Related categories
Siblings:
142 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 142
  1. Karl Ameriks, Otfried Höffe & Nicolas Walker (eds.) (2009). Kant's Moral and Legal Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    This volume brings to English readers the finest postwar German-language scholarship on Kant's moral and legal philosophy. Examining Kant's relation to predecessors such as Hutcheson, Wolff, and Baumgarten, it clarifies the central issues in each of Kant's major works in practical philosophy, including The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, The Critique of Practical Reason, and The Metaphysics of Morals. It also examines the relation of Kant's philosophy to politics. Collectively, the essays in this volume provide English readers with a (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Sharon Anderson-Gold (1988). War And Resistance: Kant'S Implicit Doctrine Of Human Rights. Journal of Social Philosophy 19:37-50.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Sharon Anderson-Gold (1988). War and Resistance: Kant's Doctrine of Human Rights. Journal of Social Philosophy 19 (1):37-50.
  4. Richard Arneson, Arthur Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy.
    In this excellent book Arthur Ripstein develops a broadly Kantian interpretation of tort law and criminal law that is noteworthy for its spirited defense of core features of Anglo-American law and for its uncompromising dismissal of the so-called law and economics approach to these matters. A final chapter extends the analysis to the topic of distributive justice.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. John E. Atwell (1988). Book Review: Kant, Respect and Injustice: The Limits of Liberal Moral Theory. Victor J. Seidler. [REVIEW] Ethics 98 (4):838-.
  6. Sidney Axinn (1970). Kant on Authority. Southern Journal of Philosophy 8 (2-3):157-163.
  7. Stefano Bacin (forthcoming). ‘Only One Obligation’: Kant on the Distinction and the Normative Continuity of Ethics and Right. Studi Kantiani 29.
    I suggest that looking at how Kant’s arguments relate to the stand of the discussion on the relationship between right and ethics in his times contributes to a better understanding of his own position in this matter. I contrast the terms of the pre-Kantian debate with Kant’s take on the matter, in order to point out how Kant gains a new perspective concerning the rela- tionship between ethics and right. While the most prominent pre-Kantian view construed right and ethics as (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. G. Banham (2002). Kant's Critique of Right. Kantian Review 6 (1):35-59.
    Full-text of this article is not available in this e-prints service. This article was originally published [following peer-review] in Kantian Review, published by and copyright University of Wales Press.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Gary Banham (2011). New Work on Kant's Doctrine of Right. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (3):549 - 560.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 19, Issue 3, Page 549-560, May 2011.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Gary Banham (2007). Publicity and Provisional Right. Politics and Ethics Review 3 (1):73-89.
    This piece presents an account of Kant's notion of provisional right and connects this conception to his defence of two principles of publicity. The argument is to the effect that understanding the notion of provisional right will enable us to comprehend the Kantian picture of the state of nature, the basis of the transition from such a state to the civil condition and also his treatment of international right. The paper also presents the sketch of a Kantian theory of normatively (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11. W. Bartuschat (2008). Der moralische Begriff des Rechts in Kants Rechtstheorie. Jahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik 16:25-41.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Wg Bayerer (1986). Comment on a Gap in the Text of the Akademie-Ausgabe of Kant Notes on Bouterwek Review Of'metaphsische Anfangsgrunde der Rechtslehre'. Kant-Studien 77 (3):338-346.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Wg Bayerer (1986). Hinweis auf eine Lücke im Text der Akademie—Ausgabe von Kants Bemerkungen zur Bouterwek-Rezension. Kant-Studien 77 (3):338.
  14. Gunnar Beck (2006). Immanuel Kant's Theory of Rights. Ratio Juris 19 (4):371-401.
  15. ? Belás (2008). Kant and the Problem of Politics. Filozofia 63:131-143.
    The paper offers a discussion of Kant’s views on politics. It shows how the latter is interwoven with the morals and law. The author reminds us, that for Kant the highest political good possible was the eternal peace. What plays an important role in reaching this status is the reform. The author aims at justifying the claim, that Kant’s interest in politics was not a matter of contingency. As he believes, its continuity can be proved, especially in Kant’s kleine Schriften, (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Rudolf Bernet (1991). Loi et éthique chez Kant et Lacan. Revue Philosophique De Louvain 89 (3):450-468.
  17. Alyssa R. Bernstein (2010). Review of Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):531-532.
    This superb, exemplary account of Immanuel Kant’s legal and political philosophy is essential reading not only for Kant scholars, but also for political philosophers and philosophers of law. Lucidly reasoned and written with crystalline clarity, the book is both accessible to non-specialists and a pleasure to read. Ripstein reveals the coherent, systematic structure of thought in Kant’s obscurely written Doctrine of Right, and goes beyond illumination to defense and development of Kant’s conception of equal freedom. In the course of doing (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Alyssa R. Bernstein (2010). Review: Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):531-532.
