This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
82 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 82
  1. Henry E. Allison, Peter Heath, Gary Hatfield & Michael Friedman (eds.) (2005). Theoretical Philosophy After 1781. Cambridge University Press.
    This volume, originally published in 2002, assembles the historical sequence of writings that Kant published between 1783 and 1796 to popularize, summarize, amplify and defend the doctrines of his masterpiece, the Critique of Pure Reason of 1781. The best known of them, the Prolegomena, is often recommended to beginning students, but the other texts are also vintage Kant and are important sources for a fully rounded picture of Kant's intellectual development. As with other volumes in the series there are copious (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Henry Allison, Peter Heath, Gary Hatfield & Michael Friedman (eds.) (2009). Theoretical Philosophy After 1781. Cambridge University Press.
    This volume, originally published in 2002, assembles the historical sequence of writings that Kant published between 1783 and 1796 to popularize, summarize, amplify and defend the doctrines of his masterpiece, the Critique of Pure Reason of 1781. The best known of them, the Prolegomena, is often recommended to beginning students, but the other texts are also vintage Kant and are important sources for a fully rounded picture of Kant's intellectual development. As with other volumes in the series there are copious (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Karl Ameriks (2006). Kant and the Historical Turn: Philosophy as Critical Interpretation. Oxford University Press.
    Immanuel Kant's work changed the course of modern philosophy; Karl Ameriks examines how. He compares the philosophical system set out in Kant's Critiques with the work of the major philosophers before and after Kant. Individual essays provide case studies in support of Ameriks's thesis that late 18th-century reactions to Kant initiated an "historical turn," after which historical and systematic considerations became joined in a way that fundamentally distinguishes philosophy from science and art.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  4. Review Author[S.]: Karl Ameriks (1992). Review Essays: Recent Work on Hegel: The Rehabilitation of an Epistemologist? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (1):177-202.
  5. Pamela Anderson (2010). Pure Reason and Contemporary Philosophy of Religion: The Rational Striving in and for Truth. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1):95-106.
    This essay urges contemporary philosophers of religion to rethink the role that Kant’s critical philosophy has played both in establishing the analytic nature of modern philosophy and in developing a critique of reason’s drive for the unconditioned. In particular, the essay demonstrates the contribution that Kant and other modern rationalists such as Spinoza can still make today to our rational striving in and for truth. This demonstration focuses on a recent group of analytic philosophers of religion who have labelled their (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Emilia Angelova (2012). Kant's Physical Geography. Comparative and Continental Philosophy 4 (1):151 - 157.
    Reading Kant’s Geography, edited by Stuart Elden and Eduardo Mendieta, State University of New York Press, 2011, 382 pp., pb. $34.95, hb. $90.00, ISBN-13: 9781438436050. This review of an edited collection, Reading Kant’s Geography, discusses a series of critical essays on Kant’s physical geography, a topic to which he devoted many years of intellectual energy. The volume is the first of its kind for it appears in anticipation of the first ever publication into English of Kant’s own lectures on physical (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Massimo Barale (2000). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason with in the Tradition of Modern Logic. [REVIEW] International Studies in Philosophy 32 (4):149-152.
  8. Lewis White Beck, Mary J. Gregor, Ralf Meerbote & John A. Reuscher (1988). Kant's Latin Writings, Translations, Commentaries, and Notes. Philosophical Review 97 (3):427-429.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  9. Frederick Beiser (1992). Kant's Intellectual Development: 1746–1781. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge University Press 26--61.
  10. Mick Bowles (2009). The Nature of Productive Force: Kant, Spinoza and Deleuze. In Edward Willatt & Matt Lee (eds.), Thinking Between Deleuze and Kant: A Strange Encounter. Continuum
  11. Luigi Caranti (2006). Kant's Criticism of Descartes in the “Reflexionen Zum Idealismus” (1788–1793). Kant-Studien 97 (3):318-342.
    Kant devotes to the problem of Cartesian skepticism a constant attention throughout his philosophical career. His first attempt to refute the skeptic goes back to the 1755 Nova Delucidatio, while other arguments, both in the pre-critical and in the critical period, follow one another in a rather erratic effort to remove the “scandal” of philosophy, that is, our inability to prove the existence of the external world beyond doubt. This on-going struggle against the skeptic does not end with the 1787 (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Tony Cheng (2008). World and Subject: Themes From McDowell. Dissertation, National Chengchi University, Taiwan
    This essay is an inquiry into John McDowell’s thinking on ‘subjectivity.’ The project consists in two parts. On the one hand, I will discuss how McDowell understands and responds to the various issues he is tackling; on the other, I will approach relevant issues concerning subjectivity by considering different aspects of it: a subject as a perceiver, knower, thinker, speaker, agent, person and (self-) conscious being in the world. The inquiry begins by identifying and resolving a tension generated by the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. George Di Giovanni (2005). Freedom and Religion in Kant and His Immediate Successors: The Vocation of Humankind, 1774-1800. Cambridge University Press.
