motion in the Metaphysical Foundations and the First Critique: The Empirical Concept of Matter and the Categories. In Eric Watkins (ed.), Kant and the Sciences. Oxford University Press. 53--69.
  26. Michael Friedman (1989). Kant on Space, the Understanding, and the Law of Gravitation. The Monist 72 (2):236-284.
  27. Mainz Funke, M. Lauth, F. Bern, La Rocca, Robinson, Brandt, Schulze, Bondeli, Dancy, Plerobon & Chenet (1996). Kant-Studien, Begründet von Hans Vaihinger; neubegründet von Paul Menzer und Gottfried Martin. Kant-Studien 1896:385.
  28. Hannah Ginsborg, Qu'est-Ce Que la Faculté de Juger?
    L’idée d’un jugement [Urteil], et du pouvoir de juger [Vermögen zu urteilen], joue un rôle cardinal dans l’argumentation de la Critique de la raison pure. L’argument central de la première Critique vise à montrer comment les concepts purs de l’entendement peuvent s’appliquer aux objets qui nous sont donnés dans l’expérience. Cet argument dépend de l’idée que l’expérience n’est pas l’affaire de la sensibilité à elle seule, mais qu’elle implique, dès le début, le concours de l’entendement. Or, l’entendement n’est rien d’autre (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Constanze Glaser (1933). Realisten und idealisten, die menschlichen grundtypen. Kant-Studien 38 (1-2):118-152.
  30. Wolfgang Gramer (1961). Aufgaben und methoden einer kategorienlehre. Kant-Studien 52 (1-4):351-368.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Aaron M. Griffith (2012). Perception and the Categories: A Conceptualist Reading of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):193-222.
    Abstract: Philosophers interested in Kant's relevance to contemporary debates over the nature of mental content—notably Robert Hanna and Lucy Allais—have argued that Kant ought to be credited with being the original proponent of the existence of ‘nonconceptual content’. However, I think the ‘nonconceptualist’ interpretations that Hanna and Allais give do not show that Kant allowed for nonconceptual content as they construe it. I argue, on the basis of an analysis of certain sections of the A and B editions of the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Stefanie Grüne (2011). Is There a Gap in Kant's B Deduction? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):465 - 490.
    In "Beyond the Myth of the Myth: A Kantian Theory of Non-Conceptual Content", Robert Hanna argues for a very strong kind of non-conceptualism, and claims that this kind of non-conceptualism originally has been developed by Kant. But according to "Kant's Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects and the Gap in the B Deduction", Kant's non-conceptualism poses a serious problem for his argument for the objective validity of the categories, namely the problem that there is a gap in the B Deduction. This gap is (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Paul Guyer (2013). Review: Kitcher, Kant's Thinker; A Declaration of Interdependence. [REVIEW] European Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):495-505.
  34. Paul Guyer (2010). The Deduction of Categories: The Metaphysical and Transcendental Deductions. In , The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
  35. Paul Guyer (2005). Review: Dickerson, Kant on Representation and Objectivity. Philosophical Books 46 (2):113-117.
  36. Paul Guyer (1992). The Transcendental Deduction of the Categories. In , The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge University Press. 3--123.
  37. Paul Guyer (1987). The Failure of the B-Deduction. Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (S1):67-84.
  38. Robert Hanna (2003). Review: Weatherston, Heidegger's Interpretation of Kant: Categories, Imagination, and Temporality. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (8).
  39. Alma Hartmann (1912). Chronologische Übersicht der Schriften von Eduard von Hartmann. Kant-Studien 17 (1-3):501-520.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Ingeborg Heidemann (1966). Prinzip und wirklichkeit in der kantischen ethik. Kant-Studien 57 (1-4):230-250.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Heinz Heimsoeth (1963). Zur herkunft und entwicklung Von kants kategorientafel. Kant-Studien 54 (1-4):376-403.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Johannes Heinrichs (2004). Das Geheimnis der Kategorien: Die Entschlüsselung von Kants Zentralem Lehrstück. Maas.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Heinrich Hempel (1957). Konkretum und abstraktum AlS sprachliche kategorien. Kant-Studien 48 (1-4):134-160.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. R. Hiltscher (1993). Kant Proof-Structure of the Theory of Adequation of Truth in Die 'Transzendentale Deduktion (B)'. Kant-Studien 84 (4):426-447.
  45. Reinhard Hiltscher (1993). Kants Begründung der Adäquationstheorie der Wahrheit in der transzendentalen Deduktion der Ausgabe B. Kant-Studien 84 (4):426-447.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Till Hoeppner (2011). Kants Begriff der Funktion und die Vollständigkeit der Urteils- und Kategorientafel. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 65 (2):193-217.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Harald Höffding (1930). Zur stellung der erkenntnistheorie in unserer zeit. Kant-Studien 35 (1-4):480-495.
  48. Malte Hossenfelder (1990). Review: Allison, Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. [REVIEW] Inquiry 33 (4):467 – 479.
  49. Kant Immanuel (1998). Critique of Pure Reason ; Translated and Edited by Paul Guyer, Allen W. Wood. Cambridge.
    This entirely new translation of Critique of Pure Reason by Paul Guyer and Allan Wood is the most accurate and informative English translation ever produced of this epochal philosophical text. Though its simple, direct style will make it suitable for all new readers of Kant, the translation displays a philosophical and textual sophistication that will enlighten Kant scholars as well. This translation recreates as far as possible a text with the same interpretative nuances and richness as the original.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Philip J. Kain (1989). Kant and the Possibility of Uncategorized Experience. Idealistic Studies 19 (2):154-173.
1 — 50 / 110