This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
51 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 51
  1. R. Lanier Anderson (2008). Review: Comments on Wayne Martin, Theories of Judgment. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 137 (1):91-108.
    Martin offers an intriguing account of nineteenth century challenges to the traditional theory of judgment as a synthesis of subject and predicate (the synthesis theory)--criticisms motivated largely by the problem posed by existential judgments, which need not have two terms at all. Such judgments led to a theory of "thetic" judgments, whose essential feature is to "posit" something, rather than to combine terms (as in synthetic judgment). I argue, however, that Kant's official definition of judgment already implicitly recognizes the importance (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Tom Baldwin (2002). The Inaugural Address: Kantian Modality. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76:1 - 24.
    Kant's claim that modality is a 'category' provides an approach to modality to be contrasted with Lewis's reductive analysis. Lewis's position is unsatisfactory, since it depends on an inherently modal conception of a world. This suggests that modality is 'primitive'; and the Kantian position is a prima facie plausible position of this kind, which is filled out by considering the relationship between modality and inference. This provides a context for comparing the Kantian position with Wright's non-cognitivist 'conventionalism'. Wright's position is (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Massimo Barale (2000). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason with in the Tradition of Modern Logic. [REVIEW] International Studies in Philosophy 32 (4):149-152.
  4. Terry Boswell (1988). On the Textual Authenticity of Kant's Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 9 (2):193-203.
    Philological background information is presented on the origin and composition of the text generally known as Kant's Logic. The text, which was not in the strict sense of the word written by Kant himself, but rather assembled by another writer whom Kant had authorized to do so on his behalf, is a mixture of materials, not all of which originate directly from Kant, and cannot claim full authenticity.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Vladimir Bryushinkin (1999). Kant, Frege and the Problem of Psychologism. Kant-Studien 90 (1):59-74.
  6. Mirella Capozzi & Gino Roncaglia (2009). Logic and Philosophy of Logic From Humanism to Kant. In Leila Haaparanta (ed.), The Development of Modern Logic. Oxford University Press. 78-158.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Alberto Coffa (1982). Kant, Bolzano, and the Emergence of Logicism. Journal of Philosophy 79 (11):679-689.
  8. James Conant (1992). The Search for Logically Alien Thought: Descartes, Kant, Frege, and the Tractatus. Philosophical Topics 20 (1):115-180.
  9. Kirk Dallas Wilson (1978). Studies in the Formal Logic of Kant's Modal Functions of Judgment. Kant-Studien 69 (1-4):252-272.
  10. R. Enskat (1986). Logical Functions and Logical Capacities in Kant Theory of the Functions of Judgment and in Conjunctive Logic. Kant-Studien 77 (2):224-240.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Rainer Enskat (1986). Logische Funktionen und logische Fähigkeiten in der Kantischen Theorie der Urteilsfunktionen und in der Junktorenlogik. Kant-Studien 77 (1-4):224-240.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. James R. Flynn (1986). The Logic of Kant's Derivation of Freedom From Reason, An Alternative Reading to Paton. Kant-Studien 77 (4):441-446.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Fausto Fraisopi (2005). Adamo Sulla Sponda Del Rubicone: Analogia E Dimensione Speculativa in Kant. Armando.
  14. Gabriele Gava (2011). Peirce's 'Prescision' as a Transcendental Method. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (2):231 - 253.
    Abstract In this Paper I interpret Charles S. Peirce?s method of prescision as a transcendental method. In order to do so, I argue that Peirce?s pragmatism can be interpreted in a transcendental light only if we use a non?justificatory understanding of transcendental philosophy. I show how Peirce?s prescision is similar to some abstracting procedure that Immanuel Kant used in his Critique of Pure Reason. Prescision abstracts from experience and thought in general those elements without which such experience and thought would (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Axel Gelfert (2006). Kant on Testimony. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (4):627 – 652.