    This superb, exemplary account of Immanuel Kant’s legal and political philosophy is essential reading not only for Kant scholars, but also for political philosophers and philosophers of law. Lucidly reasoned and written with crystalline clarity, the book is both accessible to non-specialists and a pleasure to read. Ripstein reveals the coherent, systematic structure of thought in Kant’s obscurely written Doctrine of Right, and goes beyond illumination to defense and development of Kant’s conception of equal freedom. In the course of doing (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Elizabeth Brake (2005). Justice and Virtue in Kant's Account of Marriage. Kantian Review 9 (1):58-94.
    All duties are either duties of right (officia iuris), that is, duties for which external lawgiving is possible, or duties of virtue (officia virtutis s. ethica), for which external lawgiving is not possible. – Duties of virtue cannot be subject to external lawgiving simply because they have to do with an end which (or the having of which) is also a duty. No external lawgiving can bring about someone's setting an end for himself (because this is an internal act of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  20. Reinhard Brandt (2012). "Sei ein rechtlicher Mensch " : wie das? In Mario Brandhorst, Andree Hahmann & Bernd Ludwig (eds.), Sind Wir Bürger Zweier Welten?: Freiheit Und Moralische Verantwortung Im Transzendentalen Idealismus. Meiner
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Reinhard Brandt & Piero Giordanetti (2000). Der Streit der Facultäten (Band VII, 1 — 116). Kant-Studien 91 (s1):66-75.
  22. Thom Brooks (2001). Corlett on Kant, Hegel, and Retribution. Philosophy 76 (4):561-580.
    The purpose of this essay is to critically appraise J. Angelo Corlett's recent interpretation of Kant's theory of punishment as well as his rejection of Hegel's penology. In taking Kant to be a retributivist at a primary level and a proponent of deterrence at a secondary level, I believe Corlett has inappropriately wed together Kant's distinction between moral and positive law. Moreover, his support of Kant on these grounds is misguided as it is instead Hegel who holds such a distinction. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23. Stuart M. Brown Jr (1962). Has Kant a Philosophy of Law? Philosophical Review 71 (1):33-48.
  24. Alexius Bucher (1983). The Development of Kant's Critical Philosophy of Law, 1762–1780. Philosophy and History 16 (1):9-14.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. B. Sharon Byrd (1989). Kant's Theory of Punishment: Deterrence in its Threat, Retribution in its Execution. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 8 (2):151 - 200.
    Kant's theory of punishment is commonly regarded as purely retributive in nature, and indeed much of his discourse seems to support that interpretation. Still, it leaves one with certain misgivings regarding the internal consistency of his position. Perhaps the problem lies not in Kant's inconsistency nor in the senility sometimes claimed to be apparent in the Metaphysic of Morals, but rather in a superimposed, modern yet monistic view of punishment. Historical considerations tend to show that Kant was discussing not one, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  26. Georg Cavallar (2012). Review: Eberl & Niesen, Immanuel Kant: Zum ewigen Frieden und Auszüge aus der Rechtslehre: Kommentar. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 17 (2):367-369.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Georg Cavallar (2002). Rezension: Höffe, 'Königliche Völker': Zu Kants kosmopolitisher Rechts- und Friedenstheorie. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 6 (1):129-132.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Georg Cavallar (2002). Review: Frankfurt, 'Königliche Völker': Zu Kants Kosmopolitischer Rechts- Und Friedenstheorie. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 6:129.
  29. Georg Cavallar (1991). Kant's System of Rights. [REVIEW] International Studies in Philosophy 23 (3):134-135.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. J. Angelo Corlett (1993). Foundations of a Kantian Theory of Punishment. Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):263-283.
    It has recently been argued that there is probably no theory of punishment to be found in Immanuel Kant’s writings, but that “if one selects carefully among the many remarks and insights that Kant has left us about crime and punishment, one might even be able to build such an edifice from the bricks provided.” In this paper, I seek to provide part of a foundation of a Kantian theory of punishment, one which is consistent with many, if not all, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Stephen Darwall (2013). Arthur Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. [REVIEW] Legal Theory 19 (1):89-99.
  32. Aviau de Ternay & Henri D' (2005). Un Impératif de Communication: Une Relecture de la Philosophie du Droit de Kant à Partir de la Troisième Critique. Cerf.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Das Königsberger Schlußblatt des Entwurfs (1988). Berichte und diskussionen. Kant-Studien 79 (1-4):293.
