This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
108 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 108
  1. R. E. Aquila (2002). Robert Greenberg, Kant's Theory of A Priori Knowledge. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2):267-267.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Richard E. Aquila (1977). The Relationship Between Pure and Empirical Intuition in Kant. Kant-Studien 68 (1-4):275-289.
  3. Gary Banham (2010). Scepticism, Causation and Cognition. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):507-520.
  4. Lewis White Beck (1976). Is There a Non Sequitur in Kant's Proof of the Causal Principle? Kant-Studien 67 (1-4):385-389.
  5. Jonathan Francis Bennett (1966). Kant's Analytic. London, Cambridge U.P..
  6. Graham Bird (1959). The Necessity of Kant. Mind 68 (271):389-392.
  7. Laurence Bonjour (2002). Review: New Essays on the a Priori. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (443):647-652.
  8. G. Anthony Bruno (forthcoming). Epistemic Reciprocity in Schelling's Late Return to Kant. In Pablo Muchnik (ed.), Rethinking Kant (volume 4). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    In his 1841-2 Berlin lectures, Schelling critiques German idealism’s negative method of regressing from existence to its first principle, which is supposed to be intelligible without remainder. He sees existence as precisely its remainder since there could be nothing that exists. To solve this, Schelling enlists the positive method of progressing from the fact of existence to a proof of this principle’s reality. Since this proof faces the absurdity that there is anything rather than nothing, he concludes that this fact’s (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Emily Carson (1999). Kant on the Method of Mathematics. Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (4):629-652.
  10. Pelaéz Cedrés & J. Álvaro (2008). Lo a Priori Constitutivo: Historia y Prospectiva. Anthropos.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Andrew Chignell (2007). Review of Georges Dicker, Kant's Theory of Knowledge. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 116 (2):307-309.
    A review of Georges Dicker's primer on Kant's theoretical philosophy. -/- .
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Predrag Čičovački (1994). On Kant's Letter to Marcus Herz From 1772. Theoria 37 (1):11-22.
  13. Predrag Cicovacki (1991). An Aporia of A Priori Knowledge. On Carl's and Beck's Interpretation of Kant's Letter to Markus Herz. Kant-Studien 82 (3):349-360.
  14. Jacinto Rivera de Rosales (2005). El a priori de la corporalidad en el Opus postumum. Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofía 32:221-248.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. H. Delius (1966). Review: Hoche, Nichtempirische Erkenntnis: Analytische und Synthetische Urteile a Priori bei Kant und bei Husserl. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 16 (63):183.
  16. M. C. Dillon (1987). Apriority in Kant and Merleau-Ponty. Kant-Studien 78 (1-4):403-423.
    If the a priori is the proper subject matter of transcendental philosophy, then the problems of the a priori are also problems for transcendental philosophy. the idea that defines transcendental philosophy is the idea that there are stable general structures which are discernible in experience, provide the foundations of our knowledge of it, and collectively constitute an a priori which transcends experience and informs it. the a priori is traditionally conceived as a nexus of relations which is held to be (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. John Divers (1999). Kant's Criteria of the a Priori. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):17–45.
  18. Robert J. Dostal (1977). The A Priori of Experience in Kant and Hegel: A Reply to M. Kalin. Southern Journal of Philosophy 15 (2):267-275.
  19. Steffen Ducheyne (2011). Kant and Whewell on Bridging Principles Between Metaphysics and Science. Kant-Studien 102 (1):22-45.
    In this essay, I call attention to Kant’s and Whewell’s attempt to provide bridging principles between a priori principles and scientific laws. Part of Kant’s aim in the Opus postumum (ca. 1796-1803) was precisely to bridge the gap between the metaphysical foundations of natural science (on the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science (1786) see section 1) and physics by establishing intermediary concepts or ‘Mittelbegriffe’ (henceforth this problem is referred to as ‘the bridging-problem’). I argue that the late-Kant attempted to show (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Michael Friedman (2010). Einstein, Kant, and the A Priori. In Mauricio Suarez, Mauro Dorato & Miklos Redei (eds.), Epsa Philosophical Issues in the Sciences. Springer. 65--73.
