This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
139 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 139
  1. Paul Abela (2005). Kant's Theory of Knowledge. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (4):558-560.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Lucy Allais (2009). Kant : The Possibility of Metaphysics. In Robin Le Poidevin (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics. Routledge.
  3. Henry E. Allison (2004). Kant's Transcendental Idealism. Yale University Press.
  4. Henry E. Allison (1968). Kant's Concept of the Transcendental Object. Kant-Studien 59 (1-4):165-186.
  5. Richard Aquila (2003). Kant's Empirical Realism. [REVIEW] International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (3):389-390.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Richard E. Aquila (1974). Kant's Theory of Concepts. Kant-Studien 65 (1-4):1-19.
  7. Nikolaos Avgelis (1991). Die Duhem-Quine-These unter dem Geltungsaspekt der erkenntnistheoretischen Fragestellung Kants. Kant-Studien 82 (3):285-302.
  8. Sidney Axinn (2006). The First Western Pragmatist, Immanuel Kant. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33 (1):83–94.
  9. Sidney Axinn (1960). A Kantian Definition of Degree of Rationality. Kant-Studien 51 (1-4):27-33.
  10. Carla Bagnoli (2012). “Kant’s Contribution to Moral Epistemology”. Paradigmi 1:69-79.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Bruno Bauch (1907). Erfahrung und Geometrie in ihrem erkenntnistheoretischen Verhältnis. Kant-Studien 12 (1-3):213-235.
  12. Steven M. Bayne (2000). Kant's Answer to Hume: How Kant Should Have Tried to Stand Hume's Copy Thesis on its Head. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (2):207 – 224.
  13. Lewis White Beck (1976). Is There a Non Sequitur in Kant's Proof of the Causal Principle? Kant-Studien 67 (1-4):385-389.
  14. Lewis White Beck (ed.) (1974). Kant's Theory of Knowledge: Selected Papers From the Third International Kant Congress. D. Reidel.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Ermanno Bencivenga (1987). Kant's Copernican Revolution. Oxford University Press.
    This is a highly original, wide-ranging, and unorthodox discourse on the idea of philosophy contained in Kant's major work, the Critique of Pure Reason. Bencivenga proposes a novel explanation of the Critique's celebrated "obscurity." This great obstacle to reading Kant, Bencivenga argues, has nothing to do with Kant's being a bad writer or with his having anything very complicated to say; rather, it is the natural result of the kind of operation Kant was performing: a universal conceptual revolution. Bencivenga contends (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jonathan Bennett (1968). Strawson on Kant. Philosophical Review 77 (3):340-349.
  17. Jonathan Francis Bennett (1966). Kant's Analytic. London, Cambridge U.P..
  18. Jocelyn Benoist (1998). L'impensé de la Représentation: De Leibniz à Kant. Kant-Studien 89 (3):300-317.
  19. Stefano Besoli, Claudio La Rocca & Riccardo Martinelli (eds.) (2010). L'universo Kantiano: Filosofia, Scienze, Sapere. Quodlibet.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Graham Bird (1997). Editorial Review: Kant and Contemporary Epistemology. Kantian Review 1:1-16.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Graham Bird (1996). McDowell's Kant: "Mind and World". [REVIEW] Philosophy 71 (276):219 - 243.
  22. Graham Bird (1973). Kant's Theory of Knowledge. New York, Humanities Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. J. Fr Bjelke (1964). Der ausgangspunkt der erkenntnistheorie. Eine auseinandersetzung mit Husserl. Kant-Studien 55 (1-4):3-19.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Philip Blosser (1986). Kant And Phenomenology. Philosophy Today 30 (2):168-173.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Giovanni Boniolo & Silvio Valentini (2008). Vagueness, Kant and Topology: A Study of Formal Epistemology. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (2):141 - 168.
    In this paper we propose an approach to vagueness characterised by two features. The first one is philosophical: we move along a Kantian path emphasizing the knowing subject’s conceptual apparatus. The second one is formal: to face vagueness, and our philosophical view on it, we propose to use topology and formal topology. We show that the Kantian and the topological features joined together allow us an atypical, but promising, way of considering vagueness.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. William F. Bristow (2002). Are Kant's Categories Subjective? Review of Metaphysics 55 (3):551-580.
    Argues that there is a significant respect in which Kant's categories are to be understood as subjective, namely, in the sense that they are to be understood as the self-legislated rules of our understanding. Argues that the subjectivism of Kant's idealism, by which is meant the relativization of knowledge of objects to our standpoint, is a consequence of the subjectivity of the categories, on this interpretation of their subjectivity. On the reading opposed here, Kant's subjectivism is strictly a consequence of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Gordon G. Brittan Jr (1989). Review: Fernandes, Foundations of Objective Knowledge: The Relations of Popper's Theory of Knowledge to That of Kant. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 56 (3):537-.
  28. Etienne Brun-Rovet (2002). Reid, Kant and the Philosophy of Mind. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):495-510.
    I suggest a possible rehabilitation of Reid's philosophy of mind by a constructive use of Kant's criticisms of the common sense tradition. Kant offers two criticisms, explicitly claiming that common sense philosophy is ill directed methodologically, and implicitly rejecting Reid's view that there is direct epistemological access by introspection to the ontology of mind. Putting the two views together reveals a tension between epistemology and ontology, but the problem which Kant finds in Reid also infects his own system, as his (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Mario Caimi (2005). Gedanken ohne Inhalt sind leer. Kant-Studien 96 (2):135-146.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. John J. Callanan (2006). Kant's Transcendental Strategy. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (224):360–381.
