Related categories
Siblings:
70 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 70
  1. Lilian Alweiss (2005). Is There an ‘End’ to Philosophical Scepticism? Philosophy 80 (3):395-411.
    P F Strawson advocates a descriptive metaphysics. Contrary to Kant, he believes that metaphysics should be ‘content to describe the actual structure of thought about the world’, there is no need of postulating a world that lies beyond our grasp. We neither need to refute nor accept scepticism since we can ignore it with good reasons. Yet this paper argues that Strawson fails to provide us with good reasons. He fails to realise that one cannot do metaphysics by construing its (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Abraham Anderson (1998). On the Practical Foundation of Kant's Response to Epistemic Skepticism. Kant-Studien 89 (2):145-166.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Ralf M. Bader (2012). The Role of Kant's Refutation of Idealism. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94 (1):53-73.
    This paper assesses the role of the Refutation of Idealism within the Critique of Pure Reason, as well as its relation to the treatment of idealism in the First Edition and to transcendental idealism more generally. It is argued that the Refutation is consistent with the Fourth Paralogism and that it can be considered as an extension of the Transcendental Deduction. While the Deduction, considered on its own, constitutes a 'regressive argument', the Refutation allows us to turn the Transcendental Analytic (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Gary Banham, Kant's Refutations of Idealism.
  5. Gary Banham (2010). Scepticism, Causation and Cognition. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):507-520.
  6. Adrian Bardon (2004). Kant's Empiricism in His Refutation of Idealism. Kantian Review 8 (1):62-88.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Nathan Bauer (2010). Kant's Subjective Deduction. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):433-460.
    In the transcendental deduction, the central argument of the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant seeks to secure the objective validity of our basic categories of thought. He distinguishes objective and subjective sides of this argument. The latter side, the subjective deduction, is normally understood as an investigation of our cognitive faculties. It is identified with Kant’s account of a threefold synthesis involved in our cognition of objects of experience, and it is said to precede and ground Kant’s proof of the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. G. Anthony Bruno (forthcoming). Epistemic Reciprocity in Schelling's Late Return to Kant. In Pablo Muchnik (ed.), Rethinking Kant (volume 4). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    In his 1841-2 Berlin lectures, Schelling critiques German idealism’s negative method of regressing from existence to its first principle, which is supposed to be intelligible without remainder. He sees existence as precisely its remainder since there could be nothing that exists. To solve this, Schelling enlists the positive method of progressing from the fact of existence to a proof of this principle’s reality. Since this proof faces the absurdity that there is anything rather than nothing, he concludes that this fact’s (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. John J. Callanan (2006). Kant's Transcendental Strategy. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (224):360–381.
    The interpretation of transcendental arguments remains a contentious issue for contemporary epistemology. It is usually agreed that they originated in Kant's theoretical philosophy and were intended to have some kind of anti-sceptical efficacy. I argue that the sceptic with whom Kant was concerned has been consistently misidentified. The actual sceptic was Hume, questioning whether the faculty of reason can justify any of our judgements whatsoever. His challenge is a sceptical argument regarding rule-following which engenders a vicious regress. Once this sceptical (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. H. G. Callaway (ed.) (2003). W.V. Quine, Immanuel Kant Lectures, translated and introduced by H.G. Callaway. Frommann-Holzboog.
    This book is a translation of W.V. Quine's Kant Lectures, given as a series at Stanford University in 1980. It provide a short and useful summary of Quine's philosophy. There are four lectures altogether: I. Prolegomena: Mind and its Place in Nature; II. Endolegomena: From Ostension to Quantification; III. Endolegomena loipa: The forked animal; and IV. Epilegomena: What's It all About? The Kant Lectures have been published to date only in Italian and German translation. The present book is filled out (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Luigi Caranti (2004). Kant E Lo Scetticismo. Marco.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Luigi Caranti (2004). The Problem of Idealism in Kants Pre-Critical Period. Kant Studien 95 (3):283-303.
  13. Luigi Caranti (2003). Review: Heidemann, Kant Und Das Problem des Metaphysischen Idealismus. [REVIEW] American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (2):299-302.
  14. Quassim Cassam (1993). Inner Sense, Body Sense, and Kant's "Refutation of Idealism&Quot;. European Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):111-127.
  15. Brian Chance (2014). Kant and the Discipline of Reason. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4).
    Kant's notion of ‘discipline’ has received considerable attention from scholars of his philosophy of education, but its role in his theoretical philosophy has been largely ignored. This omission is surprising since his discussion of discipline in the first Critique is not only more extensive and expansive in scope than his other discussions but also predates them. The goal of this essay is to provide a comprehensive reading of the Discipline that emphasizes its systematic importance in the first Critique. I argue (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Andrew Chignell & Colin McLear (2010). Three Skeptics and the Critique. [REVIEW] Philosophical Books 51 (4):228-244.
    A long critical notice of Michael Forster's recent book, "Kant and Skepticism." We argue that Forster's characterization of Kant's response to skepticism is both textually dubious and philosophically flawed. -/- .
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Georges Dicker (2010). Review: Forster, Kant and Skepticism. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (4):609-615.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Corey W. Dyck (2009). Review: Guyer, Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant's Response to Hume. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (5):613-619.
  19. Dina Edmundts (2010). The Refutation of Idealism and the Distinction Between Phenomena and Noumena. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
  20. Lorne Falkenstein (1998). Hume's Answer to Kant. Noûs 32 (3):331-360.
  21. Vanderlei de Oliveira Farias (2006). Kants Realismus Und der Aussenweltskeptizismus. G. Olms.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Michael Forster, Hegelian Vs. Kantian Interpretations of Pyrrhonism: Revolution or Reaction?
