This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
53 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 53
  1. Henry E. Allison (1996). Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant's Theoretical and Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    Henry Allison is one of the foremost interpreters of the philosophy of Kant. This new volume collects all his recent essays on Kant's theoretical and practical philosophy. All the essays postdate Allison's two major books on Kant (Kant's Transcendental Idealism, 1983, and Kant's Theory of Freedom, 1990), and together they constitute an attempt to respond to critics and to clarify, develop and apply some of the central theses of those books. Two are published here for the first time. Special features (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Karl Ameriks (1999). Idealism and Freedom. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):825-829.
  3. Karl Ameriks (1992). Book Review:Kant's Theory of Freedom. Henry Allison. [REVIEW] Ethics 102 (3):655-.
  4. Stefano Bacin (2010). The Meaning of the Critique of Practical Reason for Moral Beings: The Doctrine of Method of Pure Practical Reason. In Andrews Reath & Jens Timmermann (eds.), Kant's Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Ralf M. Bader (2009). Kant and the Categories of Freedom. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (4):799-820.
    This paper provides an account of Kant's categories of freedom, explaining how they fit together and what role they are supposed to play. My interpretation places particular emphasis on the structural features that the table of the categories of freedom shares with the table of judgements and the table of categories laid out by Kant in the Critique of Pure Reason. In this way we can identify two interpretative constraints, namely (i) that the categories falling under each heading must form (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Robert J. Benton (1977). Kant's Second Critique and the Problem of Transcendental Arguments. M. Nijhoff.
    following list of abbreviations : Ethics — Lectures on Ethics GMM — Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals KrV — Critique of Pure Reason KU — Critique of ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Susanne Bobzien (2013). Kant's Categories of Freedom. In Kant - Analysen, Probleme, Kritik (English translation of 1988 article).
    ABSTRACT: A general interpretation and close textual analysis of Kant’s theory of the categories of freedom (or categories of practical reason) in his Critique of Practical Reason. My main concerns in the paper are the following: (1) I show that Kant’s categories of freedom have primarily three functions: as conditions of the possibility for actions (i) to be free, (ii) to be comprehensible as free and (iii) to be morally evaluated. (2) I show that for Kant actions, although qua theoretical (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Susanne Bobzien (1997). Kants Kategorien der praktischen Vernunft. Eine Anmerkung Zu Bruno Haas. Kant 3:77-80..
    ABSTRACT: A brief critique of Bruno Haas’ interpretation of Kant’s categories of practical reason and a reply to his criticism of my paper 'Die Kategorien der Freiheit bei Kant' ('Kant's Categories of Freedom').
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Susanne Bobzien (1988). Die Kategorien Der Freiheit Bei Kant (Kant's Categories of Freedom). Kant 1:193-220.
    NOTE: The English translation is listed separately. ABSTRACT: A general interpretation and close textual analysis of Kant’s theory of the categories of freedom (or categories of practical reason) in his Critique of Practical Reason. My main concerns in the paper are the following: (1) I show that Kant’s categories of freedom have primarily three functions: as conditions of the possibility for actions (i) to be free, (ii) to be comprehensible as free and (iii) to be morally evaluated. (2) I show (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Nick Bostrom, R. C. W. Ettinger & Charles Tandy (eds.) (2004). Death and Anti-Death, Volume 2: Two Hundred Years After Kant, Fifty Years After Turing. Palo Alto: Ria University Press.
  11. Curtis Bowman (2003). A Deduction of Kant's Concept of the Highest Good. Journal of Philosophical Research 28:45-63.
    This paper attempts a deduction of Kant's concept of the highest good: that is, it attempts to prove, in accordance with Dieter Henrich.s interpretation of the notion of deduction, that the highest good is an end that is also a duty. It does this by appealing to features of practical reason that make up the legitimating facts that serve as the premises that any deduction must possess. According to Kant, the highest good consists of happiness, virtue, and relations of proportionality (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Reinhard Brandt (2013). Zu Eckart Försters Die 25 Jahre der Philosophie. Eine systematische Rekonstruktion. Kant-Studien 104 (3):367-385.
