This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
286 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 286
  1. Henry E. Allison (2012). Essays on Kant. Oxford University Press.
    This volume presents seventeen essays by one of the world's leading scholars on Kant. Henry E. Allison explores the nature of transcendental idealism, freedom of the will, and the concept of the purposiveness of nature. He places Kant's views in their historical context and explores their contemporary relevance to present day philosophers.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Henry E. Allison (2007). Comments on Guyer. Inquiry 50 (5):480 – 488.
    Guyer argues for four major theses. First, in his early, pre-critical discussions of morality, Kant advocated a version of rational egoism, in which freedom, understood naturalistically as a freedom from domination by both one's own inclinations and from other people, rather than happiness, is the fundamental value. From this point of view, the function of the moral law is to prescribe rules best suited to the preservation and maximization of such freedom, just as on the traditional eudaemonistic account it is (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Henry E. Allison (2006). Kant on Freedom of the Will. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. 381--415.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Henry E. Allison (1997). We Can Act Only Under the Idea of Freedom. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 71 (2):39 - 50.
  5. Henry E. Allison (1996). Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant's Theoretical and Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    Henry Allison is one of the foremost interpreters of the philosophy of Kant. This new volume collects all his recent essays on Kant's theoretical and practical philosophy. All the essays postdate Allison's two major books on Kant (Kant's Transcendental Idealism, 1983, and Kant's Theory of Freedom, 1990), and together they constitute an attempt to respond to critics and to clarify, develop and apply some of the central theses of those books. Two are published here for the first time. Special features (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Henry E. Allison (1996). Review of Kant's Compatibilism. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 105 (1).
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Henry E. Allison (1996). Review: Hudson, Kant's Compatibilism. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 105 (1):125-127.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Henry E. Allison (1993). Kant on Freedom: A Reply to My Critics. Inquiry 36 (4):443 – 464.
    The first two sections of this paper are devoted respectively to the criticisms of my views raised by Stephen Engstrom and Andrews Reath at a symposium on Kant's Theory of Freedom held in Washington D.C. on 28 December 1992 under the auspices of the North American Kant Society. The third section contains my response to the remarks of Marcia Baron at a second symposium in Chicago on 24 April 1993 at the APA Western Division meetings. The fourth section deals with (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Henry E. Allison (1990). Kant's Theory of Freedom. Cambridge University Press.
    In his new book the eminent Kant scholar Henry Allison provides an innovative and comprehensive interpretation of Kant's concept of freedom. The author analyzes the concept and discusses the role it plays in Kant's moral philosophy and psychology. He also considers in full detail the critical literature on the subject from Kant's own time to the present day. In the first part Professor Allison argues that at the center of the Critique of Pure Reason there is the foundation for a (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Henry E. Allison (1989). Kant's Refutation of Materialism. The Monist 72 (2):190-208.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Henry E. Allison (1986). Morality and Freedom: Kant's Reciprocity Thesis. Philosophical Review 95 (3):393-425.
  12. Henry E. Allison (1986). The Concept of Freedom in Kant's “Semi-Critical” Ethics. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 68 (1):96-115.
  13. Karl Ameriks (2003). On Being Neither Post- nor Anti-Kantian: A Reply to Breazeale and Larmore Concerning the Fate of Autonomy. Inquiry 46 (2):272 – 292.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Karl Ameriks (2000). Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    It has been argued that Kant's all-consuming efforts to place autonomy at the center of philosophy have had, in the long-run, the unintended effect of leading to the widespread discrediting of philosophy and of undermining the notion of autonomy itself. The result of this 'Copernican revolution' has seemed to many commentators the de-centring, if not the self-destruction, of the autonomous self. In this major reinterpretation of Kant and the post-Kantian response to his critical philosophy, Karl Ameriks argues that such a (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Karl Ameriks (1999). Idealism and Freedom. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):825-829.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Karl Ameriks (1994). Review: Guyer, Kant and the Experience of Freedom: Essays on Aesthetics and Morality. [REVIEW] Ethics 105 (1):207-.
