Related categories
Siblings:
109 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 109
  1. Karl Ameriks, Otfried Höffe & Nicolas Walker (eds.) (2009). Kant's Moral and Legal Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Sharon Anderson-Gold (1988). War And Resistance: Kant'S Implicit Doctrine Of Human Rights. Journal of Social Philosophy 19:37-50.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Sharon Anderson-Gold (1988). War and Resistance: Kant's Doctrine of Human Rights. Journal of Social Philosophy 19 (1):37-50.
  4. Richard Arneson, Arthur Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy.
    In this excellent book Arthur Ripstein develops a broadly Kantian interpretation of tort law and criminal law that is noteworthy for its spirited defense of core features of Anglo-American law and for its uncompromising dismissal of the so-called law and economics approach to these matters. A final chapter extends the analysis to the topic of distributive justice.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. John E. Atwell (1988). Book Review: Kant, Respect and Injustice: The Limits of Liberal Moral Theory. Victor J. Seidler. [REVIEW] Ethics 98 (4):838-.
  6. Sidney Axinn (1970). Kant on Authority. Southern Journal of Philosophy 8 (2-3):157-163.
  7. G. Banham (2002). Kant's Critique of Right. Kantian Review 6 (1):35-59.
    Full-text of this article is not available in this e-prints service. This article was originally published [following peer-review] in Kantian Review, published by and copyright University of Wales Press.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Gary Banham (2011). New Work on Kant's Doctrine of Right. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (3):549 - 560.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 19, Issue 3, Page 549-560, May 2011.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Gary Banham (2007). Publicity and Provisional Right. Politics and Ethics Review 3 (1):73-89.
    This piece presents an account of Kant's notion of provisional right and connects this conception to his defence of two principles of publicity. The argument is to the effect that understanding the notion of provisional right will enable us to comprehend the Kantian picture of the state of nature, the basis of the transition from such a state to the civil condition and also his treatment of international right. The paper also presents the sketch of a Kantian theory of normatively (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. W. Bartuschat (2008). Der moralische Begriff des Rechts in Kants Rechtstheorie. Jahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik 16:25-41.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Wg Bayerer (1986). Comment on a Gap in the Text of the Akademie-Ausgabe of Kant Notes on Bouterwek Review Of'metaphsische Anfangsgrunde der Rechtslehre'. Kant-Studien 77 (3):338-346.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Wg Bayerer (1986). Hinweis auf eine Lücke im Text der Akademie—Ausgabe von Kants Bemerkungen zur Bouterwek-Rezension. Kant Studien 77 (3):338.
  13. Gunnar Beck (2006). Immanuel Kant's Theory of Rights. Ratio Juris 19 (4):371-401.
  14. Rudolf Bernet (1991). Loi et éthique chez Kant et Lacan. Revue Philosophique De Louvain 89 (3):450-468.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Alyssa R. Bernstein (2010). Review of Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):531-532.
    This superb, exemplary account of Immanuel Kant’s legal and political philosophy is essential reading not only for Kant scholars, but also for political philosophers and philosophers of law. Lucidly reasoned and written with crystalline clarity, the book is both accessible to non-specialists and a pleasure to read. Ripstein reveals the coherent, systematic structure of thought in Kant’s obscurely written Doctrine of Right, and goes beyond illumination to defense and development of Kant’s conception of equal freedom. In the course of doing (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Elizabeth Brake (2005). Justice and Virtue in Kant's Account of Marriage. Kantian Review 9 (1):58-94.
    All duties are either duties of right (officia iuris), that is, duties for which external lawgiving is possible, or duties of virtue (officia virtutis s. ethica), for which external lawgiving is not possible. – Duties of virtue cannot be subject to external lawgiving simply because they have to do with an end which (or the having of which) is also a duty. No external lawgiving can bring about someone's setting an end for himself (because this is an internal act of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Reinhard Brandt (2012). Sei Ein Rechtlicher Mensch (Honeste Vive)" : Wie Das? In Mario Brandhorst, Andree Hahmann & Bernd Ludwig (eds.), Sind Wir Bürger Zweier Welten?: Freiheit Und Moralische Verantwortung Im Transzendentalen Idealismus. Meiner.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Reinhard Brandt & Piero Giordanetti (2000). Der Streit der Facultäten (Band VII, 1 — 116). Kant-Studien 91 (s1):66-75.
