This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
98 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 98
  1. Uygar Abaci (2013). Leibniz and Kant on Existence and the Syntheticity of Existential Statements. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter 297-308.
  2. J. Davidson Alexander (1979). Kant, Hegel and the Problem of Grounds. Kant-Studien 70 (1-4):451-470.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Ameriks (2011). Kant's Idealism on a Moderate Interpretation. In Dennis Schulting & Jacco Verburgt (eds.), Kant's Idealism. New Interpretations of a Controversial Doctrine. Springer
  4. Karl Ameriks (1992). The Critique of Metaphysics: Kant and Traditional Ontology. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge University Press 249--79.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  5. Richard E. Aquila (2001). Review: Sacks, Objectivity and Insight. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 5 (1):114-119.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. L. K. B. (1957). Heimsoeth, Studien Zur Philosophie Immanuel Kant: Metaphysische Ursprünge Und Ontologische Grundlagen. Review of Metaphysics 10 (3):539-539.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. R. J. B. (1967). Review: Gram (Ed/Trans), Kant: Disputed Questions. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 21 (2):385-385.
  8. Gary Banham, Kantian Ontology.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Pierfrancesco Basile (2010). Kant, Spinoza, and the Metaphysics of the Ontological Proof. Metaphysica 11 (1):17-37.
    This paper provides an interpretation and evaluation of Spinoza's highly original version of the ontological proof in terms of the concept of substance instead of the concept of perfection in the first book of his Ethics. Taking the lead from Kant'€™s critique of ontological arguments in the Critique of Pure Reason, the paper explores the underlying ontological and epistemological presuppositions of Spinoza'€™s proof. The main topics of consideration are the nature of Spinoza's definitions, the way he conceives of the relation (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10. Frederick Beiser (1992). Kant's Intellectual Development: 1746–1781. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge University Press 26--61.
  11. Sébastien Billioud (2006). Mou Zongsan's Problem with the Heideggerian Interpretation of Kant. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33 (2):225–247.
    The article elucidates the modern Chinese philosopher Mou Zongsan's relation to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger. It postulates that Mou's appropriation of Immanuel Kant to build up his metaphysical system encountered one real obstacle, which was Heidegger's interpretation of the "Critique of Pure Reason" in the "Kantbuch." Heidegger and Mou both link their conceptions of the Self with understandings of ontology which are totally incompatible.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Clive Cazeaux (1998). Review: Ameriks & Naragon (Trans & Ed), Immanuel Kant, Lectures on Metaphysics. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 2 (1):150-155.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Clive Cazeaux (1995). Metaphor and Heidegger's Kant. Review of Metaphysics 49 (2):341 - 364.
  14. Sébastien Charles (2000). De l'utilisation critique d'un exemple monétaire en philosophie: Kant face à Buffier. Kant-Studien 91 (3):356-365.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Stéphane Chauvier (2001). Kant et la métaphysique générale. Philosophie 70 (2):51.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Luciano Codato (2008). Judgment, Extension, Logical Form. In Kant-Gesellschaft E. V. Walter de Gruyter (ed.), Law and Peace in Kant’s Philosophy / Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Walter de Gruyter 1--139.
    In Kant’s logical texts the reference of the form S is P to an “unknown = x” is well known, but its understanding still remains controversial. Due to the universality of all concepts, the subject as much as the predicate is regarded as predicate of the x, which, in turn, is regarded as the subject of the judgment. In the CPR, this Kantian interpretation of the S-P relationship leads to the question about the relations between intuition and concept in judgment. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Marco Vinícius de Siqueira Côrtes, Origem do sujeito transcendental kantiano. Filosofia Alemã: De Kant a Hegel (Encontro Nacional Anpof).
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Paul Crowther (1985). Fundamental Ontology and Transcendent Beauty: An Approach to Kant's Aesthetics. Kant-Studien 76 (1-4):55-71.
  19. Jean-Jacques Delfour (1997). Une équivocité énigmatique dans le quatrième paralogisme de la Critique de la raison pure. La labilité de la frontière entre réalité et effectivité. Kant-Studien 88 (3):280-310.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Klaus Düsing (2009). Grundformen der Ontologie bei Kant und bei Hegel. Quaestio 9 (1):311-324.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Corey W. Dyck (2008). The Subjective Deduction and the Search for a Fundamental Force. Kant-Studien 99 (2):152-179.
    In this paper, I claim that Kant’s subjective deduction in the first edition of the KrV is to be understood in terms of an investigation of the fundamental force(s) (Grundkraft) of the soul, an investigation essential to Wolffian psychology and much debated throughout Germany in the second half of the 1700’s. I argue that the subjective deduction is indeed presented by means of the exposition of the three-fold syntheses but only insofar as these syntheses are employed as pointers towards each (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22. Wolfgang Ertl (2011). “Kant and the Early Modern Scholastic Legacy: New Perspectives on Transcendental Idealism”. In Hubertus Busche (ed.), Departure for Modern Europe. A Handbook of Early Modern Philosophy. Meiner 1178-1193.