    Immanuel Kant is often regarded as an exponent of the ‘individualist’ tradition in epistemology, according to which testimony is not a fundamental source of knowledge. The present paper argues that this view is far from accurate. Kant devotes ample space to discussions of testimony and, in his lectures on logic, arrives at a distinct and stable philosophical position regarding testimony. Important elements of this position consist in (a) acknowledging the ineliminability of testimony; (b) realizing that testimony can establish empirical knowledge (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Volker Gerhardt, Rolf Horstmann & Ralph Schumacher (eds.) (2001). Kant Und Die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Vol. 3. Walter de Gruyter.
    Theoretical Laws and Normative Rules: Kant and Bolzano's Views on Logic'"1" Anita Von Duhn, Genf Does logic instruct us how to think correctly? ...
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. José Arthur Giannotti (2005). Desvendando o sentido. Doispontos 2 (2).
    A terceira Crítica configura um papel inédito para a reflexão: a conformação da natureza em gêneros e espécies aparece como pressuposto de uma forma de pensar que é vaga na medida em que empresta sentido a modos particulares de finalidade. No entanto, como esse sentido vai ser pensado depende de uma leitura da lógica formal, quer porque fica subordinada a uma gramática universal, no caso de Husserl, quer porque se dissolve ela mesma numa linguagem, como em Wittgenstein. Unveiling the meaning (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Felix Grayeff (1954). Interpretation und logik. Kant-Studien 45 (1-4):55-66.
  19. Robert Greenberg (2007). Review: Brown, Peter Strawson (Series: Philosophy Now). [REVIEW] Kantian Review 12 (2):181-184.
  20. Amit Hagar (2008). Kant and Non-Euclidean Geometry. Kant-Studien 99 (1):80-98.
    It is occasionally claimed that the important work of philosophers, physicists, and mathematicians in the nineteenth and in the early twentieth centuries made Kant’s critical philosophy of geometry look somewhat unattractive. Indeed, from the wider perspective of the discovery of non-Euclidean geometries, the replacement of Newtonian physics with Einstein’s theories of relativity, and the rise of quantificational logic, Kant’s philosophy seems “quaint at best and silly at worst”.1 While there is no doubt that Kant’s transcendental project involves his own conceptions (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Georg Huber (1906). Graf von Benzel-Sternau und seine „Dichterischen Versuche über Gegenstände der kritischen Philosophie“. Kant-Studien 11 (1-3):1-39.
  22. Dale Jacquette (1991). Moral Dilemmas, Disjunctive Obligations, and Kant's Principle That 'Ought' Implies 'Can'. Synthese 88 (1):43 - 55.
    In moral dilemmas, where circumstances prevent two or more equally justified prima facie ethical requirements from being fulfilled, it is often maintained that, since the agent cannot do both, conjoint obligation is overridden by Kant's principle that ought implies can, but that the agent nevertheless has a disjunctive obligation to perform one of the otherwise obligatory actions or the other. Against this commonly received view, it is demonstrated that although Kant's ought-can principle may avoid logical inconsistency, the principle is incompatible (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Immanuel Kant (1798/1993). Essays and Treatises. Thoemmes Press.
  24. Fritz Karsch (1925). Christoph Gottfried Bardilis Logischer Realismus. Kant-Studien 30 (1-2):437-452.
  25. Moshe Kroy (1976). A Partial Formalization of Kant's Categorical Imperative. An Application of Deontic Logic to Classical Moral Philosophy. Kant-Studien 67 (1-4):192-209.
  26. Huaping Lu-Adler (forthcoming). Kant on the Logical Form of Singular Judgements. Kantian Review.
    At A71/B96-7 Kant explains that singular judgements are ‘special’ because they stand to the general ones as Einheit to Unendlichkeit. The reference to Einheit brings to mind the category of unity and hence raises a specter of circularity in Kant’s explanation. I aim to remove this specter by interpreting the Einheit-Unendlichkeit contrast in light of the logical distinctions among universal, particular and singular judgments shared by Kant and his logician predecessors. This interpretation has a further implication for resolving a controversy (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Huaping Lu-Adler (2013). The Objects and the Formal Truth of Kantian Analytic Judgments. History of Philosophy Quarterly 30 (2):177-93.
