Related categories
Subcategories:

5984 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 5984
Material to categorize
  1. Carmen Martínez Adame (2012). The Parallelogram Law in the Works of d'Alembert and Kant. Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 27 (3):365-388.
    We compare two approaches given to the parallelogram law as a fundamental notion in eighteenth century mechanics. The authors we study are Kant and d’Alembert and we use the context created by Newton’s Principia as our point of departure.En este artículo comparamos dos caminos seguidos en el tratamiento de la ley del paralelogramo como noción fundamental en la mecánica del siglo XVIII. Los autores que estudiamos son Kant y d’Alembert y utilizamos el contexto creado por los Principia de Newton como (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. George P. Adams (1915). Iller's Kant's Doctrine of Freedom. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 12 (22):613.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. R. Adamson (1882). M. Müller, Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. [REVIEW] Mind 7:277.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Louise Adey (1989). “Reading Between The Lines: Tieck’s Prolegomena To The Shlegel-Tieck Edition Of Shakespeare,”. Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 71 (3):89-104.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Jan A. Aertsen (2005). Metaphysics as a Transcendental Science. Quaestio 5 (1):376-389.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Tryg A. Ager (1970). Kant's Theory of Representations: An Interpretation of the Metaphysical and Transcendental Deductions in the 'Critique of Pure Reason'. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Julieta Aguilera (2012). The Synthetic Experience as an Exoskeleton of the Mind. Technoetic Arts 9 (2):271-276.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Alexander Aichele (2013). An Sich Kein Ding: Nietzsches Wirklichkeiten. Nietzscheforschung 20 (1).
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Samuel Ajzenstat (1988). TC Williams, The Unity of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 8 (9):369-371.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Samuel Ajzenstat (1988). T.C. Williams, The Unity Of Kant's Critique Of Pure Reason. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 8:369-371.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Dr Reza Akbarian (unknown). Existence as a Predicate in Kant and Mulla Sadra. Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 21.
    The question of "existence as a predicate" enjoys an outstanding significance from the historical and comparative point of view.Kant, the eminent German philosopher claimed that existence could not be a real predicate for its own subject, since existence is not a concept that could add anything to an object. According to Kant, existence in its logical sense is, merely, copula , rather than either of the terms. The copula on the proposition, of the other hand, does not indicate something that (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Sadik J. Al-azm (1974). The Origin of Kant's Arguments in the Antinomies. Philosophical Review 83 (3):416-419.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  13. Lucy Allais (2001). An Interpretation and Defence of Kant's Transcendental Idealism.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Henry E. Allison (1996). Kant’s Compatibilism. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 105 (1):125-127.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Henry E. Allison (1985). Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. Philosophical Review 94 (1):134-136.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   36 citations  
  16. Modesto M. Gómez Alonso (2012). Animal Logic and Transcendental Arguments: On Certainty's Two Levels of Justification. In Jesús Padilla Gálvez & Margit Gaffal (eds.), Doubtful Certainties. Language-Games, Forms of Life, Relativism. Ontos 7--63.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Mary Aloysius (1956). The Kantian Theory of Sense-Intuition: A Critique. The Thomist 19:506.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. N. Alpert, X. Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous, C. Anderson, S. W. Anderson, B. P. Andrews, L. Angladette, S. H. Anthony, D. A. Baldwin, T. Ball & M. A. Barnett (2012). Alder, AG, 127 Alicke, MD, 283 Allison, SC, 154. In Robyn Langdon & Catriona Mackenzie (eds.), Emotions, Imagination, and Moral Reasoning. Psychology Press
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Karl Ameriks (1994). C. Thomas Powell., Kant's Theory of Self-Consciousness. [REVIEW] International Studies in Philosophy 26 (2):143-144.
  20. Was Schopenhauer an Idealist, Dale Snow & R. E. X. Intelligibility (1991). Descartes on Sensible Qualities, Jill Vance Buroker. The Monist 74 (2).
