This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
68 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 68
  1. Richard E. Aquila (1977). The Relationship Between Pure and Empirical Intuition in Kant. Kant-Studien 68 (1-4):275-289.
  2. Gary Banham (2010). Scepticism, Causation and Cognition. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):507-520.
  3. Lewis White Beck (1976). Is There a Non Sequitur in Kant's Proof of the Causal Principle? Kant-Studien 67 (1-4):385-389.
  4. Ermanno Bencivenga (1987). Kant's Copernican Revolution. Oxford University Press.
    This is a highly original, wide-ranging, and unorthodox discourse on the idea of philosophy contained in Kant's major work, the Critique of Pure Reason. Bencivenga proposes a novel explanation of the Critique's celebrated "obscurity." This great obstacle to reading Kant, Bencivenga argues, has nothing to do with Kant's being a bad writer or with his having anything very complicated to say; rather, it is the natural result of the kind of operation Kant was performing: a universal conceptual revolution. Bencivenga contends (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Jonathan Francis Bennett (1966). Kant's Analytic. London, Cambridge U.P..
  6. Graham Bird (1959). The Necessity of Kant. Mind 68 (271):389-392.
  7. G. Anthony Bruno (forthcoming). Epistemic Reciprocity in Schelling's Late Return to Kant. In Pablo Muchnik (ed.), Rethinking Kant (volume 4). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    In his 1841-2 Berlin lectures, Schelling critiques German idealism’s negative method of regressing from existence to its first principle, which is supposed to be intelligible without remainder. He sees existence as precisely its remainder since there could be nothing that exists. To solve this, Schelling enlists the positive method of progressing from the fact of existence to a proof of this principle’s reality. Since this proof faces the absurdity that there is anything rather than nothing, he concludes that this fact’s (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Emily Carson (1999). Kant on the Method of Mathematics. Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (4):629-652.
  9. Pelaéz Cedrés & J. Álvaro (2008). Lo a Priori Constitutivo: Historia y Prospectiva. Anthropos.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Andrew Chignell (2007). Review of Georges Dicker, Kant's Theory of Knowledge. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 116 (2):307-309.
    A review of Georges Dicker's primer on Kant's theoretical philosophy. -/- .
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. H. Delius (1966). Review: Hoche, Nichtempirische Erkenntnis: Analytische und Synthetische Urteile a Priori bei Kant und bei Husserl. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 16 (63):183.
  12. M. C. Dillon (1987). Apriority in Kant and Merleau-Ponty. Kant-Studien 78 (1-4):403-423.
    If the a priori is the proper subject matter of transcendental philosophy, then the problems of the a priori are also problems for transcendental philosophy. the idea that defines transcendental philosophy is the idea that there are stable general structures which are discernible in experience, provide the foundations of our knowledge of it, and collectively constitute an a priori which transcends experience and informs it. the a priori is traditionally conceived as a nexus of relations which is held to be (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. John Divers (1999). Kant's Criteria of the a Priori. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):17–45.
  14. Robert J. Dostal (1977). The A Priori of Experience in Kant and Hegel. Southern Journal of Philosophy 15 (2):267-275.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Robert J. Dostal (1977). The a Priori of Experience in Kant and Hegel: A Reply to M. Kalin. Southern Journal of Philosophy 15 (2):267-275.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Michael Friedman (2001). Dynamics of Reason: The 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University. Csli Publications.
    This book introduces a new approach to the issue of radical scientific revolutions, or "paradigm-shifts," given prominence in the work of Thomas Kuhn. The book articulates a dynamical and historicized version of the conception of scientific a priori principles first developed by the philosopher Immanuel Kant. This approach defends the Enlightenment ideal of scientific objectivity and universality while simultaneously doing justice to the revolutionary changes within the sciences that have since undermined Kant's original defense of this ideal. Through a modified (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Constanze Friedmann (1921). Psychologische Momente in der Ableitung des Apriori bei Kant. Kant-Studien 26 (1-2):312-350.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Manfred Geier (1981). Linguistisches Apriori und angeborene Ideen. Kommentar zu den Kantischen Grundlagen einer generativ-transformationellen Sprachtheorie. Kant-Studien 72 (1-4):68-87.