  21. Michael Friedman (2002). Kant, Kuhn, and the Rationality of Science. Philosophy of Science 69 (2):171-90.
    This paper considers the evolution of the problem of scientific rationality from Kant through Carnap to Kuhn. I argue for a relativized and historicized version of the original Kantian conception of scientific a priori principles and examine the way in which these principles change and develop across revolutionary paradigm shifts. The distinctively philosophical enterprise of reflecting upon and contextualizing such principles is then seen to play a key role in making possible rational intersubjective communication between otherwise incommensurable paradigms.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Michael Friedman (2001). Dynamics of Reason: The 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University. Csli Publications.
    This book introduces a new approach to the issue of radical scientific revolutions, or "paradigm-shifts," given prominence in the work of Thomas Kuhn. The book articulates a dynamical and historicized version of the conception of scientific a priori principles first developed by the philosopher Immanuel Kant. This approach defends the Enlightenment ideal of scientific objectivity and universality while simultaneously doing justice to the revolutionary changes within the sciences that have since undermined Kant's original defense of this ideal. Through a modified (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Michael Friedman (2000). Transcendental Philosophy and a Priori Knowledge: A Neo-Kantian Perspective. In Paul Boghossian & Christopher Peacocke (eds.), New Essays on the a Priori. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Michael Friedman & Tradutor: Rogério Passos Severo (2010). Kant, Kuhn e a racionalidade da ciência. Philósophos - Revista de Filosofia 14 (1):175-209.
    This paper considers the evolution of the problem of scientific rationality from Kant through Carnap to Kuhn. I argue for a relativized and historicized version of the original Kantian conception of scientific a priori principles and examine the way in which these principles change and develop across revolutionary paradigm shifts. The distinctively philosophical enterprise of reflecting upon and contextualizing such principles is then seen to play a key role in making possible rational intersubjective communication between otherwise incommensurable paradigms.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Constanze Friedmann (1921). Psychologische Momente in der Ableitung des Apriori bei Kant. Kant-Studien 26 (1-2):312-350.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Manfred Geier (1981). Linguistisches Apriori und angeborene Ideen. Kommentar zu den Kantischen Grundlagen einer generativ-transformationellen Sprachtheorie. Kant-Studien 72 (1-4):68-87.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Volker Gerhardt (1987). Kants Koprrnikanische Wende. Kant-Studien 78 (1-4):133-152.
  28. Hannah Ginsborg (2006). Kant and the Problem of Experience. Philosophical Topics 34 (1/2):59-106.
    As most of its readers are aware, the Critique of Pure Reason is primarily concerned not with empirical, but with a priori knowledge. For the most part, the Kant of the first Critique tends to assume that experience, and the knowledge that is based on it, is unproblematic. The problem with which he is concerned is that of how we can be capable of substantive knowledge independently of experience. At the same time, however, the notion of experience plays a crucial (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Constanze Glaser (1933). Realisten und idealisten, die menschlichen grundtypen. Kant-Studien 38 (1-2):118-152.
  30. Hans-Johann Glock (1997). Kant and Wittgenstein: Philosophy, Necessity and Representation. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2):285 – 305.
    Several authors have detected profound analogies between Kant and Wittgenstein. Their claims have been contradicted by scholars, such being the agreed penalty for attributions to authorities. Many of the alleged similarities have either been left unsubstantiated at a detailed exegetical level, or have been confined to highly general points. At the same time, the 'scholarly' backlash has tended to ignore the importance of some of these general points, or has focused on very specific issues or purely terminological matters. To advance (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. William Mark Goodwin (2010). Coffa's Kant and the Evolution of Accounts of Mathematical Necessity. Synthese 172 (3):361 - 379.
    According to Alberto Coffa in The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap, Kant’s account of mathematical judgment is built on a ‘semantic swamp’. Kant’s primitive semantics led him to appeal to pure intuition in an attempt to explain mathematical necessity. The appeal to pure intuition was, on Coffa’s line, a blunder from which philosophy was forced to spend the next 150 years trying to recover. This dismal assessment of Kant’s contributions to the evolution of accounts of mathematical necessity is fundamentally (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Moltke S. Gram (1968). Kant, Ontology & the a Priori. Evanston [Ill.]Northwestern University Press.
