This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
174 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 174
  1. Paul Abela (2013). Review: Smith & Sullivan (Eds), Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 18 (1):148-154.
    Book Reviews Paul Abela, Kantian Review , FirstView Article(s).
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Paul Abela (2013). Review: Smith & Sullivan (Eds), Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 18 (1):148-154.
    Book Reviews Paul Abela, Kantian Review , FirstView Article(s).
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Paul Abela (2005). Kant's Theory of Knowledge. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (4):558-560.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Henry E. Allison (1971). Kant's Transcendental Humanism. The Monist 55 (2):182-207.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Karl Ameriks (1982). Current German Epistemology: The Significance of Gerold Prauss. Inquiry 25 (1):125 – 138.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Richard Aquila (2003). Kant's Empirical Realism. [REVIEW] International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (3):389-390.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Richard E. Aquila (1974). Kant's Theory of Concepts. Kant-Studien 65 (1-4):1-19.
  8. Nikolaos Avgelis (1991). Die Duhem-Quine-These unter dem Geltungsaspekt der erkenntnistheoretischen Fragestellung Kants. Kant-Studien 82 (3):285-302.
  9. Sidney Axinn (2006). The First Western Pragmatist, Immanuel Kant. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33 (1):83–94.
  10. Sidney Axinn (1960). A Kantian Definition of Degree of Rationality. Kant-Studien 51 (1-4):27-33.
  11. Carla Bagnoli (2012). “Kant’s Contribution to Moral Epistemology”. Paradigmi 1:69-79.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Bruno Bauch (1907). Erfahrung und Geometrie in ihrem erkenntnistheoretischen Verhältnis. Kant-Studien 12 (1-3):213-235.
  13. Steven M. Bayne (2000). Kant's Answer to Hume: How Kant Should Have Tried to Stand Hume's Copy Thesis on its Head. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (2):207 – 224.
  14. Lewis White Beck (1976). Is There a Non Sequitur in Kant's Proof of the Causal Principle? Kant-Studien 67 (1-4):385-389.
  15. Lewis White Beck (ed.) (1974). Kant's Theory of Knowledge: Selected Papers From the Third International Kant Congress. D. Reidel.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jonathan Bennett (1968). Strawson on Kant. Philosophical Review 77 (3):340-349.
  17. Jonathan Francis Bennett (1966). Kant's Analytic. London, Cambridge U.P..
  18. Jocelyn Benoist (1998). L'impensé de la Représentation: De Leibniz à Kant. Kant-Studien 89 (3):300-317.
  19. Stefano Besoli, Claudio La Rocca & Riccardo Martinelli (eds.) (2010). L'universo Kantiano: Filosofia, Scienze, Sapere. Quodlibet.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Graham Bird (1997). Editorial Review: Kant and Contemporary Epistemology. Kantian Review 1:1-16.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Graham Bird (1996). McDowell's Kant: "Mind and World". [REVIEW] Philosophy 71 (276):219 - 243.
  22. Graham Bird (1973). Kant's Theory of Knowledge. New York, Humanities Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. J. Fr Bjelke (1964). Der ausgangspunkt der erkenntnistheorie. Eine auseinandersetzung mit Husserl. Kant-Studien 55 (1-4):3-19.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Philip Blosser (1986). Kant And Phenomenology. Philosophy Today 30 (2):168-173.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Giovanni Boniolo & Silvio Valentini (2008). Vagueness, Kant and Topology: A Study of Formal Epistemology. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (2):141 - 168.
    In this paper we propose an approach to vagueness characterised by two features. The first one is philosophical: we move along a Kantian path emphasizing the knowing subject’s conceptual apparatus. The second one is formal: to face vagueness, and our philosophical view on it, we propose to use topology and formal topology. We show that the Kantian and the topological features joined together allow us an atypical, but promising, way of considering vagueness.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. William F. Bristow (2002). Are Kant's Categories Subjective? Review of Metaphysics 55 (3):551-580.
    Argues that there is a significant respect in which Kant's categories are to be understood as subjective, namely, in the sense that they are to be understood as the self-legislated rules of our understanding. Argues that the subjectivism of Kant's idealism, by which is meant the relativization of knowledge of objects to our standpoint, is a consequence of the subjectivity of the categories, on this interpretation of their subjectivity. On the reading opposed here, Kant's subjectivism is strictly a consequence of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Gordon G. Brittan Jr (1989). Review: Fernandes, Foundations of Objective Knowledge: The Relations of Popper's Theory of Knowledge to That of Kant. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 56 (3):537-.
  28. Etienne Brun-Rovet (2002). Reid, Kant and the Philosophy of Mind. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):495-510.
    I suggest a possible rehabilitation of Reid's philosophy of mind by a constructive use of Kant's criticisms of the common sense tradition. Kant offers two criticisms, explicitly claiming that common sense philosophy is ill directed methodologically, and implicitly rejecting Reid's view that there is direct epistemological access by introspection to the ontology of mind. Putting the two views together reveals a tension between epistemology and ontology, but the problem which Kant finds in Reid also infects his own system, as his (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Mario Caimi (2005). Gedanken ohne Inhalt sind leer. Kant-Studien 96 (2):135-146.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. John J. Callanan (2006). Kant's Transcendental Strategy. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (224):360–381.