  19. Volker Gerhardt (1987). Kants Koprrnikanische Wende. Kant-Studien 78 (1-4):133-152.
  20. Constanze Glaser (1933). Realisten und idealisten, die menschlichen grundtypen. Kant-Studien 38 (1-2):118-152.
  21. Hans-Johann Glock (1997). Kant and Wittgenstein: Philosophy, Necessity and Representation. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2):285 – 305.
    Several authors have detected profound analogies between Kant and Wittgenstein. Their claims have been contradicted by scholars, such being the agreed penalty for attributions to authorities. Many of the alleged similarities have either been left unsubstantiated at a detailed exegetical level, or have been confined to highly general points. At the same time, the 'scholarly' backlash has tended to ignore the importance of some of these general points, or has focused on very specific issues or purely terminological matters. To advance (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. William Mark Goodwin (2010). Coffa's Kant and the Evolution of Accounts of Mathematical Necessity. Synthese 172 (3):361 - 379.
    According to Alberto Coffa in The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap, Kant’s account of mathematical judgment is built on a ‘semantic swamp’. Kant’s primitive semantics led him to appeal to pure intuition in an attempt to explain mathematical necessity. The appeal to pure intuition was, on Coffa’s line, a blunder from which philosophy was forced to spend the next 150 years trying to recover. This dismal assessment of Kant’s contributions to the evolution of accounts of mathematical necessity is fundamentally (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Moltke S. Gram (1968). Kant, Ontology & the a Priori. Evanston [Ill.]Northwestern University Press.
  24. Robert Greenberg (1999). The Ontology of Kant's Theory of Knowledge. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:39-48.
    Adopting a Quinean criterion of ontological commitment, I consider Kant’s theory of our a priori knowledge of objects. I am directly concerned with the customary view that the ontology of Kant’s theory of knowledge in general, whether a priori or empirical, must be thought in terms of the a priori conditions or representations of space, time, and the categories. Accordingly, the customary view is accompanied by the customary interpretation of the ontology as consisting of Kantian“appearances” or “empirical objects.” I argue (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Jean Grondin (1989). The A Priori From Kant to Schelling. Idealistic Studies 19 (3):202-221.
  26. Patrick Grüneberg (2012). Elena Ficara: Die Ontologie in der »Kritik der reinen Vernunft«. [REVIEW] Fichte-Studien 40:299-307.
    Das vorliegende Buch stellt die publizierte Fassung der Dissertation (Köln 2004) Elena Ficaras dar. Wie der Titel bereits zeigt, bewegt sich die Arbeit auf dem Feld transzendentaler Grundlagenarbeit und sucht die Ontologie, so wie Kant diese trotz aller Vorwürfe der Metaphysikfeindlichkeit neu begründet, zu erarbeiten.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Robert Hanna (2010). Review: Russell, Truth in Virtue of Meaning: A Defence of the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 14 (2):158-165.
  28. Robert Hanna (2002). Greenberg, Kant's Theory of a Priori Knowledge. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (443):671-675.
  29. Robert Hanna (2001). Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
    Robert Hanna presents a fresh view of the Kantian and analytic traditions that have dominated continental European and Anglo-American philosophy over the last two centuries, and of the connections between them. But this is not just a study in the history of philosophy, for out of this emerges Hanna's original approach to two much-contested theories that remain at the heart of contemporary philosophy. Hanna puts forward a new 'cognitive-semantic' interpretation of transcendental idealism, and a vigorous defense of Kant's theory of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Robert Hanna (1998). How Do We Know Necessary Truths? Kant's Answer. European Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):115–145.
  31. Jean G. Harrell (1980). Kant's a Priori in Critique of Judgment. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 39 (2):198-200.
  32. K. Heim (1909). Die Unterscheidung zwischen Erscheinungen und Funktionen als Grundlage für die Einteilung der Wissenschaften. Kant-Studien 14 (1-3):484-490.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Robert A. Holland (1992). Kant, Reichenbach, and Aprioricity. Philosophical Studies 66 (3):209 - 233.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Joachim Horvath (2009). The Modal Argument for a Priori Justification. Ratio 22 (2):191-205.
    Kant famously argued that, from experience, we can only learn how something actually is, but not that it must be so. In this paper, I defend an improved version of Kant's argument for the existence of a priori knowledge, the Modal Argument , against recent objections by Casullo and Kitcher. For the sake of the argument, I concede Casullo's claim that we may know certain counterfactuals in an empirical way and thereby gain epistemic access to some nearby, nomologically possible worlds. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. P. Hoyningen-Huene (1998). A Further Hypothesis on the Arrangement of the Text in Kant's 'Prolegomena', and the Second Edition of 'Kritik der Reinen Vernunft'. Kant-Studien 89 (1):84-89.
