Related categories
Siblings:
157 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 157
  1. Erich Adickes (1897). Die bewegenden Kräfte in Kants philosophischer Entwicklung und die beiden Pole seines Systems. Zweiter Artikel. Kant-Studien 1 (1-3):161-196.
  2. H. Allison, A. Aspect, P. Grangier, G. Roger & S. Auyang (2009). Abraham, R. And Marsden, J.(1978), Foundations of Mechanics, New York/Reading, MA: Benjamin Cummings. Allison, H.(1994),“Causality and Causal Laws in Kant. A Critique of Michael Friedman”, In: P. Parrini (Ed.), Kant and Contemporary Epistemology, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. [REVIEW] In P. Kerszberg, J. Petitot & M. Bitbol (eds.), Constituting Objectivity. Transcendental Perspectives on Modern Physics. 515.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Henry E. Allison (2008). &Quot;whatever Begins to Exist Must Have a Cause of Existence&Quot;: Hume's Analysis and Kant's Response. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (3):525–546.
  4. J. Aul (1986). ST Sur le concept de causalité chez Kant. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 78 (1):34-54.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Sin Autor (2004). Causalidad y genio en la construcción de la experiencia según Kant. Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica 37 (2):195-221.
    This Work claims to be a reconstruction of the experience on the Kant's reality. The relations betwen Nature and Genius trougth the epistemology of Kant, try to offer a new perspective of causality and teleology.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Kent Baldner (1988). Causality and Things in Themselves. Synthese 77 (3):353 - 373.
    In this paper I examine Kant''s use of causal language to characterize things in themselves. Following Nicholas Rescher, I contend that Kant''s use of such causal language can only be understood by first coming to grips with the relation of things in themselves to appearances. Unlike Rescher, however, I argue that things in themselves and appearances are not numerically distinct entities. Rather, I claim that it is things in themselves that we are intentionally related to in veridical experience, though of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Gary Banham, Dynamics and the Reality of Force in Leibniz and Kant.
  8. Gary Banham, Kant and Leibniz on Living Force.
    Paper published on author's website available at http://www.garybanham.net/PAPERS_files/Kant%20and%20Leibniz%20on%20Living%20Force.pdf.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Gary Banham (2008). Kant, Hume and Causation. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (4):801 – 810.
    Full-text of this article is not available in this e-prints service. This article was originally published following peer-review in British Journal for the History of Philosophy, published by and copyright Routledge.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Adrian Bardon (2002). Temporal Passage and Kant's Second Analogy. Ratio 15 (2):134–153.
  11. Steven M. Bayne (2004). Kant on Causation: On the Fivefold Routes to the Principle of Causation. State University of New York Press.
    A volume in the SUNY series in Philosophy George R. Lucas Jr., editor.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Lewis White Beck (1981). Kant on the Uniformity of Nature. Synthese 47 (3):449 - 464.
  13. Lewis White Beck (1976). Is There a Non Sequitur in Kant's Proof of the Causal Principle? Kant-Studien 67 (1-4):385-389.
  14. Lewis White Beck (1966). The Second Analogy and the Principle of Indeterminacy. Kant-Studien 57 (1-4):199-205.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Michel Bitbol (2011). Traces of Objectivity: Causality and Probabilities in Quantum Physics. Diogenes 58 (4):30-57.
  16. Nathan Brett (1983). Hume's Debt to Kant. Hume Studies 9 (1):59-73.
  17. W. Brocker (1987). Kants Beweis des Kausalgesetzes. Kant-Studien 78 (3):314-317.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. W. Brocker (1987). The Kantian Proof of the Law of Causation. Kant-Studien 78 (3):314-317.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Baruch Brody (1976). Page 8 Hume, Reid, and Kant on Causality/Brody. In Stephen Francis Barker & Tom L. Beauchamp (eds.), Thomas Reid: Critical Interpretations. University City Science Center. 3--8.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Gerd Buchdahl (1965). Causality, Causal Laws and Scientific Theory in the Philosophy of Kant. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (63):187-208.
