Bookmark and Share

Languages

Edited by Guy Longworth (University of Warwick)
About this topic
Summary This category covers discussion of a wide range of issues, including the following. 1. Linguistic Convention. What is the nature of the relation between individuals and the languages that they can speak? In particular, should it be accounted for by appeal to convention and, if so, what account should be given of the nature of convention? 2. Idiolects. What determines the properties of individual speakers' languages? Are those properties determined by properties of the individual speaker, or might properties of other speakers, or communities of speakers (perhaps including past speakers), figure here? Are there shared or communal languages? What is the relation between individuals' languages and shared or communal languages? 3. Knowledge of Language. Do speakers of a language know that language? If they do, in what does their knowledge consist? Is it a form of propositional knowledge, a form of practical knowledge, or some other form of knowledge? And what is it that they know when they know a language? 4. Linguistic Universals. Are there properties shared by all possible languages? Are there properties shared by all natural, or humanly acquirable, languages? If there are such properties, what are they? And can we explain why there are precisely those universal properties? 5. Private Language. Is it possible for there to be a language that, as a matter of necessity, only one person speaks? Or are there arguments that no such language is possible? 6. Words. Are there such things as words? If there are, what is their nature? Are words concrete individuals or types, or do they belong to a different metaphysical category? What are the principles that govern how words are to be counted?
Key works Lewis 1975 Important presentation of a view about how convention figures in determining which language individuals speak. Davidson 1986 Important defence of the idea that idiolects are fundamental to language and communication. Dummett 1993 Development of Dummett's view that knowledge of a language is a distinctive form of practical knowledge. Crain & Pietroski 2001 Useful overview of arguments for innateness and linguistic universals. Kripke 1982 Important argument that private languages are not possible. Kaplan 1990 Important account of the metaphysics of words.
  Show all references
Related categories
Subcategories:
1921 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 1921
Material to categorize
  1. G. A. (1975). Consciousness and the Acquisition of Language. Review of Metaphysics 28 (4):760-761.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. R. A. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. Review of Metaphysics 22 (2):374-375.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Barbara Abbott & Grover Hudson (1981). Making Sense. Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (3):437-451.
    This would have been a better book if Sampson had argued his main point, the usefulness of the Simonian principle as an explanation of the evolution, structure, and acquisition of language, on its own merits, instead of making it subsidiary to his attack on ‘limited-minders’ (e.g., Noam Chomsky). The energy he has spent on the attack he might then have been willing and able to employ in developing his argument at reasonable length and detail. He might then have found that (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Joseph Agassi, Chomsky, P.
    Summary and conclusions As a new field, cognitivism began with the total rejection of the old, traditional views of language acquisition and of learning -- individual and collective alike. Chomsky was one of the pioneers in this respect, yet he clouds issues by excessive claim s for his originality and by not allowing the beginner in the art of the acquisition of language the use of learning by making hypotheses and testing them, though he acknowledges that researchers, himself included, do (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. David Barsamian & Noam Chomsky (2001). Propaganda and the Public Mind Conversations with Noam Chomsky. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Patrick K. Bastable (1971). Language and Being. Philosophical Studies 20:332-332.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Elizabeth Bates (2001). And the Development of Language. In William P. Bechtel, Pete Mandik, Jennifer Mundale & Robert S. Stufflebeam (eds.), Philosophy and the Neurosciences: A Reader. Blackwell. 134.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Christina Behme (2013). Noam Chomsky , The Science of Language. Interview with James McGilvray . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 33 (2):100-103.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Nikhil Bhattacharya (1989). On Language. New Vico Studies 7:142-145.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Diane W. Birckbichler, Robert M. Terry, James J. Davis & American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (2000). Reflecting on the Past to Shape the Future. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Lera Boroditsky (2011). How Languages Construct Time. In Stanislas Dehaene & Elizabeth Brannon (eds.), Space, Time and Number in the Brain. Oxford University Press. 333--341.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Ivan Brady (2007). Language Tinder. Philosophy Now 60:36-36.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Myles Brand (1971). The Language of Not Doing. American Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1):45 - 53.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Tyler Burge (1989). Wherein is Language Social? In A. George (ed.), Reflections on Chomsky. Blackwell. 175--191.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Eric Buyssens (1969). La Grammaire Générative Selon Chomsky. Revue Belge de Philologie Et D'Histoire 47 (3):840-857.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Mihaela Călinescu (2012). Chomsky's Biolinguistic Approach to Mind and Language. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 11:91-96.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Kr Chandra (2002). Place of Ardhamagadhi and SaurasenI Languages of Jain Canonical Works in the Evolution of MIA. Languages. In Hīrālāla Jaina, Dharmacandra Jaina & R. K. Sharma (eds.), Jaina Philosophy, Art & Science in Indian Culture. Sharada Pub. House. 1--95.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Noam Chomsky (2001). The Ideas of Chomsky. In Bryan Magee (ed.), Talking Philosophy: Dialogues with Fifteen Leading Philosophers. Oup Oxford.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Noam Chomsky & British Broadcasting Corporation (1977). The Ideas of Chomsky Bryan Magee Talked to Noam Chomsky. British Broadcasting Corporation.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Kiel Christianson & Fernanda Ferreira (2005). Planning in Sentence Production: Evidence From a Free Word Order Language (Odawa). Cognition 98:105-135.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. D. S. Clarke (2003). Sign Levels Language and its Evolutionary Antecedents. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Bp Cochran & Jl Mcdonald (1992). Promoting Native-Like Acquisition of a 2nd Language in Adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (6):474-474.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. L. Jonathan Cohen & James Logue (2002). Knowledge and Language Selected Essays of L. Jonathan Cohen. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Finn Collin & Guldmann (2004). Meaning, Use, and Truth Introducing the Philosophy of Language. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. John Collins (2009). The Limits of Conceivability: Logical Cognitivism and the Language Faculty. Synthese 171 (1):175 - 194.
