Bookmark and Share

Knowledge

Edited by Clayton Littlejohn (King's College London)
Related categories
Subcategories:History/traditions: Knowledge
2684 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 2684
Material to categorize
  1. C. P. A. (1957). The Problem of Knowledge. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 10 (4):715-715.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. S. C. A. (1971). Human Factual Knowledge. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 25 (2):376-376.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. J. J. Acero (2011). Cuestiones de teoría del conocimiento. [REVIEW] Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 30 (2).
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Timo Airaksinen (1981). Meaning and Knowledge: The Place of Criteria in Epistemology. Dialectics and Humanism 8 (1):113-122.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Rudolf Allers (1942). The Analysis of Knowledge. New Scholasticism 16 (1):82-85.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Robert F. Almeder (1983). Basic Knowledge and Jusificaton. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13 (1):115 - 127.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7. Robert Almeder & Robert Arrington (1977). Mannison on Inexplicable Knowledge and Belief. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 55 (1):87 – 90.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Robert P. Amico (2003). Is a Fully General Theory of Knowledge Possible? Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):307-322.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Mehdi Aminrazavi (2003). How Ibn Sīnian is Suhrawardī's Theory of Knowledge? Philosophy East and West 53 (2):203-214.
    It is demonstrated here that despite apparent differences and their adherence to two different schools of thought, Suhrawardī's epistemology is essentially Ibn Sīnian, and even his theory of "knowledge by Presence" ('ilm al-hudurī), which is considered to be uniquely his, is at least inspired by Ibn Sīnā. I argue that Ibn Sīnā's peripatetic orientation and Suhrawardī's ishrāqī perspective have both maintained and adhered to the same epistemological framework while the philosophical languages in which their respective epistemologies are discussed are different.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. James F. Anderson & Gerald B. Phelan (1946). The Metaphysics of Knowledge. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 21:106-111.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Albert J. J. Anglberger & Christian J. Feldbacher (2011). Eine reliabilistische Rechtfertigung des Wertes von Wissen über Theorien. In Christoph Jäger & Winfried Löffler (eds.), Epistemology: Contexts, Values, Disagreement. Papers of the 34th International Ludwig Wittgenstein-Symposium in Kirchberg, 2011. The Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society 11--13.
    In this contribution the socalled Meno-Problem will be discussed. With respect to theories the problem is the following question: Why is it epistemologically more valuable to know a true theory than to simply believe it? A classical answer in reabilist accounts to this problem refers to the value of the operation which is used for gathering knowledge. But there is a gap in the argumentation as far as one is not allowed to derive from this assumption the conclusion that also (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. David Annis (1969). A Note on Lehrer's Proof That Knowledge Entails Belief. Analysis 29 (6):207 - 208.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  13. N. Arm (1961). Can Knowledge Be Reached? Inquiry 4 (1-4):219 – 227.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. D. M. Armstrong (1969). Does Knowledge Entail Belief? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 70:21 - 36.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  15. Robert Audi (1980). Defeated Knowledge, Reliability, and Justification. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1):75-96.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16. F. Aveling (1914). Some Theories of Knowledge. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 15:304 - 331.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Michael Ayers (1999). The Empiricist Strikes Back. The Philosophers' Magazine 5 (5):54-55.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Celso Martins Azar Filho (2012). Método e estilo, subjetividade e conhecimento nos ensaios de Montaigne. Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 53 (126):559-578.
    A característica mais notável da filosofia renascentista foi também o que tornou sua assimilação pela história da filosofia tão difícil: a interação entre forma e conteúdo, entre ideia e sua expressão. Tal resulta da tentativa de realizar outra inter-relação que lhe é ainda mais essencial: aquela entre teoria e prática, pensamento e ação. Nos Ensaios de Montaigne, o método constitui antes de tudo um estilo de vida: a linguagem é aí o meio pelo qual a implicação entre mundos externos e (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. J. B. Baillie (1918). The Stereoscopic Character of Knowledge. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 19:236 - 269.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Ballard Ballard (1949). ERKMEISTER'S The Basis and Structure of Knowledge. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 10:140.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. John A. Barker (1975). A Note on Knowledge and Belief. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):143 - 144.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Christoph Baumberger & Georg Brun (2017). Dimensions of Objectual Understanding. In Stephen Grimm Christoph Baumberger & Sabine Ammon (eds.), Explaining Understanding: New Perspectives from Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Routledge 165-189.