    This paper attempts to shed light on Kant’s distinction between things in themselves and appearances. It draws on the early modern debate about the nature of divine knowledge which resonates in Kant’s lectures on metaphysics and natural theology. The problem as to how divine foreknowledge of human actions is compatible with their freedom is of particular relevance, since the solution to the problem of human freedom is at the core of transcendental idealism. Philosophers such as Molina take divine (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Wolfgang Ertl (1999). Hud Hudson: Kant's Compatibilism. [REVIEW] Kant-Studien 90:371-384.
    In this review article I critically discuss Hudson's claims that (i) Kant is a Davidsonian anomalous monist avant la lettre and that (ii) Kant's approach provides the resources for undermining van Inwagen's consequence argument. While I disagree with regard to (i) in the face of Kant's causality thesis about reason as something non-physical, I agree with regard to (ii). The attack on van Inwagen, however, only works because Kant, in his account of the regulative use of reason, draws on doctrines (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24. Mariannina Failla (2012). Dell'esistenza: Glosse Allo Scritto Kantiano Del 1762. Quodlibet.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Hector Ferreiro (2012). El argumento ontológico y la muerte de la metafísica. Dos visiones complementarias: Kant y Hegel. Veritas: Revista de Filosofia da PUCRS 57 (3):99-120.
    The core of Kant’s criticism of the ontological argument is the thesis that existence is not a real predicate capable of being added to the concept of an object. The concept of the most perfect or the most real being is a subjective content that is as such completely determined, that is to say, that already has all the determinations that define that concept as such. Therefore, to know if that object also exists in the real world is indispensable that (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Elena Ficara (2009). »Transzendental« bei Kant und Fichte. Fichte-Studien 33:81-95.
    The article analyses Kant’s and Fichte’s uses of the word ‘transcendental’. As a matter of fact, in both philosophers the use of the word is strongly connected with the problem of definition and foundation of philosophy. According to some commentators (first of all Norbert Hinske), Kant’s use of the word shows an oscillation (Doppeltendenz) between an old (metaphysical) and a new (epistemological-critical) meaning. This semantic oscillation means that Kant’s philosophical foundation fluctuates between the attempt to overcome traditional metaphysics and the (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Elena Ficara (2006). Die Ontologie in der Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Königshausen&Neumann.
    The book is an analysis of Kant’s uses and definitions of the three concepts ‘transcendental philosophy’, ‘ontology’ and ‘logic’. It first focuses on Kant’s definitions of ‘transcendental’ in the Critique of Pure Reason, where the term is used for the very first time with a programmatic meaning, as the qualification of Kant’s specific philosophical standpoint. Secondly, it reconstructs Kant’s position towards metaphysics and ontology in his pre-critical and critical writings, as well as its premises in the Leibnizian and Wolffian metaphysics. (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28. Michael Fletcher (2011). Review: Lord, Kant and Spinoza: Transcendental Idealism and Immanence From Jacobi to Deleuze. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 16 (3):482-488.
  29. Luca Forgione (2015). Kant and the Problem of Self-Identification. Organon F 22 (2):178-198.
    Ever since Strawson’s The Bounds of Sense, the transcendental apperception device has become a theoretical reference point to shed light on the criterionless selfascription form of mental states, reformulating a contemporary theoretical place tackled for the first time in explicit terms by Wittgenstein’s Blue Book. By investigating thoroughly some elements of the critical system the issue of the identification of the transcendental subject with reference to the I think will be singled out. In this respect, the debate presents at least (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Enrico M. Forni (1962). Il Problem a Dell'esistenza in Kant Nell'interpretazione di Pantaleo Carabellese. Kant-Studien 53 (1-4):192-208.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Hans Friedrich Fulda (1988). Ontologie nach Kant und Hegel. In Dieter Henrich (ed.), Metaphysik nach Kant? Stuttgarter Hegel-Kongreß 1987. 44-82.
  32. Gerhard Funke (1971). Der Weg zur ontologischen kantinterpretation. Kant-Studien 62 (1-4):446-466.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Mainz Funke, M. Lauth, F. Bern, La Rocca, Robinson, Brandt, Schulze, Bondeli, Dancy, Plerobon & Chenet (1996). Kant-Studien, Begründet von Hans Vaihinger; neubegründet von Paul Menzer und Gottfried Martin. Kant-Studien 1896:385.
  34. Moltke S. Gram (1968). Kant, Ontology & the a Priori. Evanston [Ill.]Northwestern University Press.
  35. Robert Greenberg (2007). Review: Brown, Peter Strawson. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 12 (2):181-184.
  36. Robert Greenberg (2001). Kant's Theory of a Priori Knowledge. Pennsylvania State University Press.
    Instead, Robert Greenberg argues that Kant is more fundamentally concerned with the possibility of a priori knowledge -- the very possibility of the possibility ...
