This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
155 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 155
  1. Paul Abela (2013). Joel Smith and Peter Sullivan (Eds), Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 18 (1):148-154.
    Book Reviews Paul Abela, Kantian Review , FirstView Article(s).
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Paul Abela (2002). Kant's Empirical Realism. Oxford University Press.
    Paul Abela presents a powerful, experience-sensitive form of realism about the relation between mind and world, based on an innovative interpretation of Kant. Abela breaks with tradition in taking seriously Kant's claim that his Transcendental Idealism yields a form of empirical realism, and giving a realist analysis of major themes of the Critique of Pure Reason. Abela's blending of Kantian scholarship with contemporary epistemology offers a new way of resolving philosophical debates about realism.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Laird C. Addis (1963). Kant's First Analogy. Kant-Studien 54 (1-4):237-242.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Sadik J. Al-Azm (1968). Kant's Conception of the Noumenon. Dialogue 6 (04):516-520.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Lucy Allais (2010). Transcendental Idealism and Metaphysics: Kant's Commitment to Things as They Are in Themselves. Kant Yearbook 2 (1):1-32.
  6. Lucy Allais (2009). Kant : The Possibility of Metaphysics. In Robin Le Poidevin (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics. Routledge.
  7. Richard E. Aquila (1981). Intentional Objects and Kantian Appearances. Philosophical Topics 12 (2):9-37.
  8. Richard E. Aquila (1976). Two Kinds of Transcendental Arguments in Kant. Kant-Studien 67 (1-4):1-19.
  9. Richard E. Aquila (1975). Kant's Phenomenalism. Idealistic Studies 5 (2):108-126.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Richard E. Aquila (1974). Kant's Theory of Concepts. Kant-Studien 65 (1-4):1-19.
  11. Ralf M. Bader (2009). Kant and the Categories of Freedom. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (4):799-820.
    This paper provides an account of Kant's categories of freedom, explaining how they fit together and what role they are supposed to play. My interpretation places particular emphasis on the structural features that the table of the categories of freedom shares with the table of judgements and the table of categories laid out by Kant in the Critique of Pure Reason. In this way we can identify two interpretative constraints, namely (i) that the categories falling under each heading must form (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Gary Banham, Kant's Refutations of Idealism.
  13. Gary Banham (2007). Kantian Realism and Scientific Essentialism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (4):775 – 784.
    Full-text of this article is not available in this e-prints service. This article was originally published following peer-review in British Journal for the History of Philosophy, published by and copyright Routledge.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Wolfgang Becker (1985). Kritik und Begründung in transzendentaler Argumentation. Kant-Studien 76 (1-4):170-195.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Ermanno Bencivenga (1987). Kant's Copernican Revolution. Oxford University Press.
    This is a highly original, wide-ranging, and unorthodox discourse on the idea of philosophy contained in Kant's major work, the Critique of Pure Reason. Bencivenga proposes a novel explanation of the Critique's celebrated "obscurity." This great obstacle to reading Kant, Bencivenga argues, has nothing to do with Kant's being a bad writer or with his having anything very complicated to say; rather, it is the natural result of the kind of operation Kant was performing: a universal conceptual revolution. Bencivenga contends (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jonathan Bennett (1968). Strawson on Kant. Philosophical Review 77 (3):340-349.
  17. Jonathan Francis Bennett (1966). Kant's Analytic. London, Cambridge U.P..
  18. Graham Bird (2006). The Revolutionary Kant. Open Court.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Alexandru Boboc (1983). Kants Kritizismus und die neue Bedeutung der Metaphysik. Kant-Studien 74 (3):314-326.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. William H. Bossart (1964). Kant and Some Metaphysicians. Kant-Studien 55 (1-4):20-36.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Harold W. Brogan (2004). Kant's Retrieval of Leibniz. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (2):271-284.
    Kant’s avowed commitment to the basic principles of Leibniz’s metaphysics is evident throughout the critical project and stated explicitly in the Prize Essay. However, it is not until the Critique of Judgment, wherein Kant recognizes that Judgment operating in its reflective mood can engender synthetic a priori claims, that Kant is fully capable of appropriating the basic tenets of Leibniz’s metaphysics. This paper examines Kant’s treatment of Leibniz from the perspective of the Critique of Judgment. It is argued that from (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Mario Caimi (2000). Einige Bemerkungen über die Metaphysische Deduktion in der Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Kant-Studien 91 (3):257-282.
  23. Bernard Carnois (1987). Revisão: Guillermit E Paris, Prolégomènes à Toute Métaphysique Future Qui Pourra Se Présenter Comme Science Emmanuel Kant. [REVIEW] Dialogue 26 (02):386-.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Ernst Cassirer (1931). Kant und Das problem der metaphysik. Kant-Studien 36 (1-2):1-26.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Hector-Neri Castañeda (1988). Metaphysical Internalism, Selves, and the Invisible Noumenon (A Frego-Kantian Reflection on Descartes's Cogito). Midwest Studies in Philosophy 12 (1):129-144.
  26. Alix A. Cohen (2009). Kant's Concept of Freedom and the Human Sciences. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (1):pp. 113-135.
  27. Juan Manuel Navarro Cordón (1974). Método y Metafísica en el Kant precrítico. Logos 9 (9):75-122.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Michael E. Cuffaro (2012). Kant and Frege on Existence and the Ontological Argument. History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (4):337-354.
    I argue that Kant's and Frege's refutations of the ontological argument are more similar than has generally been acknowledged. As I clarify, for both Kant and Frege, to say that something exists is to assert of a concept that it is instantiated. With such an assertion one expresses that there is a particular relation between the instantiating object and a rational subject - a particular mode of presentation for the object in question. By its very nature such a relation cannot (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Karin de Boer (2010). Pure Reason's Enlightenment: Transcendental Reflection in Kant's First Critique. Kant Yearbook 2:53-73.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Henri Declève (1968). Le Second Avant-Propos de « Kant et le problème de la métaphysique ». Dialogue 6 (04):555-566.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Ulrich Diehl (2013). Kants ursprüngliche Einsicht. Universitätsverlag Halle-Wittenberg.