  33. Robert Greenberg (2001). Kant's Theory of a Priori Knowledge. Pennsylvania State University Press.
    Instead, Robert Greenberg argues that Kant is more fundamentally concerned with the possibility of a priori knowledge -- the very possibility of the possibility ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Robert Greenberg (1999). The Ontology of Kant's Theory of Knowledge. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:39-48.
    Adopting a Quinean criterion of ontological commitment, I consider Kant’s theory of our a priori knowledge of objects. I am directly concerned with the customary view that the ontology of Kant’s theory of knowledge in general, whether a priori or empirical, must be thought in terms of the a priori conditions or representations of space, time, and the categories. Accordingly, the customary view is accompanied by the customary interpretation of the ontology as consisting of Kantian“appearances” or “empirical objects.” I argue (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Jean Grondin (1989). The A Priori From Kant to Schelling. Idealistic Studies 19 (3):202-221.
  36. Patrick Grüneberg (2012). Elena Ficara: Die Ontologie in der »Kritik der reinen Vernunft«. [REVIEW] Fichte-Studien 40:299-307.
    Das vorliegende Buch stellt die publizierte Fassung der Dissertation (Köln 2004) Elena Ficaras dar. Wie der Titel bereits zeigt, bewegt sich die Arbeit auf dem Feld transzendentaler Grundlagenarbeit und sucht die Ontologie, so wie Kant diese trotz aller Vorwürfe der Metaphysikfeindlichkeit neu begründet, zu erarbeiten.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. R. K. Gupta (1971). Kant's Groundwork of Morality. Studi Internazionali Di Filosofia 3:111-161.
  38. Paul Guyer (1987). The Failure of the B-Deduction. Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (S1):67-84.
  39. Paul Guyer (1980). Kant on Apperception and "A Priori" Synthesis. American Philosophical Quarterly 17 (3):205 - 212.
  40. Paul Guyer & Ralph Walker (1990). Kant's Conception of Empirical Law. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 64:221 - 258.
  41. Robert Hanna (2010). Review: Russell, Truth in Virtue of Meaning: A Defence of the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 14 (2):158-165.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Robert Hanna (2002). Kants Theory of A Priori Knowledge. Mind 111 (443):671-675.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Robert Hanna (2002). Review: Greenberg, Kant's Theory of a Priori Knowledge. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (443):671-675.
  44. Robert Hanna (2001). Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
    Robert Hanna presents a fresh view of the Kantian and analytic traditions that have dominated continental European and Anglo-American philosophy over the last two centuries, and of the connections between them. But this is not just a study in the history of philosophy, for out of this emerges Hanna's original approach to two much-contested theories that remain at the heart of contemporary philosophy. Hanna puts forward a new 'cognitive-semantic' interpretation of transcendental idealism, and a vigorous defense of Kant's theory of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Robert Hanna (1998). How Do We Know Necessary Truths? Kant's Answer. European Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):115–145.
  46. Jean G. Harrell (1980). Kant's a Priori in Critique of Judgment. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 39 (2):198-200.
  47. K. Heim (1909). Die Unterscheidung zwischen Erscheinungen und Funktionen als Grundlage für die Einteilung der Wissenschaften. Kant-Studien 14 (1-3):484-490.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Desmond Hogan (2013). Metaphysical Motives of Kant's Analytic–Synthetic Distinction. Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (2):267-307.
    Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (KrV) presents a priori knowledge of synthetic truths as posing a philosophical problem of great import whose only possible solution vindicates the system of transcendental idealism. The work does not accord any such significance to a priori knowledge of analytic truths. The intelligibility of the contrast rests on the well-foundedness of Kant’s analytic–synthetic distinction and on his claim to objectively or correctly classify key judgments with respect to it. Though the correctness of Kant’s classification is (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Robert A. Holland (1992). Kant, Reichenbach, and Aprioricity. Philosophical Studies 66 (3):209 - 233.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Joachim Horvath (2009). The Modal Argument for a Priori Justification. Ratio 22 (2):191-205.
    Kant famously argued that, from experience, we can only learn how something actually is, but not that it must be so. In this paper, I defend an improved version of Kant's argument for the existence of a priori knowledge, the Modal Argument , against recent objections by Casullo and Kitcher. For the sake of the argument, I concede Casullo's claim that we may know certain counterfactuals in an empirical way and thereby gain epistemic access to some nearby, nomologically possible worlds. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 108