  13. Kimberly Brewer & Eric Watkins (2012). A Difficulty Still Awaits: Kant, Spinoza, and the Threat of Theological Determinism. Kant-Studien 103 (2):163-187.
    In a short and much-neglected passage in the second Critique, Kant discusses the threat posed to human freedom by theological determinism. In this paper we present an interpretation of Kant’s conception of and response to this threat. Regarding his conception, we argue that he addresses two versions of the threat: either God causes appearances (and hence our spatio-temporal actions) directly or he does so indirectly by causing things in themselves which in turn cause appearances. Kant’s response to the first version (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Sanford Budick (2010). Kant and Milton. Harvard University Press.
    Kant and Milton: fundamentals and foundations -- Kant's journey in the constellation of German Miltonism: toward the procedure of succession -- Kant's Miltonic transfer to exemplarity: the succession to Milton's "On his blindness" in the groundwork of the Metaphysics of morals -- Kantian tragic form and Kantian "storytelling" -- The Critique of practical reason and Samson agonistes -- Kant's Miltonic procedure of succession in a key moment of the Critique of judgment.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Andrew Cutrofello (2006). On the Idea of a Critique of Pure Practical Reason in Kant, Lacan, and Deleuze. Symposium 10 (1):91-102.
  16. Stephen Engstrom (2010). The Triebfeder of Pure Practical Reason. In Andrews Reath & Jens Timmermann (eds.), Kant's Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Katrin Flikschuh (1999). Review: Flikschuha, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 3:143-146.
  18. Paul Formosa (2007). Kant on the Radical Evil of Human Nature. Philosophical Forum 38 (3):221–245.
    In ‘Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason’ Kant presents his thesis that human nature is ‘radically evil’. To be radically evil is to have a propensity toward moral frailty, impurity and even perversity. Kant claims that all humans are ‘by nature’ radically evil. By presenting counter-examples of moral saints, I argue that not all humans are morally corrupt, even if most are. Even so, the possibility of moral failure is central to what makes us human.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Eckart Förster (2012). The 25 Years of Philosophy: A Systematic Reconstruction. Harvard University Press.
  20. Eckart Förster (2011). Die 25 Jahre der Philosophie: Eine Systematische Rekonstruktion. Vittorio Klostermann.
  21. Sebastian Gardner (2011). Kant's Practical Postulates and the Limits of the Critical System. Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 63:187 - 215.
  22. A. C. Genova (1969). Kant's Three Critiques: A Suggested Analytical Framework. Kant-Studien 60 (2):135-146.
  23. Martial Guéroult (1963). Vom Kanon der kritik der reinen vernunft zur kritik der praktischen vernunft. Kant-Studien 54 (1-4):432-444.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Alexander Haardt (1982). Die Stellung des Personalitatsprinzips in der „Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten“ und in der „Kritik der praktischen Vernunft“. Kant-Studien 73 (1-4):157-168.
  25. J. E. Hare (1996). The Moral Gap: Kantian Ethics, Human Limits, and God's Assistance. Oxford University Press.
    Is morality too difficult for human beings? Kant said that it was, except with God's assistance. Contemporary moral philosophers have usually discussed the question without reference to Christian doctrine, and have either diminished the moral demand, exaggerated human moral capacity, or tried to find a substitute in nature for God's assistance. This book looks at these philosophers--from Kant and Kierkegaard to Swinburne, Russell, and R.M. Hare--and the alternative in Christianity.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Otfried Höffe (2012). Kants Kritik der Praktischen Vernunft: Eine Philosophie der Freiheit. Verlag C.H. Beck.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Axel Hutter (1995). Die Spannung zwischen theoretischer und praktischer Vernunft. Schellings späte Anknüpfung an Kant. Kant-Studien 86 (4):431-445.