  17. Karl Ameriks (1992). Review: Allison, Kant's Theory of Freedom. [REVIEW] Ethics 102 (3):655-.
  18. Karl Ameriks (1992). Kant and Hegel on Freedom: Two New Interpretations. Inquiry 35 (2):219 – 232.
    Can Kant's theory of freedom be defended in contemporary "incompatibilist" terms, as Henry Allison believes, or is it vulnerable to Hegelian criticisms of the "compatibilist" sort that Allen Wood presents? I argue that the answer to both of these questions is negative, and that there is a third option, namely that Kant's real theory of freedom is not as well off as Allison contends, nor as weak as Wood claims. Allison tries to save Kant's theory of freedom from both what (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Karl Ameriks (1991). Freedom and the End of Reason: On the Moral Foundation of Kant's Critical Philosophy (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (4):684-685.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Karl Ameriks (1984). Review: Kant Über Freiheit Als Autonomie. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 38 (1):136-139.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Karl Ameriks (1981). Kant's Deduction of Freedom and Morality. Journal of the History of Philosophy 19 (1):53-79.
  22. Richard E. Aquila (1994). Review: Guyer, Kant and the Experience of Freedom: Essays on Aesthetics and Morality. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 47 (4):815-817.
  23. Ralf M. Bader (2009). Kant and the Categories of Freedom. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (4):799-820.
    This paper provides an account of Kant's categories of freedom, explaining how they fit together and what role they are supposed to play. My interpretation places particular emphasis on the structural features that the table of the categories of freedom shares with the table of judgements and the table of categories laid out by Kant in the Critique of Pure Reason. In this way we can identify two interpretative constraints, namely (i) that the categories falling under each heading must form (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Marcia Baron (1993). Henry Allison on Kant's Theory of Freedom. Dialogue 32 (04):775-.
  25. Marcia Baron (1993). Freedom, Frailty, and Impurity. Inquiry 36 (4):431 – 441.
    Part I raises some questions concerning the extent of our freedom on the view that Henry Allison's Kant's Theory of Freedom attributes to Kant, and the possibility, on that view, of weakness of will. Allison is correct to attribute to Kant the "Incorporation Thesis": one is never compelled to do x just because one has a desire (even a very intense desire) to do x; a desire moves one to action only if one allows it to. But while the attribution (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Kristina Mussgnug Barrett (2006). Review: Sherover & Johnson (Ed), Are We in Time? [REVIEW] Kantian Review 11:133-136.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Federica Basaglia (2009). Libertà E Male Morale Nella "Critica Della Ragion Pratica" di Immanuel Kant. Aracne.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Anne Margaret Baxley (2013). Review: Deligiorgi, The Scope of Autonomy: Kant and the Morality of Freedom. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):807-809.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Anne Margaret Baxley (2007). Review: Melnick, Themes in Kant's Metaphysics and Ethics. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 116 (1):142-144.
  30. Kenneth Baynes (2007). Freedom as Autonomy. In Brian Leiter & Michael Rosen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Continental Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Kenneth Baynes (2002). Freedom and Recognition in Hegel and Habermas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (1):1-17.
    Contrary to some popular interpretations, I argue that Hegel and Habermas share many basic assumptions in their respective accounts of freedom. In particular, both respond to weaknesses in Kant's idea of freedom as acting from (certain kinds of) reasons by explicating this idea with reference to specific social practices or 'forms of recognition' that in turn express suppositions and expectations that actors adopt with respect to one another. I illustrate this common strategy in each and suggest that it may offer (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. M. G. J. Beets (1988). Reality and Freedom: Reflections on Kant's Moral Philosophy. Eburon.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Ermanno Bencivenga (2007). Ethics Vindicated: Kant's Transcendental Legitimation of Moral Discourse. Oxford University Press.
    Can we regard ourselves as having free will? What is the place of values in a world of facts? What grounds the authority of moral injunctions, and why should we care about them? Unless we provide satisfactory answers to these questions, ethics has no credible status and is likely to be subsumed by psychology, history, or rational decision theory. According to Ermanno Bencivenga, this outcome is both common and regrettable. Bencivenga points to Immanuel Kant for the solution. Kant's philosophy is (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Jonathan Bennett (1984). Kant's Theory of Freedom. In Allen W. Wood (ed.), Self and Nature in Kant's Philosophy. Cornell University Press.
  35. Claudia Bickmann (1995). Auf Dem Wege Zu Einer Metaphysik der Freiheit: Kants Idee der Vollendung der Kopernikanischen Wende Im Experiment der Vernunft Mit Sich Selbst. Kant-Studien 86 (3):321-330.
    "On the Way to a Metaphysics of Freedom: Kant's Idea to accomplish the Kopernicanic Shift by the Experiment of the Reason with itself." 1) Kant's Kopernicanic shift is read as an attempt to solve a main problem of the rationalistic tradition on metaphysics (Leibniz-Wolff; Spinoza): Adopting a method developed in analogy to the successful revolutions within the mathematical and the natural sciences, he tries to find a criterion for an uncontradictional concept of a future metaphysics. We analyze his method, goals (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Susanne Bobzien (2013). Kant's Categories of Freedom. In Kant - Analysen, Probleme, Kritik (English translation of 1988 article).