  34. C. Dierksmeier (2002). Kant on 'Selbständigkeit'. Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 1:49-62.
    With the term ‘Selbständigkeit’ Kant completes his notion of freedom and equality. The formula ‘Freiheit, Gleichheit, Selbständigkeit’ should replace the term ‘brotherhood’ brought up by the French Revolution. The article examines what would be the systematically adequate interprettion of ‘Selbständigkeit’ within Kant`s philosophy of law. The objective of this investigation is to find out whether and how the concept of civil and civic ‘Selbständigkeit’ includes certain obligations of society as a whole to enable each and every individual to reach a (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Felipe dos Santos Durante (2013). As objeções feitas Por Arthur Schopenhauer à doutrina kantiana do direito. Cadernos de Ética E Filosofia Política 22:71-83.
    This article aims to show the objections made by Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) to Immanuel Kant’s doctrine of right (1724-1804). Based on the main Schopenhauer’s work we’ll be able to explain the five points of disagreement between Schopenhauer and Kant: (i) Kant tries to separate right sharply from ethics; (ii) the definition (Bestimmung) of the concept of right; (iii) the right to property (what is the basis of this right and if its exists outside the State); (iv) the purpose of the (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Julius Ebbinghaus (1958). Rechtsfähigkeit Des menschen, metaphysische embryologie und politische psychiatrie. Kant-Studien 49 (1-4):36-48.
  37. Kyla Ebels-Duggan (2011). Arthur Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. [REVIEW] Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):549-573.
  38. William A. Edmundson (2010). Review: Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. [REVIEW] Ethics 120 (4):869-873.
  39. Francis H. Eterovich (1972). Approaches to Natural Law, From Plato to Kant. New York,Exposition Press.
  40. Katrin Flikschuh (2008). Reason, Right, and Revolution: Kant and Locke. Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (4):375-404.
  41. Juan Carlos Utrera García (2008). Teología nominalista y racionalidad ilustrada. Los presupuestos ockhamianos de la filosofía del derecho kantiana. Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 42:199-214.
    The purpose of the present paper is to demonstrate a series of connections in terms of concepts and subjects between Ockham and Kant’s philosophical models that may provide a comprehensive framework for their respective insights on Law. Our main thesis postulates the existence of a continuum of certain fundamental assumptions derived from Nominalist theology and enlightened rationality that contribute to the essential unity of so-called “modern thought” and how such continuity is projected in the legal domain. In this sense, we (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. G. Geismann (1993). The Berlin Dispute on Anti-Semitism and the Retreat of Legal Practical Reason. Kant-Studien 84 (3):369-380.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Georg Geismann (1993). Der Berliner Antisemitismusstreit und die Abdankung der rechtlich-praktischen Vernunft. Kant-Studien 83:369-380.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Kaidisch Gerhard, Über das Sprechenmüssen in Kants Über ein vermeintes Recht aus Menschenliebe zu lügen.
    Schon der Titel von Kants Aufsatz kann als Hinweis darauf verstanden werden, zu lügen könne, wenn überhaupt, dann nur vermeintlich rechtens sein. Doch geht es um Lügen, die vermeintlich rechtens sein können, ist Kant notorisch unklar, mit Ausnahme dieses Aufsatzes. Denn die Klärung dieser Unklarheit ist gerade Kants systematischer Grund seiner Abfassung. Dieser These folgend wird versucht, Kants Argumentation in Anschluss an Die Metaphysik der Sitten nachzuzeichnen, und das, wofür argumentiert wird, ist: Genau dann, wenn einmal gesprochen werden muss, widerspricht (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Robert Goedecke (1973). Kant and the Radical Regrounding of the Norms of Politics. Journal of Value Inquiry 7 (2):81-95.
  46. E. A. Goerner (1975). On Patrick Riley's "on Kant as the Most Adequate of the Social Contract Theorists". Political Theory 3 (4):467-468.
  47. Mary Gregor (1994). Review: Mulholland, On Kant's Rechtslehre (System of Rights). [REVIEW] Dialogue 33 (04):693-.
  48. Paul Guyer (2002). Kant's Deductions of the Principles of Right. In Mark Timmons (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. Clarendon Press
  49. Christopher Harding (2000). Review: Cavallar & Tesón, From the Theory and Practice of International Right to a Philosophy of International Law. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 4 (1):148-155.
  50. Karlfriedrich Herb & Bernd Ludwig (1994). Kants Kritisches Staatsrecht. Jahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik 2.
    Contrary to popular assumption, Kant's theory of state experienced a major transformation during the period between "On the Common Saying" of 1793 and the "Metaphysical First Principles of the Doctrine of Right" of 1797. This transformation is primarily expressed in the systematic new formulation of the relationship between "noumenal state" and "phenomenal state". Kant's new system permits him, on the one hand, to develop the idea of state a priori from his theory of private right and thus to systematically incorporate (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 142