About this topic
Summary Kant's thought about logic is at once central to his own philosophical system and also stands at a key transitional moment in the broader history of logic and philosophy of logic.  Kant conceives of logic as the science of our understanding, which means that it is tasked with discovering the basic kinds of activities that our understanding is capable of (formal logic), as well as the basic kinds of representational contents (concepts) that our understanding makes use of in these acts (transcendental logic).  Because forming a science is itself one of these acts, and because philosophy itself is intended to be a science, Kant thinks that logic provides philosophy with the core blueprint of its structure -- a thought exemplified by his famous organizational 'Tables', and picked up by later German Idealists (among others).  Yet because Kant thinks that our minds are capable of more than just understanding, both in terms of the kinds of its activity and in terms of the representational contents it can engage with, Kant thinks that the knowledge provided within logic is sharply limited.  Critically revisiting these alleged restrictions provided inspiration for many of those responsible for the most influential developments in the subsequent history of logic (such as Bolzano, Frege, and Russell).
Key works Despite its central importance for his philosophical system, Kant himself did not publish a separate work on logic during his lifetime.  Nevertheless, Kant does present his views on logic in almost all of his most important theoretical writings, including Kant 1998, and works collected in Kant 2002 and Kant 2002.  What is more, Kant lectured on logic throughout the entirety of his career, and the surviving student transcripts of some of these lectures provide us with a further window into Kant's thought about logic, some of which are collected in Kant 1992.  Finally, the vast collection of notes and fragments that Kant left after his death contain many brief discussions about logic, some of which can be found in Kant 2005.
  Show all references
Related categories
Subcategories:See also:
344 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 344
Material to categorize
  1. Anthony Anderson (1970). Review: Lewis White Beck, Can Kant's Synthetic Judgements Be Made Analytic? [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):167-168.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Francesco Barone (1956). Kant e la logica formale. Filosofia 7 (4):697-750.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. J. Bergmann (1899). Zur Lehre Kants von den logischen Grundsätzen. Kant-Studien 2 (1-3):323-348.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Jean-Yves Beziau (2008). What is “Formal Logic”? Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 13:9-22.
    “Formal logic”, an expression created by Kant to characterize Aristotelian logic, has also been used as a name for modern logic, originated by Boole and Frege, which in many aspects differs radically from traditional logic. We shed light on this paradox by distinguishing in this paper five different meanings of the expression “formal logic”: (1) Formal reasoning according to the Aristotelian dichotomy of form and content, (2) Formal logic as a formal science by opposition to an empirical science, (3) Formal (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5. T. Boswell (1994). I. KANT "Lectures on Logic". [REVIEW] History and Philosophy of Logic 15 (2):244.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Mirella Capozzi (2001). Dialectic, Probability and Verisimilitude in Kant's Logic. In V. Fano, M. Stanzione & G. Tarozzi (eds.), Prospettive Della Logica E Della Filosofia Della Scienza. Rubettino 31.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. James Collins (1977). Kant's Logic as a Critical Aid. Review of Metaphysics 30 (3):440 - 461.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. James Collins (1977). "Kants Logik: Eine Interpretation Auf der Grundlage von Vorlesungen, Veröffentlichten Werken Und Nachlass," by Rainer Stuhlmann-Laeisz. [REVIEW] Modern Schoolman 54 (3):311-312.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Alfredo Ferrarin (1997). Review of G. Tonelli, Kant's "Critique of Pure Reason" Within the Tradition of Modern Logic. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (3):472-474.
  10. D. Foellesdal (forthcoming). Bolzano's Legacy Bernard Bolzano (1781-1848) Was an Original and Independent Thinker, Who Left a Lasting Legacy in Several Areas of Philosophy. [REVIEW] Grazer Philosophische Studien.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Dagfin Føllesdal (1997). Bolzano's Legacy. Grazer Philosophische Studien 53:1-11.
