This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
65 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 65
  1. Robert Merrihew Adams (1997). Things in Themselves. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):801-825.
    The paper is an interpretation and defense of Kant's conception of things in themselves as noumena, along the following lines. Noumena are transempirical realities. As such they have several important roles in Kant's critical philosophy (Section 1). Our theoretical faculties cannot obtain enough content for a conception of noumena that would assure their real possibility as objects, but can establish their merely formal logical possibility (Sections 2-3). Our practical reason, however, grounds belief in the real possibility of some noumena, and (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. J. Davidson Alexander (1979). Kant, Hegel and the Problem of Grounds. Kant-Studien 70 (1-4):451-470.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Henry E. Allison (1968). Kant's Concept of the Transcendental Object. Kant-Studien 59 (1-4):165-186.
  4. Richard E. Aquila (2001). Review: Sacks, Objectivity and Insight. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 5:114-119.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Gary Banham, Kantian Ontology.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Sébastien Billioud (2006). Mou Zongsan's Problem with the Heideggerian Interpretation of Kant. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33 (2):225–247.
    The article elucidates the modern Chinese philosopher Mou Zongsan's relation to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger. It postulates that Mou's appropriation of Immanuel Kant to build up his metaphysical system encountered one real obstacle, which was Heidegger's interpretation of the "Critique of Pure Reason" in the "Kantbuch." Heidegger and Mou both link their conceptions of the Self with understandings of ontology which are totally incompatible.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Clive Cazeaux (1998). Review: Ameriks & Naragon (Trans & Ed), Immanuel Kant, Lectures on Metaphysics. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 2:150-155.
  8. Clive Cazeaux (1995). Metaphor and Heidegger's Kant. Review of Metaphysics 49 (2):341 - 364.
  9. Sébastien Charles (2000). De l'utilisation critique d'un exemple monétaire en philosophie: Kant face à Buffier. Kant-Studien 91 (3):356-365.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Luciano Codato (2008). Judgment, Extension, Logical Form. In Kant-Gesellschaft E. V. Walter de Gruyter (ed.), Law and Peace in Kant’s Philosophy / Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Walter de Gruyter. 1--139.
    In Kant’s logical texts the reference of the form of the judgment to an “unknown = x” is well known, but its understanding remains far from consensual. Due to the universality of all concepts, the subject as much as the predicate, in the form S is P, is regarded as predicate of the x, which, in turn, is regarded as the subject of the judgment. In the CPR, particularly in the text on the “logical use of the understanding”, this Kantian (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Steven Galt Crowell (1996). Emil Lask: Aletheiology as Ontology. Kant-Studien 87 (1):69-88.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Paul Crowther (1985). Fundamental Ontology and Transcendent Beauty: An Approach to Kant's Aesthetics. Kant-Studien 76 (1-4):55-71.
  13. Jean-Jacques Delfour (1997). Une équivocité énigmatique dans le quatrième paralogisme de la Critique de la raison pure. La labilité de la frontière entre réalité et effectivité. Kant-Studien 88 (3):280-310.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Corey W. Dyck (2008). The Subjective Deduction and the Search for a Fundamental Force. Kant-Studien 99 (2):152-179.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Mariannina Failla (2012). Dell'esistenza: Glosse Allo Scritto Kantiano Del 1762. Quodlibet.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Elena Ficara (2009). »Transzendental« bei Kant und Fichte. Fichte-Studien 33:81-95.
    The article analyses Kant’s and Fichte’s uses of the word ‘transcendental’. As a matter of fact, in both philosophers the use of the word is strongly connected with the problem of definition and foundation of philosophy. According to some commentators (first of all Norbert Hinske), Kant’s use of the word shows an oscillation (Doppeltendenz) between an old (metaphysical) and a new (epistemological-critical) meaning. This semantic oscillation means that Kant’s philosophical foundation fluctuates between the attempt to overcome traditional metaphysics and the (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Michael Fletcher (2011). Review: Lord, Kant and Spinoza: Transcendental Idealism and Immanence From Jacobi to Deleuze. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 16 (3):482-488.
