This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
69 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 69
  1. Karl Ameriks (2006). Kant and the Historical Turn: Philosophy as Critical Interpretation. Oxford University Press.
    Immanuel Kant's work changed the course of modern philosophy; Karl Ameriks examines how. He compares the philosophical system set out in Kant's Critiques with the work of the major philosophers before and after Kant. Individual essays provide case studies in support of Ameriks's thesis that late 18th-century reactions to Kant initiated an "historical turn," after which historical and systematic considerations became joined in a way that fundamentally distinguishes philosophy from science and art.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Review Author[S.]: Karl Ameriks (1992). Review Essays: Recent Work on Hegel: The Rehabilitation of an Epistemologist? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (1):177-202.
  3. Pamela Anderson (2010). Pure Reason and Contemporary Philosophy of Religion: The Rational Striving in and for Truth. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1):95-106.
    This essay urges contemporary philosophers of religion to rethink the role that Kant’s critical philosophy has played both in establishing the analytic nature of modern philosophy and in developing a critique of reason’s drive for the unconditioned. In particular, the essay demonstrates the contribution that Kant and other modern rationalists such as Spinoza can still make today to our rational striving in and for truth. This demonstration focuses on a recent group of analytic philosophers of religion who have labelled their (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Massimo Barale (2000). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason with in the Tradition of Modern Logic. [REVIEW] International Studies in Philosophy 32 (4):149-152.
  5. Mick Bowles (2009). The Nature of Productive Force: Kant, Spinoza and Deleuze. In Edward Willatt & Matt Lee (eds.), Thinking Between Deleuze and Kant: A Strange Encounter. Continuum.
  6. Luigi Caranti (2006). Kant's Criticism of Descartes in the “Reflexionen Zum Idealismus” (1788–1793). Kant-Studien 97 (3):318-342.
    Kant devotes to the problem of Cartesian skepticism a constant attention throughout his philosophical career. His first attempt to refute the skeptic goes back to the 1755 Nova Delucidatio, while other arguments, both in the pre-critical and in the critical period, follow one another in a rather erratic effort to remove the “scandal” of philosophy, that is, our inability to prove the existence of the external world beyond doubt. This on-going struggle against the skeptic does not end with the 1787 (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. George Di Giovanni (2005). Freedom and Religion in Kant and His Immediate Successors: The Vocation of Humankind, 1774-1800. Cambridge University Press.
    The theologians of the late German Enlightenment saw in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason a new rational defense of their Christian faith. In fact, Kant's critical theory of meaning and moral law totally subverted the spirit of that faith. This challenging new study examines the contribution made by the Critique of Pure Reason to this change of meaning. George di Giovanni stresses the revolutionary character of Kant's critical thought but also reveals how this thought was being held hostage to unwarranted (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. A. C. Ewing (1955). Review: Lucas, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Present Itself as a Science. [REVIEW] Philosophy 30 (112):74-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. J. N. Findlay (2007). Notes on Kant's Prolegomena. Philosophical Forum 38 (3):289–308.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Marcela Garcia (2012). Schelling's Late Negative Philosophy: Crisis and Critique of Pure Reason. Comparative and Continental Philosophy 3 (2):141-164.
    Schelling’s late philosophy is characterized by its division of philosophy into a “negative” and a “positive” approach. After developing positive philosophy, Schelling goes back in his last work (Darstellung der reinrationalen Philosophie) to a negative philosophy that is to play a critical role within Schelling’s late system by showing pure rationally the limits of pure reason. This critical task requires the failure and crisis of negative philosophy. In the article, I show why Schelling understands his late negative project as a (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Jerry H. Gill (1984). Kant, Analogy, and Natural Theology. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16 (1):19 - 28.