  21. Kristian Camilleri (2005). Heisenberg and the Transformation of Kantian Philosophy. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):271 – 287.
    In this paper, I argue that Heisenberg's mature philosophy of quantum mechanics must be understood in the context of his epistemological project to reinterpret and redefine Kant's notion of the a priori. After discussions with Weizsäcker and Hermann in Leipzig in the 1930s, Heisenberg attempted to ground his interpretation of quantum mechanics on what might be termed a 'practical' transformation of Kantian philosophy. Taking as his starting point, Bohr's doctrine of the indispensability of classical concepts, Heisenberg argued that concepts such (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Quassim Cassam (2008). Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality, by Eric Watkins. European Journal of Philosophy 16 (2):330-332.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Gary L. Cesarz (2007). Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (1):166-167.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Brian Chance (2013). Causal Powers, Hume's Early German Critics, and Kant's Response to Hume. Kant-Studien 104 (2):213-236.
    Eric Watkins has argued on philosophical, textual, and historical grounds that Kant’s account of causation in the first Critique should not be read as an attempt to refute Hume’s account of causation. In this paper, I challenge the arguments for Watkins’ claim. Specifically, I argue (1) that Kant’s philosophical commitments, even on Watkins’ reading, are not obvious obstacles to refuting Hume, (2) that textual evidence from the “Disciple of Pure Reason” suggests Kant conceived of his account of causation as such (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Andrew Chignell (forthcoming). Leibniz and Kant on Miracles: Rationalism, Religion, and the Laws. In Brandon Look (ed.), Leibniz and Kant. Oxford.
  26. Andrew Chignell (2014). Can Kantian Laws Be Broken? Res Philosophica 91 (1):103-121.
    In this paper I explore Kant’s critical discussions of the topic of miracles (including the important but neglected fragment from the 1780s called “On Miracles”) in an effort to answer the question in the title. Along the way I discuss some of the different kinds of “laws” in Kant’s system, and also the argument for his claim that, even if empirical miracles do occur, we will never be in a good position to identify instances of them. I conclude with some (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Andrew Chignell & Derk Pereboom (2010). Kant's Theory of Causation and its Eighteenth-Century German Background. Philosophical Review 119 (4):565-591.
    This critical notice highlights the important contributions that Eric Watkins's writings have made to our understanding of theories about causation developed in eighteenth-century German philosophy and by Kant in particular. Watkins provides a convincing argument that central to Kant's theory of causation is the notion of a real ground or causal power that is non-Humean (since it doesn't reduce to regularities or counterfactual dependencies among events or states) and non-Leibnizean because it doesn't reduce to logical or conceptual relations. However, we (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Michael Cuffaro (2010). The Kantian Framework of Complementarity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 41 (4):309-317.
    A growing number of commentators have, in recent years, noted the important affinities in the views of Immanuel Kant and Niels Bohr. While these commentators are correct, the picture they present of the connections between Bohr and Kant is painted in broad strokes; it is open to the criticism that these affinities are merely superficial. In this essay, I provide a closer, structural, analysis of both Bohr's and Kant's views that makes these connections more explicit. In particular, I demonstrate the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Graciela De Pierris & Michael Friedman (2008). Kant and Hume on Causality. In Edward Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  30. Ludovicus De Vos (2006). E. Watkins, Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 68:624-626.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Jeffery R. Dodge (1982). Uniformity of Empirical Cause-Effect Relations in the Second Analogy. Kant-Studien 73 (1-4):47-54.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Corey W. Dyck (2011). Kant's Transcendental Deduction and the Ghosts of Descartes and Hume. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (3):473-496.
    This paper considers how Descartes's and Hume's sceptical challenges were appropriated by Christian Wolff and Johann Nicolaus Tetens specifically in the context of projects related to Kant's in the transcendental deduction. Wolff introduces Descartes's dream hypothesis as an obstacle to his account of the truth of propositions, or logical truth, which he identifies with the 'possibility' of empirical concepts. Tetens explicitly takes Hume's account of our idea of causality to be a challenge to the `reality' of transcendent concepts in general, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Corey W. Dyck (2009). Review: Guyer, Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant's Response to Hume. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (5):613-619.
