Related categories
Subcategories:

5110 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 5110
Material to categorize
  1. R. A.-M. (1974). La Cohérence de la Doctrine Kantienne de la Liberté. Review of Metaphysics 27 (4):789-790.
  2. Uygar Abaci (2013). Leibniz and Kant on Existence and the Syntheticity of Existential Statements. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter. 297-308.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Carmen Martínez Adame (2012). The Parallelogram Law in the Works of d'Alembert and Kant. Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 27 (3):365-388.
    We compare two approaches given to the parallelogram law as a fundamental notion in eighteenth century mechanics. The authors we study are Kant and d’Alembert and we use the context created by Newton’s Principia as our point of departure.En este artículo comparamos dos caminos seguidos en el tratamiento de la ley del paralelogramo como noción fundamental en la mecánica del siglo XVIII. Los autores que estudiamos son Kant y d’Alembert y utilizamos el contexto creado por los Principia de Newton como (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. George P. Adams (1915). Iller's Kant's Doctrine of Freedom. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 12 (22):613.
  5. R. Adamson (1882). M. Müller, Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. [REVIEW] Mind 7:277.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jan A. Aertsen (2005). Metaphysics as a Transcendental Science. Quaestio 5 (1):376-389.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Tryg A. Ager (1970). Kant's Theory of Representations: An Interpretation of the Metaphysical and Transcendental Deductions in the 'Critique of Pure Reason'. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. J. Aguilera (forthcoming). The Synthetic Experience as an Exoskeleton of the Mind. Technoetic Arts.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Alexander Aichele (2013). An Sich Kein Ding: Nietzsches Wirklichkeiten. Nietzscheforschung 20 (1).
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Samuel Ajzenstat (1988). TC Williams, The Unity of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 8 (9):369-371.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Sadik J. Al-azm (1974). The Origin of Kant's Arguments in the Antinomies. Philosophical Review 83 (3):416-419.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Michael Albrecht, M. Enders & J. Szaif (2006). Wahrheitsbegriffe von Descartes Bis Kant. In Markus Enders & Jan Szaif (eds.), Die Geschichte des Philosophischen Begriffs der Wahrheit. De Gruyter. 231--250.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Lucy Allais (2001). An Interpretation and Defence of Kant's Transcendental Idealism.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Henry E. Allison (1996). Kant’s Compatibilism. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 105 (1):125-127.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Henry E. Allison (1985). Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. Philosophical Review 94 (1):134-136.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Modesto M. Gómez Alonso (2012). Animal Logic and Transcendental Arguments: On Certainty's Two Levels of Justification. In Jesús Padilla Gálvez & Margit Gaffal (eds.), Doubtful Certainties. Language-Games, Forms of Life, Relativism. Ontos. 7--63.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. N. Alpert, X. Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous, C. Anderson, S. W. Anderson, B. P. Andrews, L. Angladette, S. H. Anthony, D. A. Baldwin, T. Ball & M. A. Barnett (2012). Alder, AG, 127 Alicke, MD, 283 Allison, SC, 154. In Robyn Langdon & Catriona Mackenzie (eds.), Emotions, Imagination, and Moral Reasoning. Psychology Press.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Karl Ameriks (1994). C. Thomas Powell., Kant's Theory of Self-Consciousness. [REVIEW] International Studies in Philosophy 26 (2):143-144.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Karl Ameriks (1985). Kant. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 38 (3):692-693.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Was Schopenhauer an Idealist, Dale Snow & R. E. X. Intelligibility (1991). Descartes on Sensible Qualities, Jill Vance Buroker. The Monist 74 (2).
  21. R. Anderson (2002). Kant on the Apriority of Causal Laws. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 9:67-80.
    Kant famously rejected an empiricist account of causal claims, because it cannot account for the necessity and universality of causal laws. He then concludes that causal claims must have an a priori basis:1the concept of cause cannot arise in this [empiricist] way at all, but must either be grounded in the understanding completely a priori or else be entirely surrendered as a mere fantasy of the brain. For this concept always requires that something A be of such a kind that (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. R. Lanier Anderson, Hans Sluga & Günter ZÖLLER (2008). Author-Meets-Critics: Theories of Judgment by Wayne Martin. Philosophical Studies 137 (1).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Fe Andrews (1990). Reflections on Kant's Criticism of the Leibnizian Philosophy. Dionysius 14:157-167.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Bolesław Andrzejewski (2013). Transcendental Philosophy and Communication. Dialogue and Universalism 23 (2):115-131.
    The paper discusses the philosophy of language and communication based on Immanuel Kant’s transcendental method. Firstly, the basic assumptions of methodical rationalism are presented. Subsequent sections analyse Kant’s intellectual successors: Wilhelm von Humboldt and Ernst Cassirer. Both the intellectuals adopted Kant’s point of views and both treated language as an active, cultural factor participating in the creation of reality. The article ends with a suggestion that the transcendental approach will be present in the 21th-century researches on language and communication.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Emilia Angelova (2013). Desubjectivation of Time and Self-Affection: Kant in Heidegger. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter. 653-664.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Emilia Angelova (2009). A Continuity Between the A and B Deductions of the Critique. Idealistic Studies 39 (1/3):53-69.
