This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
59 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 59
  1. Henry E. Allison (1973). Kant's Critique of Berkeley. Journal of the History of Philosophy 11 (1).
  2. Richard E. Aquila (2003). Hans Vaihinger and Some Recent Intentionalist Readings of Kant. Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2):231-250.
    BRENTANO'S APPROPRIATION OF THE Scholastic notion of intentionality, and of what Brentano called "the intentional (or mental) inexistence of an object," was early on exploited in a reading of Kant's theory of objects and appearances. Apparently the first systematic attempt was undertaken by Hans Vaihinger. However, Vaihinger's is radically different from more recent intentionalist readings of Kant. Albeit not in every respect, I propose that a return to this aspect of Vaihinger's approach supports a rewarding advance on such readings. After (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Patrick E. Arens (2010). Kant and the Understanding's Role in Imaginative Synthesis. Kant Yearbook 2 (1).
  4. N. Avgelis (1991). The Relevance of Duhem and Quine Thesis in the Light of Kant Cognitive Theory. Kant-Studien 82 (3):285-302.
  5. J. Benoist (1998). The Unthinkability of Representation: From Leibniz to Kant. Kant-Studien 89 (3):300-317.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. M. C. Bettoni (forthcoming). Mit Kant fortschreiten in der Künstlichen Intelligenz (1). Kant Yearbook.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Daniel Breazeale (2001). Fichte's Conception of Philosophy as a "Pragmatic History of the Human Mind" and the Contributions of Kant, Platner, and Maimon. Journal of the History of Ideas 62 (4):685-703.
  8. Nathan Brett (1983). Hume's Debt to Kant. Hume Studies 9 (1):59-73.
  9. Andrew Brook (2006). Kant: A Unified Representational Base for All Consciousness. In Uriah Kriegel & Kenneth Williford (eds.), Self-Representational Approaches to Consciousness. MIT Press. 89-109.
  10. Andrew Brook (1997). Unity of Consciousness and Other Mental Unities. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Ablex Press.
    Though there has been a huge resurgence of interest in consciousness in the past decade, little attention has been paid to what the philosopher Immanuel Kant and others call the unity of consciousness. The unity of consciousness takes different forms, as we will see, but the general idea is that each of us is aware of many things in the world at the same time, and often many of one's own mental states and of oneself as their single common subject, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Andrew Brook (1994). Kant and the Mind. Cambridge University Press.
    Kant made a number of highly original discoveries about the mind - about its ability to synthesise a single, coherent representation of self and world, about the unity it must have to do so, and about the mind's awareness of itself and the semantic apparatus it uses to achieve this awareness. The past fifty years have seen intense activity in research on human cognition. Even so, Kant's discoveries have not been superseded, and some of them have not even been assimilated (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Richard Brown, Kant, Polysolipsism, and the Real Unity of Experience.
    The question I am interested in revolves around Kant’s notion of the unity of experience. My central claim will be that, apart from the unity of experiencings and the unity of individual substances, there is a third unity: the unity of Experience. I will argue that this third unity can be conceived of as a sort of ‘experiential space’ with the Aesthetic and Categories as dimensions. I call this ‘Euclidean Experience’ to emphasize the idea that individual experiencings have a ‘location’ (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Etienne Brun-Rovet (2002). Reid, Kant and the Philosophy of Mind. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):495-510.
    I suggest a possible rehabilitation of Reid's philosophy of mind by a constructive use of Kant's criticisms of the common sense tradition. Kant offers two criticisms, explicitly claiming that common sense philosophy is ill directed methodologically, and implicitly rejecting Reid's view that there is direct epistemological access by introspection to the ontology of mind. Putting the two views together reveals a tension between epistemology and ontology, but the problem which Kant finds in Reid also infects his own system, as his (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Vladimir Bryushinkin (1999). Kant, Frege and the Problem of Psychologism. Kant-Studien 90 (1):59-74.
  15. Gertrude C. Bussey (1922). Anticipations of Kant's Refutation of Sensationalism. Philosophical Review 31 (6):564-580.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Claudio Cesa (2009). Paola Rumore, L'ordine delle idee. La genesi del concetto di rappresentazione in Kant attraverso le sue fonti wolffiane. [REVIEW] Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 4:862.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Brian Chance (2007). Review: Waxman, Kant and the Empiricists: Understanding Understanding. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 60 (4):893-894.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. James Conant (1992). The Search for Logically Alien Thought: Descartes, Kant, Frege, and the Tractatus. Philosophical Topics 20 (1):115-180.
