This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
42 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
  1. G. Baum & R. Malter (1991). Kant in England, Kant Newly Discovered Letter to Nitsch, Friedrich. Kant-Studien 82 (4):456-468.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. G. Baum & R. Malter (1991). Kant in England. Ein Neuer Brief: Kant an Friedrich August Nitsch. Kant-Studien 82 (4):456-468.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Predrag Čičovački (1994). On Kant's Letter to Marcus Herz From 1772. Theoria 37 (1):11-22.
  4. Predrag Cicovacki (1991). An Aporia of A Priori Knowledge. On Carl's and Beck's Interpretation of Kant's Letter to Markus Herz. Kant-Studien 82 (3):349-360.
  5. Werner Euler (2000). Kants Briefwechsel und „Amtlicher Schriftverkehr“. Mit einem Anhang zu Kants Vorlesung über römischen Stil. Kant-Studien 91 (s1):106-142.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Hp Fischer (1985). An Answer to Kant Letters of August 23, 1749. Kant-Studien 76 (1):79-89.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Katrin Flikschuh (1999). Review: Flikschuha, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 3 (1):143-146.
  8. Alison R. Hume (1968). Review: Zweig (Ed & Tr), Philosophical Correspondence 1759–99. [REVIEW] Dialogue 6 (04):612-614.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Kant (2009). Marcus Herz: First Letter (1770) / Herz ; Second Letter (1771) / Kant ; Third Letter (1771) / Herz ; Observations From Speculative Philosophy (1771) / Herz ; Fourth Letter (1772) ; Fifth Letter (1776). In Eric Watkins (ed.), Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: Background Source Materials. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Immanuel Kant (2014). Briefwechsel. Felix Meiner Verlag Gmbh.
    Der Kantische Briefwechsel stellt für die Kantforschung eine profunde Quelle dar: eine Quelle sowohl für Kants äußeren Lebensweg wie auch für die Entstehung seines Werks und dessen unmittelbare Wirkungsgeschichte. Nicht nur Versuche, Kants Lebensgeschichte und Persönlichkeit darzustellen, stützen sich ganz maßgeblich auf die erhaltene Korrespondenz. Auch für unsere Kenntnis der inneren und äußeren Entwicklung der kritischen Philosophie, des wachsenden Erfolgs des Kritizismus, aber auch der damit im Zusammenhang stehenden Konflikte ist Kants Briefwechsel eine unschätzbare Quelle.Der Band enthält alle bis dato (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Immanuel Kant (2013). Carta a Markus Hertz. Estudios de Filosofía 10:165-172.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Immanuel Kant (1997). Lectures on Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press.
    The purpose of the Cambridge Edition is to offer translations of the best modern German edition of Kant's work in a uniform format suitable for Kant scholars. When complete (fourteen volumes are currently envisaged) the edition will include all of Kant's published writings and a generous selection from the unpublished writings such as the Opus postumum, handschriftliche Nachlass, lectures, and correspondence. This volume contains the first translation into English of notes from Kant's lectures on metaphysics. These lectures, dating from the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Immanuel Kant (1986). Philosophical Correspondence, 1759-1799. University of Chicago Press.
    Drawn from the Prussian Academy edition of Kant's collected works, these letters make it possible to trace the development of Kant's thought from his earliest worries about the topics discussed in the Critique of Pure Reason to his attempts ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Immanuel Kant (1968). Selected Pre-Critical Writings and Correspondence with Beck. New York, Barnes & Noble.
  15. Immanuel Kant (1967). Philosophical Correspondence, 1759-99. [Chicago]University of Chicago Press.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Alison Laywine (2005). Kant on the Self as Model of Experience. Kantian Review 9 (1):1-29.
    Kant's correspondence includes a short letter from a well-wisher named Bertram. The content of the letter is as harmless as it is uninteresting: Bertram invites Kant to visit his brother's estate. ‘Do come,’ he says, ‘because the weather is so beautiful and such travel so beneficial’ . The interest of the letter is entirely exhausted by the date: 20 May 1775. For Kant used the letter to scribble down ideas, some suggestive of themes later to emerge in the first Critique. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Alison Laywine (2001). Kant in Reply to Lambert on the Ancestry of Metaphysical Concepts. Kantian Review 5 (1):1-48.
    The purpose of this paper is to make sense of the immediate philosophical aftermath of Kant's Inaugural Dissertation. I will try to show what Kant himself took to be the problems left unsettled in the dissertation, and how he tried to deal with them. At the end of the paper, I will briefly sketch how he may have proceeded after the famous letter to Marcus Herz of 1772, and what path he would have had to take to recognize the need (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. James Edwin Mahon (2006). Kant and Maria Von Herbert: Reticence Vs. Deception. Philosophy 81 (3):417-444.
