This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
260 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 260
  1. Laird C. Addis (1963). Kant's First Analogy. Kant-Studien 54 (1-4):237-242.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Rolf Ahlers (2009). Review: Bondeli, Apperzeption und erfahrung: Kants transzendentale deduktion im spannungsfeld der frühen rezeption und kritik. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (3):pp. 475-476.
    This book deals with the epicenter of modern philosophy, Kant's transcendental thinking self. It lives and breathes not only in the unity of reason in Kant himself, but also spells out how the problems that emerge in that conception were dealt with in the intellectual world of early German idealism. Bondeli shows how Kant's unity of reason is variously conceived by Kant as the "I think," the "highest point" of the "unity of apperception," as well as the more traditional concept (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Sadik J. Al-Azm (1968). Kant's Conception of the Noumenon. Dialogue 6 (4):516-520.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Lucy Allais (2010). Transcendental Idealism and Metaphysics: Kant's Commitment to Things as They Are in Themselves. Kant Yearbook 2 (1):1-32.
  5. Henry E. Allison (2006). Transcendental Realism, Empirical Realism and Transcendental Idealism. Kantian Review 11 (1):1-28.
    This essay argues that the key to understanding Kant's transcendental idealism is to understand the transcendental realism with which he contrasts it. It maintains that the latter is not to be identified with a particular metaphysical thesis, but with the assumption that the proper objects of human cognitions are “objects in general” or “as such,” that is, objects considered simply qua objects of some understanding. Since this appears to conflict with Kant's own characterization of transcendental realism as the view that (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Henry E. Allison (1996). Review: Hudson, Kant's Compatibilism. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 105 (1):125-127.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Karl Ameriks (2006). The Critique of Metaphysics: The Structure and Fate of Kant's Dialectic. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press 269--302.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Karl Ameriks (1992). The Critique of Metaphysics: Kant and Traditional Ontology. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge University Press 249--79.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  9. Erik Anderson (1994). Kant, Natural Kind Terms, and Scientific Essentialism. History of Philosophy Quarterly 11 (4):355 - 373.
  10. Richard E. Aquila (1981). Intentional Objects and Kantian Appearances. Philosophical Topics 12 (2):9-37.
  11. Richard E. Aquila (1976). Two Kinds of Transcendental Arguments in Kant. Kant-Studien 67 (1-4):1-19.
  12. Richard E. Aquila (1975). Kant's Phenomenalism. Idealistic Studies 5 (2):108-126.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13. Richard E. Aquila (1974). Kant's Theory of Concepts. Kant-Studien 65 (1-4):1-19.
  14. L. K. B. (1957). Heimsoeth, Studien Zur Philosophie Immanuel Kant: Metaphysische Ursprünge Und Ontologische Grundlagen. Review of Metaphysics 10 (3):539-539.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. L. K. B. (1956). Review: Miller, The Kantian Thing-in-Itself, or The Creative Mind. Review of Metaphysics 10 (1):180-180.
  16. Sorin Baiasu, Howard Williams & Sami Pihlstrom (eds.) (2011). Politics and Metaphysics in Kant. University of Wales Press.
    The past three decades have witnessed the emergence, at the forefront of political thought, of several Kantian theories. Both the critical reaction to consequentialism inspired by Rawlsian constructivism and the universalism of more recent theories informed by Habermasian discourse ethics trace their main sources of inspiration back to Kant's writings. Yet much of what is Kantian in contemporary theory is formulated with more or less strict caveats concerning Kant's metaphysics. These range from radical claims that theories of justice must be (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Gary Banham, Kant's Refutations of Idealism.
  18. Gary Banham (2007). Kantian Realism and Scientific Essentialism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (4):775 – 784.
    Full-text of this article is not available in this e-prints service. This article was originally published following peer-review in British Journal for the History of Philosophy, published by and copyright Routledge.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Massimo Barale (1988). Kant e il metodo della filosofia. ETS.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Peter Baumann (2007). Kant y el yo. In Felipe Castañeda, Vincente Durán & Luis Eduardo Hoyos (eds.), Immanuel Kant: vigencia de la filosofía crítica. Siglo Del Hombre Editores 79-89.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Hans-Ulrich Baumgarten (1997). Kant und das Problem einer prästabilierten Harmonie Überlegungen zur transzendentalen Deduktion der Verstandeskategorien. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 51 (3):411 - 426.