  19. Thom Brooks (2001). Corlett on Kant, Hegel, and Retribution. Philosophy 76 (4):561-580.
    The purpose of this essay is to critically appraise J. Angelo Corlett's recent interpretation of Kant's theory of punishment as well as his rejection of Hegel's penology. In taking Kant to be a retributivist at a primary level and a proponent of deterrence at a secondary level, I believe Corlett has inappropriately wed together Kant's distinction between moral and positive law. Moreover, his support of Kant on these grounds is misguided as it is instead Hegel who holds such a distinction. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Stuart M. Brown Jr (1962). Has Kant a Philosophy of Law? Philosophical Review 71 (1):33-48.
  21. Alexius Bucher (1983). The Development of Kant's Critical Philosophy of Law, 1762–1780. Philosophy and History 16 (1):9-14.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. B. Sharon Byrd (1989). Kant's Theory of Punishment: Deterrence in its Threat, Retribution in its Execution. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 8 (2):151 - 200.
    Kant's theory of punishment is commonly regarded as purely retributive in nature, and indeed much of his discourse seems to support that interpretation. Still, it leaves one with certain misgivings regarding the internal consistency of his position. Perhaps the problem lies not in Kant's inconsistency nor in the senility sometimes claimed to be apparent in the Metaphysic of Morals, but rather in a superimposed, modern yet monistic view of punishment. Historical considerations tend to show that Kant was discussing not one, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Georg Cavallar (2012). Review: Eberl & Niesen, Immanuel Kant: Zum ewigen Frieden und Auszüge aus der Rechtslehre: Kommentar. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 17 (2):367-369.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Georg Cavallar (2002). Review: Frankfurt, 'Königliche Völker': Zu Kants Kosmopolitischer Rechts- Und Friedenstheorie. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 6:129.
  25. Georg Cavallar (2002). Rezension: Höffe, 'Königliche Völker': Zu Kants kosmopolitisher Rechts- und Friedenstheorie. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 6 (1):129-132.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Stephen Darwall (2013). Arthur Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. [REVIEW] Legal Theory 19 (1):89-99.
  27. Aviau de Ternay & Henri D' (2005). Un Impératif de Communication: Une Relecture de la Philosophie du Droit de Kant à Partir de la Troisième Critique. Cerf.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Das Königsberger Schlußblatt des Entwurfs (1988). Berichte und diskussionen. Kant-Studien 79:293.
  29. Felipe dos Santos Durante (2013). As objeções feitas Por Arthur Schopenhauer à doutrina kantiana do direito. Cadernos de Ética E Filosofia Política 22:71-83.
    This article aims to show the objections made by Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) to Immanuel Kant’s doctrine of right (1724-1804). Based on the main Schopenhauer’s work we’ll be able to explain the five points of disagreement between Schopenhauer and Kant: (i) Kant tries to separate right sharply from ethics; (ii) the definition (Bestimmung) of the concept of right; (iii) the right to property (what is the basis of this right and if its exists outside the State); (iv) the purpose of the (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Julius Ebbinghaus (1958). Rechtsfähigkeit Des menschen, metaphysische embryologie und politische psychiatrie. Kant-Studien 49 (1-4):36-48.
  31. Kyla Ebels-Duggan (2011). Arthur Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. [REVIEW] Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):549-573.
  32. William A. Edmundson (2010). Review: Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. [REVIEW] Ethics 120 (4):869-873.
  33. Francis H. Eterovich (1972). Approaches to Natural Law, From Plato to Kant. New York,Exposition Press.
  34. Katrin Flikschuh (2008). Reason, Right, and Revolution: Kant and Locke. Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (4):375-404.