    I defend the thesis that Kantian analytic judgments are about objects (as opposed to concepts) against two challenges raised by recent scholars. First, can it accommodate cases like “A two-sided polygon is two-sided”, where no object really falls under the subject-concept as Kant sees it? Second, is it compatible with Kant’s view that analytic judgments make no claims about objects in the world and that we can know them to be true without going beyond the given concepts? I address these (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Wolfgang Marx (1979). Entfremdung Durch Reflexion. Transzendentalphilosophische Überlegungen Zur Logik des Entfremdungsbegriffs. Kant-Studien 70 (1-4):35-51.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Matthew McAndrew (2014). Kant's Theory of Inductive Reasoning: The Reflecting Power of Judgment in Kant's Logic. Kant Studies Online:43-64.
  30. Nikolay Milkov (2013). Kant’s Transcendental Turn as a Second Phase in the Logicization of Philosophy. In Stefano Bacin (ed.), Kant and Philosophy in a Cosmopolitan Sense, vol. 1. de Gruyter. 653-666.
    This paper advances an assessment of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason made from a bird’s eye view. Seen from this perspective, the task of Kant’s work was to ground the spontaneity of human reason, preserving at the same time the strict methods of science and mathematics. Kant accomplished this objective by reviving an old philosophical discipline: the peirastic dialectic of Plato and Aristotle. What is more, he managed to combine it with logic. From this blend, Kant’s transcendental idealism appeared as (...)
    No categories
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Kurt Mosser (2008). Kant's General Logic and Aristotle. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:181-189.
    In the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant uses the term “logic” in a bewildering variety of ways, at times making it close to impossible to determine whether he is referring to (among others) general logic, transcendental logic, transcendental analytic, a "special" logic relative to a specific science, a "natural" logic, a logic intended for the "learned" (Gelehrter), some hybrid of these logics, or even some still-more abstract notion that ranges over all of these uses. This paper seeks to come to (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Aleksy Mołczanow (2012). Quantification: Transcending Beyond Frege's Boundaries: A Case Study in Transcendental-Metaphysical Logic. Brill.
    Drawing on the original conception of Kant’s synthetic a priori and the relevant related developments in philosophy, this book presents a reconstruction of the intellectual history of the conception of quantity and offers an entirely ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. M. Oberhausen (1997). A Misplaced Leaf in the 'Logik Philippi'. On a Mistake in Volume XXIV. 1 of the Academy Edition of'Kant's Gesammelten Schriften'. [REVIEW] Kant-Studien 88 (4):462-466.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Lawrence Pasternack (2014). Kant on Opinion: Assent, Hypothesis, and the Norms of General Applied Logic. Kant-Studien 105 (1):41-82.
    Kant identifies knowledge [Wissen], belief [Glaube], and opinion [Meinung] as our three primary modes of “holding-to-be-true” [Fürwahrhalten]. He also identifies opinion as making up the greatest part of our cognition. After a preliminary sketch of Kant’s system of propositional attitudes, this paper will explore what he says about the norms governing opinion and empirical hypotheses. The final section will turn to what, in the Critique of Pure Reason and elsewhere, Kant refers to as “General Applied Logic”. It concerns the “contingent (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Carl J. Posy (1997). Between Leibniz and Mill: Kant's Logic and the Rhetoric of Psychologism. Philosophy and Rhetoric 30 (3):243 - 270.
  36. Riccardo Pozzo (2005). Prejudices and Horizons: G. F. Meier's. Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (2).
    : The object of G. F. Meier's Vernunftlehre and its abridgement for courses, the Auszug aus der Vernunftlehre, does not consist exclusively in the elaboration of the formal aspects of logic, but rather in the individuation of the elements of thought and language, which make human understanding possible. Instead of limiting himself to formal truth, Meier investigates the realms of epistemic, aesthetic, and historic truths, of horizons, and prejudices. Kant used both Meier's Vernunftlehre and its Auszug for about forty years (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Henrique Jales Ribeiro (2005). Kant, os começos da Filosofia Analítica e o Wiener Kreis. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 61 (3/4):883 - 899.