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  37. Robert Greenberg (1999). The Ontology of Kant's Theory of Knowledge. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:39-48.
    Adopting a Quinean criterion of ontological commitment, I consider Kant’s theory of our a priori knowledge of objects. I am directly concerned with the customary view that the ontology of Kant’s theory of knowledge in general, whether a priori or empirical, must be thought in terms of the a priori conditions or representations of space, time, and the categories. Accordingly, the customary view is accompanied by the customary interpretation of the ontology as consisting of Kantian“appearances” or “empirical objects.” I argue (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. D. Greimann (2004). Is Kantian Ethics Ontologically Not Guilty? Kant-Studien 95 (1):107-127.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Dirk Greimann (2004). Berichte und Diskussionen: Ist die Ethik Kants ontologisch unschuldig? Kant-Studien 95 (1):107-127.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Patrick Grüneberg (2012). Elena Ficara: Die Ontologie in der »Kritik der reinen Vernunft«. [REVIEW] Fichte-Studien 40:299-307.
    Das vorliegende Buch stellt die publizierte Fassung der Dissertation (Köln 2004) Elena Ficaras dar. Wie der Titel bereits zeigt, bewegt sich die Arbeit auf dem Feld transzendentaler Grundlagenarbeit und sucht die Ontologie, so wie Kant diese trotz aller Vorwürfe der Metaphysikfeindlichkeit neu begründet, zu erarbeiten.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Bryan Hall (2011). A Dilemma for Kant's Theory of Substance. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (1):79-109.
    This paper poses a dilemma for applying the category of substance given Kant's different conceptions of substance in the Critique of Pure Reason. Briefly stated, if the category of substance applies to an omnipresent and sempiternal substance, then although this would ensure that all experiences of empirical objects take place in a common spatiotemporal framework, one could not individuate these empirical objects and experience their alterations. If the category of substance applies to ordinary empirical objects, however, then although one could (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Béatrice Han-Pile, Heidegger's Appropriation of Kant.
    Being and Time, Heidegger praises Kant as “the first and only person who has gone any stretch of the way towards investigating the dimension of temporality or has even let himself be drawn hither by the coercion of the phenomena themselves” (SZ: 23).1 Kant was, before Husserl (and perhaps, in Heidegger's mind, more than him), a true phenomenologist in the sense that the need to curtail the pretension of dogmatic metaphysics to overstep the boundaries of sensible experience led him to (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Rom Harré (2009). Trope Theory and the Ontology of Chemistry. Foundations of Chemistry 11 (2):93-103.
    The traditional ontology within which chemistry has developed involved various versions of a general substance/attribute scheme. Recently this has been challenged by two versions of Dynamism. One version is derived from the writings of A. N. Whitehead and the other from several sources, including G. Leibniz and I. Kant. Both involve the idea of flux of actual occasions. Unlike the former scheme, the latter involves a foundation of causal powers and the energetics of field theory. The situation has been made (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Norbert Hinske (2009). Ontologie oder Analytik des Verstandes? Kants langer Abschied von der Ontologie. Quaestio 9 (1):303-309.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Jaakko Hintikka (1981). Kant on Existence, Predication, and the Ontological Argument. Dialectica 35 (1):127-146.
    The ontological argument fails because of an operator order switch between (1) “necessarily there is an perfect being” and (2) “there is a being which necessarily is perfect”. Here (1) is trivially true logically but (2) problematic. Since Kant's criticisms were directed at the notion of existence, not at the step from (1) to (2), they are misplaced. They are also wrong, because existence can be a predicate. Moreover, Kant did not anticipate Frege's claim that “is” is ambiguous between existence, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  46. Paulo Jesus (2008). Poetique de L'Ipse: Etude Sur le Je Pense Kantien. Lang.
  47. Jonathan Joseph (2006). Review: Rothfield (Ed), Kant After Derrida. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 11 (1):125-127.
  48. Toni Kannisto (forthcoming). Positio Contra Complementum Possibilitatis - Kant and Baumgarten on Existence. Kant-Studien.
    In the course of his philosophy, in various contexts, Kant comes to reject three theses about existence: (i) that the thoroughgoing determination of a thing implies its existence, (ii) that existence is a real predicate or determination of a thing, and (iii) that existence is the complement of inner possibility or essence. Kant’s target here is Baumgarten, who advocates these theses as the criterion, classification, and definition of existence. In this article I seek to clarify Kant’s elusive theory of existence (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Immanuel Kant (2011). Der Einzig Mögliche Beweisgrund Zu Einer Demonstration des Daseins Gottes. Felix Meiner Verlag.
    Kant führt in dem Werk einen neuartigen, später ›ontotheologisch‹ genannten Gottesbeweis, den er anschließend für die Verbesserung der Physikotheologie fruchtbar macht.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  50. Immanuel Kant (2009). The Ontological Argument: A Critique. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy of Religion: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press
1 — 50 / 98