  28. Immanuel Kant (1949/1976). Critique of Practical Reason, and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy. Garland Pub..
    Foundations of the metaphysics of morals.--Critique of practical reason.--An inquiry into the distinctness of the principles of natural theology and morals.--What is enlightenment?--What is orientation in thinking.--Perpetual peace: a philosophical sketch.--On a supposed right to lie from altruistic motives.--Selections from The metaphysics of morals.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Immanuel Kant (1909/2004). Critique of Practical Reason. Dover Publications.
    The second of Kant’s three critiques, Critique of Practical Reason forms the center of Kantian philosophy. Kant establishes his role as a vindicator of the truth of Christianity in this work, published in 1788, and he approaches his proof by presenting positive affirmations of the immortality of the soul and the existence of God. The philosopher offers an argument concerning the summum bonum of life: people should not simply search after happiness, but follow the moral law and seek to become (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Immanuel Kant (1909/2004). Critique of Practical Reason and Other Works on the Theory of Ethics. Barnes & Noble Books.
    CHAPTER I OF THE PRINCIPLES OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON § i. — DEFINITION PRACTICAL principles are propositions which contain a general determination of the ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Immanuel Kant (1900f.). Gesammelte Werke. Akademie.
  32. Halla Kim (2002). Has Kant Committed the Fallacy of Circularity in Foundations III? Journal of Philosophical Research 27:65-81.
    The third section of the Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals presents a particularly acute interpretative problem that has perplexed generations of Kant commentators. Having devoted the two preceding sections of the work to identifying the supreme principle of morality, Kant, in this section, turns to the task of justifying the principle for rational yet sensually affected beings like humans. However, in the middle of this famous “deduction,” he suddenly confesses that “there is a hidden circle” from which “there is (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Jeffrey Kinlaw (2003). Review: Pluhar (Tr) & Engstrom (Intro), Critique of Practical Reason. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (3).
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Heiner P. Klemme (2010). The Origin and Aim of Kant's Critique of Practical Reason. In Andrews Reath & Jens Timmermann (eds.), Kant's Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Manfred Kuehn (1985). Kant's Transcendental Deduction of God's Existence as a Postulate of Pure Practical Reason. Kant-Studien 76 (1-4):152-169.
  36. Gerhard Lehmann (1981). Kants Bemerkungen im Handexemplar der Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Kant-Studien 72 (1-4):132-139.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Bernd Ludwig (2007). Kant, Garve, and the Motives of Moral Action. Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):183-193.
    against Garve' constitute his reaction to the latter's remarks on Cicero's De Officiis . Two related criticisms of Kant's against Garve are discussed in brief in this paper. A closer look is then taken at Garve's claim that `Kantian morality destroys all incentives that can move human beings to act at all'. I argue that Kant and Garve rely on two different models of human action for their analyses of moral motivation; these models differ in what each takes to be (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Bryan Lueck (2009). Kant's Fact of Reason as Source of Normativity. Inquiry 52 (6):596 – 608.
    _In_ The Sources of Normativity_, Christine M. Korsgaard argues that unconditional obligation can be accounted for in terms of practical identity. My argument in this paper is that practical identity cannot play this foundational role. More specifically, I interpret Korsgaard's argument as beginning with something analogous to Kant's fact of reason, viz. with the fact that our minds are reflective. I then try to show that her determination of this fact is inadequate and that this causes the argument concerning practical (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Jacqueline Mariña (1999). Schleiermacher on the Philosopher’s Stone: The Shaping of Schleiermacher’s Early Ethics by the Kantian Legacy. Journal of Religion 79 (2):193-215.
