This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
56 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 56
  1. T. Achourioti & M. van Lambalgen (2011). A Formalization of Kant's Transcendental Logic. Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (2):254-289.
    Although Kant (1998) envisaged a prominent role for logic in the argumentative structure of his Critique of Pure Reason, logicians and philosophers have generally judged Kantgeneralformaltranscendental logics is a logic in the strict formal sense, albeit with a semantics and a definition of validity that are vastly more complex than that of first-order logic. The main technical application of the formalism developed here is a formal proof that Kants logic is after all a distinguished subsystem of first-order logic, namely what (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Pedro M. S. Alves (2008). The Concept of a Transcendental Logic. In Valerio Hrsg V. Rohden, Ricardo Terra & Guido Almeida (eds.), Recht Und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. 113-125.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Richard E. Aquila (2002). Kant's Theory of A Priori Knowledge (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2):267-268.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Manuel Bremer (2008). Transcendental Logic Redefined. Review of Contemporary Philosophy 7.
    Traditionally transcendental logic has been set apart from formal logic. Transcendental logic had to deal with the conditions of possibility of judgements, which were presupposed by formal logic. Defined as a purely philosophical enterprise transcendental logic was considered as being a priori delivering either analytic or even synthetic a priori results. In this paper it is argued that this separation from the (empirical) cognitive sciences should be given up. Transcendental logic should be understood as focusing on specific questions. These do (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Jorge Brower Beltramin (2013). Aportes (otros) de Foucault al análisis de la cultura. Eidos 18 (18):198-202.
    En las discusiones modernas sobre la posibilidad de las proposiciones sintéticas a priori, la teoría de la definición tiene una importancia capital, porque la mayoría de las teorías sostiene que los juicios analíticos están lógicamente implicados en una definición explícita (lo que restringe los enunciados de una definición completa y precisa a juicios de este tipo). Sin embargo, para Kant -el primer autor en señalar la distinción entre proposiciones analíticas y sintéticas-muchos juicios analíticos son obtenidos mediante análisis de conceptos que (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jill Vance Buroker (2004). Kant's Theory of A Priori Knowledge Robert Greenberg University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2001, Ix + 278 Pp. [REVIEW] Dialogue 43 (01):165-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Quassim Cassam (2003). Can Transcendental Epistemology Be Naturalized? Philosophy 78 (2):181-203.
    Transcendental epistemology is an inquiry into conditions of human knowledge which reflect the structure of the human cognitive apparatus. The dependence thesis is the thesis that a proper investigation of such conditions must lean in important respects on the deliverances of science. I argue that Kant is right to object to the dependence thesis, but that the best objections to this thesis lead to the conclusion that the conditions of knowledge which Kant identifies are not, in any interesting sense, a (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Philip Dwyer (2010). Necessity and Possibility: The Logical Strategy of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (3):402-403.
    This book is a foray into the thorny interpretive issue of what to make of Kant's so-called "Metaphysical Deduction" of the categories. As with many of the arguments in the first Critique, the claim of the Metaphysical Deduction is easier to make out than its argument. The claim is that by some or other reference to "general logic," one may obtain a "transcendental logic," i.e., a justification (or "deduction") of the categories (of the understanding) necessary to the (very) possibility of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Dina Emundts (2008). Emil Lask on Judgment and Truth. Philosophical Forum 39 (2):263-281.
  10. Elena Ficara (2009). »Transzendental« bei Kant und Fichte. Fichte-Studien 33:81-95.
    The article analyses Kant’s and Fichte’s uses of the word ‘transcendental’. As a matter of fact, in both philosophers the use of the word is strongly connected with the problem of definition and foundation of philosophy. According to some commentators (first of all Norbert Hinske), Kant’s use of the word shows an oscillation (Doppeltendenz) between an old (metaphysical) and a new (epistemological-critical) meaning. This semantic oscillation means that Kant’s philosophical foundation fluctuates between the attempt to overcome traditional metaphysics and the (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Amihud Gilead (1982). The Relationship Between Formal and Transcendental-Metaphysical Logic According to Kant. The Monist 65 (4):437-443.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Robert Greenberg (2001). Kant's Theory of a Priori Knowledge. Pennsylvania State University Press.