  35. Juan Carlos Utrera García (2008). Teología nominalista y racionalidad ilustrada. Los presupuestos ockhamianos de la filosofía del derecho kantiana. Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 42:199-214.
    The purpose of the present paper is to demonstrate a series of connections in terms of concepts and subjects between Ockham and Kant’s philosophical models that may provide a comprehensive framework for their respective insights on Law. Our main thesis postulates the existence of a continuum of certain fundamental assumptions derived from Nominalist theology and enlightened rationality that contribute to the essential unity of so-called “modern thought” and how such continuity is projected in the legal domain. In this sense, we (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. G. Geismann (1993). The Berlin Dispute on Anti-Semitism and the Retreat of Legal Practical Reason. Kant-Studien 84 (3):369-380.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Georg Geismann (1993). Der Berliner Antisemitismusstreit und die Abdankung der rechtlich-praktischen Vernunft. Kant-Studien 83:369-380.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Robert Goedecke (1973). Kant and the Radical Regrounding of the Norms of Politics. Journal of Value Inquiry 7 (2):81-95.
  39. E. A. Goerner (1975). On Patrick Riley's "on Kant as the Most Adequate of the Social Contract Theorists". Political Theory 3 (4):467-468.
  40. Mary Gregor (1994). Review: Mulholland, On Kant's Rechtslehre (System of Rights). [REVIEW] Dialogue 33 (04):693-.
  41. Christopher Harding (2000). Review: Cavallar & Tesón (Respectively), From the Theory and Practice of International Right to a Philosophy of International Law. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 4:148-155.
  42. Wilson Herrera (2013). A Constructivist Interpretation of the Kantian Principle of Right and of the Idea of the Original Contract. Ideas Y Valores 62:85-105.
    El propósito central de este artículo es hacer un análisis desde una perspectiva constructivista del concepto de derecho de dos de los principios más importantes de la filosofía política de Kant: el principio del derecho y la idea del contrato original. El texto comienza con una breve exposición de lo que significa el constructivismo kantiano. A continuación se hace un análisis del concepto de derecho y de los atributos que definen a la ciudadanía, a saber: la libertad, la igualdad y (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Thomas E. Hill (2012). Virtue, Rules, and Justice: Kantian Aspirations. Oup Oxford.
    Thomas E. Hill, Jr., interprets and extends Kant's moral theory in a series of essays that highlight its relevance to contemporary ethics. He introduces the major themes of Kantian ethics and explores its practical application to questions about revolution, prison reform, and forcible interventions in other countries for humanitarian purposes.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Thomas E. Hill (1999). Kant on Wrongdoing, Desert, and Punishment. Law and Philosophy 18 (4):407 - 441.
  45. E. L. Hinman (1925). Kant's Philosophy of Law. The Monist 35 (2):280-295.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Matthias Hoesch (2012). Lässt Kants Völkerbund Als Mitgliedsstaaten Nur Republiken Zu? Kant-Studien 103 (1):114-125.
  47. Otfried Höffe (2006). Kant's Cosmopolitan Theory of Law and Peace. Cambridge University Press.
    Kant is widely acknowledged for his critique of theoretical reason, his universalistic ethics, and his aesthetics. Scholars, however, often ignore his achievements in the philosophy of law and government. At least four innovations that are still relevant today can be attributed to Kant. He is the first thinker, and to date the only great thinker, to have elevated the concept of peace to the status of a foundational concept of philosophy. Kant links this concept to the political innovation of his (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. S. Holtman (2002). Civility and Hospitality: Justice and Social Grace in Trying Times. Kantian Review 6 (1):85-108.
  49. Sarah Holtman (2013). Review: Howard, Kant and the End of War: A Critique of Just War Theory. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 18 (2):334-338.
  50. Sarah Holtman (2011). Review: Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 16 (3):473-478.
1 — 50 / 109