    The theologians of the late German Enlightenment saw in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason a new rational defense of their Christian faith. In fact, Kant's critical theory of meaning and moral law totally subverted the spirit of that faith. This challenging new study examines the contribution made by the Critique of Pure Reason to this change of meaning. George di Giovanni stresses the revolutionary character of Kant's critical thought but also reveals how this thought was being held hostage to unwarranted (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14. Santiago Echeverri (2004). La filosofía trascendental de Kant y el argumento de la ilusión. Pensamiento 60 (227):247-277.
  15. F. E. England & Immanuel Kant (1929). Kant's Conception of God a Critical Exposition of its Metaphysical Development, Together with a Translation of the Nova Dilucidatio. G. Allen & Unwin.
  16. Wolfgang Ertl (1999). David Hume und die Dissertation von 1770. Peter Lang.
    I pursue a suggestion by Kreimendahl according to which it was Hamann's translation of Section I.4.7 of Hume's "Treatise" which triggered Kant's critical turn in 1768/69. In the section Hume put forward the idea that the principles at work in the human mind might be radically at odds with each other, i.e., that there might be an "antinomy" in the original meaning of the word. My claims are (i) that in his dissertation Kant attempted to solve the problem of antinomy (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. A. C. Ewing (1955). Review: Lucas, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Present Itself as a Science. [REVIEW] Philosophy 30 (112):74-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. J. N. Findlay (2007). Notes on Kant's Prolegomena. Philosophical Forum 38 (3):289–308.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Marcela Garcia (2012). Schelling's Late Negative Philosophy: Crisis and Critique of Pure Reason. Comparative and Continental Philosophy 3 (2):141-164.
    Schelling’s late philosophy is characterized by its division of philosophy into a “negative” and a “positive” approach. After developing positive philosophy, Schelling goes back in his last work (Darstellung der reinrationalen Philosophie) to a negative philosophy that is to play a critical role within Schelling’s late system by showing pure rationally the limits of pure reason. This critical task requires the failure and crisis of negative philosophy. In the article, I show why Schelling understands his late negative project as a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Jerry H. Gill (1984). Kant, Analogy, and Natural Theology. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16 (1):19 - 28.
  21. Garth W. Green (2007). Fichte's Critique of Kant's Doctrine of Inner Sense. Idealistic Studies 37 (3):157-178.
    In this paper, the thematic context for Fichte’s early concern with the character of the forms of intuition, and specifically inner intuition, is adumbrated. This context is provided by means of a brief exposition of Kant’s doctrine of time as the form of inner sense, and its dual role; its positive role in the “order of (synthetic) cognition” or ordo cognoscendi, and its negative role in the critique of Seelenlehre or “doctrine of the soul.” It is then argued, on this (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Paul Guyer, Curtis Bowman & Frederick Rauscher (eds.) (2005). Notes and Fragments. Cambridge University Press.
    This 2005 volume provides an extensive translation of the notes and fragments that survived Kant's death in 1804. These include marginalia, lecture notes, and sketches and drafts for his published works. They are important as an indispensable resource for understanding Kant's intellectual development and published works, casting fresh light on Kant's conception of his own philosophical methods and his relations to his predecessors, as well as on central doctrines of his work such as the theory of space, time and categories, (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Gary Hatfield (ed.) (2006). Immanuel Kant: Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics: That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science: With Selections From the Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
    Kant is the central figure of modern philosophy. He sought to rebuild philosophy from the ground up, and he succeeded in permanently changing its problems and methods. This revised edition of the Prolegomena, which is the best introduction to the theoretical side of his philosophy, presents his thought clearly by paying careful attention to his original language. Also included are selections from the Critique of Pure Reason, which fill out and explicate some of Kant's central arguments, and in which Kant (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Christopher Jay (2009). Review: Ameriks, Kant and the Historical Turn: Philosophy as Critical Interpretation. Heythrop Journal 50 (2):337-339.
  25. Scott Jenkins (2011). Hegel on Space: A Critique of Kant's Transcendental Philosophy. Inquiry 53 (4):326-355.
    This paper considers Hegel's views on space and his account of Kant's theory of space. I show that Hegel's discussions of space exhibit a deep understanding of Kant's apriority argument in the first Critique , commit him to the central premise of that argument, and separate his concerns from the familiar problem of the neglected alternative. Nevertheless, Hegel makes two objections to Kant's theory of space. First, he argues that the theory is internally inconsistent insofar as Kant's identification of space (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. I. Kant (2002). 'O Kastnerjevih razpravah' (The Slovenian translation of Kant's essay 'On Kastner's treatises'). Filozofski Vestnik 23 (1):63-69.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Immanuel Kant (2009). The Ontological Argument: A Critique. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy of Religion: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press
  28. Immanuel Kant (2003). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics: With Two Early Reviews of the Critique of Pure Reason. OUP Oxford.