    Die Wende von der vorkritischen zur kritischen Phase von Kants intellektueller Entwicklung ist ein wichtiges Thema der biographischen und hermeneutischen Kantforschung. Umfangreiche Abhandlungen und Essays wurden schon zu diesem Thema verfasst. Ist es überhaupt möglich, noch etwas Neues zu diesem Thema bei zutragen? Wie lässt sich das Verständnis von Kants Umbruchphase und der Genese seiner kritischen Philosophie erweitern und vertiefen? Im dem Aufsatz wird der Behauptung des Kantbiographen Manfred Kühn nachgegangen, derzufolge „keine der bislang vorgelegten Darstellungen [...] völlig zutreffend“ sei. (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. C. Dierksmeier (2004). Review: Hunter, Rival Enlightenments: Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early Modern Germany. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 8:137-142.
  33. C. Dierksmeier (2004). Review: Hunter, Rival Enlightenments: Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early Modern Germany. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 8:137-142.
  34. D. P. Dryer (1966). Kant's Solution for Verification in Metaphysics. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Denis Dumas (1994). Emmanuel Kant. Avant/Après Jean Grondin Collection «La Création de l'Esprit» Paris, Criterion, 1991, 204 P. Dialogue 33 (01):164-.
  36. Julius Ebbinghaus (1958). Rechtsfähigkeit Des menschen, metaphysische embryologie und politische psychiatrie. Kant-Studien 49 (1-4):36-48.
  37. L. Falkenstein (2000). Langton on Things in Themselves. Kantian Review 5:49-64.
  38. Lorne Falkenstein (2001). Debate: Langton on Things in Themselves: Critique of Kantian Humility. Kantian Review 5:49.
  39. James K. Feibleman (1954). Kant and Metaphysics. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 3:55-87.
  40. Peter D. Fenves (1991). A Peculiar Fate: Metaphysics and World-History in Kant. Cornell University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. António Fragoso Fernandes (2006). Da Aporia à Cisão: Uma Interpretação Do Opus Postumum Kantiano. Imprensa Nacional-Casa da Moeda.
  42. Hector Ferreiro (2012). A Superação Hegeliana Do Dualismo Entre Determinismo E Liberdade. In Konrad Utz, Agemir Bavaresco & Paulo R. Konzen (eds.), Sujeito e Liberdade: Investigações a Partir do Idealismo Alemão. ediPUCRS. 129-143.
    Kant explicitou, talvez com maior clareza que qualquer outro filósofo antes do que ele, a essência do conflito que implica a relação da causalidade natural e a causalidade livre. Hegel assevera que com o dualismo fenômeno-coisa em si Kant deixa intacta como tal a incompatibilidade entre as noções de causalidade natural e causalidade livre, já que, conserva sua contraposição mesma para simplesmente localizá-la na estrutura do sujeito. Hegel aspira precisamente a fechar o ciclo da metafísica dualista que definiu a filosofia (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Hector Ferreiro (2012). El argumento ontológico y la muerte de la metafísica. Dos visiones complementarias: Kant y Hegel. Veritas 57 (3):99-120.
    The core of Kant’s criticism of the ontological argument is the thesis that existence is not a real predicate capable of being added to the concept of an object. The concept of the most perfect or the most real being is a subjective content that is as such completely determined, that is to say, that already has all the determinations that define that concept as such. Therefore, to know if that object also exists in the real world is indispensable that (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. J. N. Findlay (1981). Kant and the Transcendental Object: A Hermeneutic Study. Oxford University Press.
    This book is an attempt to conduct a comprehensive examination of Kant's metaphysic of Transcendental Idealism, which is everywhere presupposed by his critical theory of knowledge, his theory of the moral and the aesthetic judgement, and his rational approach to religion. It will attempt to show that this metaphysic is profoundly coherent, despite frequent inconsistencies of expression, and that it throws an indispensable light on his critical enquiries. Kant conceives of knowledge in especially narrow terms, and there is nothing absurd (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Michael Joseph Fletcher (2011). The Cognitive Significance of Kant's Third Critique. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara
    This dissertation aims at forging an archetectonic link between Kant's first and third Critiques within a cognitive-semantic framework. My aim is to show how the major conceptual innovations of Kant’s third Critique can be plausibly understood in terms of the theoretical aims of the first, (Critique of Pure Reason). However, unlike other cognition-oriented approaches to Kant's third Critique, which take the point of contact between the first and third Critique's to be the first Critique's Transcendental Analytic, I link these two (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Michael Joseph Fletcher (2011). Kant and Spinoza: Transcendental Immanence From Jacobi to Deleuze. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 16 (3).
  47. Gerhard Funke (1976). Die Diskussion um die metaphysische Kantinterpretation. Kant-Studien 67 (1-4):409-424.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Mainz Funke, M. Lauth, F. Bern, La Rocca, Robinson, Brandt, Schulze, Bondeli, Dancy, Plerobon & Chenet (1996). Kant-Studien, Begründet von Hans Vaihinger; neubegründet von Paul Menzer und Gottfried Martin. Kant-Studien 1896:385.
  49. Robert E. Gahringer (1954). The Metaphysical Aspect of Kant's Moral Philosopy. Ethics 64 (4):277-291.
  50. Lutz Geldsetzer (1965). Der methodenstreit in der philosophiegeschichtsschreibung 1791—1820. Kant-Studien 56 (3-4):519-527.
1 — 50 / 155