  18. Enrico M. Forni (1962). Il Problem a Dell'esistenza in Kant Nell'interpretazione di Pantaleo Carabellese. Kant-Studien 53 (1-4):192-208.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Eckart Förster & Yitzhak Y. Melamed (eds.) (2012). Spinoza and German Idealism. Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: 1. Rationality, idealism, monism, and beyond Michael Della Rocca; 2. Kant's idea of the unconditioned and Spinoza's the fourth antinomy and the ideal of pure reason Omri Boehm; 3. The question is whether a purely apparent person is possible Karl Ameriks; 4. Herder and Spinoza Michael Forster; 5. Goethe's Spinozism Eckart Förster; 6. Fichte on freedom: the Spinozistic background Allen Wood; 7. Fichte on the consciousness of Spinoza's God Johannes Haag; 8. Spinoza in Schelling's early conception (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Gerhard Funke (1971). Der Weg zur ontologischen kantinterpretation. Kant-Studien 62 (1-4):446-466.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Mainz Funke, M. Lauth, F. Bern, La Rocca, Robinson, Brandt, Schulze, Bondeli, Dancy, Plerobon & Chenet (1996). Kant-Studien, Begründet von Hans Vaihinger; neubegründet von Paul Menzer und Gottfried Martin. Kant-Studien 1896:385.
  22. Moltke S. Gram (1968). Kant, Ontology & the a Priori. Evanston [Ill.]Northwestern University Press.
  23. Alexander Grau (1999). „No Entity without Identity” — Schellings Identitätsbegriff im Lichte analytischen Denkens. Kant-Studien 90 (1):75-90.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Robert Greenberg (2007). Review: Brown, Peter Strawson (Series: Philosophy Now). [REVIEW] Kantian Review 12 (2):181-184.
  25. D. Greimann (2004). Is Kantian Ethics Ontologically Not Guilty? Kant-Studien 95 (1):107-127.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Dirk Greimann (2004). Berichte und Diskussionen: Ist die Ethik Kants ontologisch unschuldig? Kant-Studien 95 (1):107-127.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Patrick Grüneberg (2012). Elena Ficara: Die Ontologie in der »Kritik der reinen Vernunft«. [REVIEW] Fichte-Studien 40:299-307.
    Das vorliegende Buch stellt die publizierte Fassung der Dissertation (Köln 2004) Elena Ficaras dar. Wie der Titel bereits zeigt, bewegt sich die Arbeit auf dem Feld transzendentaler Grundlagenarbeit und sucht die Ontologie, so wie Kant diese trotz aller Vorwürfe der Metaphysikfeindlichkeit neu begründet, zu erarbeiten.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Bryan Hall (2011). A Dilemma for Kant's Theory of Substance. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (1):79-109.
    This paper poses a dilemma for applying the category of substance given Kant's different conceptions of substance in the Critique of Pure Reason. Briefly stated, if the category of substance applies to an omnipresent and sempiternal substance, then although this would ensure that all experiences of empirical objects take place in a common spatiotemporal framework, one could not individuate these empirical objects and experience their alterations. If the category of substance applies to ordinary empirical objects, however, then although one could (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Béatrice Han-Pile, Heidegger's Appropriation of Kant.
    Being and Time, Heidegger praises Kant as “the first and only person who has gone any stretch of the way towards investigating the dimension of temporality or has even let himself be drawn hither by the coercion of the phenomena themselves” (SZ: 23).1 Kant was, before Husserl (and perhaps, in Heidegger's mind, more than him), a true phenomenologist in the sense that the need to curtail the pretension of dogmatic metaphysics to overstep the boundaries of sensible experience led him to (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Rom Harré (2009). Trope Theory and the Ontology of Chemistry. Foundations of Chemistry 11 (2):93-103.
    The traditional ontology within which chemistry has developed involved various versions of a general substance/attribute scheme. Recently this has been challenged by two versions of Dynamism. One version is derived from the writings of A. N. Whitehead and the other from several sources, including G. Leibniz and I. Kant. Both involve the idea of flux of actual occasions. Unlike the former scheme, the latter involves a foundation of causal powers and the energetics of field theory. The situation has been made (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Paulo Jesus (2008). Poetique de L'Ipse: Etude Sur le Je Pense Kantien. Lang.
  32. Jonathan Joseph (2006). Review: Rothfield (Ed), Kant After Derrida. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 11 (1):125-127.
  33. Immanuel Kant (2011). Der Einzig Mögliche Beweisgrund Zu Einer Demonstration des Daseins Gottes. Felix Meiner Verlag.
    Kant führt in dem Werk einen neuartigen, später ›ontotheologisch‹ genannten Gottesbeweis, den er anschließend für die Verbesserung der Physikotheologie fruchtbar macht.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. David Kolb (2002). Coming Down From the Trees: Metaphysics and the History of Classification. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 35 (2):161-183.