    Instead, Robert Greenberg argues that Kant is more fundamentally concerned with the possibility of a priori knowledge -- the very possibility of the possibility ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. K. Hammacher (1988). The Transcendental-Logic Basis of Fichte Dialectic. Kant-Studien 79 (4):467-475.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Klaus Hammacher (1988). Zur Transzendentallogischen Begründung der Dialektik bei Fichte. Kant-Studien 79 (1-4):467-475.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. R. Hanna (2002). Review: Kant's Theory of A Priori Knowledge. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (443):671-675.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Kant Immanuel (1998). Critique of Pure Reason ; Translated and Edited by Paul Guyer, Allen W. Wood. Cambridge.
    This entirely new translation of Critique of Pure Reason by Paul Guyer and Allan Wood is the most accurate and informative English translation ever produced of this epochal philosophical text. Though its simple, direct style will make it suitable for all new readers of Kant, the translation displays a philosophical and textual sophistication that will enlighten Kant scholars as well. This translation recreates as far as possible a text with the same interpretative nuances and richness as the original.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Patricia Kitcher (2011). Kant's Thinker. Oxford University Press.
    Overview -- Locke's internal sense and Kant's changing views -- Personal identity amd its problems -- Rationalist metaphysics of mind -- Consciousness, self-consciousness, and cognition -- Strands of Argument in the Duisburg Nachlass -- A transcendental deduction for a priori concepts -- Synthesis : why and how? -- Arguing for apperception -- The power of apperception -- "I-think" as the destroyer of rational psychology -- Is Kant's theory consistent? -- The normativity objection -- Is Kant's thinker (as such) a free (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Reinhard Kynast (1925). Zur Synthesis in der reinen Logik. Kant-Studien 30 (1-2):135-148.
  19. Nectarios G. Limnatis (2006). The Canon and the Organon of Thought. Idealistic Studies 36 (2):123-139.
    This paper looks at the Kantian background in the development of the views on formal logic and contradiction in German Idealism. Assuming the post-Kantian view, I examine what Kant advanced and what he left unsettled, provoking thus the subsequent debate. I start by showing (§1) that already the pre-critical Kant questions the effectiveness of formal logic in philosophical discourse andclaims that the laws of identity and non-contradiction fall short of explaining change, opposition, and contradiction, all these being parts of reality. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Béatrice Longuenesse (2007). Hegel's Critique of Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press.
    Hegel's Science of Logic has received less attention than his Phenomenology of Spirit, but Hegel himself took it to be his highest philosophical achievement and the backbone of his system. The present book focuses on this most difficult of Hegel’s published works. Béatrice Longuenesse offers a close analysis of core issues, including discussions of what Hegel means by ‘dialectical logic’, the role and meaning of ‘contradiction’ in Hegel’s philosophy, and Hegel’s justification for the provocative statement that ‘what is actual is (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. John MacFarlane (2008). Brandom's Demarcation of Logic. Philosophical Topics 36 (2):55-62.
    This is a lightly edited version of my comments on Brandom’s Lecture 2, as delivered in Prague at the “Prague Locke Lectures” in April, 2007. I try to say why Brandom’s proposed demarcation is significant, by placing it in a broader context of demarcation proposals from Kant to the twentieth century. I then raise some questions about the basic ingredients of Brandom’s demarcation—the notions of PP-sufficiency and VP-sufficiency—and question whether the vocabulary of conditionals, Brandom’s paradigm for logical vocabulary, can be (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. John MacFarlane (2002). Frege, Kant, and the Logic in Logicism. Philosophical Review 111 (1):25-65.
    Let me start with a well-known story. Kant held that logic and conceptual analysis alone cannot account for our knowledge of arithmetic: “however we might turn and twist our concepts, we could never, by the mere analysis of them, and without the aid of intuition, discover what is the sum [7+5]” (KrV, B16). Frege took himself to have shown that Kant was wrong about this. According to Frege’s logicist thesis, every arithmetical concept can be defined in purely logical terms, and (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Penelope Maddy (1999). Logic and the Discursive Intellect. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (1):94-115.
