About this topic
Summary The question for which Kant is best known -- how are synthetic a priori cognitions possible? -- is an epistemological one, as is his most famous doctrine, that we cannot cognize 'things in themselves' [Dinge an sich selbst].  Consequently, Kant and Kantian ideas have figured prominently in discussion in epistemology, in particular about a priori knowledge.  However, more recently scholars have widened their attention to consider aspects of Kant's epistemology that reflect the wide range of epistemic attitudes studied by contemporary epistemologists: belief, assent, opinion, knowledge by testimony, etc.  The contemporary separation between metaphysics and epistemology as distinct philosophical domains is somewhat alien to Kant; he typically discusses simultaneously what we would now call 'metaphysics' and 'epistemology,' making it difficult to discern how a particular claim is to be taken.  Consequently, Kant's epistemology has traditionally been discussed alongside his views in metaphysics (and philosophy of mind).  Many of the most influential works on Kant's epistemology also treat broader themes in his philosophy, although some more recent scholars have tried to isolate distinctively epistemic issues.
  Show all references
Related categories
Subcategories:
967 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 967
Material to categorize
  1. C. Adair-Toteff (1998). Kant on Platonic Scepticism. Skepsis: A Journal for Philosophy and Interdisciplinary Research 9.
  2. Lucy Allais (2016). Replies to Critics. Kantian Review 21 (2):303-311.
  3. Richard E. Aquila (1989). Matter in Mind a Study of Kant's Transcendental Deduction. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4. K. Bagchi (1982). Kant and The Idea of Epistemology. Indian Philosophical Quarterly 9 (4):377.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Gary Banham (2013). Regulative Principles and Regulative Ideas. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter 15-24.
  6. J. Baranova (2009). Kant’s Fourth Antinomy and the Odyssey of Levinas’s Subject. Topos 21 (1).
  7. Michael Baur (2003). Kant, Lonergan, and Fichte on the Critique of Immediacy and the Epistemology of Constraint in Human Knowing. International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (1):91-112.
    One of the defining characteristics of Kant’s “critical philosophy” is what has been called the “critique of immediacy” or the rejection of the “myth of the given.” According to the Kantian position, no object can count as an object for a human knower apart from the knower’s own activity or spontaneity. That is, no object can count as an object for a human knower on the basis of the object’s givenness alone. But this gives rise to a problem: how is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8. Michael Baur (2003). Problems From Kant. [REVIEW] International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (1):124-126.
  9. Michael Baur (1998). Sublating Kant and the Old Metaphysics. The Owl of Minerva 29 (2):139-164.
  10. Lewis White Beck (1981). Uber Die Regelmassigkeit der Natur Bei Kant. Dialectica 35 (1-2):43-56.
    Hume distinguished the principle that everything has a cause from the principle of the uniformity of nature, Viz., That like causes have like effects. In the second analogy of experience kant attempts to refute what he (erroneously) believed had been hume's explanation of our acceptance of the first principle. He did not there attempt to establish the second principle, But j dodge has shown that the second analogy implicitly contains a justification of the principle of like cause-Like effect. Kant himself, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  11. Lewis White Beck (1957). On the Meta-Semantics of the Problem of the Synthetic a Priori. Mind 66 (262):228-232.
  12. Wolfgang Becker (1991). RICHARD E. AQUILA: Matter in Mind. Philosophische Rundschau 38 (1/2):155.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. John L. Bell (2006). Paul Rusnock. Bolzano's Philosophy and the Emergence of Modern Mathematics. Studien Zur Österreichischen Philosophie [Studies in Austrian Philosophy], Vol. 30. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Editions Rodopi, 2000. Isbn 90-420-1501-2. Pp. 218. [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica 14 (3):362-364.
    Bernard Bolzano , one of the leading figures of the Bohemian Enlightenment, made important contributions both to mathematics and philosophy which were virtually unknown in his lifetime and are still largely unacknowledged today. As a mathematician, he was a pioneer in the clarification and rigorization of mathematical analysis; as a philosopher, he may be considered a forerunner of the analytic movement later to emerge with Frege and Russell.Rusnock's account of Bolzano's work is laid out in five chapters and two appendices. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Aaron Ben-zeev (1984). The Kantian Revolution in Perception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 14 (1):69–84.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   64 citations  
  15. José A. Benardete (1992). Matter in Mind. [REVIEW] International Studies in Philosophy 24 (3):117-118.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Jonathan H. Berk (2013). Jennifer Mensch, Kant’s Organicism: Epigenesis and the Development of Critical Philosophy. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 34 (2):487-491.
  17. Maurice Bitran (2012). Philological Remarks on the Term "Class" in §11 of Critique of Pure Reason. Kant-Studien 103 (2).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. John Blanco (1998). Cross the Line: Goya and Kant-Between the 18th and 19th Centuries. Budhi: A Journal of Ideas and Culture 2 (1):1-26.
  19. Laurence Bonjour (2001). Précis of in Defense of Pure Reason. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):625–631.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Brian Hansford Bowles (2000). Sensibility and Transcendence in Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. Philosophy Today 44 (4):347-365.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Borden Parker Bowne (1912). Kant and Spencer: A Critical Exposition. Philosophical Review 21 (6):692-696.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Charles Braverman (2015). The Kantian Legacy in French Empiricism During the Early Nineteenth Century. Kant Yearbook 7 (1).