  19. Joe Cruz, A Humean Psychological Alternative to Kant and Wittgenstein: Comments on Stueber's Importance of Simulation for Understanding Linguistic and Rational Agency.
    Let me begin by saying that I am sympathetic to the simulation theory, especially where it is conceived of as a crucial and central addition alongside the theory-theory as the explanation of our capacity to attribute mental states, rather than as an exclusive and exhaustive account by itself.1 I part company with Professor Stueber, however, in that I view the recent simulation theory/theory- theory controversy as subject to resolution primarily through empirical findings. Still, it cannot be denied that Stueber has (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Gilles Deleuze (1984). Kant's Critical Philosophy: The Doctrine of the Faculties. Athlone Press.
  21. Theodore di Maria Jr (2009). Is Kant's Theoretical Doctrine of the Self Consistent with His Thesis of Noumenal Ignorance? International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (1).
    The relation between the concepts of the subject of apperception, the phenomenal self, and the noumenal self has long puzzled commentators on Kant’s theoretical account of the self. This paper argues that many of the puzzles surrounding Kant’s account can be resolved by treating the subject of apperception and other transcendental predicates of thinking as a dimension of the noumenal self. Yet this interpretation requires a clarification of how the transcendental predicates of thinking can be attributed to the noumenal self (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. G. Dwelshauvers (1909). La Synthèse mentale. Kant-Studien 14 (1-3):86-88.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Crawford L. Elder (1980). Kant and the Unity of Experience. Kant-Studien 71 (1-4):299-307.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Chiara Fabbrizi (2008). Mente E Corpo in Kant. Aracne.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Volker Gerhardt (1979). Kant Und Die Dogmatismusforschung. Kant-Studien 70 (1-4):324-338.
  26. P. Guyer (2006). Review: Burnham, Kant's Philosophies of Judgement. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (1):99-102.
  27. Andy Hamilton (1993). Kant's Theory of Self-Consciousness. Philosophical Books 34 (1):19-21.
  28. Richard Hönigswald (1913). Prinzipienfragen der Denkpsychologie. Kant-Studien 18 (1-3):205-245.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Erwin Hufnagel (1974). Aspekte der Schelerschen Personlehre. Kant-Studien 65 (1-4):436-456.
  30. Philip J. Kain (1989). Kant and the Possibility of Uncategorized Experience. Idealistic Studies 19 (2):154-173.
  31. Immanuel Kant (2007). Essay on the Maladies of the Head (1764). In , Anthropology, History, and Education. Cambridge University Press.
  32. Immanuel Kant, On Comprehension and Transcendental Consciousness (German).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Patricia Kitcher (2013). Kant Versus the Asymmetry Dogma. Kant Yearbook 5 (1).
    One of the most widely accepted contemporary constraints on theories of self-knowledge is that they must account for the very different ways in which cognitive subjects know their own minds and the ways in which they know other minds. Through the influence of Peter Strawson, Kant is often taken to be an original source for this view. I argue that Kant is quite explicit in holding the opposite position. In a little discussed passage in the Paralogisms chapter, he argues that (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Joseph A. Leighton (1925). Kant, the Seminal Thinker. The Monist 35 (2):224-240.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Dieter Lohmar (1993). Grundzüge Eines Synthesis-Modells der Auffassung: Kant Und Husserl Über den Ordnungsgrad Sinnlicher Vorgegebenheiten Und Die Elemente Einer Phänomenologie der Auffassung. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 10 (2):111-141.
  36. Beatrice Longuenesse (forthcoming). Kant's 'I' and Freud's Ego. In Stefano Bacin, Alfredo Ferrarin, Claudio La Rocca & Margit Ruffing (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Kant Congress. Walter De Gruyter.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Arthur O. Lovejoy (1907). Kant's Classification of the Forms of Judgment. Philosophical Review 16 (6):588-603.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Colin Marshall (forthcoming). Does Kant Demand Explanations for All Synthetic a Priori Claims? Journal of the History of Philosophy.