    Heidegger’s Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics controversially claims that the A deduction is superior to the B deduction because the imagination, as the“common root” of understanding and sensibility, opens the first Critique to metaphysical ground. Drawing on Dieter Henrich, this paper reinterprets Heidegger’sreading by moving beyond the Analytic and taking the Dialectic into account. This suggests a continuity between the A and B deductions, namely that the imagination, as more than an ontic faculty, remains a basic power that keeps (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. John J. Ansbro (1973). Kant's Limitations on Individual Freedom. New Scholasticism 47 (1):88-99.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. R. Aquila (1996). Kant's Theory of Imagination: Bridging Gaps in Judgement and Experience by Sarah L. Gibbons. European Journal of Philosophy 4:93-96.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Richard Aquila (2002). Review of Paul Abela, Kant's Empirical Realism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (9).
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Richard E. Aquila (2000). Possible Experience: Understanding Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. [REVIEW] International Philosophical Quarterly 40 (3):394-396.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Richard E. Aquila (1994). Wayne Waxman., Kant's Model of the Mind: A New Interpretation of Transcendental Idealism. International Studies in Philosophy 26 (2):152-153.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Richard E. Aquila (1992). Space, Time, and Thought in Kant. International Studies in Philosophy 24 (1):119-120.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Richard E. Aquila (1991). Representational Mind: A Study of Kant's Theory of Knowledge. Philosophical Review 100 (4):703-710.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Richard E. Aquila (1990). Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. International Studies in Philosophy 22 (3):110-111.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Richard E. Aquila (1989). Matter in Mind a Study of Kant's Transcendental Deduction. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Richard E. Aquila (1987). Kant's Transcendental Idealism. International Studies in Philosophy 19 (3):61-62.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Richard E. Aquila (1978). Two Lines of Argument in Kant's Transcendental Aesthetic. International Studies in Philosophy 10:85-100.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Richard E. Aquila (1976). Categories, Schematism and Forms of Judgment. Ratio 18 (1):31.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Martín Arias-Albisu (2005). La doctrina kantiana del esquematismo trascendental. Areté. Revista de Filosofía 17 (2):155-182.
    The paper’s purpose is to offer an interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason ’s chapter “On the schematism of the pure concepts of the understanding”. Our hypothesis is that in the doctrine of the schematism the possibility of the ontological constitution of the object as object is decided. Thus we will show that only with the transcendental schemes we find the basic ontological predicates of objectivity. This is demonstrated by establishing that only thanks to the doctrine of schematism the (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. A. C. Armstrong (1904). Anger's Kants Lehre Vom Glauben. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 1 (17):466.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. J. Arnould, M. Bellion, R. Bergeret, J. Courcier, J. Fantino, R. Klaine & J. -M. Maldame (2011). Bulletin de Théologie: Théologie de la Création Sciences Et Théologies. Revue des Sciences Philosophiques Et Théologiques 95 (4):921-974.
  42. J. Arnould, R. Bergeret, J. Courcier, J. Fantino, R. Klaine, J. -M. Maldame & D. Renouard (2000). Bulletin de Théologie: Théologie de la Création. Sciences Et Théologies. Revue des Sciences Philosophiques Et Théologiques 84 (1):135-171.
  43. J. Arnould, R. Bergeret, J. Fantino, R. Klaine, J. -M. Maldame & D. Renouard (1994). Bulletin de Théologie. Théologie de la Création. Revue des Sciences Philosophiques Et Théologiques 78 (1):95-124.
  44. Christopher Arroyo (2006). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (1):129-130.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Karl Aschenbrenner (1983). A Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: Transcendental Aesthetic and Analytic. Upa.
    Provides comment on the first of the three primary sections of Kant's Critique; the analytical, the dialectical, and the methodological. The analytical section runs from Kant's Introduction to nearly the end of the Analytic of Principles, and is concerned with the nature, foundations, and the limits of empirical knowledge.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. V. Asmus (1965). Kant. Russian Studies in Philosophy 4 (1):52-63.
    Kant, Immanual was a German philosopher, the founder of German classical idealism, born in the city of Koenigsberg . Upon graduation from the university there , he became a private tutor. In 1755 he became privatdozent and in 1770 professor at Koenigsberg University. His development as a philosopher may be divided into two periods — the precritical , and the critical, when he undertook the criticism of reason, set forth in Kritik der reinen Vernunft , Kritik der praktischen Vernunft , (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Christoph Asmuth (2007). Realism and Idealism, Or: Is It Possible to Resolve Philosophical Problems? Prolegomena 6 (2):203-222.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. R. F. Atkinson (1981). Kant's First Critique.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Ihre Gemeinsame Kritik an Platons Auffassung (2004). Aristoteles Und Wittgenstein: Ihre Gemeinsame Kritik an Platons Auffassung Praktischer Vernunft Nicholas White University of California, Irvine. Grazer Philosophische Studien 68:163-174.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Iep Author, Kant, Immanuel.
    Immanuel Kant Towards the end of his most influential work, Critique of Pure Reason(1781/1787), Kant argues that all philosophy ultimately aims at answering these three questions: “What can I know? What should I do? What may I hope?” The book appeared at the beginning of the most productive period of his career, and by the […].
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 5110