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Cynthia Regas Anderson (1993). Kant's Theory of Measurement. Dissertation, Georgetown University
    The dissertation considers two different theories of measurement in Kant's Critical philosophy. The first is found in the Critique of Pure Reason. The second is found in the Critique of Judgment. In the former, Kant shows how the size of an object is structured by the necessary rules of the understanding and imagination in terms of its spatial dimensions. In the latter, Kant shows how the actual measurement of this spatial object is estimated. ;Through a detailed inquiry we argue that, (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Hayden William Anderson (2000). Concepts and the Given in Kant's Theory of Experience. Dissertation, University of Notre Dame
    John McDowell, one of the leading philosophers of our time, has an appealing account of experience that is inspired by Kantian insights. Although he borrows heavily from Kant, he believes the Kantian theory ultimately fails. For McDowell, a successful epistemological account of experience must provide the resources to avoid the "interminable oscillation" between coherentism and the myth of the Given, and he thinks a robust conception of second nature is necessary to escape the oscillation. I suggest that McDowell's criticisms do (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. James Clark Anderson (1975). The Transcendental Deduction of Body: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Experience. Dissertation, Syracuse University
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. R. Anderson (2002). Kant on the Apriority of Causal Laws. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 9:67-80.
    Kant famously rejected an empiricist account of causal claims, because it cannot account for the necessity and universality of causal laws. He then concludes that causal claims must have an a priori basis:1the concept of cause cannot arise in this [empiricist] way at all, but must either be grounded in the understanding completely a priori or else be entirely surrendered as a mere fantasy of the brain. For this concept always requires that something A be of such a kind that (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. R. Lanier Anderson, Hans Sluga & Günter ZÖLLER (2008). Author-Meets-Critics: Theories of Judgment by Wayne Martin. Philosophical Studies 137 (1).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Fe Andrews (1990). Reflections on Kant's Criticism of the Leibnizian Philosophy. Dionysius 14:157-167.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Bolesław Andrzejewski (2013). Transcendental Philosophy and Communication. Dialogue and Universalism 23 (2):115-131.
    The paper discusses the philosophy of language and communication based on Immanuel Kant’s transcendental method. Firstly, the basic assumptions of methodical rationalism are presented. Subsequent sections analyse Kant’s intellectual successors: Wilhelm von Humboldt and Ernst Cassirer. Both the intellectuals adopted Kant’s point of views and both treated language as an active, cultural factor participating in the creation of reality. The article ends with a suggestion that the transcendental approach will be present in the 21th-century researches on language and communication.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Emilia Angelova (2013). Desubjectivation of Time and Self-Affection: Kant in Heidegger. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter 653-664.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Emilia Angelova (2009). A Continuity Between the A and B Deductions of the Critique. Idealistic Studies 39 (1/3):53-69.
    Heidegger’s Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics controversially claims that the A deduction is superior to the B deduction because the imagination, as the“common root” of understanding and sensibility, opens the first Critique to metaphysical ground. Drawing on Dieter Henrich, this paper reinterprets Heidegger’sreading by moving beyond the Analytic and taking the Dialectic into account. This suggests a continuity between the A and B deductions, namely that the imagination, as more than an ontic faculty, remains a basic power that keeps (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30. S. Antarkar (2004). Kant's First Antinomy: A Citical Appraisal From the Classical Indian Perspectives. Indian Philosophical Quarterly 31 (1-4):53.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. David Robert Antonini, The Conception of the Productive Imagination in the Critique of Pure Reason: Kant and Heidegger.
    The primary objective of this thesis is to provide an account of productive imagination in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason using Heidegger's interpretation in Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. Kant's account of productive imagination largely remains in the context of his own project to establish the conditions for the possibility of experience which can ground a theory of knowledge. Thus, Kant's project can largely be read as a work of epistemology leaving an account of experience that is limited to (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. R. Aquila (1996). Kant's Theory of Imagination: Bridging Gaps in Judgement and Experience by Sarah L. Gibbons. European Journal of Philosophy 4:93-96.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Richard Aquila (2002). Review of Paul Abela, Kant's Empirical Realism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (9).