    Bernard Bolzano (1781-1848) was an original and independent thinker, who left a lasting legacy in several areas of philosophy. Four such areas are singled for special attention: political philosophy, ethics and theology, logics and semantics, and mathematics. In all these areas he was far ahead of his time. He had pioneering ideas in political philosophy and in ethics and philosophy of religion, and he argued for them in a brilliantly clear way. In logic and semantics he anticipated Frege, Carnap and (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Catalina González (2015). Kant, Cicero, and «Popularity» in the Lectures on Logic. In Ubirajara Rancan de Azevedo Marques, Robert Louden, Claudio La Rocca & Bernd Dörflinger (eds.), Kant's Lectures / Kants Vorlesungen. De Gruyter 47-60.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Bruno Haas (2004). Kant et la raison comme fonctionnalité logique. Archives de Philosophie 3:379-398.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Norbert Hinske (1994). Tra Illuminismo e critica della ragione: il significato filosofico del corpus logico di Kant. Rivista di Filosofia 85 (2):163-183.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Robert A. Holland (1993). Immanuel Kant, Lectures on Logic Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 13 (5):239-241.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. F. Hughes (1995). I Kant ’s Lectures On Logic; I.Kant ’s Theoretical Writings 1755-1770. [REVIEW] Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 32:14-18.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Immanuel Kant, John Richardson & W. Simpkin and R. Marshall (1819). Logic From the German of Emmanuel Kant, M.A. ... To Which is Annexed a Sketch of His Life and Writings. Printed for W. Simpkin and R. Marshall ..
  18. Masashi Kasaki & C. Jenkins (2015). The Traditional Conception of the a Priori. Synthese 192 (9):2725-2746.
    In this paper, we explore the traditional conception of a prioricity as epistemic independence of evidence from sense experience. We investigate the fortunes of the traditional conception in the light of recent challenges by Timothy Williamson. We contend that Williamson’s arguments can be resisted in various ways. En route, we argue that Williamson’s views are not as distant from tradition as they might seem at first glance.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Anders Kraal (2013). The Aim of Russell's Early Logicism: A Reinterpretation. Synthese 191 (7):1-18.
    I argue that three main interpretations of the aim of Russell’s early logicism in The Principles of Mathematics (1903) are mistaken, and propose a new interpretation. According to this new interpretation, the aim of Russell’s logicism is to show, in opposition to Kant, that mathematical propositions have a certain sort of complete generality which entails that their truth is independent of space and time. I argue that on this interpretation two often-heard objections to Russell’s logicism, deriving from Gödel’s incompleteness theorem (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Huaping Lu-Adler (2016). Kant on Proving Aristotle’s Logic as Complete. Kantian Review 21 (1):1-26.
    Kant claims that Aristotles logic as complete, explain the historical and philosophical considerations that commit him to proving the completeness claim and sketch the proof based on materials from his logic corpus. The proof will turn out to be an integral part of Kant’s larger reform of formal logic in response to a foundational crisis facing it.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Danielle MacBeth (1995). The Logic of Relations and the Ideality of Space. Journal of Philosophical Research 20:367-379.
    As Friedman has argued, Kant's argument for the ideality of space turns on the nondeductive character of geometrical reasoning in Euclid's system. Since geometry can be axiomatized, this argument fails. But ("pace" Russell) Leibniz's argument based on the unreality of constitutive relations is not thereby answered as well. I argue that what is needed in response to Leibniz is a properly post-Kantian conception of concepts as inferentially articulated. This conception, I suggest, is based on the same fundamental insight that underlies (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Penelope Maddy (2012). The Philosophy of Logic. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 18 (4):481-504.