    This paper concerns a surprisingly sharp disagreement about the nature of ancient Pyrrhonism which first emerges clearly in Kant and Hegel, but which continues in contemporary interpretations. The paper begins by explaining the character of this disagreement, then attempts to adjudicate it in the light of the ancient texts.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Paul W. Franks (2005). All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism. Harvard University Press.
    In this work, the first overview of the German Idealism that is both conceptual and methodological, Paul W. Franks offers a philosophical reconstruction that is ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Craig French (2009). Review: Forster, Kant and Skepticism. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 50 (2):334-335.
  25. Jonathan Friday (2005). Dugald Stewart on Reid, Kant and the Refutation of Idealism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (2):263 – 286.
  26. Michael Friedman (2006). Kant, Skepticism, and Idealism. Inquiry 49 (1):26 – 43.
    Skeptical problems arising for Kant's version of transcendental idealism have been raised from Kant's own time to the present day. By focussing on how such problems originally arose in the wake of Kant's work, and on the first formulations of absolute idealism by Schelling, I argue that the skeptical problems in question ultimately depend on fundamental features of Kant's philosophy of natural science. As a result, Naturphilosophie and the organic conception of nature cannot easily be separated from the deep and (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Don Garrett (2008). Should Hume Have Been a Transcendental Idealist? In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press. 193--208.
  28. A. C. Genova (2008). Transcendentally Speaking. Kant-Studien 99 (1):13-29.
  29. P. Guyer (2009). Kant and Skepticism. Philosophical Review 118 (3):384-389.
  30. P. Guyer (2003). Kant on Common Sense and Scepticism. Kantian Review 7 (1):1-37.
  31. Andy Hamilton (2010). Review: Guyer, Knowledge, Reason and Taste: Kant's Response to Hume. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):737-739.
  32. Robert Hanna (2012). The Kantian's Revenge: On Forster's Kant and Skepticism. Kantian Review 17 (1):33-45.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Robert Hanna (2011). Review: Forster, Kant and Skepticism. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):635-637.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Robert Hanna (2000). The Inner and the Outer: Kant's 'Refutation' Reconstructed. Ratio 13 (2):146–174.
  35. Katie Harrington (2010). Review: Caranti, Kant and the Scandal of Philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (1):168-171.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Charles Hartshorne (1968). Kant's Refutation Still Not Convincing. The Monist 52 (2):312-316.
  37. John Hooker (1979). A Refutation of Idealism. Kant-Studien 70 (1-4):197-205.
  38. Michael Hymers (1997). Kant's Private-Clock Argument. Kant-Studien 88 (4):442-461.
    Examining the effectiveness of the Kant’s Refutation of Idealism as a critique of a Cartesian account of consciousness, I argue that Kant's reasoning turns on the insight that self-knowledge presupposes independent temporal determination of the self. This insight bears an intriguing resemblance to claims about meaning and justification that appear in Wittgenstein's later work. Much as Wittgenstein rules out the possibility of a private language, whose meanings derive from acts of inner ostensive definition, on the ground that language requires an (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Michael Hymers (1991). The Role of Kant's Refutation of Idealism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (1):51-67.
  40. Anthony K. Jensen (2009). Kant and the Scandal of Philosophy. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (2):pp. 317-318.
  41. Patricia Kitcher (1995). Revisiting Kant's Epistemology: Skepticism, Apriority, and Psychologism. Noûs 29 (3):285-315.
  42. Douglas Langston (1979). The Supposed Incompatibility Between Kant's Two Refutations of Idealism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):359-369.
  43. John Christian Laursen (1992). The Politics of Skepticism in the Ancients, Montaigne, Hume, and Kant. E.J. Brill.
    This book brings out the profound influence of the tradition of philosophical skepticism on political thought.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Greg Lynch (2012). The Semantics of Self-Knowledge in the Refutation of Idealism. Kant Studies Online.
  45. Diego E. Machuca (2010). Review of M. Forster, Kant and Skepticism. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 30 (3):186-8.
  46. Richard N. Manning (2008). Review: Guyer, Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant's Response to Hume. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (9).
  47. Colin Marshall (2009). Kant and Skepticism (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (2):pp. 319-320.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Jeffrey K. McDonough (2000). Defending the Refutation of Idealism. Southwestern Philosophy Review 17 (1):35-44.
    In his Kant and the Claims of Knowledge, Paul Guyer offers an influential reading of Kant’s famous “Refutation of Idealism.” Guyer’s reading has been widely praised as Kantian exegesis but less favorably received as an anti-skeptical line of argument worthy of contemporary interest. In this paper, I focus on defending the general thrust of Guyer’s reading as a response to Cartesian skepticism. The paper falls into two sections. The first section constructs Guyer’s central argument in three steps and gives it (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. William Meyer (1906). Hume Vs. Kant. The Monist 16 (3):461-468.
  50. A. T. Nuyen (1990). Sense, Reason and Causality in Hume and Kant. Kant-Studien 81 (1):57-68.
    It is argued that Hume has two notions of causation, one psychological and the other philosophical. Kant's criticism of Hume overlooks the fact that Hume's scepticism is directed only at the latter. At the psychological level, Hume could have accepted Kant's argument without abandoning his own account of causation. The real difference between Hume and Kant is that Hume is not and Kant is concerned with the conditions for the possibility of sense experience. Hume is concerned only with the philosophical (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 70