This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
76 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 76
  1. George J. Agich (1983). L. W. Beck's Proposal of Meta-Critique and the “Critique of Judgment”. Kant-Studien 74 (3):261-270.
  2. Barry Allen (2003). The Abyss of Contingency: Purposiveness and Contingency in Darwin and Kant. History of Philosophy Quarterly 20 (4):373 - 391.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Henry E. Allison (1992). Kant's Antinomy of Teleological Judgment. Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (S1):25-42.
  4. C. Beihart (2009). Kant's Characterization of Natural Ends. Kant Yearbook 1:1-30.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. R. Brandt (1997). Answer to Bernd Ludwig+ I. Kant: Is Nature's Inevitable Goal a Republic? Kant-Studien 88 (2).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Douglas Burnham, Immanuel Kant: Aesthetics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  7. H. W. Cassirer (1938/1970). A Commentary on Kant's Critique of Judgment. New York, Barnes & Noble.
  8. Andrew Chignell (2012). Review: Lehner, Kants Vorsehungskonzept Auf Dem Hintergrund der Deutschen Schulphilosophie Und -Theologie. [REVIEW] Journal of the Philosophy of History 6 (1):143-147.
  9. Katerina Deligiorgi (2011). The Proper Telos of Life: Schiller, Kant and Having Autonomy as an End. Inquiry 54 (5):494 - 511.
    Abstract In this paper I set the debate between Kant and Schiller in terms of the role that an ideal of life can play within an autonomist ethic. I begin by examining the critical role Schiller gives to emotions in tackling specific motivational concerns in Kant's ethics. In the Kantian response I offer to these criticisms, I emphasise the role of metaphysics for a proper understanding of Kant's position whilst allowing that with respect to moral psychology, Kant and Schiller are (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Willem A. deVries (1991). The Dialectic of Teleology. Philosophical Topics 19 (2):51-70.
  11. Bernd Dörflinger & Günter Kruck (eds.) (2012). Worauf Vernunft Hinaussieht: Kants Regulative Ideen Im Kontext von Teleologie Und Praktischer Philosophie. Olms.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Félix Duque (1984). Teleologie und Leiblichkeit beim späten Kant. Kant-Studien 75 (1-4):381-397.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Eckart Förster (2009). The Significance of §§76 and 77 Of the Critique of Judgment for the Development of Post-Kantian Philosophy (Part 1). Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 30 (2):197-217.
  14. Eckart Förster (2002). Die Bedeutung von §§ 76, 77 der "Kritik der Urteilskraft" für die Entwicklung der nachkantischen Philosophie [Teil 1]. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 56 (2):169 - 190.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Fausto Fraisopi (2005). Adamo Sulla Sponda Del Rubicone: Analogia E Dimensione Speculativa in Kant. Armando.
  16. Jürg Freudiger (1996). Kants Schlußstein. Wie die Teleologie die Einheit der Vernunft stiftet. Kant-Studien 87 (4):423-435.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Walter Frost (1906). Kants Teleologie. Kant-Studien 11 (1-3):297-347.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. A. C. Genova (1971). Review: McFarland, Kant's Concept of Teleology. [REVIEW] Ethics 81 (2):186-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Hannah Ginsborg, Kant's Aesthetics and Teleology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    While Kant is perhaps best known for his writings in metaphysics and epistemology (in particular the Critique of Pure Reason of 1781, with a second edition in 1787) and in ethics (the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals of 1785 and the Critique of Practical Reason of 1788), he also developed an influential and much-discussed theory of aesthetics. This theory is presented in his Critique of Judgment (Kritik der Urteilskraft, also translated as Critique of the Power of Judgment) of 1790, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Piero Giordanetti (2011). L'avventura della ragione. Kant e il giovane Nietzsche. Georg Olms.
    Dieser Band analysiert den Begriff des ‚Abenteuers der Vernunft’, welcher in der dritten Kritik von Kant als Hypothese für die Erklärung des Ursprungs des Lebendigen aufgestellt wird. In systematischer Hinsicht werden vornehmlich zwei Themen behandelt: der kantische Materialismus und das Verhältnis zwischen dem Abenteuer der Vernunft und der kopernikanisch-newtonianischen Wende. Der Nietzsche gewidmete Teil hat das Anliegen, seine Theorie aus dem Jahre 1868 als eine selbständige Erarbeitung physiologischer, empirischer und materialistischer Aspekte des Kantischen Kritizismus zu präsentieren.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Paul Guyer (2013). Kant's Elliptical Path, by Karl Ameriks. Mind 122 (488):1053-1061.