    O presente artigo brota da constatação de que, desde os sens inícios, com Frege, Russell e Wittgenstein, a filosofia analítica partiu do pressuposto de que Kant era o seu principal inimigo de entre os grandes autores da história da filosofia. Uma vez eliminados o papel fundamental da ideia de um sujeito de conhecimento e o psicologismo que daí se seguia, e reposto no seu devido lugar, quer dizer, depurado de implicações epistemológicas espúrias, o estatuto da lógica como empreendimento radical de (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Frank Schalow (1994). The Unique Role of Logic in the Development of Heidegger's Dialogue with Kant. Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (1):103-125.
  39. Dennis Schulting (2012). Review of L'universo Kantiano. Filosofia, Scienze, Sapere. [REVIEW] Studi Kantiani:159-161.
  40. David Sherry (1999). Construction and Reductio Proof. Kant-Studien 90 (1):23-39.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Nicholas F. Stang (2011). Did Kant Conflate the Necessary and the A Priori? Noûs 45 (3):443-471.
    It is commonly accepted by Kant scholars that Kant held that all necessary truths are a priori, and all a priori knowledge is knowledge of necessary truths. Against the prevailing interpretation, I argue that Kant was agnostic as to whether necessity and a priority are co-extensive. I focus on three kinds of modality Kant implicitly distinguishes: formal possibility and necessity, empirical possibility and necessity, and noumenal possibility and necessity. Formal possibility is compatibility with the forms of experience; empirical possibility is (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Roland J. Teske (1976). "Logic," by Immanuel Kant, Trans., with an Introduction by Robert S. Hartman and Wolfgang Schwarz. The Modern Schoolman 53 (2):221-222.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Lucas Thorpe (2011). One Community or Many? From Logic to Juridical Law, Via Metaphysics [in Kant]. In Howard Williams, Sorin Baiasu & Sami Pihlstrom (eds.), Politics and Metaphysics in Kant. Political Philosophy Now: University of Wales Press.
  44. Mary Tiles (1980). Kant, Wittgenstein and the Limits of Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 1 (1-2):151-170.
    This paper has two purposes. (1) To justify the claim that there is an important distinction underlying the saying/showing distinction of the Tractatus; the distinction which Kant characterises as that between historical and rational knowledge. (2) To argue that it is because the Tractatus accepts Frege/Russell logic as a complete representation of all thought according to laws, that what is shown cannot be recognised as knowledge. This is done by interpolating Frege's logical innovations between the views of Kant and Wittgenstein (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Clinton Tolley (2012). Bolzano and Kant on the Nature of Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (4):307-327.
    Here I revisit Bolzano's criticisms of Kant on the nature of logic. I argue that while Bolzano is correct in taking Kant to conceive of the traditional logic as a science of the activity of thinking rather than the content of thought, he is wrong to charge Kant with a failure to identify and examine this content itself within logic as such. This neglects Kant's own insistence that traditional logic does not exhaust logic as such, since it must be supplemented (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Clinton Tolley (2012). Bolzano and Kant on the Place of Subjectivity in a Wissenschaftslehre. Grazer Philosophische Studien 85 (1):63-88.
  47. Clinton Tolley (2008). Kant and the Normativity of Logic. In Valerio Rohden (ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International Kant Congress. de Gruyter. 1--215.
  48. Alberto Vanzo (2012). Kant on Truth-Aptness. History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (2):109-126.
    Many scholars claimed that, according to Immanuel Kant, some judgements lack a truth-value: analytic judgements, judgements about items of which humans cannot have experience, judgements of perception, and non-assertoric judgements. However, no one has undertaken an extensive examination of the textual evidence for those claims. Based on an analysis of Kant's texts, I argue that: (1) according to Kant, only judgements of perception are not truth-apt. All other judgements are truth-apt, including analytic judgements and judgements about items of which humans (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Francis Augustine Walsh (1928). The Theory of Fallacy in Aristotle and Kant. New Scholasticism 2 (4):357-366.
  50. W. H. Werkmeister (1973). Analytic and Synthetic Concepts According to Kant's Logik. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):25-28.
1 — 50 / 51