    This talk surveys a range of positions on the fundamental metaphysical and epistemological questions about elementary logic, for example, as a starting point: what is the subject matter of logic—what makes its truths true? how do we come to know the truths of logic? A taxonomy is approached by beginning from well-known schools of thought in the philosophy of mathematics—Logicism, Intuitionism, Formalism, Realism—and sketching roughly corresponding views in the philosophy of logic. Kant, Mill, Frege, Wittgenstein, Carnap, Ayer, Quine, and Putnam (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Ulrich Majer (2006). The Relation of Logic and Intuition in Kant's Philosophy of Science, Particularly Geometry. In Emily Carson & Renate Huber (eds.), Intuition and the Axiomatic Method. Springer 47--66.
  24. Wayne Martin, Inverse Psychologism in the Theory of Judgment.
    Outline: 1. Why Judgment? 2. Inverse Psychologism: General Issues 3. Inverse Psychologism in the Phenomeno-Logic of Judgment 4. Judgment and Language 5. [De-]stabilizing Kant ’s Inverse Psychologism.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. H. E. Matthews (1970). Kant's Transcendental Logic. Philosophical Books 11 (2):28-29.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Emily Michael (1978). Peirce's Adaptation of Kant's Definition of Logic: The Early Manuscripts. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 14 (3):176 - 183.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Imtiaz Moosa (1995). Formalism of Kant's A Priori Versus Scheler's Material A Priori. International Studies in Philosophy 27 (2):33-47.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Chris Onof, Thinking the in-Itself and its Relation to Appearances.
    Book synopsis: This key collection of essays sheds new light on long-debated controversies surrounding Kant’s doctrine of idealism and is the first book in the English language that is exclusively dedicated to the subject. Well-known Kantians Karl Ameriks and Manfred Baum present their considered views on this most topical aspect of Kant's thought. Several essays by acclaimed Kant scholars broach a vastly neglected problem in discussions of Kant's idealism, namely the relation between his conception of logic and idealism: The standard (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. George Henry Radcliffe Parkinson (1970). Francesco Barone: Logica formale E logica trascendentale. I: Da Leibniz a Kant. [REVIEW] Studia Leibnitiana 2:67.
  30. T. Pinder (2000). On the Akademie Edition of the New Logic Writings From the Previously Unpublished Works of Kant. Kant-Studien 91:172-177.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Tillmann Pinder (1979). Kants Begriff der Logik. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61 (3):309-336.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Marcin Poręba (2013). Two Concepts of Apriority. Dialogue and Universalism 23 (2):43-53.
    The paper considers two—in author’s belief fundamental—approaches to apriority, which he proposes to call “absolute” and “relative.” The first was most fully expressed by Immanuel Kant, the second by Ludwig Wittgenstein. In author’s opinion, both derive from empiricist philosophy in its modern form. The concept of experience which is characteristic of modern empiricism forces acceptance of certain experienceindependent (a priori) assumptions, thanks to which only experience can provide information about objects. Depending on whether we regard these assumptions as independent of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. R. Pozzo (1999). I. KANT Logik-Vorlesungen: Unveroffentliche Nachschriften. History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (2):133-133.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Hoke Robinson (2007). Comments on Mosser's "Kant and the Logic of Aristotle". Southwest Philosophy Review 23 (2):33-36.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Sebastian Rödl (2012). Categories of the Temporal: An Inquiry Into the Forms of the Finite Understanding. Harvard University Press.
    The publication of Frege’s Begriffsschrift in 1879 forever altered the landscape for many Western philosophers. Here, Sebastian Rödl traces how the Fregean influence, written all over the development and present state of analytic philosophy, led into an unholy alliance of an empiricist conception of sensibility with an inferentialist conception of thought. -/- According to Rödl, Wittgenstein responded to the implosion of Frege’s principle that the nature of thought consists in its inferential order, but his Philosophical Investigations shied away from offering (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36. Paul Rusnock (ed.) (2000). Bolzano's Philosophy and the Emergence of Modern Mathematics. Rodopi.