  12. Garth W. Green (2007). Fichte's Critique of Kant's Doctrine of Inner Sense. Idealistic Studies 37 (3):157-178.
    In this paper, the thematic context for Fichte’s early concern with the character of the forms of intuition, and specifically inner intuition, is adumbrated. This context is provided by means of a brief exposition of Kant’s doctrine of time as the form of inner sense, and its dual role; its positive role in the “order of (synthetic) cognition” or ordo cognoscendi, and its negative role in the critique of Seelenlehre or “doctrine of the soul.” It is then argued, on this (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Christopher Jay (2009). Review: Ameriks, Kant and the Historical Turn: Philosophy as Critical Interpretation. Heythrop Journal 50 (2):337-339.
  14. Scott Jenkins (2011). Hegel on Space: A Critique of Kant's Transcendental Philosophy. Inquiry 53 (4):326-355.
    This paper considers Hegel's views on space and his account of Kant's theory of space. I show that Hegel's discussions of space exhibit a deep understanding of Kant's apriority argument in the first Critique , commit him to the central premise of that argument, and separate his concerns from the familiar problem of the neglected alternative. Nevertheless, Hegel makes two objections to Kant's theory of space. First, he argues that the theory is internally inconsistent insofar as Kant's identification of space (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Immanuel Kant (2009). The Ontological Argument: A Critique. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy of Religion: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press.
  16. Immanuel Kant (2003). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics: With Two Early Reviews of the Critique of Pure Reason. OUP Oxford.
    Two hundred years after his death, Kant remains one of the most important modern philosophers. The Prolegomena is the ideal introduction to Kant's unique account of the nature human knowledge, according to which we actively shape the world as we know it. -/- This new edition of Kant's own summary of his philosophy is designed specially for students. Guenter Zoeller assumes no prior knowledge of the Prolegomena and provides an extensive and comprehensive introduction which explores Kant's life, the origin and (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Immanuel Kant (2002). Theoretical Philosophy After 1781. Cambridge University Press.
    The purpose of the Cambridge edition is to offer translations of the best modern German edition of Kant's work in a uniform format suitable for Kant scholars. This volume is the first to assemble in historical sequence the writings that Kant published between 1783 and 1796 to popularize, summarize, amplify and defend the doctrines of his masterpiece, the Critique of Pure Reason of 1781. The best known of them, the Prolegomena, is often recommended to beginning students, but the other texts (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Immanuel Kant (1997). Lectures on Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press.
    The purpose of the Cambridge Edition is to offer translations of the best modern German edition of Kant's work in a uniform format suitable for Kant scholars. When complete (fourteen volumes are currently envisaged) the edition will include all of Kant's published writings and a generous selection from the unpublished writings such as the Opus postumum, handschriftliche Nachlass, lectures, and correspondence. This volume contains the first translation into English of notes from Kant's lectures on metaphysics. These lectures, dating from the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Immanuel Kant (1997). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Present Itself as a Science: With Selections From the Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
  20. Immanuel Kant (1992). Lectures on Logic. Cambridge University Press.
    Kant's views on logic and logical theory play an important role in his critical writings, especially the Critique of Pure Reason. However, since he published only one short essay on the subject, we must turn to the texts derived from his logic lectures to understand his views. The present volume includes three previously untranslated transcripts of Kant's logic lectures: the Blumberg Logic from the 1770s; the Vienna Logic (supplemented by the recently discovered Hechsel Logic) from the early 1780s; and the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Immanuel Kant (1974). Preface to the First Edition of the Critique of Pure Reason ; Preface to the Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics ; Preface to the Second Edition of the Critique of Pure Reason. In Houston Peterson (ed.), Essays in Philosophy: From David Hume to George Santayana. Pocket Books.
  22. Immanuel Kant (1973). The Kant-Eberhard Controversy. Baltimore,Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. David Landy (2013). Review: Sedgwick, Hegel's Critique of Kant: From Dichotomy to Identity. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 18 (1):157-162.
    Book Reviews David Landy, Kantian Review , FirstView Article(s).
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. David Landy (2007). A (Sellarsian) Kantian Critique of Hume's Theory of Concepts. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (4):445–457.