    Robert Hanna (Rationality and logic. MIT Press, Cambridge, 2006) articulates and defends the thesis of logical cognitivism, the claim that human logical competence is grounded in a cognitive faculty (in Chomsky’s sense) that is not naturalistically explicable. This position is intended to steer us between the Scylla of logical Platonism and the Charybdis of logical naturalism (/psychologism). The paper argues that Hanna’s interpretation of Chomsky is mistaken. Read aright, Chomsky’s position offers a defensible version of naturalism, one Hanna may accept (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. David E. Cooper (1977). Linguistic Behaviour. Philosophical Books 18 (1):26-28.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Fred D'Agostino (2001). Double Review: Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals by Neil Smith and Chomsky: Language, Mind, and Politics by James McGilvray. Mind and Language 16 (3):335–344.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. A. B. D. (1963). Language and Philosophy. Review of Metaphysics 17 (2):302-303.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. A. B. D. (1963). Language and Philosophy. Review of Metaphysics 17 (2):302-303.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Marcel Danesi (1995). What is Language? New Vico Studies 13:43-54.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Jürgen Dassow, Florin Manea & Robert Mercaş (2012). Connecting Partial Words and Regular Languages. In S. Barry Cooper (ed.), How the World Computes. 151--161.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Koen DePryck (1993). Knowledge, Evolution and Paradox: The Ontology of Language. State University of New York Press.
    Investigates the possibility of constructing an interdisciplinary ontology to address such fundamental issues as guidelines for behavior and the validity and scope of knowledge from other than a limited perspective.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Alan Durant (forthcoming). Harold Berman: Law and Language. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique:1-6.
    This review discusses Harold Berman’s, Law and Language, published by Cambridge University Press in 2013. It locates this short book in relation to Berman’s extensive body of publications in international and comparative law, and asks what contribution the book’s recent, posthumous publication (40 years after Berman wrote the first draft and 7 years since his death) can make to current debates over approaches to forensic linguistics. Particular attention is given to Berman’s conceptualisation of law as a ‘living language’, as well (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. M. Durrell (2006). Germanic Languages. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Elsevier. 53--55.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Shimon Edelman, Characterizing Motherese: On the Computational Structure of Child-Directed Language.
    We report a quantitative analysis of the cross-utterance coordination observed in child-directed language, where successive utterances often overlap in a manner that makes their constituent structure more prominent, and describe the application of a recently published unsupervised algorithm for grammar induction to the largest available corpus of such language, producing a grammar capable of accepting and generating novel wellformed sentences. We also introduce a new corpus-based method for assessing the precision and recall of an automatically acquired generative grammar without recourse (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. J. Edwards (2003). Dummett: Philosophy of Language. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):298-300.
    Book Information Dummett: Philosophy of Language. By Karen Green. Polity Press. Cambridge. 2002. Pp. xi + 220. Hardback, £55. Paperback, £14.99.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Koerner Efk (1976). The Importance of Linguistic Historiography and the Place of History in Linguistic Science. Foundations of Language 14 (4):541-547.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Dave Elder‐Vass (2014). Debate: Seven Ways to Be A Realist About Language. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 44 (3):249-267.
    There are many differing ways to be a realist about language. This paper seeks to classify some of these and to examine the implications of each for the study of language. The principle of classification it adopts is that we may distinguish between realisms on the basis of what exactly it is that they take to be real. Examining in turn realisms that ascribe reality to the external world in general, to causal mechanisms, to innate capacities, to linguistic signs, to (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Timothy Endicott, Law and Language. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Christina E. Erneling (1993). Understanding Language Acquisition: The Framework of Learning. State University of New York Press.
    She challenges the usefulness of the concept of a language of thought in explaining language acquisition, and draws on the later work of Wittgen.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Greg Evans (1986). Sign Language Research and Linguistic Theory. Nexus 5 (1):1.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Austin Fagothey (1958). The Language of Value. New Scholasticism 32 (2):260-262.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. James W. Gair (2007). The Dhivehi Language: A Descriptive and Historical Grammar of Dhivehi and Its Dialects. 2 Vols. Journal of the American Oriental Society 127 (3):365.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Timothy J. Gallagher (2014). A Mead‐Chomsky Comparison Reveals a Set of Key Questions on the Nature of Language and Mind. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 44 (2):148-167.
    The social psychologist George Herbert Mead and the cognitive linguist Noam Chomsky both investigated the nature of language and mind during the 20th century. They approached the issues broadly, pursuing both philosophical and scientific lines of reasoning and evidence. This comparative analysis of Mead and Chomsky identifies fourteen questions that summarize their collective effort, and which animated much of the debate concerning language and mind in the 20th century. These questions continue to be relevant to 21st century inquiries. This paper (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. John C. Trueswell & Gleitman & R. Lila (2009). Learning to Parse and its Implications for Language Acquisition. In Gareth Gaskell (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oup Oxford.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Robert Goedecke (1976). Linguistic Ontology. Philosophy Today 20 (2):157-166.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. C. K. Grant (1956). On Using Language. Philosophical Quarterly 6 (25):327-343.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Georges Gusdorf (1956). La Parole. Presses Universitaires de France.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Bernard Harrison (1972). Meaning and Structure an Essay in the Philosophy of Language. --. Harper & Row.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. J. B. Hellige & M. M. Adamson (2006). Laterality Across the World's Languages. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Elsevier. 709--719.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1921