  22. Paul Guyer (2009). Kant's Teleological Conception of Philosophy and its Development. Kant Yearbook 1 (1).
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Paul Guyer (2002). Review: Kant and the Ends of Aesthetics. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (442):363-366.
    "The importance and significance of Kant's aesthetics have been widely debated. This work presents an original interpretation of Kant's account which is based on rethinking the nature of Critical Philosophy. Gary Banham presents the argument that the Critique of Judgment needs to be read as a whole. Aesthetics is investigated in relation to all three critiques with the recovery of a larger sense of the 'aesthetic' resulting. This broader notion of aesthetics is connected to the recovery of the critique of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Paul Guyer (2002). Ends of Reason and Ends of Nature: The Place of Teleology in Kant's Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (2-3):161-186.
  25. Allen Hance (1998). The Art of Nature: Hegel and the Critique of Judgment. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (1):37 – 65.
    This essay examines the reasons for Hegel's frequently professed claim that Kant's Critique of Judgment simultaneously reveals the internal limits of critical philosophy and opens the door to his own system of speculative idealism. It evaluates Hegel's contention that the conceptions of aesthetic experience, organic purposiveness, and the intuitive intellect developed in the third Critique together conspire to undermine the epistemological and metaphysical foundations of the theories of nature and freedom advanced in the first and second Critiques . Finally it (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Robert Hanna (2009). Freedom, Teleology, and Rational Causation. Kant Yearbook 1 (1).
  27. James C. Hebbeler (2012). The Principles of the First Critique. Review of Metaphysics 65 (3):555-579.
    In the Critique of Pure Reason Kant claims that he is offering a science of reason grounded on principles. Given Kant’s frequent but diverse use of the term “principle” throughout the work, it is unclear what exactly this term is supposed to signify, whether there are more or less fundamental principles and on what basis, and whether there is supposed to be some way in which the diverse instances of them are related to form a unified science of theoretical reason. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Wiebke Henning (2009). An Annotated Bibliography to Kant's Teleology. Kant Yearbook 1 (1).
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Formulating Categorical Imperatives & Die Antinomie der Ideologischen Urteilskraft (1988). Begründet von Hans Vaihinger; neubegründet von Paul Menzer und Gottfried Martin. Kant-Studien 79:387.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Patrick Paul Kain (1999). Review: Reath, Herman and, & Korsgaard (Ed), Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 3:114-122.
  31. Immanuel Kant (2007/2005). Critique of Judgement. Oxford University Press.
    In the Critique of Judgement, Kant offers a penetrating analysis of our experience of the beautiful and the sublime. He discusses the objectivity of taste, aesthetic disinterestedness, the relation of art and nature, the role of imagination, genius and originality, the limits of representation, and the connection between morality and the aesthetic. He also investigates the validity of our judgements concerning the degree in which nature has a purpose, with respect to the highest interests of reason and enlightenment. The work (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Immanuel Kant (2007). On the Use of Teleological Principles in Philosophy (1788). In , Anthropology, History, and Education. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Immanuel Kant (1928). Kant's Critique of Teleological Judgement. Oxford, the Clarendon Press.
  34. Joel Thiago Klein (2013). World History in the Context of Critique of Teleological Judgment. Kant-Studien 104 (2).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. James Kreines (forthcoming). Kant and Hegel on Teleology and Life From the Perspective of Debates About Free Will. In Thomas Khurana (ed.), THE FREEDOM OF LIFE. Hegelian Perspectives. Walther König.
    Kant’s treatment of teleology and life in the Critique of the Power of Judgment is complicated and difficult to interpret; Hegel’s response adds considerable complexity. I propose a new way of understanding the underlying philosophical issues in this debate, allowing a better understanding of the underlying structure of the arguments in Kant and Hegel. My new way is unusual: I use for an interpretive lens some structural features of familiar debates about freedom of the will. These debates, I argue, allow (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. James Kreines (2005). The Inexplicability of Kant's Naturzweck: Kant on Teleology, Explanation and Biology. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (3):270-311.