    Two hundred years after his death, Kant remains one of the most important modern philosopher. The Prolegomena are the ideal introduction to Kant's unique account of the nature of human knowledge, according to which we actively shape the world as we know it. This new edition of Kant's own summary of his philosophy is designed specially for students.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Immanuel Kant (2002). Theoretical Philosophy After 1781. Cambridge University Press.
    The purpose of the Cambridge edition is to offer translations of the best modern German edition of Kant's work in a uniform format suitable for Kant scholars. This volume is the first to assemble in historical sequence the writings that Kant published between 1783 and 1796 to popularize, summarize, amplify and defend the doctrines of his masterpiece, the Critique of Pure Reason of 1781. The best known of them, the Prolegomena, is often recommended to beginning students, but the other texts (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  30. Immanuel Kant (1997). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Present Itself as a Science: With Selections From the Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
  31. Immanuel Kant (1992). Lectures on Logic. Cambridge University Press.
    Kant's views on logic and logical theory play an important role in his critical writings, especially the Critique of Pure Reason. However, since he published only one short essay on the subject, we must turn to the texts derived from his logic lectures to understand his views. The present volume includes three previously untranslated transcripts of Kant's logic lectures: the Blumberg Logic from the 1770s; the Vienna Logic (supplemented by the recently discovered Hechsel Logic) from the early 1780s; and the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   40 citations  
  32. Immanuel Kant (1974). Preface to the First Edition of the Critique of Pure Reason ; Preface to the Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics ; Preface to the Second Edition of the Critique of Pure Reason. In Houston Peterson (ed.), Essays in Philosophy: From David Hume to George Santayana. Pocket Books
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Immanuel Kant (1973). The Kant-Eberhard Controversy. Baltimore,Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  34. Manfred Kuehn (2003). Review: Allison, Henry and Heath, Peter (Eds.), Theoretical Philosophy After 1781. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (11).
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. David Landy (2013). Review: Sedgwick, Hegel's Critique of Kant: From Dichotomy to Identity. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 18 (1):157-162.
    Book Reviews David Landy, Kantian Review, FirstView Article.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. David Landy (2007). A (Sellarsian) Kantian Critique of Hume's Theory of Concepts. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (4):445–457.
  37. Markku Leppäkoski (1998). The Two Steps of the B-Deduction. Kantian Review 2 (1):107-116.
    Since the publication of Dieter Henrich's classic paper, ‘The proof structure of the transcendental deduction’, in The Review of Metaphysics 22 , the transcendental deduction of the pure concepts of the understanding has been under focus in Kant studies in a very special way. The B-deduction seems to be a proof in two steps. Consequently, the focus has been on questions like, ‘What is the structure of the deduction?’, and ‘Why is the deduction carried out in two steps?’ No doubt (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38. Paul Livingston (2007). Wittgenstein, Kant and the Critique of Totality. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (6):691-715.
    In this paper, I explore Wittgenstein’s inheritance of one specific strand of Kant’s criticism, in the Critique of Pure Reason, of reason’s inherent pretensions to totality. This exploration reveals new critical possibilities in Wittgenstein’s own philosophical method, challenging existing interpretations of Wittgenstein’s political thought as “conservative” and exhibiting the closeness of its connection to another inheritor of Kant’s critique of totality, the Frankfurt school’s criticism of “identity thinking” and the reification of reason to which it leads. Additionally, it shows how (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. W. Loh (1991). Alternatives and Error in Kant Critical Philosophy. Kant-Studien 82 (1):81-95.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Werner Loh (1991). Alternativen und Irrtum in der Kritischen Philosophie Kants. Kant-Studien 82 (1):81-95.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. R. Malter (1988). Kant-Bibliographie 1986. Kant-Studien 79 (4):499-517.
  42. R. Malter (1987). 1985 Kant Bibliography. Kant-Studien 78 (4):498-514.
  43. R. Malter (1985). Kant Bibliography 1981. Kant-Studien 76 (4):480-514.
  44. Rudolf Malter (1987). Kant-Bibliographie 1982. Kant-Studien 78 (2):231-258.
  45. Rudolf Malter (1987). Kant Bibliography 1983-1984. Kant-Studien 78 (3):340-381.
  46. Jacqueline Mariña (2007). Review: Guyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (2).
  47. August Messer (1906). Die Philosophie im Beginn des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts. Kant-Studien 11 (1-3):390-424.
  48. A. W. Moore (2003). Noble in Reason, Infinite in Faculty: Themes and Variations in Kant's Moral and Religious Philosophy. Routledge.
    In this bold and innovative new work, Adrian Moore provides a refreshing but challenging new interpretation of Kant's moral philosophy and argues that it can enrich our understanding of a central problem in contemporary ethical debate: the problem of rationality. Noble in Reason, Infinite in Faculty is essential reading for all those interested in Kant, ethics and philosophy of religion.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  49. A. W. Moore (2008). Kant and the Historical Turn: Philosophy as Critical Interpretation - by Karl Ameriks. Philosophical Books 49 (2):149-150.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Alejandro Mumbrú Mora (2012). El concepto de exposición simbólica en Kant. Endoxa 29:45-72.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 82