This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
264 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 264
  1. Paul Abela (2002). Kant's Empirical Realism. Oxford University Press.
    Paul Abela presents a powerful, experience-sensitive form of realism about the relation between mind and world, based on an innovative interpretation of Kant. Abela breaks with tradition in taking seriously Kant's claim that his Transcendental Idealism yields a form of empirical realism, and giving a realist analysis of major themes of the Critique of Pure Reason. Abela's blending of Kantian scholarship with contemporary epistemology offers a new way of resolving philosophical debates about realism.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Paul Abela (1996). Putnam's Internal Realism and Kant's Empirical Realism. Idealistic Studies 26 (1):45-56.
    This paper challenges Putnam's claim that his internal realism is a revival of Kant's empirical realism. I agree with Putnam that there are good reasons to revive Kant's rather neglected empirical realist doctrine. However, internal realism is not the way this should be done. At the center of the following discussion lies the important difference between Putman's "real within a scheme" model and Kant's assertion of the independent existence of empirical objects. The strategy for the paper is as follows. I (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Robert Merrihew Adams (1997). Things in Themselves. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):801-825.
    The paper is an interpretation and defense of Kant's conception of things in themselves as noumena, along the following lines. Noumena are transempirical realities. As such they have several important roles in Kant's critical philosophy (Section 1). Our theoretical faculties cannot obtain enough content for a conception of noumena that would assure their real possibility as objects, but can establish their merely formal logical possibility (Sections 2-3). Our practical reason, however, grounds belief in the real possibility of some noumena, and (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Lucy Allais (2013). Langton, Kant, and Things in Themselves. In Stewart Duncan & Antonia LoLordo (eds.), Debates in Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings and Contemporary Responses. Routledge. 331.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Lucy Allais (2011). Idealism Enough: Response to Roche. Kantian Review 16 (3):375-398.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Lucy Allais (2010). Transcendental Idealism and Metaphysics: Kant's Commitment to Things as They Are in Themselves. Kant Yearbook 2 (1):1-32.
  7. Lucy Allais (2010). Kant's Argument for Transcendental Idealism in the Transcendental Aesthetic. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (1):47-75.
    This paper gives an interpretation of Kant's argument for transcendental idealism in the Transcendental Aesthetic. I argue against a common way of reading this argument, which sees Kant as arguing that substantive a priori claims about mind-independent reality would be unintelligible because we cannot explain the source of their justification. I argue that Kant's concern with how synthetic a priori propositions are possible is not a concern with the source of their justification, but with how they can have objects. I (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Lucy Allais (2007). Kant's Idealism and the Secondary Quality Analogy. Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):459-484.
    : Interpretations of Kant's transcendental idealism have been dominated by two extreme views: phenomenalist and merely epistemic readings. There are serious objections to both of these extremes, and the aim of this paper is to develop a middle ground between the two. In the Prolegomena, Kant suggests that his idealism about appearances can be understood in terms of an analogy with secondary qualities like color. Commentators have rejected this option because they have assumed that the analogy should be read in (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Lucy Allais (2006). Intrinsic Natures: A Critique of Langton on Kant. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):143–169.
    This paper argues that there is an important respect in which Rae Langton's recent interpretation of Kant is correct: Kant's claim that we cannot know things in themselves should be understood as the claim that we cannot know the intrinsic nature of things. However, I dispute Langton's account of intrinsic properties, and therefore her version of what this claim amounts to. Langton's distinction between intrinsic, causally inert properties and causal powers is problematic, both as an interpretation of Kant, and as (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Lucy Allais (2004). Kant's One World: Interpreting 'Transcendental Idealism'. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (4):655 – 684.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Lucy Allais (2003). Kant's Transcendental Idealism and Contemporary Anti-Realism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (4):369 – 392.
    This paper compares Kant's transcendental idealism with three main groups of contemporary anti-realism, associated with Wittgenstein, Putnam, and Dummett, respectively. The kind of anti-realism associated with Wittgenstein has it that there is no deep sense in which our concepts are answerable to reality. Associated with Putnam is the rejection of four main ideas: theory-independent reality, the idea of a uniquely true theory, a correspondence theory of truth, and bivalence. While there are superficial similarities between both views and Kant's, I find (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Henry E. Allison (2012). Essays on Kant. Oxford University Press.
    This volume presents seventeen essays by one of the world's leading scholars on Kant. Henry E. Allison explores the nature of transcendental idealism, freedom of the will, and the concept of the purposiveness of nature. He places Kant's views in their historical context and explores their contemporary relevance to present day philosophers.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Henry E. Allison (2006). Transcendental Realism, Empirical Realism and Transcendental Idealism. Kantian Review 11 (1):1-28.