    Kant’s position on teleology and biology is neither inconsistent nor obsolete; his arguments have some surprising and enduring philosophical strengths. But Kant’s account will appear weak if we muddy the waters by reading him as aiming to defend teleology by appealing to considerations popular in contemporary philosophy. Kant argues for very different conclusions: we can neither know teleological judgments of living beings to be true, nor legitimately explain living beings in teleological terms; such teleological judgment is justified only as a (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Silviya Lechner (2008). Review: Guyer, Kant's System of Nature and Freedom. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 13 (2):146-148.
  38. Silviya Lechner (2008). Review: Guyer, Kant's System of Nature and Freedom: Selected Essays. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 13 (2):146-148.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Donald Loose (ed.) (2012). The Sublime and its Teleology: Kant, German Idealism, Phenomenology. Brill.
    Based on their critical analysis of Kant's "Critique of Judgment", the authors of this book show from different perspectives in what way the Kantian concept of the sublime is still a main stream of inspiration for contemporary thinking.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. R. A. C. Macmillan (1912/1976). The Crowning Phase of the Critical Philosophy: A Study in Kant's Critique of Judgment. Garland Pub..
  41. William Maker (1986). Review: Auxter, Kant's Moral Teleology. Idealistic Studies 16 (2):154-154.
  42. Rudolf A. Makkreel (1990). Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. University of Chicago Press.
    In this illuminating study of Kant's theory of imagination and its role in interpretation, Rudolf A. Makkreel argues against the commonly held notion that Kant's transcendental philosophy is incompatible with hermeneutics. The charge that Kant's foundational philosophy is inadequate to the task of interpretation can be rebutted, explains Makkreel, if we fully understand the role of imagination in his work. In identifying this role, Makkreel also reevaluates the relationship among Kant's discussions of the feeling of life, common sense, and the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Richard N. Manning (2008). Review: Guyer, Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant's Response to Hume. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (9).
  44. Inder S. Marwah (2013). What Nature Makes of Her: Kant's Gendered Metaphysics. Hypatia 28 (3):551-567.
    Women's exclusion from political enfranchisement in Kant's political writings has frequently been noted in the literature, and yet has not been closely scrutinized. More often than not, commentators suggest that this reflects little more than Kant's sharing in the prejudices of his era. This paper argues that, for Kant, women's civil incapacities stem from defects relating to their capacities as moral agents, and more specifically, to his teleological account of the conditions within which we, as imperfect beings, develop our moral (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Lawrence Masek (2002). Why Kant's Project Did Not Have To Fail. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76 (Suppl.):253-264.
    This paper argues that Kant identifies what is morally good as what allows people to fulfill their essential purpose. In After Virtue, Alasdair MacIntyre contends that the Enlightenment project of justifying morality had to fail because Enlightenment thinkers did not treat moral judgments as teleological judgments. However, Kant claims in his Critique of Judgment that judging something to be good always refers to a purpose. I reconcile this claim with some passages from Kant’s writings that seem to contradict it, including (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. John D. McFarland (1970). Kant's Concept of Teleology. [Edinburgh]University of Edinburgh Press.
  47. Peter McLaughlin (1990). Kant's Critique of Teleology in Biological Explanation: Antinomy and Teleology. E. Mellen Press.
  48. Bernhard Minnigerode (2008). Kritisch Urteilen Mit Kant: Von der Aesthetischen Und der Teleologischen Urteilskraft. Die Blaue Eule.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Dalia Nassar (forthcoming). Sensibility and Organic Unity: Kant, Goethe, and the Plasticity of Cognition. Intellectual History Review:1-16.
    In this paper, I trace a ‘leading thread’ from Kant’s Critique of Judgment to Goethe that involves a shift from a conceptual framework, in which a priori concepts furnish necessity and thereby science, to a framework in which sensible experience plays a far more significant and determining role in the formation of knowledge. Although this shift was not enacted by Kant himself, his elaboration of organic unity or organisms paved the way for this transformation. By considering both the methodological difficulties (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Angelica Nuzzo (2009). Kritik der Urteilskraft Par. 76-77. Kant Yearbook 1 (1):143-172.
    This essay reconstructs the argument of Kritik der Urteilskraft §§76 –77 by placing it in the context of the “Critique of Teleological Judgment”. What role does the problematic and historically so successful figure of the intuitive understanding play in the antinomy of teleological judgment? The answer is considered indispensable to address the issue of the reception of §§76 – 77. The claim is that these sections institute the “closure” of transcendental philosophy—a closure fundamentally misunderstood by the post Kantians. On the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 76