    In science and philosophy, a relatively demanding notion of understanding is of central interest: an epistemic subject understands a subject matter by means of a theory. This notion can be explicated in a way which resembles JTB analyses of knowledge. The explication requires that the theory answers to the facts, that the subject grasps the theory, that she is committed to the theory and that the theory is justified for her. In this paper, we focus on the justification condition and (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Charles A. Baylis (1963). A Criticism of Lovejoy's Case for Epistemological Dualism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 23 (4):527-537.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Monroe C. Beardsley (1961). Philosophy of Knowledge. New Scholasticism 35 (2):271-273.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Guy Bennett-Hunter (2016). New Work on Ineffability: Review of “Ineffability and Its Metaphysics: The Unspeakable in Art, Religion, and Philosophy” by Silvia Jonas. [REVIEW] The Expository Times 128 (1):30–32.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. David Berlinski (1990). Knowing, Knowledge, Known. Logique Et Analyse 33 (29):3.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Luís Manuel A. V. Bernardo (2012). Introdução Ao Problema Do Conhecimento Em Pontos de Referência, de Francisco Vieira de AlmeidaIntroduction to the Problem of Knowledge in Pontos de Referência by Francisco Vieira de Almeida. Cultura:33-63.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Francesco Bertoldi (2003). Riflessioni sulla necessità e possibilità del vero. Divus Thomas 106 (2):73-85.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Francesco Bertoldi (2002). Motivi dell'antirealismo moderno. Divus Thomas 105 (2):175-201.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Francesco Bertoldi (2001). La verità in Blondel (Seconda Parte). Divus Thomas 104 (2):179-202.
    Blondel non era un relativista, credeva nella possibilità per il pensiero umano di arrivare alla verità, ma coinvolgendo la vita, verificando la verità nell'azione.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Francesco Bertoldi (2000). La Verità in Blondel o la Non-Possedibilità Del Vero. Divus Thomas 103 (2):110-132.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Michel Bitbol (2001). Non-Representationalist Theories of Knowledge and Quantum Mechanics. SATS 2 (1).
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Stefan Björklund (1993). The Philosophy of Everyday Knowledge. Theoria 59 (1-3):28-52.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. James Blachowicz (1999). Knowledge Vs. Inquiry. The Owl of Minerva 31 (1):45-52.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Claudia Blöser, Mikael Janvid, Hannes Matthiessen & Marcus Willaschek (2013). Preface. Grazer Philosophische Studien 87.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Marcel Bodea (2011). The Mix Of Languages. A Source Of Transdisciplinary Conflicts / Le Mélange Des Langages. Une Source Des Conflits Transdisciplinaires. Studia Philosophica 2.
    Epistemological criticism will be applied in those cases when the claims of certain constructs to represent a particular kind of knowledge are not legitimate. The communication of knowledge in society must be made in a correct way. We understand correctness as “justness and neutrality towards knowledge”. However, there may be political, ideological, religious, or other interests in promoting certain kind of knowledge, which weaken the foundations of a society based on knowledge. Certainly, The incompetence, the lack of culture, the existential (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Steffen Borge (2006). Knowledge and Lotteries, by John Hawthorne. Disputatio.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38. B. W. Bower (2004). Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology-Stephen Hetherington. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1; ISSU 173):107-107.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Elke Brendel & Christoph Jäger (eds.) (2004). Contextualisms in Epistemology. Springer.
    Contextualism has become one of the leading paradigms in contemporary epistemology. According to this view, there is no context-independent standard of knowledge, and as a result, all knowledge ascriptions are context-sensitive. Contextualists contend that their account of this analysis allows us to resolve some major epistemological problems such as skeptical paradoxes and the lottery paradox, and that it helps us explain various other linguistic data about knowledge ascriptions. The apparent ease with which contextualism seems to solve numerous epistemological quandaries has (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40. Karl Britton (1954). The Paragon of Knowledge. Philosophy 29 (110):216 - 230.
    I. “Our reason must be consider'd as a kind of cause, of which truth is the natural effect.” 1 In these quaint words, David Hume expresses the Philosophers’ point of view. By means of reason we must be able to see the truth of principles and to see that truth without any possibility of error. This view has been so long and so firmly held that it may be called the philosophical ideal of knowledge. Reason is not truly reason, unless (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Bruce W. Brower (2004). Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):107-108.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Allen Buchanan (1976). Basic Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (1):101-108.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Thomas O. Buford (1982). Knowledge. Review of Metaphysics 36 (2):443-444.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. L. S. Carrier (1971). An Analysis of Empirical Knowledge. Southern Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):3-11.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. J. Adam Carter, Martin Peterson & Bart van Bezooijen (2016). Not Knowing a Cat is a Cat: Analyticity and Knowledge Ascriptions. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 (4):817-834.
    It is a natural assumption in mainstream epistemological theory that ascriptions of knowledge of a proposition p track strength of epistemic position vis-à-vis p. It is equally natural to assume that the strength of one’s epistemic position is maximally high in cases where p concerns a simple analytic truth. For instance, it seems reasonable to suppose that one’s epistemic position vis-à-vis “a cat is a cat” is harder to improve than one’s position vis-à-vis “a cat is on the mat”, and (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46. José Mauricio de Carvalho (2012). Djacir Menezes E o Problema Do conhecimentoDjacir Menezes and the Problem of Knowledge. Cultura:65-73.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Quassim Cassam (2009). What is Knowledge? Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84 (64):101-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Quassim Cassam (2008). Précis of "The Possibility of Knowledge". [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (2):507 - 509.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Hector Neri Castaneda (1965). Knowledge and Certainty. Review of Metaphysics 18 (3):508 - 547.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50. Hector-Neri Castaneda (1988). Knowledge and Epistemic Obligation. Philosophical Perspectives 2:211-233.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
1 — 50 / 2684