    This essay argues that the key to understanding Kant's transcendental idealism is to understand the transcendental realism with which he contrasts it. It maintains that the latter is not to be identified with a particular metaphysical thesis, but with the assumption that the proper objects of human cognitions are “objects in general” or “as such,” that is, objects considered simply qua objects of some understanding. Since this appears to conflict with Kant's own characterization of transcendental realism as the view that (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Henry E. Allison (2004). Kant's Transcendental Idealism. Yale University Press.
    This landmark book is now reissued in a new edition that has been vastly rewritten and updated to respond to recent Kantian literature.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Henry E. Allison (1996). Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant's Theoretical and Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    Henry Allison is one of the foremost interpreters of the philosophy of Kant. This new volume collects all his recent essays on Kant's theoretical and practical philosophy. All the essays postdate Allison's two major books on Kant (Kant's Transcendental Idealism, 1983, and Kant's Theory of Freedom, 1990), and together they constitute an attempt to respond to critics and to clarify, develop and apply some of the central theses of those books. Two are published here for the first time. Special features (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Henry E. Allison (1993). Kant on Freedom: A Reply to My Critics. Inquiry 36 (4):443 – 464.
    The first two sections of this paper are devoted respectively to the criticisms of my views raised by Stephen Engstrom and Andrews Reath at a symposium on Kant's Theory of Freedom held in Washington D.C. on 28 December 1992 under the auspices of the North American Kant Society. The third section contains my response to the remarks of Marcia Baron at a second symposium in Chicago on 24 April 1993 at the APA Western Division meetings. The fourth section deals with (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Henry E. Allison (1976). Kant's Refutation of Realism. Dialectica 30 (2‐3):223-253.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Henry E. Allison (1973). Kant's Critique of Berkeley. Journal of the History of Philosophy 11 (1).
  19. Henry E. Allison (1968). Kant's Concept of the Transcendental Object. Kant-Studien 59 (1-4):165-186.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Karl Ameriks (2010). Reality, Reason, and Religion in the Development of Kant's Ethics. In Benjamin Lipscomb & James Krueger (eds.), Kant's Moral Metaphysics: God, Freedom, and Immortality. De Gruyter. 23.
  21. Karl Ameriks (2003). Problems From Van Cleve's Kant: Experience and Objects. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):196–202.
  22. Karl Ameriks (1999). Idealism and Freedom. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):825-829.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Karl Ameriks (1992). Kantian Idealism Today. History of Philosophy Quarterly 9 (3):329 - 342.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Karl Ameriks (1991). Hegel and Idealism. The Monist 74 (3):386-402.
  25. Karl Ameriks (1990). Kant, Fichte, and Short Arguments to Idealism. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 72 (1):63-85.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Karl Ameriks (1985). Hegel's Critique of Kant's Theoretical Philosophy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (1):1-35.
    This paper analyzes hegel's critique of kant's theoretical philosophy in terms of three specific objections to kant's transcendental deduction (concerning the representation of the i, The necessity of the categories, And the problem of a preliminary epistemology) and three specific objections to kant's transcendental idealism (concerning the thing in itself, The antinomies, And other specific problems of the transcendental dialectic).
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Karl Ameriks (1985). Review: Hoffe, Immanuel Kant. Review of Metaphysics 38 (3):636-637.
  28. Karl Ameriks (1982). Recent Work on Kant's Theoretical Philosophy. American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (1):1 - 24.
  29. Karl Ameriks & R. Meerbote (1984). Reviews. [REVIEW] Topoi 3 (2):181-190.
  30. Richard E. Aquila (2003). Hans Vaihinger and Some Recent Intentionalist Readings of Kant. Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2):231-250.
    BRENTANO'S APPROPRIATION OF THE Scholastic notion of intentionality, and of what Brentano called "the intentional (or mental) inexistence of an object," was early on exploited in a reading of Kant's theory of objects and appearances. Apparently the first systematic attempt was undertaken by Hans Vaihinger. However, Vaihinger's is radically different from more recent intentionalist readings of Kant. Albeit not in every respect, I propose that a return to this aspect of Vaihinger's approach supports a rewarding advance on such readings. After (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Richard E. Aquila (2001). Review: Sacks, Objectivity and Insight. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 5:114-119.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Richard E. Aquila (1992). The Subject as Appearance and as Thing in Itself in the Critique of Pure Reason: Reflections in the Light of the Role of Imagination and Apprehension. In Phillip D. Cummins & Guenter Zoeller (eds.), Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays in the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy. Ridgeview Publishing Company.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Luis M. Augusto (2005). Who's Afraid of Idealism? University Press of America.