  36. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1998). Eine weitere Textverschiebungshypothese zu Kants Prolegomena (und zur 2. Auflage der KrV). Kant-Studien 89 (1):84-89.
  37. Hermann Jordan (1926). Das Apriori bei Tier und Mensch. Kant-Studien 31 (1-3):527-535.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Immanuel Kant (1987). Kants Koperaikanische Wende, F. Kaulbach zum 75. Geburtstag. Kant-Studien 78 (1987):133-151.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Friedrich Kaulbach (1963). Das prinzip der bewegung in der philosophie kants. Kant-Studien 54 (1-4):3-16.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Satoru Kimura (2000). Die Logik der Urteilskraft in der Theorie des Erhabenen bei Kant: Abgrund und Ubergang (in Japanese). Bigaku 51 (2):25-36.
    In dieser Abhandlung versuchen wir die Theorie des Erhabenen bei Kant als eine Logik der reflektierenden Urteilskraft darzustellen, die den Ubergang des Sinnlichen ins Ubersinnliche ermoglicht. Die Urteilskraft bezieht die Spannung der Einbildungskraft vor dem Nicht-Darstellbaren auf das Ubersinnliche, und in dieser Beziehung sieht Kant "eine a priori im Subjekte liegende Zweckmassigkeit". Durch die Vorstellung der gewaltigen Natur kann unsere innere Idee erweckt werden, wenn wir berucksichtigen, "dass auf jene moralischen Anlagen bei jeder schicklichen Veranlassung Rucksicht genommen werden sollte". Durch (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Patricia Kitcher (1995). Revisiting Kant's Epistemology: Skepticism, Apriority, and Psychologism. Noûs 29 (3):285-315.
  42. Joachim Kopper (1981). Jenseits des analytischen und des synthetischen Urteils. Reflexionen zu Hermann Cohens Logik der reinen Erkenntnis. Kant-Studien 72 (1-4):58-67.
  43. Frederick W. Kroon (1981). Kant and Kripke on the Identifiability of Modal and Epistemic Notions. Southern Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):49-60.
    It is sometimes claimed that kripke's work in "naming and necessity" has demonstrated that kant was "right" in his acceptance of the synthetic "a priori", Even though perhaps "wrong" in his choice of examples. This article disputes such a claim by showing that, In accepting the identification of the empirically necessary and the "a priori", Kant's position is incompatible with an acceptance of the kripkean synthetic "a priori" (as well as the kripkean necessary "a posteriori").
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Gerhard Lehmann (1954). Erscheinungsstufung und realitätsproblem in kants opus postumum. Kant-Studien 45 (1-4):140-154.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Jens Lemanski (2012). The Queen of the Revolution. To Rescue and Preserve the Copernican Revolution. Kant-Studien 103 (4).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Béatrice Longuenesse (2005). Kant on the Human Standpoint. Cambridge University Press.
    Be;atrice Longuenesse considers the three aspects of Kant's philosophy, his epistemology and metaphysics of nature, moral philosophy, and aesthetic theory, under one unifying standpoint: Kant's conception of our capacity to form judgments. She argues that the elements which make up our cognitive access to the world have an equally important role to play in our moral evaluations and our aesthetic judgments. Her book will appeal to all interested in Kant and his thought, ranging over Kant's account of our representations of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. H. Lorenz (1997). Conditions and Completeness a-Priori of Kant's Catalogue of Judgements. Kant-Studien 88 (4):386-405.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Kenton F. Machina (1972). Kant, Quine, and Human Experience. Philosophical Review 81 (4):484-497.
  49. Jacqueline Mariña (2007). Review: Guyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (2).
  50. Colin Marshall (forthcoming). Does Kant Demand Explanations for All Synthetic a Priori Claims? Journal of the History of Philosophy.
    Most of Kant's readers have assumed that he demanded explanations for all synthetic a priori claims. I argue that this is not the case, and that Kant accepted some synthetic a priori claims as basic. I further argue that he took himself to be justified in making such claims on the basis of a certain sort of robust reflection. In essence, Kant's method is more like that of the phenomenologists than that of 20th century analytic philosophers.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 68