    Kant setzt sich im Vorwort seiner Schrift "Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft" mit dem Vorwurf auseinander, die Deduktion der Verstandeskategorien in der "Kritik der reinen Vernunft" würde dem Gedanken einer prästabilierten Harmonie Vorschub leisten. Gleichsam ins kritische Mark getroffen weist er diesen Gedanken der dogmatischen Metaphysik zurück. Nicht zuletzt durch diesen Vorwurf angeregt überarbeitet er für die zweite Auflage seiner Kritik insbesondere die Deduktion, die sich nun in zwei Schritten vollzieht. Die Überlegungen sollen verdeutlichen, daß sich diese zwei Schritte zum einen (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Anne Margaret Baxley (2007). Review: Melnick, Themes in Kant's Metaphysics and Ethics. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 116 (1):142-144.
  23. Wolfgang Becker (1985). Kritik und Begründung in transzendentaler Argumentation. Kant-Studien 76 (1-4):170-195.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Ermanno Bencivenga (1991). The Metaphysical Structure of Kant's Moral Philosophy. Philosophical Topics 19 (1):17-29.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Jonathan Bennett (1968). Strawson on Kant. Philosophical Review 77 (3):340-349.
  26. Jonathan Francis Bennett (1966). Kant's Analytic. London, Cambridge U.P..
  27. Graham Bird (2006). The Revolutionary Kant. Open Court.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  28. William Blattner (2006). Laying the Ground for Metaphysics: Heidegger's Appropriation of Kant. In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger. 149--76.
  29. Alexandru Boboc (1983). Kants Kritizismus und die neue Bedeutung der Metaphysik. Kant-Studien 74 (3):314-326.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. William H. Bossart (1964). Kant and Some Metaphysicians. Kant-Studien 55 (1-4):20-36.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Angela Breitenbach (2004). Langton on Things in Themselves: A Critique of Kantian Humility. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (1):137-148.
  32. Harold W. Brogan (2004). Kant's Retrieval of Leibniz. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (2):271-284.
    Kant’s avowed commitment to the basic principles of Leibniz’s metaphysics is evident throughout the critical project and stated explicitly in the Prize Essay. However, it is not until the Critique of Judgment, wherein Kant recognizes that Judgment operating in its reflective mood can engender synthetic a priori claims, that Kant is fully capable of appropriating the basic tenets of Leibniz’s metaphysics. This paper examines Kant’s treatment of Leibniz from the perspective of the Critique of Judgment. It is argued that from (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. M. S. C. (1982). Review: Findlay, Kant and the Transcendental Object: A Hermenueutic Study. Review of Metaphysics 35 (3):602-604.
  34. M. Caimi (1995). Concerning a Neglected Deduction of Regulative Ideas--Kant Transcendental Dialectics. Kant-Studien 86 (3):308-320.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Mario Caimi (2000). Einige Bemerkungen über die Metaphysische Deduktion in der Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Kant-Studien 91 (3):257-282.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Bernard Carnois (1987). Revisão: Guillermit E Paris, Prolégomènes À Toute Métaphysique Future Qui Pourra Se Présenter Comme Science Emmanuel Kant. [REVIEW] Dialogue 26 (02):386-.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. M. Carrier (1990). The Theory of Matter of Kant and its Impact on Contemporary Chemistry. Kant-Studien 81 (2):170-210.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38. Emily Carson (2006). Locke and Kant on Mathematical Knowledge. In Emily Carson & Renate Huber (eds.), Intuition and the Axiomatic Method. Springer 3--19.
  39. Emily Carson (2004). Metaphysics, Mathematics and the Distinction Between the Sensible and the Intelligible in Kant's Inaugural Dissertation. Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (2):165-194.