    ABSTRACT: A general interpretation and close textual analysis of Kant’s theory of the categories of freedom (or categories of practical reason) in his Critique of Practical Reason. My main concerns in the paper are the following: (1) I show that Kant’s categories of freedom have primarily three functions: as conditions of the possibility for actions (i) to be free, (ii) to be comprehensible as free and (iii) to be morally evaluated. (2) I show that for Kant actions, although qua theoretical (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Susanne Bobzien (1997). Kants Kategorien der praktischen Vernunft. Eine Anmerkung Zu Bruno Haas. Kant 3:77-80..
    ABSTRACT: A brief critique of Bruno Haas’ interpretation of Kant’s categories of practical reason and a reply to his criticism of my paper 'Die Kategorien der Freiheit bei Kant' ('Kant's Categories of Freedom').
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Jochen Bojanowski (2012). Ist Kant Ein Kompatibilist? In Mario Brandhorst, Andree Hahmann & Bernd Ludwig (eds.), Sind Wir Bürger Zweier Welten?: Freiheit Und Moralische Verantwortung Im Transzendentalen Idealismus. Meiner.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Ramiro Délio Borges de Meneses (2012). The Concept of Freedom to the Practical Reason in Kant. Filosofia Oggi 36 (137):151-162.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. William H. Bossart (1968). Kant's Doctrine of the Reciprocity of Freedom and Reason. International Philosophical Quarterly 8 (3):334-355.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Mario Brandhorst (2012). Woran scheitert Kants Theorie der Freiheit? In Mario Brandhorst, Andree Hahmann & Bernd Ludwig (eds.), Sind Wir Bürger Zweier Welten?: Freiheit Und Moralische Verantwortung Im Transzendentalen Idealismus. Meiner.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Mario Brandhorst, Andree Hahmann & Bernd Ludwig (eds.) (2012). Sind Wir Bürger Zweier Welten?: Freiheit Und Moralische Verantwortung Im Transzendentalen Idealismus. Meiner.
    - Dieter Schönecker: Kants Grundlegung über den bösen Willen. Eine kommentarische Interpretation von GMS III 457,25-458,5 – Susanne Brauer: Alternative zu Kant? Freiheit nach Hegel in den Grundlinien zur Philosophie des Rechts.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Mario Brandhorst, Andree Hahmann & Bernd Ludwig (2012). Einleitung. In Mario Brandhorst, Andree Hahmann & Bernd Ludwig (eds.), Sind Wir Bürger Zweier Welten?: Freiheit Und Moralische Verantwortung Im Transzendentalen Idealismus. Meiner.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Henry Walter Brann (1970). Kant's Ethics and the Problem of Unity of Freedom and Law. Philosophy and History 3 (2):185-187.
  45. Susanne Brauer (2012). Alternative zu Kant? : Freiheit nach Hegel in den Grundlinien zur Philosophie des Rechts. In Mario Brandhorst, Andree Hahmann & Bernd Ludwig (eds.), Sind Wir Bürger Zweier Welten?: Freiheit Und Moralische Verantwortung Im Transzendentalen Idealismus. Meiner.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Daniel Breazeale (2008). Review: Henrich, Between Kant and Hegel. Lectures on German Idealism. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2):pp. 330-331.
  47. Kimberly Brewer & Eric Watkins (2012). A Difficulty Still Awaits: Kant, Spinoza, and the Threat of Theological Determinism. Kant-Studien 103 (2):163-187.
    In a short and much-neglected passage in the second Critique, Kant discusses the threat posed to human freedom by theological determinism. In this paper we present an interpretation of Kant’s conception of and response to this threat. Regarding his conception, we argue that he addresses two versions of the threat: either God causes appearances (and hence our spatio-temporal actions) directly or he does so indirectly by causing things in themselves which in turn cause appearances. Kant’s response to the first version (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Klaus Brinkmann (2010). Review: Ameriks, Kant and the Fate of Autonomy. Review of Metaphysics 57 (4):824-826.
  49. Klaus Brinkmann (2004). Review: Ameriks, Kant and the Fate of Autonomy. Review of Metaphysics 57 (4):824-826.
  50. Jeremy Byrd (2008). Kant's Compatibilism in the New Eludication of the First Principles of Metaphysical Cognition. Kant-Studien 99 (1):68-79.
1 — 50 / 286