    This article explores the early Schleiermacher's attempts to deal with difficult philosophical problems arising from Kant's ethics, specifically Kant's notion of transcendental freedom. How do we connect a transcendentally free act with the nature of the subject? Insofar as the act is transcendentally free, it cannot be understood in terms of causes, and this means that it cannot be connected with the previous state of the individual before he or she engaged in the act. I work through Schleiermacher's grappling with (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Jacqueline Mariña & West Lafayette (2000). Making Sense of Kant's Highest Good. Kant-Studien 91 (3):329-355.
    This paper explores Kant's concept of the highest good and the postulate of the existence of God arising from it. Kant has two concepts of the highest good standing in tension with one another, an immanent and a transcendent one. I provide a systematic exposition of the constituents of both variants and show how Kant’s arguments are prone to confusion through a conflation of both concepts. I argue that once these confusions are sorted out Kant’s claim regarding the need to (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. A. C. McGiffert (1910). The Pragmatism of Kant. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 7 (8):197-203.
  42. R. Meerbote (1998). The Legacy of Lewis White Beck. Kant-Studien 89 (4):446-455.
  43. Lawrence Pasternack (2011). The Development and Scope of Kantian Belief: The Highest Good, The Practical Postulates and The Fact of Reason. Kant-Studien 102 (3):290-315.
    This paper offers an account of the historical development of Kant's understanding of belief ( Glaube ) from its early ties to George Friedrich Meier's Auszug aus der Vernunftlehre through various stages of refinement. It will be argued that the Critique of Pure Reason reflects an important but not final stage in Kant's understanding of belief. Its structure is further refined and its scope narrowed in later works, including the Critique of Practical Reason and Critique of Judgment . After charting (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. H. J. Paton (1951). Review: Beck, Immanuel Kant (Tr & Ed), Critique of Practical Reason and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy. [REVIEW] Philosophy 26 (97):176-.
  45. Robert B. Pippin (1997). Idealism as Modernism: Hegelian Variations. Cambridge University Press.
    'Modernity' has come to refer both to a contested historical category and to an even more contested philosophical and civilisational ideal. In this important collection of essays Robert Pippin takes issue with some prominent assessments of what is or is not philosophically at stake in the idea of a modern revolution in Western civilisation, and presents an alternative view. Professor Pippin disputes many traditional characterisations of the distinctiveness of modern philosophy. In their place he defends claims about agency, freedom, ethical (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Andrews Reath & Jens Timmermann (eds.) (2010). Kant's Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
    Engaging and critical, this volume will be invaluable to advanced students and scholars of Kant and to moral theorists alike.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. John L. Treloar (1988). The Polemical Employment of Pure Reason and Kantian Ethics. Philosophy Research Archives 14:183-192.
    From the earliest days of philosophy, polemic has functioned as a common means of philosophical argumentation. Kant spends some time in the Critique of Pure Reason analyzing the place of polemic in rational argumentation. Even though it does not provide a legitimate approach to philosophical argument as employed by the dogmatists, Kant’s concern for the teaching of the young allows him to raise some issues concerning the ethics of philosophical argumentation also.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Carol W. Voeller (2001). The Metaphysics of the Moral Law: Kant's Deduction of Freedom. Garland Pub..
    This work offers a new understanding of Kant on the freedom of the will. Voeller looks in detail at the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals and the Critique of Practical Reason against the background of Kant's critical philosophy as a whole.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Kiel von Walter Brocker (forthcoming). Berichte und diskussionen, Kants Beweis des Kausalgesetzes. Kant-Studien.
  50. Andrew Ward (2006). Kant: The Three Critiques. Polity Press.
    Immanuel Kants three critiques the Critique of Pure Reason, the Critique of Practical Reason and the Critique of Judgment are among the pinnacles of Western Philosophy. This accessible study grounds Kants philosophical position in the context of his intellectual influences, most notably against the background of the scepticism and empiricism of David Hume. It is an ideal critical introduction to Kants views in the key areas of knowledge and metaphysics; morality and freedom; and beauty and design. By examining the Kantian (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 53