    In Who's Afraid of Idealism? the philosophical concept of idealism, the extent to which reality is mind-made, is examined in new light. Author Luis M. Augusto explores epistemological idealism, at the source of all other kinds of idealism, from the viewpoints of Immanuel Kant and Friedrich Nietzsche, two philosophers who spent a large part of their lives denigrating the very concept. Working from Kant and Nietzsche's viewpoints that idealism was a scandal to philosophy and the cause of nihilism, Augusto evaluates (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Ralf M. Bader (2012). The Role of Kant's Refutation of Idealism. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 94 (1):53-73.
    This paper assesses the role of the Refutation of Idealism within the Critique of Pure Reason, as well as its relation to the treatment of idealism in the First Edition and to transcendental idealism more generally. It is argued that the Refutation is consistent with the Fourth Paralogism and that it can be considered as an extension of the Transcendental Deduction. While the Deduction, considered on its own, constitutes a 'regressive argument', the Refutation allows us to turn the Transcendental Analytic (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Kalyankumar Bagchi (1972). Metalanguage and Transcendental Idealism. Centre of Advanced Study in Philosophy, Visva-Bharati.
  36. Sorin Baiasu (2011). Space, Time and Mind-Dependence. Kantian Review 16 (2):175-190.
  37. Sorin Baiasu & Michelle Grier (2011). Revolutionary Versus Traditionalist Approaches to Kant: Some Aspects of the Debate. Kantian Review 16 (2):161-173.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Tom Bailey (2006). Review: Wood, Kant. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 11:138-140.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Gary Banham (2011). The Status of the Principles of the Analogies. Kantian Review 16 (2):201-210.
    The interpretation of Kant's Critical philosophy as a version of traditional idealism has a long history. In spite of Kant's and his commentators’ various attempts to distinguish between traditional and transcendental idealism, his philosophy continues to be construed as committed (whether explicitly or implicitly and whether consistently or inconsistently) to various features usually associated with the traditional idealist project. As a result, most often, the accusation is that his Critical philosophy makes too strong metaphysical and epistemological claims.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Gary Banham (2006). Freedom and Transcendental Idealism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (4):787 – 797.
    Full-text of this article is not available in this e-prints service. This article was originally published following peer-review in British Journal for the History of Philosophy, published by and copyright Routledge.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Gary Banham (2003). Kant and German Idealisms. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):333 – 339.
    This review article responds to a biography of Fichte and a collection of essays on German Idealism stressing the plurality of types of idealism that were presented at the close of the 18th and the beginning of the 19th century.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Marcia Baron (1993). Henry Allison on Kant's Theory of Freedom. Dialogue 32 (04):775-.
  43. Anne Margaret Baxley (2007). Review: Melnick, Themes in Kant's Metaphysics and Ethics. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 116 (1):142-144.
  44. Steven M. Bayne (2011). Marks, Images, and Rules. In Dennis Schulting & Jacco Verburgt (eds.), Kant's Idealism: New Interpretations of a Controversial Doctrine. Springer. 127-142.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Graham Bird (2013). Reply to Edward Kanterian. Kantian Review 18 (2):289-300.
    The reply to Kanterian offers a rebuttal of his central criticisms. It reaffirms the difference between Kant's arguments in the Aesthetic and at B 148-9; it rejects the alleged error of logic in Fischer's (and my) arguments; and it rejects Kanterian's reading of passages in the Preface (A xx-xxii) and of the Amphiboly. Beyond these specific points Kanterian assumes that Kant's project in the first Critique cannot be understood as a and so begs the question at issue.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Graham Bird (2011). Replies to My Critics. Kantian Review 16 (2):257-282.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Graham Bird (2008). Review: Ameriks, Kant and the Historical Turn: Philosophy as Critical Interpretation, and Rockmore, Kant and Idealism. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (1):237 – 248.
  48. Graham Bird (2008). Review: Höffe, Kant's Kritik der Reinen Vernunft: Die Grundlegung der Modernen Philosophie. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 13 (1):184-187.
  49. Graham Bird (2004). Review: Abela, Kant's Empirical Realism. [REVIEW] European Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):127–131.
  50. Graham Bird (1996). McDowell's Kant: "Mind and World". [REVIEW] Philosophy 71 (276):219 - 243.
1 — 50 / 264