    This article argues for a distinction between reticence and lying on the basis of what Kant says about reticence in his correspondence with Maria von Herbert and in his other ethical writings, and defends this distinction against the objections of Rae Langton , 481–505). Lying is necessarily deceptive, whereas reticence is not necessarily deceptive. Allowing another person to remain ignorant of some matter is a form of reticence that is not deceptive. This form of reticence may be ethically permissible.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Paul Menzer (1924). Neue Kantbriefe. Kant-Studien 29 (2):496-500.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Kevin Mulligan, Peter Simons & Barry Smith (1987). Wahrmacher. In L. Bruno Puntel (ed.), Der Wahrheitsbegriff. Neue Explikationsversuche. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
    German translation of Mulligan, Simons and Smith, "Truth-Makers" (1984) A realist theory of truth for a class of sentence holds that there are entities in virtue of which these sentences are true or false. We call such entities ‘truthmakers’ and contend that those for a wide range of sentences about the real world are moments (dependent particulars). Since moments are unfamiliar we provide a definition and a brief philosophical history, anchoring them in our ontology by showing that they are objects (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Ernst-Otto Onnasch (2012). Das Manuskript von Kants Brief an Kiesewetter vom 13. Oktober 1797. Kant-Studien 103 (2):237-241.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Ernst-Otto Onnasch (2011). The Correspondence Between Immanuel Kant and Jeronimo de Bosch Or a Comment on Dutch-German Exchange of Critical Philosophy. Kant-Studien 102 (1).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Ernst-Otto Onnasch (2011). Der Briefwechsel zwischen Immanuel Kant und Jeronimo de Bosch. Oder ein Beitrag zum holländisch-deutschen Austausch über die kritische Philosophie. Kant-Studien 102 (1):89-112.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. H. Reiss (2005). On Buchmacherey. Two Letters to Herr Friedrich Nicolai. Observations on the Text of This Script in the Academy Edition-a Preparatory Work for a New Improved Edition. [REVIEW] Kant-Studien 96 (3).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Hans Reiss (2005). Ueber die Buchmacherey. Zwey Briefe an Herrn Friedrich Nicoley. Anmerkungen zum Text dieser Schrift in der Akademieausgabe – eine Vorarbeit für eine neue, verbesserte Edition. Kant-Studien 96 (3):375-399.
    Kants letzte Schrift Ueber die Buchmacherey ist von den Biographen Kants nur all zu oft ignoriert worden. Sogar so angesehene Gelehrte wie Friedrich Paulsen und Ernst Cassirer widmen dieser Schrift in ihren bekannten Darstellungen von Kants Leben und Denken kein Wort. Auch Manfred Kuehn geht in seiner jüngst veröffentlichten sehr lesbaren Biographie auf Kants Abrechnung mit Nicolai überhaupt nicht ein. Das ist bedauerlich; denn dieses Werk verdient mehr Aufmerksamkeit. Es weist nach, wie sehr es Kant an dem richtigen Verständnis seiner (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Peter Remnant & Christoph E. Schweitzer (1965). A New Letter by Kant. Journal of the History of Philosophy 3 (2):243.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Ernst Sänger (1904). Die neue Kantausgabe: Kants Briefwechsel. Kant-Studien 8 (1-4):97-110.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Eva Schaper (1969). Review: Kerferd & Walford (Tr & Introduction), Lucas (Contribution), Kant: Selected Pre-Critial Writings and Correspondence with Beck. [REVIEW] Philosophy 44 (168):164-.
  29. Friedrich Alfred Schmid (1904). Kant im Spiegel seiner Briefe. Kant-Studien 9 (1-3):307-320.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Dieter Schönecker (2007). Review: Herausgegeben and Timmermann, Kant's Grundlegung Zur Metaphysik der Sitten. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 12:155.
  31. Dieter Schönecker (2007). Review: Herausgegeben & Timmermann, Kant's Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 12 (1):155-159.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Werner Stark (1993). Nachforschungen Zu Briefen Und Handschriften Immanuel Kants. Akademie Verlag.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. P. F. Strawson (1968). Review: Zweig (Ed & Tr), Kant: Philosophical Correspondence, 1759–99. [REVIEW] Philosophy 43 (166):392-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Yvonne Unna (2012). A Draft of Kant's Reply to Hufeland: Key Questions of Kant's Dietetics and the Problem of Its Systematic Place in His Philosophy. Kant-Studien 103 (3):271-291.
    : The article provides an introduction to an autograph draft of a letter on dietetics Kant wrote to the physician Christoph Wilhelm Hufeland and uses it as a springboard for the critical discussion of Kant’s dietetics as well as its systematic place in his philosophy. The final draft of Kant’s letter to Hufeland became the third part of The Conflict of the Faculties. The article argues that Kant assigns dietetics, understood as the regulation of the traditional nonnaturals, to philosophy and (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Yvonne Unna & Wolfgang G. Bayerer (2012). A Draft of Kant's Reply to Hufeland: Autograph, Transcription (Wolfgang G. Bayerer), and English Translation (Yvonne Unna). Kant-Studien 103 (1):1-24.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. E. V. Aster (1924). Die 2. Auflage des Kantischen Briefwechsels. Kant-Studien 29 (2):489-495.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. C. V. (1973). Review: Bruch, Lettres sur la Morale et la Religion. Par Emmanuel Kant. [REVIEW] Dialogue 12 (03):581-.
  38. Erlangen von Harald-Paul Fischer (forthcoming). Berichte und diskussionen: Eine Antwort auf Kants Breife. Kant-Studien.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Walter B. Waterman (1899). A New Letter of Kant's. Kant-Studien 2 (1-3):104-108.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Julian Wuerth (2010). Review: Watkins (Ed., Tr.), Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: Background Source Materials. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (8).
  41. Arnulf Zweig (2001). I. Kant: Letter to Friedrich August Nitsch (1794). Philosophical Forum 32 (4):285–288.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Arnulf Zweig (2001). I. Kant: Letter to Carl Leonhard Reinhold (1789). Philosophical Forum 32 (4):283–284.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation