This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
207 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 207
  1. Paul Abela (1996). Putnam's Internal Realism and Kant's Empirical Realism. Idealistic Studies 26 (1):45-56.
    This paper challenges Putnam's claim that his internal realism is a revival of Kant's empirical realism. I agree with Putnam that there are good reasons to revive Kant's rather neglected empirical realist doctrine. However, internal realism is not the way this should be done. At the center of the following discussion lies the important difference between Putman's "real within a scheme" model and Kant's assertion of the independent existence of empirical objects. The strategy for the paper is as follows. I (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Robert Merrihew Adams (1997). Things in Themselves. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):801-825.
    The paper is an interpretation and defense of Kant's conception of things in themselves as noumena, along the following lines. Noumena are transempirical realities. As such they have several important roles in Kant's critical philosophy (Section 1). Our theoretical faculties cannot obtain enough content for a conception of noumena that would assure their real possibility as objects, but can establish their merely formal logical possibility (Sections 2-3). Our practical reason, however, grounds belief in the real possibility of some noumena, and (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Lucy Allais (2011). Idealism Enough: Response to Roche. Kantian Review 16 (3):375-398.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Lucy Allais (2010). Transcendental Idealism and Metaphysics: Kant's Commitment to Things as They Are in Themselves. Kant Yearbook 2 (1):1-32.
  5. Lucy Allais (2010). Kant's Argument for Transcendental Idealism in the Transcendental Aesthetic. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (1):47-75.
    This paper gives an interpretation of Kant's argument for transcendental idealism in the Transcendental Aesthetic. I argue against a common way of reading this argument, which sees Kant as arguing that substantive a priori claims about mind-independent reality would be unintelligible because we cannot explain the source of their justification. I argue that Kant's concern with how synthetic a priori propositions are possible is not a concern with the source of their justification, but with how they can have objects. I (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Lucy Allais (2007). Kant's Idealism and the Secondary Quality Analogy. Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):459-484.
    : Interpretations of Kant's transcendental idealism have been dominated by two extreme views: phenomenalist and merely epistemic readings. There are serious objections to both of these extremes, and the aim of this paper is to develop a middle ground between the two. In the Prolegomena, Kant suggests that his idealism about appearances can be understood in terms of an analogy with secondary qualities like color. Commentators have rejected this option because they have assumed that the analogy should be read in (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Lucy Allais (2006). Intrinsic Natures: A Critique of Langton on Kant. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):143–169.
    This paper argues that there is an important respect in which Rae Langton's recent interpretation of Kant is correct: Kant's claim that we cannot know things in themselves should be understood as the claim that we cannot know the intrinsic nature of things. However, I dispute Langton's account of intrinsic properties, and therefore her version of what this claim amounts to. Langton's distinction between intrinsic, causally inert properties and causal powers is problematic, both as an interpretation of Kant, and as (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Lucy Allais (2004). Kant's One World: Interpreting 'Transcendental Idealism'. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (4):655 – 684.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Lucy Allais (2003). Kant's Transcendental Idealism and Contemporary Anti-Realism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (4):369 – 392.
    This paper compares Kant's transcendental idealism with three main groups of contemporary anti-realism, associated with Wittgenstein, Putnam, and Dummett, respectively. The kind of anti-realism associated with Wittgenstein has it that there is no deep sense in which our concepts are answerable to reality. Associated with Putnam is the rejection of four main ideas: theoryindependent reality, the idea of a uniquely true theory, a correspondence theory of truth, and bivalence. While there are superficial similarities between both views and Kant's, I find (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Henry E. Allison (2006). Transcendental Realism, Empirical Realism and Transcendental Idealism. Kantian Review 11 (1):1-28.
    This essay argues that the key to understanding Kant's transcendental idealism is to understand the transcendental realism with which he contrasts it. It maintains that the latter is not to be identified with a particular metaphysical thesis, but with the assumption that the proper objects of human cognitions are “objects in general” or “as such,” that is, objects considered simply qua objects of some understanding. Since this appears to conflict with Kant's own characterization of transcendental realism as the view that (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Henry E. Allison (2004). Kant's Transcendental Idealism. Yale University Press.
  12. Henry E. Allison (1973). Kant's Critique of Berkeley. Journal of the History of Philosophy 11 (1).
  13. Henry E. Allison (1968). Kant's Concept of the Transcendental Object. Kant-Studien 59 (1-4):165-186.
  14. Karl Ameriks (2003). Problems From Van Cleve's Kant: Experience and Objects. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):196–202.
  15. Richard E. Aquila (2003). Hans Vaihinger and Some Recent Intentionalist Readings of Kant. Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2):231-250.