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. K. Brinkmann (2002). The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism. Philosophical Review 111 (2):318-323.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. C. D. Broad (1941). Kant's Theory of Mathematical and Philosophical Reasoning. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 42:1 - 24.
  25. C. D. Broad, A. J. D. Porteous & Reginald Jackson (1936). Symposium: Are There Synthetic A Priori Truths? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 15 (1):102 - 153.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Gerd Buchdahl (1966). The Relation Between 'Understanding' and 'Reason' in the Architectonic of Kant's Philosophy. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 67:209 - 226.
  27. L. Burkholder (1974). The Determinist Principle as Synthetic Anda Priori. Philosophia 4 (1):139-161.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Jill Vance Buroker (2016). Lucy Allais, Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and His Realism Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015 Pp. Xii + 329 9780198747130 £40.00. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 21 (2):313-318.
  29. Robert E. Butts (1989). Kant and the Double Government Methodology: Supersensibility and Method in Kant's Philosophy of Science. Noûs 23 (2):266-270.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30. Patrick Cannon (2013). Kant at the Bar. Philosophy Now 95:15-17.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Mirella Capozzi (2012). Philosophy and Writing: The Philosophical Book According to Kant. Quaestio 11 (1):307-350.
    Moving from the conviction that philosophy differs from mathematics because the signs of philosophy are words, i.e. audible Sprachlaute, and given that the vagueness of natural language cannot be eliminated by adopting a characteristic writing on the model of algebra, Kant poses the problem of how to write a philosophical book with a necessarily only phonetic writing, and yet aspiring to a certainty comparable to that of mathematics. His solution consists in showing, by means of acroamatic proofs, that there are (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32. James F. Caron (1999). Beatrice Longuenesse, Kant and the Capacity to Judge Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 19 (1):37-38.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Quassim Cassam (1987). Transcendental Arguments, Transcendental Synthesis and Transcendental Idealism. Philosophical Quarterly 37 (149):355-378.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  34. Brian Chance (2007). Kant and the Empiricists. Review of Metaphysics 60 (4):893-894.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Hasok Chang (2008). Contingent Transcendental Arguments for Metaphysical Principles. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83 (63):113-133.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  36. Christopher Cherry (1981). Reality and the Problem of Access. Philosophy 56 (216):181 - 191.
    Deep beneath the surface of Kant's theory of knowledge lies the metaphysical doctrine of noumena, things in themselves, intelligible entities . For lengthy periods these creatures are surprisingly unobtrusive and can be safely disregarded. But at certain points Kant hauls them to the surface and tries to put them to work in perplexing ways. My concern is not with these attempts, but with what can be learned, if not salvaged, from the metaphysical doctrine as it is expounded in the chapter (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Andrew Chignell (2015). Corrigendum To: Modal Motivations for Noumenal Ignorance: Knowledge, Cognition, and Coherence. Kant-Studien.
    Journal Name: Kant-Studien Issue: Ahead of print.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Lauchlan Chipman (1972). Kant’s Categories and Their Schematism. Kant-Studien 63 (1-4).
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Gordon H. Clark (1951). George A. Schrader, Some Questions on Kant. Review of Metaphysics 5:473.
  40. James Cleve (1987). Comments on Paul Guyer's “the Failure of the B-Deduction”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (S1):85-87.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Ciril Coh (2010). Beyond the Sensibility of Language. Filozofska Istrazivanja 30 (4):563-579.
  42. Peter K. Mcinerney Consciousness (1988). "Kant's Principle of the Formal Finality of Nature and its Role in Experience, Iris Fry in His Critique of Judgment, and Especially in its Two Introductions, Kant Examined the Necessary Conditions for Concrete Knowledge and Ex-Perience. The Object of Investigation Here Was Not the First Critique's" Na. Journal of Philosophy 85 (11).
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Rebecca Elizabeth Copenhaver (2002). The Doors of Perception: Anti-Sensationalism and Direct Realism in Reid and Kant. Dissertation, Cornell University
    For Thomas Reid and Immanuel Kant, the problem of perceptual objectivity is not whether we're getting it right about the world, but whether we're getting at a world about which we can be right . This dissertation is an examination of one aspect of Reid and Kant's philosophy of mind: their theories of perception. Reid and Kant were less concerned about the truth, accuracy or justification of any particular perceptual states than they were with examining the conditions required for forming (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. John J. Coss (1913). Ulpe's Immanuel Kant. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 10 (5):135.
  45. William Leonard Courtney (1893). The Alleged Scepticism of Kent . Uncorrected Proof.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Richard Creath (1995). From Königsberg to Vienna: Coffa on the Rise of Modern Semantics. Dialogue 34 (1):113.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Charles Crittenden (1985). Transcendental Arguments Revived. Philosophical Investigations 8 (4):229-251.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Daniel Dahlstrom (2010). The Critique of Pure Reason and Continental Philosophy: Heidegger's Interpretation of Transcendental Imagination. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press
  49. Daniel O. Dahlstrom (1995). The Transcendental How. Review of Metaphysics 48 (3):663-665.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Gordon Fraser Davis (1993). Constructive and Non-Constructive Transcendental Arguments in Kant and in Contemporary Philosophy.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 967