    The effort to fit simple logical truths–like `if it's either red or green and it's not red, then it must be green'–into Kant's account of knowledge turns up a position more subtle and intriguing than might be expected at first glance.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Jacqueline Mariña (2011). Transcendental Arguments for Personal Identity in Kant's Transcendental Deduction. Philo 14 (2):109-136.
    One of the principle aims of the B version of Kant’s transcendental deduction is to show how it is possible that the same “I think” can accompany all of my representations, which is a transcendental condition of the possibility of judgment. Contra interpreters such as A. Brook, I show that this “I think” is an a priori (reflected) self-consciousness; contra P. Keller, I show that this a priori self-consciousness is first and foremost a consciousness of one’s personal identity from a (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Wayne M. Martin (2003). Nothing More or Less Than Logic: General Logic, Transcendental Philosophy, and Kant's Repudiation of Fichte's Wissenschaftslehre. Topoi 22 (1):29-39.
    In this paper I lay the foundations for an understanding of one of Fichte's most neglected and least understood texts: the late lecture course on Transcendental Logic. I situate this work in the context of Fichte's lifelong struggle with the problem of understanding the relation between logic and philosophy – a problem that I show to figure centrally both in Fichte's own revolutionary thinking and in his response to Kant's notorious denunciation of the Wissenschaftslehre. By attending to this context we (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Matt McCormick, Immanuel Kant: Metaphysics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Immanuel Kant is one of the most influential philosophers in the history of Western philosophy. His contributions to metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and aesthetics have had a profound impact on almost every philosophical movement that followed him. This portion of the Encyclopedia entry will focus on his metaphysics and epistemology in one of his most important works, The Critique of Pure Reason . (All references will be to the A (1781) and B(1787) edition pages in Werner Pluhar's translation. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1996.) (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Ben Lazare Mijuskovic (2008). The Simplicity Argument and the Unconscious. Philosophy and Theology 20 (1/2):53-83.
    I argue that Kant’s four Paralogistic conclusions concerning (a) substantiality; (b1) unity and (b2) immortality, in the famous “Achillesargument”; (c) personal identity; and (d) metaphysical idealism, in the first edition Critique of Pure Reason (1781), are all connectedby being grounded in a common underlying rational principle, an a priori (universal and necessary) presupposition, namely, that boththe mind and its essential attribute of thinking are immaterial and unextended, i.e., simple. Consequently, despite Kant’s predilectionfor architectonic divisions and separations, I show that in (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Giovanni Mion (forthcoming). The Square of Opposition: From Russell’s Logic to Kant’s Cosmology. History and Philosophy of Logic:1-6.
    In this paper, I will show to what extent we can use our modern understanding of the Square of Opposition in order to make sense of Kant’s double standard solution to the cosmological antinomies. Notoriously, for Kant, both theses and antitheses of the mathematical antinomies are false, while both theses and antitheses of the dynamical antinomies are true. Kantian philosophers and interpreters (including Schopenhauer, for example) have criticized Kant’s solution as artificial and prejudicial. In the paper, I do not dispute (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Kurt Mosser (2008). Kant's General Logic and Aristotle. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:181-189.
    In the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant uses the term “logic” in a bewildering variety of ways, at times making it close to impossible to determine whether he is referring to (among others) general logic, transcendental logic, transcendental analytic, a "special" logic relative to a specific science, a "natural" logic, a logic intended for the "learned" (Gelehrter), some hybrid of these logics, or even some still-more abstract notion that ranges over all of these uses. This paper seeks to come to (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Aleksy Mołczanow (2012). Quantification: Transcending Beyond Frege's Boundaries: A Case Study in Transcendental-Metaphysical Logic. Brill.
    Drawing on the original conception of Kant’s synthetic a priori and the relevant related developments in philosophy, this book presents a reconstruction of the intellectual history of the conception of quantity and offers an entirely ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Paul Natorp (1901). Zur Frage der logischen Methode. Mit Beziehung auf Edm. Husserls „Prolegomena zur reinen Logik“. Kant-Studien 6 (1-3):270-283.