    Most of Kant's readers have assumed that he demanded explanations for all synthetic a priori claims. I argue that this is not the case, and that Kant accepted some synthetic a priori claims as basic. I further argue that he took himself to be justified in making such claims on the basis of a certain sort of robust reflection. In essence, Kant's method is more like that of the phenomenologists than that of 20th century analytic philosophers.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. G. J. Mattey (1986). Kant's Theory of Propositional Attitudes. Kant-Studien 77 (1-4):423-440.
    Kant was among the first philosophers to recognize that modalities come in many varieties, And that there are systematic connections among them--An insight which has since been confirmed by the multitude of applications of the basic techniques of formalized modal logic. In particular, He recognized an affinity among what are now called doxastic and epistemic logics, As well as with a logic of judging which has not exact counterpart in contemporary thought. This paper will be concerned with the explication of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Matthew McAndrew (forthcoming). Healthy Understanding and Urtheilskraft: The Development of the Power of Judgment in Kant's Early Faculty Psychology. Kant-Studien.
    In the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant posits a special mental faculty that he calls the ‘power of judgment’ [Urtheilskraft]. He describes it as our capacity to apply rules. This faculty is not found in the psychology of any of Kant’s predecessors, nor is it found in his own early philosophy. This raises the question: when did Kant first introduce the power of judgment? In this paper, I demonstrate that Kant introduced this faculty during the mid-1770s, most likely between the (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Wp Mendonca (1990). Psychophysical Materialism From the Perspective of Kant and Wittgenstein. Kant-Studien 81 (3):339-359.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. August Messer (1906). Die Philosophie im Beginn des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts. Kant-Studien 11 (1-3):390-424.
  43. Eugenio Moya (2005). Epigénesisy Validez: EI Papel de la Embriología En El Programa Transcendental de Kant (Epigenesis and Validity: The Role of the Embriology in Kant's Transcendental Program). Theoria 20 (2):143-166.
    Este artículo examina eI significado de los términos biológicos “epigénesis” y “preformación” en eI desarrollo imelectual de Kant, así como sus implicaciones epistemológicas. De hecho, las ideas de espontaneidad y sistema, centrales en la teoría kantiana de la mente, encontraron su analogía empírica en la idea de epigénesis de la naturaleza, una noción que Kant utiliza para dar respuesta a la cuestión de la genesis y validez de las represenraciones puras. Para el autor, la idea de epigénesis compendia la revolución (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Christopher Norris (2000). McDowell on Kant: Redrawing the Bounds of Sense. Metaphilosophy 31 (4):382-411.
  45. S. C. Patten (1976). Hume's Bundles, Self-Consciousness and Kant. Hume Studies 2 (2):59-75.
  46. Bindu Puri, Heiko Sievers & Bijoy H. Boruah (eds.) (2007). Reason, Morality, and Beauty: Essays on the Philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Oxford University Press.
    This collection of essays by eminent scholars on the reconstruction and critique of Kant's transcendental philosophy in the Indian context specifically discusses moral philosophy, philosophical psychology, religion, and aesthetics.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Timothy Rosenkoetter (2011). Kant's Theory of Action, by Richard McCarty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, Xxiv + 250 Pp. ISBN 978-0-19-956772-0 Hb £37.50. [REVIEW] European Journal of Philosophy 19 (4):640-646.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Claudia M. Schmidt (2005). Psychologism and Cognitive Theory in Hume and Kant: A Response to Kitcher. Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (4):621-641.
  49. Hubert Schwyzer (1997). Subjectivity in Descartes and Kant. Philosophical Quarterly 47 (188):342-357.
    Kant’s response to Cartesian scepticism is often characterized in the following way. Whereas Descartes drives a wedge between subjective experience and objective reality, Kant argues that there could be no such thing as experience at all if reality were not itself structured in just the way our thought about it is structured. This picture of Kant’s response to Descartes portrays him as succeeding, where Descartes fails, in arguing directly from the nature of experience to the nature of reality; as subscribing, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. David G. Stern (1988). What is the Ground of the Relationship of That in Us Which We Call "Representation" to the Object?' Reflections on the Kantian Legacy in the Philosophy of Mind. In Peter Hare (ed.), Doing Philosophy Historically. Prometheus Press.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 59