  34. Wolfgang Ertl (2010). Persons as Causes in Kant. In Stephen R. Palmquist (ed.), Cultivating Personhood: Kant and Asian Philosophy. de Gruyter. 217-230.
    Drawing on recent Aristotelian readings of Kant's notion of natural causality with an emphasis on substances as causes, I will try to explain how persons can make a difference in the world of appearances by virtue of their rationality. For Kant, the clue is that the peculiar mode of a substance's natural causality supervenes on in-itself features, among which is the mode or character of the person's rationality. Thus, a wedge can be driven between natural necessity and metaphysical necessity, opening (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Costantino Esposito (2004). Kausalität als Freiheit: Heidegger liest Kant. Heidegger Studies 20:101-125.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. A. C. Ewing (1924/1969). Kant's Treatment of Causality. [Hamden, Conn.]Archon Books.
    First published in 1924, this book examines one of the main philosophical debates of the period. Focusing on Kant’s proof of causality, A.C. Ewing promotes its validity not only for the physical but also for the "psychological" sphere. The subject is of importance, for the problem of causality for Kant constituted the crucial test of his philosophy, the most significant of the Kantian categories. The author believes that Kant’s statement of his proof, while too much bound up with other parts (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. A. Fabriziani (2004). Kant and the Relationship of Causality in an Early Work by Maurice Blondel (1858). Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 59 (3):745-768.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Andrea Faggion (2012). The Second Analogy and the Kantian Answer to Hume: Why “Cause” has to Be an a Priori Concept. Revista de Filosofia Aurora 24 (350):61.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Hector Ferreiro (2012). A Superação Hegeliana Do Dualismo Entre Determinismo E Liberdade. In Konrad Utz, Agemir Bavaresco & Paulo R. Konzen (eds.), Sujeito e Liberdade: Investigações a Partir do Idealismo Alemão. ediPUCRS. 129-143.
    Kant explicitou, talvez com maior clareza que qualquer outro filósofo antes do que ele, a essência do conflito que implica a relação da causalidade natural e a causalidade livre. Hegel assevera que com o dualismo fenômeno-coisa em si Kant deixa intacta como tal a incompatibilidade entre as noções de causalidade natural e causalidade livre, já que, conserva sua contraposição mesma para simplesmente localizá-la na estrutura do sujeito. Hegel aspira precisamente a fechar o ciclo da metafísica dualista que definiu a filosofia (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Maurice A. Finocchiaro (1984). Hume, Kant E L'Induzione. Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (4):484-485.
  41. Robert J. Fogelin (1976). Kant and Hume on Simultaneity of Causes and Effects. Kant-Studien 67 (1-4):51-59.
  42. Michael Friedman (1992). Causal Laws and the Foundations of Natural Science. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge University Press. 3--161.
  43. Rolf George (1985). William L. Harper and Ralf Meerbote, Eds., Kant on Causality, Freedom, and Objectivity Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 5 (9):372-374.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Amihud Gilead (1990). Spinoza's Two Causal Chains. Kant-Studien 81 (4):454-475.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. T. Greenwood (1981). A Non Sequitur of Numbing Grossness. Kant-Studien 72 (1-4):11-30.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Paul Guyer (2008). Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant's Response to Hume. Princeton University Press.
    In this book, the first to describe and assess Hume's influence throughout Kant's philosophy, Guyer shows where Kant agrees or disagrees with Hume, and where Kant does or doesn't appear to resolve Hume's doubts.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Paul Guyer (2003). Kant's Answer to Hume? Philosophical Topics 31 (1/2):127-164.
  48. Andree Hahmann (2008). Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality - by Eric Watkins. Philosophical Books 49 (1):52-54.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Bryan Hall (2007). Review: Watkins, Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 12 (2):158-160.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Bryan Hall (2007). Review: Watkins, Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 12 (2):158-160.
1 — 50 / 157