    BRENTANO'S APPROPRIATION OF THE Scholastic notion of intentionality, and of what Brentano called "the intentional (or mental) inexistence of an object," was early on exploited in a reading of Kant's theory of objects and appearances. Apparently the first systematic attempt was undertaken by Hans Vaihinger. However, Vaihinger's is radically different from more recent intentionalist readings of Kant. Albeit not in every respect, I propose that a return to this aspect of Vaihinger's approach supports a rewarding advance on such readings. After (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Richard E. Aquila (2001). Review: Sacks, Objectivity and Insight. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 5:114-119.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Richard E. Aquila (1992). The Subject as Appearance and as Thing in Itself in the Critique of Pure Reason: Reflections in the Light of the Role of Imagination and Apprehension. In Phillip D. Cummins & Guenter Zoeller (eds.), Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays in the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy. Ridgeview Publishing Company.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Luis M. Augusto (2005). Who's Afraid of Idealism? University Press of America.
    In Who's Afraid of Idealism? the philosophical concept of idealism, the extent to which reality is mind-made, is examined in new light. Author Luis M. Augusto explores epistemological idealism, at the source of all other kinds of idealism, from the viewpoints of Immanuel Kant and Friedrich Nietzsche, two philosophers who spent a large part of their lives denigrating the very concept. Working from Kant and Nietzsche's viewpoints that idealism was a scandal to philosophy and the cause of nihilism, Augusto evaluates (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Kalyankumar Bagchi (1972). Metalanguage and Transcendental Idealism. Centre of Advanced Study in Philosophy, Visva-Bharati.
  20. Sorin Baiasu (2011). Space, Time and Mind-Dependence. Kantian Review 16 (2):175-190.
  21. Sorin Baiasu & Michelle Grier (2011). Revolutionary Versus Traditionalist Approaches to Kant: Some Aspects of the Debate. Kantian Review 16 (2):161-173.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Tom Bailey (2006). Review: Wood, Kant. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 11:138-140.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Gary Banham (2011). The Status of the Principles of the Analogies. Kantian Review 16 (2):201-210.
    The interpretation of Kant's Critical philosophy as a version of traditional idealism has a long history. In spite of Kant's and his commentators’ various attempts to distinguish between traditional and transcendental idealism, his philosophy continues to be construed as committed (whether explicitly or implicitly and whether consistently or inconsistently) to various features usually associated with the traditional idealist project. As a result, most often, the accusation is that his Critical philosophy makes too strong metaphysical and epistemological claims.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Gary Banham (2006). Freedom and Transcendental Idealism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (4):787 – 797.
    Full-text of this article is not available in this e-prints service. This article was originally published following peer-review in British Journal for the History of Philosophy, published by and copyright Routledge.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Gary Banham (2003). Kant and German Idealisms. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):333 – 339.
    This review article responds to a biography of Fichte and a collection of essays on German Idealism stressing the plurality of types of idealism that were presented at the close of the 18th and the beginning of the 19th century.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Graham Bird (2013). Reply to Edward Kanterian. Kantian Review 18 (2):289-300.
    The reply to Kanterian offers a rebuttal of his central criticisms. It reaffirms the difference between Kant's arguments in the Aesthetic and at B 148-9; it rejects the alleged error of logic in Fischer's (and my) arguments; and it rejects Kanterian's reading of passages in the Preface (A xx-xxii) and of the Amphiboly. Beyond these specific points Kanterian assumes that Kant's project in the first Critique cannot be understood as a and so begs the question at issue.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Graham Bird (2011). Replies to My Critics. Kantian Review 16 (2):257-282.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Graham Bird (2008). Review: Ameriks, Kant and the Historical Turn: Philosophy as Critical Interpretation, and Rockmore, Kant and Idealism. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (1):237 – 248.
  29. Graham Bird (2004). Review: Abela, Kant's Empirical Realism. [REVIEW] European Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):127–131.
  30. Graham Bird (1996). McDowell's Kant: "Mind and World". [REVIEW] Philosophy 71 (276):219 - 243.
  31. Graham Bird (1995). Kant and Naturalism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3 (2):399 – 408.
    The paper seeks to refute Skorupski's claim in _English-Language Philosophy 1750-1945 that Kant's philosophy was consciously antinaturalist. Skorupski has two related views: (1) that Kant consciously recognised steps from naturalism to empiricism and then to scepticism, and rejected naturalism; (2) that the rejection of naturalism issues in a transcendental account of the mind as outside nature. (1) Is vulnerable to the textual point that Kant never associates naturalism explicitly with the argument Skorupski notes. Indeed the textual references to naturalism do (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Ian Blecher, Anil Gomes, Joel Thiago Klien, Alexei N. Krouglov, Samuel Loncar & Colin Marshall (2013). Jahresinhalt Kant-Studien. Kant-Studien 104 (4):563-566.