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Richard E. Aquila (2000). Possible Experience: Understanding Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. [REVIEW] International Philosophical Quarterly 40 (3):394-396.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Richard E. Aquila (1994). Wayne Waxman., Kant's Model of the Mind: A New Interpretation of Transcendental Idealism. International Studies in Philosophy 26 (2):152-153.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Richard E. Aquila (1992). Space, Time, and Thought in Kant. International Studies in Philosophy 24 (1):119-120.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Richard E. Aquila (1991). Representational Mind: A Study of Kant's Theory of Knowledge. Philosophical Review 100 (4):703-710.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  38. Richard E. Aquila (1990). Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. International Studies in Philosophy 22 (3):110-111.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Richard E. Aquila (1989). Matter in Mind a Study of Kant's Transcendental Deduction. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  40. Richard E. Aquila (1987). Kant's Transcendental Idealism. International Studies in Philosophy 19 (3):61-62.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Richard E. Aquila (1978). Two Lines of Argument in Kant's Transcendental Aesthetic. International Studies in Philosophy 10:85-100.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Richard E. Aquila (1976). Categories, Schematism and Forms of Judgment. Ratio 18 (1):31.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Dr Reza Ardakani (unknown). Mulla Sadra's Relevance to Modern Philosophy. Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 24.
    The present article briefly refers to two points, one positive and one negative, shared by both Mulla Sadra and Kant concerning the issue of knowledge. It also draws on a big difference between their ideas in this regard.The great difference between them is that, according to Mulla Sadra, knowledge is firstly acquired by means of the active intellect. Secondly, the knowledge of objects conforms to the very objects themselves. However, Kant not only believed that knowledge is the product of man's (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Martín Arias-Albisu (2005). La doctrina kantiana del esquematismo trascendental. Areté. Revista de Filosofía 17 (2):155-182.
    The paper’s purpose is to offer an interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason ’s chapter “On the schematism of the pure concepts of the understanding”. Our hypothesis is that in the doctrine of the schematism the possibility of the ontological constitution of the object as object is decided. Thus we will show that only with the transcendental schemes we find the basic ontological predicates of objectivity. This is demonstrated by establishing that only thanks to the doctrine of schematism the (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. A. C. Armstrong (1904). Anger's Kants Lehre Vom Glauben. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 1 (17):466.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. J. Arnould, M. Bellion, R. Bergeret, J. Courcier, J. Fantino, R. Klaine & J. -M. Maldame (2011). Bulletin de Théologie: Théologie de la Création Sciences Et Théologies. Revue des Sciences Philosophiques Et Théologiques 95 (4):921-974.
  47. J. Arnould, R. Bergeret, J. Courcier, J. Fantino, R. Klaine, J. -M. Maldame & D. Renouard (2000). Bulletin de Théologie: Théologie de la Création. Sciences Et Théologies. Revue des Sciences Philosophiques Et Théologiques 84 (1):135-171.
  48. J. Arnould, R. Bergeret, J. Fantino, R. Klaine, J. -M. Maldame & D. Renouard (1994). Bulletin de Théologie. Théologie de la Création. Revue des Sciences Philosophiques Et Théologiques 78 (1):95-124.
  49. Christopher Arroyo (2006). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1):129-130.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Karl Aschenbrenner (1983). A Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: Transcendental Aesthetic and Analytic. Upa.
    Provides comment on the first of the three primary sections of Kant's Critique; the analytical, the dialectical, and the methodological. The analytical section runs from Kant's Introduction to nearly the end of the Analytic of Principles, and is concerned with the nature, foundations, and the limits of empirical knowledge.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 5984