    In this paper I argue that Kant's distinction in the Inaugural Dissertation between the sensible and the intelligible arises in part out of certain open questions left open by his comparison between mathematics and metaphysics in the Prize Essay. This distinction provides a philosophical justification for his distinction between the respective methods of mathematics and metaphysics and his claim that mathematics admits of a greater degree of certainty. More generally, this illustrates the importance of Kant's reflections on mathematics for the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Ernst Cassirer (1931). Kant und Das problem der metaphysik. Kant-Studien 36 (1-2):1-26.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41. Hector-Neri Castañeda (1988). Metaphysical Internalism, Selves, and the Invisible Noumenon (A Frego-Kantian Reflection on Descartes's Cogito). Midwest Studies in Philosophy 12 (1):129-144.
  42. Andrew Chignell (2010). Real Repugnance and Belief About Things-in-Themselves: A Problem and Kant's Three Solutions. In James Krueger & Benjamin Bruxvoort Lipscomb (eds.), Kant's Moral Metaphysics. Walter DeGruyter
    Kant says that it can be rational to accept propositions on the basis of non-epistemic or broadly practical considerations, even if those propositions include “transcendental ideas” of supersensible objects. He also worries, however, about how such ideas (of freedom, the soul, noumenal grounds, God, the kingdom of ends, and things-in-themselves generally) acquire genuine positive content in the absence of an appropriate connection to intuitional experience. How can we be sure that the ideas are not empty “thought-entities (Gedankendinge)”—that is, speculative fancies (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43. Predrag Cicovacki (2004). Through the Prism of the Metaphor: A Reflection of the Actuality of Kant's Philosophy. Filozofija I Društvo 25:101-111.
    This essay examines the significance of Kant's transcendental philosophy by focusing on the central metaphors used in his works. The four metaphors singled out here are those of the Copernican turn, the land of truth and the ocean of illusion, the starry heavens and the moral law, and of perpetual peace. The author emphasizes the strong and the weak points of Kant's philosophy that these metaphors reveals, and argues that these central metaphors work together and point toward the two essential (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Alix A. Cohen (2009). Kant's Concept of Freedom and the Human Sciences. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (1):pp. 113-135.
    The aim of this paper is to determine whether Kant’s account of freedom fits with his theory of the human sciences. Several Kant scholars have recently acknowledged a tension between Kant’s metaphysics and his works on anthropology in particular. I believe that in order to clarify the issue at stake, the tension between Kant’s metaphysics and his anthropology should be broken down into three distinct problems. -/- First, Kant’s Anthropology studies the human being ‘as a freely acting being.’5 This approach (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  45. Juan Manuel Navarro Cordón (1974). Método y Metafísica en el Kant precrítico. Logos 9 (9):75-122.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Juan Manuel Navarro Cordón (1970). El concepto de "trascendental" en Kant. Logos 5 (5):7-26.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Jason Costanzo, Reflection and Existence.
    Following Kant, subjectivity is seen as an obstacle to any access into things themselves. For this reason, Kant concludes that metaphysics as the science of being as being is necessarily impossible. In this essay, the possibilities of metaphysics in light of the problem of subjectivity are reexamined. The nature of subjectivity and the subject’s encounter with being are analyzed yielding two fundamental relational structures that hold with respect to being and the subject. Further examination of the act of reflection coupled (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Michael E. Cuffaro (2012). Kant and Frege on Existence and the Ontological Argument. History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (4):337-354.
    I argue that Kant's and Frege's refutations of the ontological argument are more similar than has generally been acknowledged. As I clarify, for both Kant and Frege, to say that something exists is to assert of a concept that it is instantiated. With such an assertion one expresses that there is a particular relation between the instantiating object and a rational subject - a particular mode of presentation for the object in question. By its very nature such a relation cannot (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Karin de Boer (2010). Pure Reason's Enlightenment: Transcendental Reflection in Kant's First Critique. Kant Yearbook 2:53-73.
    In this article I aim to clarify the nature of Kant’s transformation of rationalist metaphysics into a science by focusing on his conception of transcendental reflection. The aim of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, it is argued, consists primarily in liberating the productive strand of former general metaphysics – its reflection on the a priori elements of all knowledge – from the uncritical application of these elements to all things (within general metaphysics itself) and to things that can only be (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Henri Declève (1968). Le Second Avant-Propos de « Kant et le problème de la métaphysique ». Dialogue 6 (4):555-566.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 260