This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Subcategories:
490 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 490
Material to categorize
  1. Erich Adickes (1894). Bibliography of Writings by and on Kant Which Have Appeared in Germany Up to the End of 1887. (VIII.). Philosophical Review 3 (4):434-458.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Theodor W. Adorno (2002). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Polity..
    "This volume . . . provides wonderful insight into Adorno's understanding of Kant and also allows us to see more clearly the role Kant's thought played in ...
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  3. Theodor W. Adorno (2001). Kants Critique of Pure Reason, 1959. Polity.
  4. Karl Ameriks (1983). Kant on Pure Reason. Teaching Philosophy 6 (1):67-69.
  5. Daniel E. Anderson (1979). A Note on the Syntheticity of Mathematical Propositions in Kant'sprolegomena. Southern Journal of Philosophy 17 (2):149-153.
  6. R. Lanier Anderson (2010). The Introduction to the Critique: Framing the Question. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press
  7. Ignacio Angelelli (1975). On ‘Transcendental’ Again. Kant-Studien 66 (1-4).
  8. Ignacio Angelelli (1972). On the Origins of Kant's 'Transcendental'. Kant-Studien 63 (1-4):117-122.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Kent Baldner (1990). Is Transcendental Idealism Coherent? Synthese 85 (1):1 - 23.
    I argue that transcendental idealism can be understood as a coherent and plausible account of experience. I begin by proposing an interpretation of the claim that we know only appearances that does not imply that the objects of experience are anything other than independently real objects. As I understand it, the claim here is abouthow objects appear to us, and not aboutwhat objects appear to us. After this, I offer a version of a correspondence account of veridical experience, in virtue (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10. Gary Banham (2013). Regulative Principles and Regulative Ideas. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter 15-24.
  11. Peter Baumanns (1988). Kants vierte Antinomie und das Ideal der reinen Vernunft. Kant-Studien 79 (1-4):183-200.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Michael Baur (2003). Problems From Kant. [REVIEW] International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (1):124-126.
  13. Oswald Bayer (1992). Kants Geschichte der reinen Vernunft in einer Parodie. Hamanns Metakritik im zweiten Entwurf. Kant-Studien 83 (1):1-20.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Beck Beck (1955). CASSIRER'S Kant's First Critique. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 16:248.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Lewis White Beck (1969). Early German Philosophy: Kant and His Predecessors. St. Augustine's Press.
  16. Jeffrey Bernstein (1997). Imagination and Lunacy in Kant's First Critique and Anthropology. Idealistic Studies 27 (3):143-154.
  17. Alessandro Bertinetto (2009). «Wäre ihm dies klar geworden, so wäre seine Ktk. W.L. geworden«: Fichte's Auseinandersetzung mit Kant in den Vorlesungen ueber Transzendentale Logik. Fichte-Studien 33:145-164.
  18. Gisbert Beyerhaus (1921). Kants ‚Programm' der Aufklärung: aus dem Jahre 1784. Kant-Studien 26 (1-2):1-16.
  19. Joseph L. Blau (1954). Kant in America. I: Brownson's Critique of the Critique of Pure Reason. Journal of Philosophy 51 (26):874-880.
  20. Henny Blomme (2009). La preuve de l'espace absolu et l'argument des homologues non congruents en 1768. In Luc Langlois (ed.), Les années 1747-1781 : Kant avant la Critique de la raison pure. Vrin 169-176.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Alexander Bozzo (2015). The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Kant-Studien 106 (1):136-142.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Kant-Studien Jahrgang: 106 Heft: 1 Seiten: 136-142.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Reinhard Brandt & Werner Stark (2000). Zustand Und Zukunft der Akademie-Ausgabe von Immanuel Kants Gesammelten Schriften. De Gruyter.
  23. Daniel Breazeale (2003). Two Cheers for Post-Kantianism: A Response to Karl Ameriks. Inquiry 46 (2):239 – 259.
    Karl Ameriks has recently devoted an entire volume to defending what he calls "orthodox" Kantianism against what he judges to be the "errors" of such post-Kantian idealists as K. L. Reinhold and J. G. Fichte and to exposing what he claims is the frequently unnoticed but always deleterious influence of post-Kantianism upon certain prominent strands of contemporary philosophy. In response, this paper challenges Ameriks' interpretation of Kantianism itself and of the "post-Kantian project", as well as his construal of transcendental idealism. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Angela Breitenbach (2008). Two Views on Nature: A Solution to Kant's Antinomy of Mechanism and Teleology. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):351 – 369.
  25. Andrew Brook (2001). Kants Early Critics. Philosophical Inquiry 23 (3-4):153-155.
  26. Curtis Brown (1988). Internal Realism: Transcendental Idealism? Midwest Studies in Philosophy 12 (1):145-155.
    Idealism is an ontological view, a view about what sorts of things there are in the universe. Idealism holds that what there is depends on our own mental structure and activity. Berkeley of course held that everything was mental; Kant held the more complex view that there was an important distinction between the mental and the physical, but that the structure of the empirical world depended on the activities of minds. Despite radical differences, idealists like Berkeley and Kant share what (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27. Karl Bühler (1928). Die symbolik der sprache. Kant-Studien 33 (1-2):405-409.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  28. John Burnheim (1956). Kant's First Critique. Philosophical Studies 6:179-180.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Jeremy Byrd (2008). Kant's Compatibilism in the New Eludication of the First Principles of Metaphysical Cognition. Kant-Studien 99 (1):68-79.