    Three kinds of concepts can be distinguished in Plato and Aristotle, empirical genera and species, “transcendental” concepts such as being and unity, and polarized “meanings of being” such as power and actuality. Both Kant and Hegel break with the traditional dominance of polarized meanings of being, but they do so in different ways which are at work as competing trends inside both Continental and analytic philosophy today.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Chong-Fuk Lau (2010). Kant's Epistemological Reorientation of Ontology. Kant Yearbook 2 (1):123-146.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Louise Marcil-Lacoste (1983). Review: Malherbe, Kant ou Hume, ou la raison et le sensible. [REVIEW] Dialogue 22 (01):167-168.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Jacqueline Mariña (2007). All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism by Paul W. Franks. [REVIEW] Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte/Journal for the History of Modern Theology 14 (1):145-149.
  38. Jean-Luc Marion (1992). Is the Ontological Argument Ontological? The Argument According to Anselm and its Metaphysical Interpretation According to Kant. Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (2):201-218.
  39. F. Marty (1992). The Ontological Argument in Kant 'Opus Postumum' and the Influence Exerted on It by the 'Critique de la Faculte de Juger'. Kant-Studien 83 (1):50-59.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. François Marty (1992). L'Argument ontologique dans l'Opus postumum et l'influence de la Critique de la Faculté de Juger dans l'Opus postumum. Kant-Studien 83 (1):50-59.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Kris McDaniel (2013). A Philosophical Model of the Relation Between Things in Themselves and Appearances. Noûs 48 (1).
    I introduce a methodology for doing the history of philosophy called philosophical modeling. I then employ this methodology to give a theory of Kant's distinction between things in themselves and appearances. This theory models Kant's distinction on the distinction between a constituting object and the object it constitutes.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Ralf Meerbote (1995). Rickerts Auseinandersetzung mit dem Riehlschen Realismus. Kant-Studien 86 (3):346-362.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Antonio-Maria Nunziante & Alberto Vanzo (2009). Representing Subjects, Mind-Dependent Objects: Kant, Leibniz, and the Amphiboly. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (1):133-151.
    This paper compares Kant’s and Leibniz’s views on the relation between knowing subjects and known objects. Kant discusses Leibniz’s philosophy in the ‘Amphiboly’ section of the first Critique. According to Kant, Leibniz’s main error is mistaking objects in space and time for mind-independent things in themselves, that is, for monads. The paper argues that, pace Kant, Leibniz regards objects in space and time as mind-dependent. A deeper divergence between the two philosophers concerns knowing subjects. For Leibniz, they are substances. For (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Charles Thomas Powell (1985). Kant, Elanguescence, and Degrees of Reality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (2):199-217.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Michael Radner & Daisie Radner (1987). Kantian Space and the Ontological Alternatives. Kant-Studien 78 (1-4):385-402.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Sebastian Rand (2012). Apriority, Metaphysics, and Empirical Content in Kant's Theory of Matter. Kantian Review 17 (1):109-134.
    This paper addresses problems associated with the role of the empirical concept of matter in Kant's Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, offering an interpretation emphasizing two points consistently neglected in the secondary literature: the distinction between logical and real essence, and Kant's claim that motion must be represented in pure intuition by static geometrical figures. I conclude that special metaphysics cannot achieve its stated and systematically justified goal of discovering the real essence of matter, but that Kant requires this failure (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Kenneth F. Rogerson (1993). Kantian Ontology. Kant-Studien 84 (1):3-24.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Tobias Rosefeldt (2011). Frege, Pünjer, and Kant on Existence. Grazer Philosophische Studien 82 (1):329-351.
    The paper tries to shed new exegetical light on Frege's "Dialogue with Pünjer on Existence" by showing that Pünjer's position in the dialogue is strongly inspired by Kantian claims about existence. It is argued that Pünjer's wavering between a broadly Meinongian and a broadly Fregean view on existence can be explained by the fact that there are Kantian remarks which seem to speak in favour of each of these views. A suggestion is then made how Kant's claims can be interpreted (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Jay F. Rosenberg (2000). Identity and Substance in Hume and Kant. Topoi 19 (2):137-145.
    According to Hume, the idea of a persisting, self-identical object, distinct from our impressions of it, and the idea of a duration of time, the mere passage of time without change, are mutually supporting "fictions". Each rests upon a "mistake", the commingling of "qualities of the imagination" or "impressions of reflection" with "external" impressions (perceptions), and, strictly speaking, we are conceptually and epistemically entitled to neither. Among Kant's aims in the First Critique is the securing of precisely these entitlements. Like (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Dennis Schulting (2010). Kant's Idealism: The Current Debate. In Dennis Schulting Jacco Verburgt (ed.), Kant's Idealism. Springer.
    This article presents an overview of the current debate on Kant's doctrine of idealism, focussing on the metaphysical interpretations of Ameriks, Allais, Friebe, Langton, Van Cleve and Westphal, and also on Guyer's recent reassessment of Allison's latest views.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 65