  25. Markku Leppäkoski (1998). The Two Steps of the B-Deduction. Kantian Review 2:107-116.
  26. Paul Livingston (2007). Wittgenstein, Kant and the Critique of Totality. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (6):691-715.
    In this paper, I explore Wittgenstein’s inheritance of one specific strand of Kant’s criticism, in the Critique of Pure Reason, of reason’s inherent pretensions to totality. This exploration reveals new critical possibilities in Wittgenstein’s own philosophical method, challenging existing interpretations of Wittgenstein’s political thought as “conservative” and exhibiting the closeness of its connection to another inheritor of Kant’s critique of totality, the Frankfurt school’s criticism of “identity thinking” and the reification of reason to which it leads. Additionally, it shows how (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. W. Loh (1991). Alternatives and Error in Kant Critical Philosophy. Kant-Studien 82 (1):81-95.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Werner Loh (1991). Alternativen und Irrtum in der Kritischen Philosophie Kants. Kant-Studien 82 (1):81-95.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. R. Malter (1988). Kant-Bibliographie 1986. Kant-Studien 79 (4):499-517.
  30. R. Malter (1987). 1985 Kant Bibliography. Kant-Studien 78 (4):498-514.
  31. R. Malter (1985). Kant Bibliography 1981. Kant-Studien 76 (4):480-514.
  32. Rudolf Malter (1987). Kant-Bibliographie 1982. Kant-Studien 78 (2):231-258.
  33. Rudolf Malter (1987). Kant Bibliography 1983-1984. Kant-Studien 78 (3):340-381.
  34. Jacqueline Mariña (2007). Review: Guyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (2).
  35. August Messer (1906). Die Philosophie im Beginn des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts. Kant-Studien 11 (1-3):390-424.
  36. A. W. Moore (2003). Noble in Reason, Infinite in Faculty: Themes and Variations in Kant's Moral and Religious Philosophy. Routledge.
    In this bold and innovative new work, Adrian Moore provides a refreshing but challenging new interpretation of Kant's moral philosophy and argues that it can enrich our understanding of a central problem in contemporary ethical debate: the problem of rationality. Noble in Reason, Infinite in Faculty is essential reading for all those interested in Kant, ethics and philosophy of religion.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. A. W. Moore (2008). Kant and the Historical Turn: Philosophy as Critical Interpretation - by Karl Ameriks. Philosophical Books 49 (2):149-150.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Alejandro Mumbrú Mora (2012). El concepto de exposición simbólica en Kant. Endoxa 29:45-72.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Diane Morgan (2000). Kant Trouble: The Obscurities of the Enlightened. Routledge.
    Kant Trouble offers a highly original and incisive reading of some of the lesser known and less lucid aspects of Kantian thought. Diane Morgan focuses her investigation on a radical reappraisal of Kant's writings on architecture, monarchy and faith in progress. She challenges the widely held view of Kant as the exponent of concrete and rigid rationality, and argues that his airtight "architectonic" mode of reasoning, which Kant identified in The Critique of Pure Reason, overlooks certain topics which destabilize it. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Stephen R. Palmquist (2009). Kant's Religious Argument for the Existence of God. Faith and Philosophy 26 (1):3-22.
    After reviewing Kant’s well-known criticisms of the traditional proofs of God’s existence and his preferred moral argument, this paper presents a detailed analysis of a densely-packed theistic argument in Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason. Humanity’s ultimate moral destiny can be fulfilled only through organized religion, for only by participating in a religious community (or “church”) can we overcome the evil in human nature. Yet we cannot conceive how such a community can even be founded without presupposing God’s existence. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Ann A. Pang-White (2009). Nature, Interthing Intersubjectivity, and the Environment: A Comparative Analysis of Kant and Daoism. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (1):61-78.