    It is generally assumed that, during his early pre-critical phase, Kant accepted a Leibnizian account of freedom according to which we are free to do otherwise than we do even though our actions are determined. This assumption is false. Far from endorsing such an account, Kant explicitly argues in the "New Elucidation of the First Principle of Metaphysical Cognition" (1755) that there is no relevant sense in which we can do otherwise than we do. Nevertheless, he is equally convinced that (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  30. Edward Caird (1999). A Critical Account of the Philosophy of Kant with an Historical Introduction. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
  31. Edward Caird (1877). A Critical Account of the Philosophy of Kant.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32. John J. Callanan (2008). Kant on Analogy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (4):747 – 772.
    The role of analogy appears in surprisingly different areas of the first Critique. On the one hand, Kant considered the concept to have a specific enough meaning to entitle the principle concerned with causation an analogy; on the other hand we can find Kant referring to analogy in various parts of the Transcendental Dialectic in a seemingly different manner. Whereas in the Transcendental Analytic, Kant takes some time to provide a detailed (if not clear) account of the meaning of the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  33. H. W. Cassirer (1956). Kant. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 34:127.
  34. Walter Cerf (1972). The Bounds of Sense and Reason. Mind 81 (324):601-617.
  35. Michael John Clarke (1996). The Public Use of Reason in Kant's Political Philosophy. Dissertation, Boston College
    This dissertation is a study of Kant's advocacy of an active political role for reason and his corresponding defense of freedom in its public use. The central finding of Kant's critique of reason--namely, that reason is a practical, rather than theoretical faculty--justifies and even requires that philosophy turn its attention to practice and attempt to take a leading role in morals and politics. Moreover, it does so in a way that subordinates orientation by such natural ends as happiness, advantage, or (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Alix A. Cohen (2009). Kant's Concept of Freedom and the Human Sciences. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (1):pp. 113-135.
    The aim of this paper is to determine whether Kant’s account of freedom fits with his theory of the human sciences. Several Kant scholars have recently acknowledged a tension between Kant’s metaphysics and his works on anthropology in particular. I believe that in order to clarify the issue at stake, the tension between Kant’s metaphysics and his anthropology should be broken down into three distinct problems. -/- First, Kant’s Anthropology studies the human being ‘as a freely acting being.’5 This approach (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37. Phillip Cummins (1968). Kant on Outer and Inner Intuition. Noûs 2 (3):271-292.
  38. Gordon Davis (unknown). The Self and Spatial Representation in Kant's Metaphysics of Experience: From the First Critique to the Opus Postumum. Eidos: The Canadian Graduate Journal of Philosophy 12.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. H. J. De Vleeschauwer (1962). The Development of Kantian Thought. New York, T. Nelson.
  40. Herman Jean de Vleeschauwer & Alistair Robert Campbell Duncan (1962). The Development of Kantian Thought the History of a Doctrine. Nelson.
  41. B. Den Ouden (ed.) (1987). New Essays on Kant. Peter Lang.
  42. Bernard den Ouden & Marcia Moen (1991). New Essays on Kant. Philosophical Review 100 (2):341-344.
  43. Ulrich Diehl (2013). Kants ursprüngliche Einsicht. Universitätsverlag Halle-Wittenberg.
    Die Wende von der vorkritischen zur kritischen Phase von Kants intellektueller Entwicklung ist ein wichtiges Thema der biographischen und hermeneutischen Kantforschung. Umfangreiche Abhandlungen und Essays wurden schon zu diesem Thema verfasst. Ist es überhaupt möglich, noch etwas Neues zu diesem Thema bei zutragen? Wie lässt sich das Verständnis von Kants Umbruchphase und der Genese seiner kritischen Philosophie erweitern und vertiefen? Im dem Aufsatz wird der Behauptung des Kantbiographen Manfred Kühn nachgegangen, derzufolge „keine der bislang vorgelegten Darstellungen [...] völlig zutreffend“ sei. (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Charles Ess (1994). Immanuel Kant, Theoretical Philosophy, 1755-1770, David Walford and Ralf Meerbote, Eds. And Trans. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 14 (1):24-26.
  45. Werner Euler (2001). Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Critical Essays. Ed. by Patricia Kitcher. [REVIEW] Kant-Studien 92 (2):243-245.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. James Fehr (2001). Immanuel Kant: Critique of Pure Reason. [REVIEW] Kant-Studien 92 (1):106-109.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Diogo Ferrer (2005). A Ideia de Sistema em Kant. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 61 (3/4):687 - 705.
    O presente artigo lida com a questão da compatibilidade entre duas exigências opostas da filosofia teorética de Kant: a crítica, por um lado, e a ideia de sistema, por outro. Enquanto a crítica assenta sobre uma divisão da razão em faculdades distintas, o sistema é um ideal de unidade sob um mesmo princípio. Uma apreciação do uso do termo "sistem" nas principais obras críticas de Kant mostra que o termo é equívoco, e que os seus diferentes sentidos só podem ser (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. J. Freudiger (1991). The Problem of Perceptual Judgment in Kant's Theoretical Philosophy. Kant-Studien 82 (4):414-435.
  49. R. Z. Friedman (1986). Kant and Kierkegaard: The Limits of Reason and the Cunning of Faith. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 19 (1/2):3 - 22.
  50. Ido Geiger (2003). Is the Assumption of a Systematic Whole of Empirical Concepts a Necessary Condition of Knowledge? Kant-Studien 94 (3):273-298.
1 — 50 / 490