    The interpretation of transcendental arguments remains a contentious issue for contemporary epistemology. It is usually agreed that they originated in Kant's theoretical philosophy and were intended to have some kind of anti-sceptical efficacy. I argue that the sceptic with whom Kant was concerned has been consistently misidentified. The actual sceptic was Hume, questioning whether the faculty of reason can justify any of our judgements whatsoever. His challenge is a sceptical argument regarding rule-following which engenders a vicious regress. Once this sceptical (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Paola Cantù, Bolzano Versus Kant: Mathematics as a Scientia Universalis. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan.
    The paper discusses some changes in Bolzano's definition of mathematics attested in several quotations from the Beyträge, Wissenschaftslehre and Grössenlehre: is mathematics a theory of forms or a theory of quantities? Several issues that are maintained throughout Bolzano's works are distinguished from others that were accepted in the Beyträge and abandoned in the Grössenlehre. Changes are interpreted as a consequence of the new logical theory of truth introduced in the Wissenschaftslehre, but also as a consequence of the overcome of Kant's (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Miodrag Cekić (1982). Die konstitutive Rolle der Praxis in der Erkenntnis. Kant-Studien 73 (1-4):338-350.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Andrew Chignell (2007). Review of Georges Dicker, Kant's Theory of Knowledge. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 116 (2):307-309.
    A review of Georges Dicker's primer on Kant's theoretical philosophy. -/- .
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Andrew Chignell (2007). Kant's Concepts of Justification. Noûs 41 (1):33–63.
    An essay on Kant's theory of justification, where by “justification” is meant the evaluative concept that specifies conditions under which a propositional attitude is rationally acceptable with a moderate-to-high degree of confidence. Kant employs both epistemic and non-epistemic concepts of justification: an epistemic concept of justification sets out conditions under which a propositional attitude is rationally acceptable with a moderate-to-high degree of confidence and a candidate (if true and Gettier-immune) for knowledge. A non-epistemic concept of justification, by contrast, sets out (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Andrew Chignell (2007). Belief in Kant. Philosophical Review 116 (3):323-360.
    Most work in Kant’s epistemology focuses on what happens “upstream” from experience, prior to the formation of conscious propositional attitudes. By contrast, this essay focuses on what happens "downstream": the formation of assent (Fuerwahrhalten) in its various modes. The mode of assent that Kant calls "Belief" (Glaube) is the main topic: not only moral Belief but also "pragmatic" and "doctrinal" Belief as well. I argue that Kant’s discussion shows that we should reject standard accounts of the extent to which theoretical (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Andrew Chignell & Colin McLear (2010). Three Skeptics and the Critique. [REVIEW] Philosophical Books 51 (4):228-244.
    A long critical notice of Michael Forster's recent book, "Kant and Skepticism." We argue that Forster's characterization of Kant's response to skepticism is both textually dubious and philosophically flawed. -/- .
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Lauchlan Chipman (1982). Kant's Categories and Their Schematism. In Ralph Charles Sutherland Walker (ed.), Kant on Pure Reason. Oxford University Press. 36-50.
  38. Predrag Cicovacki (1997). Anamorphosis: Kant and Knowledge and Ignorance. University Press of America.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Predrag Cicovacki (1991). An Aporia of A Priori Knowledge. On Carl's and Beck's Interpretation of Kant's Letter to Markus Herz. Kant-Studien 82 (3):349-360.
  40. Dorothy Coleman (1990). Review: Guyer, Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. [REVIEW] Idealistic Studies 20 (3):258-259.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Marian David (1997). Two Conceptions of the Synthetic A Priori. In L. E. Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Roderick Chisholm (The Library of Living Philosophers). Chicago: Open Court. 629--651.
    Roderick Chisholm appears to agree with Kant on the question of the existence of synthetic a priori knowledge. But Chisholm’s conception of the a priori is a traditional Aristotelian conception and differs markedly from Kant’s. Closer scrutiny reveals that their agreement on the question of the synthetic a priori is merely verbal: what Kant meant to affirm, Chisholm denies. Curiously, it looks as if Chisholm agreed on all substantive issues with the empiricist rejection of Kant’s synthetic a priori. In the (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Willem de Vries (1975). Immanuel Kant: An Explanation of His Theory of Knowledge and Moral Philosophy. Teaching Philosophy 1 (2):207-208.
  43. Bernd Dörflinger & Günter Kruck (eds.) (2011). Über den Nutzen von Illusionen: Die Regulativen Ideen in Kants Theoretischer Philosophie. Georg Olms Verlag.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Adam Elieser (1959). Zur erkenntnistheoretischen bedeutung Des relativitätsprinzips. Kant-Studien 50 (1-4):405-408.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Achim Engstler (1988). Review: Siemek, The Idea of Transcendentalism in Fichte and Kant. Philosophy and History 21 (1):35-36.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. L. Falkenstein (2001). Critique of Kantian Humility. Kantian Review 5 (1):49-64.
  47. L. Falkenstein (2000). Langton on Things in Themselves. Kantian Review 5:49-64.
  48. Lorne Falkenstein (2001). Debate: Langton on Things in Themselves: Critique of Kantian Humility. Kantian Review 5:49.
  49. Joong Fang (1997). Kant and Mathematics Today: Between Epistemology and Exact Sciences. Edwin Mellen Press.
  50. Norman Fischer (1978). The Concept of Community in Kant's Architectonic. Man and World 11 (3-4):372-391.
1 — 50 / 174