  32. Chong-Hyon Paek (2005). Kant’s Theory of Transcendental Truth as Ontology. Kant-Studien 96 (2):147-160.
    I. The Problem of ‘Truth’ in the Logic of Truth.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Rebecca Paimann (2007). &Quot;the Lying School of Formal Logic&Quot;. Johann Baptist Schad's Transcendental Logic as a Road to True Philosophy with Particular Consideration of its Relation to Kant's and Fichte's Conceptions. Kant-Studien 98 (1):106-126.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. H. J. Paton (1958). Formal and Transcendental Logic. Kant-Studien 49 (1-4):245-263.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Robert B. Pippin (1997). Review: Longuenesse, Kant Et le Pouvoir de Juger: Sensibilite Et Discursivite Dans l'Analytique Transcendentale de la Critique de la Raison Pure. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 94 (6):318-324.
  36. Riccardo Pozzo (2000). Vázquez Lobeiras, María Jesús. Die Logik Und Ihr Spiegelbild: Das Verhältnis von Formaler Und Transzendentaler Logik in Kants Philosophischer Entwicklung. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 54 (2):462-464.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Riccardo Pozzo (1998). Kant Within the Tradition of Modern Logic: The Role of the "Introduction: Idea of a Transcendental Logic". Review of Metaphysics 52 (2):295 - 310.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. John A. Reuscher (1970). Kant's Transcendental Logic. International Philosophical Quarterly 10 (4):661-664.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Heinrich Rickert (1914). Über logische und ethische Geltung. Kant-Studien 19 (1-3):182-221.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Heinrich Rickert (1909). Zwei Wege der Erkenntnistheorie. Transscendentalpsychologie und Transscendentallogik. Kant-Studien 14 (1-3):169-228.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Sebastian Rödl (2005). Transcendental Deduction of Predicative Structure in Kant and Brandom. Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):91-108.
    Fregean predicates applied to Fregean objects are merely defined by a "timeless" deductive order of sentences. They cannot provide sufficient structure in order to explain how names can refer to objects of intuition and how predicates can express properties of substances that change in time. Therefore, the accounts of Wilson and Quine, Prior and Brandom for temporal judgments fail -- and a new reconstruction of Kant's transcendental logic, especially of the analogies of experience, is needed.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Timothy Rosenkoetter (2009). Truth Criteria and the Very Project of a Transcendental Logic. Archiv für Geschichte Der Philosophie 91 (2):193-236.
    This paper argues that Kant's idea for a new kind of logic is bound up with a very specific strategy for obtaining truth criteria, where he takes Christian Wolff to have failed. While the First Critique 's argument against any universal criterion for empirical truth has almost always been treated as extraneous to the main concerns of the Transcendental Analytic, I argue that Kant inserted it at an important juncture in the text to illustrate a signal difference between traditional logics (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Eva Schaper (1971). Kant's Transcendental Logic by Thomas Kaehao Swing. (Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1969. Pp. X + 388. [REVIEW] Philosophy 46 (175):75-76.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Claudia M. Schmidt (2008). Kant's Transcendental and Empirical Psychology of Cognition. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (4):462-472.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. G. Schulte (1972). Die aristotelische Syllogistik in der transzendentalen Logik Kants und Fichtes. Kant-Studien 63 (1-4):74-85.
  46. Dennis Schulting & Jacco Verburgt (eds.) (2010). Kant's Idealism. New Interpretations of a Controversial Doctrine. Springer.
    This key collection of essays sheds new light on long-debated controversies surrounding Kant’s doctrine of idealism and is the first book in the English language that is exclusively dedicated to the subject. Well-known Kantians Karl Ameriks and Manfred Baum present their considered views on this most topical aspect of Kant's thought. Several essays by acclaimed Kant scholars broach a vastly neglected problem in discussions of Kant's idealism, namely the relation between his conception of logic and idealism: The standard view that (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Sally Sedgwick (1991). Hegel on Kant's Antinomies and Distinction Between General and Transcendental Logic. The Monist 74 (3):403-420.
  48. T. K. Seung (1969). Kant's Transcendental Logic. New Haven, Yale University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Harold R. Smart (1955). Two Views on Kant and Formal Logic. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 16 (2):155-171.
  50. Clinton Tolley (2012). The Generality of Kant's Transcendental Logic. Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (3):417-446.
1 — 50 / 56