    The Kantian philosophy, for many, largely represents the Modern West’s anthropocentric dominance of nature in its instrumental-rationalist orientation. Recently, some scholars have argued that Kant’s aesthetics offers significant resources for environmental ethics, while others believe that Kant’s flawed dualistic views in the second Critique severely undermine any environmental promise that aesthetic judgments may hold in Kant’s third Critique . This article first examines the meanings of nature in Kant’s three Critique s. It concludes that Kant’s aesthetic view toward sensible nature (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Konstantin Pollok (2000). Review: Kants Prolegomena Zu Einer Jeden Künftigen Metaphysik (1783) Und Die Metaphysischen Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft (1786). Kritische Anmerkungen Zur Akademischen Textedition. [REVIEW] Kant-Studien 91 (s1):23-34.
    The article evaluates the standard edition of Kant's Prolegomena and the Metaphysische Anfangsgründe, trying to show that their standard editions, as found in the fourth volume of the Academy Edition, are seriously flawed. Therefore, volume 4 should be part of the planned revision of the entire edition. Most striking are the defects and inconsistencies in the text of the Prolegomena. Extended philosophical and historical research has shown that this work in its present form cannot have been published with Kant's approval. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Nelson Potter (1999). Religion and Rational Theology Immanuel Kant Translated and Edited by Allen W. Wood and George Di Giovanni Vol. 6 of Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant Edited by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Dialogue 38 (04):886-.
  44. Stephen Priest (ed.) (1987). Hegel's Critique of Kant. Oxford University Press.
    Despite the rapid growth of interest in Hegel among English-speaking philosophers, surprisingly little has been directed at Hegel's relationship toward Kant. This collection of essays by eleven eminent philosophers meets this deficiency by critically examining Hegel's attitude to Kant over a wide range of issues: the nature of space and time; the possibility of metaphysics, categories, and things-in-themselves; dialectic and the self; moral and political philosophy; aesthetics; the philosophy of history, and teleology. All the essays provide channels to a fuller (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Philip A. Quadrio (2009). Kant and Rousseau on the Critique of Philosophical Theology: The Primacy of Practical Reason. Sophia 48 (2):179-193.
    This paper explores the Rousseauian background to Kant’s critique of metaphysics and philosophical theology. The core idea is that the rejection of metaphysics and philosophical theology is part of a turn from theoretical to practical reason influential on European philosophy of religion, a turn we associate with Kant but that is prefigured by Rousseau. Rousseau is not, however, a thinker normally associated with the notion of metaphysical criticism, nor the notion of the primacy of practical reason. The paper draws out (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Ursula Renz (2011). Von Marburg nach Pittsburgh: Philosophie als Transzendentalphilosophie. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 59 (2):249-270.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. A. D. Ritchie (1941). Note on the Development of Kant's Thought in the Critique of Pure Reason. Mind 50 (198):207-208.
  48. S. Roush (2003). Copernicus, Kant, and the Anthropic Cosmological Principles. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (1):5-35.
    In the last three decades several cosmological principles and styles of reasoning termed 'anthropic' have been introduced into physics research and popular accounts of the universe and human beings' place in it. I discuss the circumstances of 'fine tuning' that have motivated this development, and what is common among the principles. I examine the two primary principles, and find a sharp difference between these 'Weak' and 'Strong' varieties: contrary to the view of the progenitors that all anthropic principles represent a (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Margit Ruffing (2009). Neugriechische Kant-Übersetzungen. Kant-Studien 100 (1):135-135.
  50. Brigitte Sassen (ed.) (2000). Kant's Early Critics: The Empiricist Critique of the Theoretical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    This book offers first time translations of the initial (1781-89) critical reactions to Kant's philosophy. Also included is a selection of writings by Kant's contemporaries who took on the task of defending the critical philosophy against early attacks. The first aim of this collection is to show in detail how Kant was understood and misunderstood by his contemporaries. The second aim is to reveal the sorts of arguments that Kant and his first disciples mounted in their defense of the theoretical (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 69