  33. Henny Blomme (forthcoming). Kant et la matière de l'espace. Georg Olms Verlag.
  34. Christophe Bouton (2012). Idéalité transcendantale ou réalité absolue du temps? Temps du sujet et temps du monde chez Kant. Kant-Studien 103 (4):429-447.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Kant-Studien Jahrgang: 103 Heft: 4 Seiten: 429-447.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Christophe Bouton (2012). Transcendental Ideality or Absolute Reality of Time? Time for the Subject and Time for the World in Kant. Kant-Studien 103 (4).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Andrew Bowie (2003). Introduction to German Philosophy: From Kant to Habermas. Distributed in the Usa by Blackwell Pub..
  37. Archibald A. Bowman (1916). Kant's Phenomenalism in its Relation to Subsequent Metaphysics. Mind 25 (100):461-489.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Klaus Brinkmann (ed.) (2007). German Idealism: Critical Concepts in Philosophy. Routledge.
    v. 1. The Enlightenment, Kant -- v. 2. Kant's immediate critics, Early German romanticism -- v. 3. General characterization, Fichte, Schelling, Hegel -- v. 4. New horizons, The legacy of German idealism.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Klaus Brinkmann (2004). Review: Ameriks, Kant and the Fate of Autonomy. Review of Metaphysics 57 (4):824-826.
  40. William F. Bristow (2002). Are Kant's Categories Subjective? Review of Metaphysics 55 (3):551-580.
    Argues that there is a significant respect in which Kant's categories are to be understood as subjective, namely, in the sense that they are to be understood as the self-legislated rules of our understanding. Argues that the subjectivism of Kant's idealism, by which is meant the relativization of knowledge of objects to our standpoint, is a consequence of the subjectivity of the categories, on this interpretation of their subjectivity. On the reading opposed here, Kant's subjectivism is strictly a consequence of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Gordon Brittan (2011). Review: Bird, The Revolutionary Kant: Introduction. Kantian Review 16 (2):211-219.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. G. Anthony Bruno (forthcoming). A Peculiar Fate: The Unity of Human Life in Kant and Heidegger. Dialogue.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. John Burbidge (1988). Review: George di Giovanni and H. S. Harris, Between Kant and Hegel: Texts in the Development of Post-Kantian Idealism. [REVIEW] Dialogue 27 (02):378-.
  44. Jeremy Byrd (2008). Kant's Compatibilism in the New Eludication of the First Principles of Metaphysical Cognition. Kant-Studien 99 (1):68-79.
    It is generally assumed that, during his early pre-critical phase, Kant accepted a Leibnizian account of freedom according to which we are free to do otherwise than we do even though our actions are determined. This assumption is false. Far from endorsing such an account, Kant explicitly argues in the "New Elucidation of the First Principle of Metaphysical Cognition" (1755) that there is no relevant sense in which we can do otherwise than we do. Nevertheless, he is equally convinced that (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Edward Caird (1879). The so-Called Idealism of Kant. Mind 4 (16):557-561.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Luigi Caranti (2004). The Problem of Idealism in Kants Pre-Critical Period. Kant Studien 95 (3):283-303.
  47. Emily Carson (2004). Metaphysics, Mathematics and the Distinction Between the Sensible and the Intelligible in Kant's Inaugural Dissertation. Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (2):165-194.
    In this paper I argue that Kant's distinction in the Inaugural Dissertation between the sensible and the intelligible arises in part out of certain open questions left open by his comparison between mathematics and metaphysics in the Prize Essay. This distinction provides a philosophical justification for his distinction between the respective methods of mathematics and metaphysics and his claim that mathematics admits of a greater degree of certainty. More generally, this illustrates the importance of Kant's reflections on mathematics for the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Paul Carus (1902). Kant's Philosophy Critically Examined. The Monist 12 (2):181-214.
  49. Hector-Neri Castañeda (1988). Metaphysical Internalism, Selves, and the Invisible Noumenon (A Frego-Kantian Reflection on Descartes's Cogito). Midwest Studies in Philosophy 12 (1):129-144.
  50. Andrew Chignell (2012). Kant, Real Possibility, and the Threat of Spinoza. Mind 121 (483):635-675.
    In the first part of the paper I reconstruct Kant’s proof of the existence of a ‘most real being’ while also highlighting the theory of modality that motivates Kant’s departure from Leibniz’s version of the proof. I go on to argue that it is precisely this departure that makes the being that falls out of the pre-critical proof look more like Spinoza’s extended natura naturans than an independent, personal creator-God. In the critical period, Kant seems to think that transcendental idealism (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 207