    Contents: Acknowledgements. Conventions. Preface. Biographical sketch. 1 Introduction. 2 The Contributions. 3 Early work in analysis. 4 The Theory of Science . 5. Later mathematical studies. A On Kantian Intuitions. B The Bolzano-Cauchy Theorem.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  37. Paul Rusnock (1999). Philosophy of Mathematics: Bolzano's Responses to Kant and Lagrange/La Philosophie des Mathématiques: Les Réponses de Bolzano À Kant Et Lagrange. Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 52 (3):399-428.
  38. Pedro Santos (2012). A Note on Kant's Formal Logic. Manuscrito 35 (1):99-113.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Centro Fiorentino di Storia E. Filisofia Della Scienza (1992). Bolzano's Wissenschaftslehre, 1837-1987 International Workshop.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Marco Sgarbi (2013). Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason Within the Tradition of Modern Logic. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter 497-508.
  41. Marco Sgarbi (2009). Kant, Rabe e la logica aristotelica. Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia (2):289-313.
    Kant, Rabe e la logica aristotelica - This article shows the influence of the Aristotelian Paul Rabe on Immanuel Kant’s philosophy. In the first part, I reconstruct the status quaestions regarding Rabe in Aristotelian studies and in Kantforschung. The second part looks at Rabe’s life and works. It is demonstrated in the third part that Kant’s definition of dialectic as Logik des Scheins comes from Rabe’s definition of dialectic as logica ex apparentibus. The fourth part shows the Aristotelian origin of (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Peter Simons (2003). Bolzano sur les nombres. Philosophiques 30 (1):127-135.
    Dans cet article, l’auteur présente la théorie bolzanienne du nombre. Il établit, sur la base d’une comparaison avec Frege, que la conception bolzanienne rencontre toutes les exigences d’une telle théorie tout en présentant plusieurs traits originaux, comme par exemple le fait qu’elle s’articule sur la base d’une théorie des « collections » , qui lui confèrent un intérêt philosophique certain. Tout en indiquant au passage un problème inhérent à la notion bolzanienne de Reihe, l’auteur présente la conception bolzanienne des nombres (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Maria Jesús Vásquez Lobeiras (1998). Die Logik und ihr Spiegelbild: Das Verhältnis von formaler und transzendentaler Logik in Kants philosophischer Entwicklung. Lang.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Maria Jesús Vásquez Lobeiras (1998). Die Logik und ihr Spiegelbild: Das Verhältnis von formaler und transzendentaler Logik in Kants philosophischer Entwicklung. Lang.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Richard Velkley (1986). Kant on the Primacy and the Limits of Logic. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 11 (2):147-162.
    KANT ASSERTS THAT "ONTOLOGY IS NOTHING OTHER THAN A TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC," AND HE BOTH CONTINUES AND CRITICIZES A TRADITION IN WHICH LOGIC SERVES AS FOUNDATION FOR ONTOLOGY. TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC IS A META-LOGIC THAT CRITICIZES THE FOUNDATIONAL COMPET.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Mscislaw Wartenberg (1900). Der Begriff des „transscendentalen Gegenstandes“ bei Kant — und Schopenhauers Kritik desselben. Kant-Studien 4 (1-3):202-231.
  47. T. E. Wilkerson (1975). Robert Hartman and Wolfgang Schwarz (Eds.), Kant's Logic. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 25 (99):164.
  48. John H. Zammito (2008). Kant and Naturalism Reconsidered. Inquiry 51 (5):532 – 558.
    Reconstructions of Kant are prominent in the contemporary debate over naturalism. Given that this naturalism rejects a priori principles, Kant's anti-naturalism can best be discerned in the “critical turn” as a response to David Hume. Hume did not awaken Kant to criticize but to defend rational metaphysics. But when Kant went transcendental did he not, in fact, go transcendent? The controversy in the 1990s over John McDowell's Mind and World explored just this suspicion: the questions of the normative force of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  49. Piotr Łaciak (2005). Kant I Husserl a Problem Materialnego a Priori. Nowa Krytyka 18.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 344