    The interpretation of transcendental arguments remains a contentious issue for contemporary epistemology. It is usually agreed that they originated in Kant's theoretical philosophy and were intended to have some kind of anti-sceptical efficacy. I argue that the sceptic with whom Kant was concerned has been consistently misidentified. The actual sceptic was Hume, questioning whether the faculty of reason can justify any of our judgements whatsoever. His challenge is a sceptical argument regarding rule-following which engenders a vicious regress. Once this sceptical (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Paola Cantù, Bolzano Versus Kant: Mathematics as a Scientia Universalis. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan.
    The paper discusses some changes in Bolzano's definition of mathematics attested in several quotations from the Beyträge, Wissenschaftslehre and Grössenlehre: is mathematics a theory of forms or a theory of quantities? Several issues that are maintained throughout Bolzano's works are distinguished from others that were accepted in the Beyträge and abandoned in the Grössenlehre. Changes are interpreted as a consequence of the new logical theory of truth introduced in the Wissenschaftslehre, but also as a consequence of the overcome of Kant's (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Miodrag Cekić (1982). Die konstitutive Rolle der Praxis in der Erkenntnis. Kant-Studien 73 (1-4):338-350.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Andrew Chignell (2007). Review of Georges Dicker, Kant's Theory of Knowledge. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 116 (2):307-309.
    A review of Georges Dicker's primer on Kant's theoretical philosophy. -/- .
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Lauchlan Chipman (1982). Kant's Categories and Their Schematism. In Ralph Charles Sutherland Walker (ed.), Kant on Pure Reason. Oxford University Press. 36-50.
  35. Dorothy Coleman (1990). Review: Guyer, Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. [REVIEW] Idealistic Studies 20 (3):258-259.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Marian David (1997). Two Conceptions of the Synthetic A Priori. In L. E. Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Roderick Chisholm (The Library of Living Philosophers). Chicago: Open Court. 629--651.
    Roderick Chisholm appears to agree with Kant on the question of the existence of synthetic a priori knowledge. But Chisholm’s conception of the a priori is a traditional Aristotelian conception and differs markedly from Kant’s. Closer scrutiny reveals that their agreement on the question of the synthetic a priori is merely verbal: what Kant meant to affirm, Chisholm denies. Curiously, it looks as if Chisholm agreed on all substantive issues with the empiricist rejection of Kant’s synthetic a priori. In the (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Willem de Vries (1975). Immanuel Kant: An Explanation of His Theory of Knowledge and Moral Philosophy. Teaching Philosophy 1 (2):207-208.
  38. Bernd Dörflinger & Günter Kruck (eds.) (2011). Über den Nutzen von Illusionen: Die Regulativen Ideen in Kants Theoretischer Philosophie. Georg Olms Verlag.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Adam Elieser (1959). Zur erkenntnistheoretischen bedeutung Des relativitätsprinzips. Kant-Studien 50 (1-4):405-408.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. L. Falkenstein (2001). Critique of Kantian Humility. Kantian Review 5 (1):49-64.
  41. L. Falkenstein (2000). Langton on Things in Themselves. Kantian Review 5:49-64.
  42. Lorne Falkenstein (2001). Debate: Langton on Things in Themselves: Critique of Kantian Humility. Kantian Review 5:49.
  43. Joong Fang (1997). Kant and Mathematics Today: Between Epistemology and Exact Sciences. Edwin Mellen Press.
  44. Michael Joseph Fletcher (2011). Kant and Spinoza: Transcendental Immanence From Jacobi to Deleuze. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 16 (3).
  45. Matthew Fluck (2010). Review: O'Hear (Ed), Epistemology: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements Vol. 64. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 15 (2):155-159.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Dr Horst Folkers (2001). Wissen Und Glauben. Neue Zeitschrift Für Systematische Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 43 (2).
    It is difficult to translate the title “Wissen und Glauben” (Knowledge and Faith, see Romans 11:33 and I Corinthians 13:13) into English, because there ist a debate between Kant, Jacobi, Fichte and Hegel behind it. Through Fichtes “Wissenschaftslehre” knowledge has been accepted as the basic element of all scholarship, whereas faith belongs to religion.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Craig French (2009). Kant's Aesthetic Epistemology: Form and World. By Fiona Hughes. Heythrop Journal 50 (2):336-336.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Jürg Freudiger (1991). Zum Problem der Wahrnehmungsurteile in Kants Theoretischer Philosophie. Kant-Studien 82 (4):414-435.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Michael Friedman (2001). Dynamics of Reason: The 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University. Csli Publications.
    This book introduces a new approach to the issue of radical scientific revolutions, or "paradigm-shifts," given prominence in the work of Thomas Kuhn. The book articulates a dynamical and historicized version of the conception of scientific a priori principles first developed by the philosopher Immanuel Kant. This approach defends the Enlightenment ideal of scientific objectivity and universality while simultaneously doing justice to the revolutionary changes within the sciences that have since undermined Kant's original defense of this ideal. Through a modified (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Ido Geiger (2003). Is the Assumption of a Systematic Whole of Empirical Concepts a Necessary Condition of Knowledge? Kant-Studien 94 (3):273-298.
1 — 50 / 139