This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
452 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 452
  1. &Na (2000). The Legal Forum. Jona's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 2 (3):77-81.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Nicola Abbagnano (1967). Positivism. In Paul Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York, Macmillan. 6--415.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Max Silva Abbott (2009). La moralidad implícita Del positivismo jurídico. Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 43:371 - 376.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Tusta Aguilar (2011). El derecho a la educación, una responsabilidad compartida. Critica 61 (972):32-35.
    Este artículo quiere ser una reflexión sobre el derecho a la educación aunque no pretende agotar, ni mucho menos, todos los aspectos que este derecho humano fundamental conlleva. Quiere explicitar que cuando hablamos de derecho a la educación y de situaciones en que este derecho se vulnera, estamos refiriéndonos a algo que afecta directamente la dignidad de las personas.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Sebastián Contreras Aguirre (2011). Ley natural, determinatio y derecho positivo. Veritas 40 (25):39-54.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Rafael Escudero Alday (2010). De la constitucionalización a la indeterminación. Retos Y desafíos Del positivismo jurídico. Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 44:395-415.
    The article presents a vision of the challenges to which contemporary legal positivism has to respond. The constitutionalisation that governs current legal systems offers a new framework in which to develop the classic controversy between positivism and iusnaturalism. This article analyses the different positivist proposals put before the reality of the constitutional state as well as its replies to the criticisms of those who consider it anoutdated theory of little use. Finally, it will also deal with the relationship between positivism (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Robert Alexy (2002). The Argument From Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism. Oxford University Press.
    At the heart of this book is the age-old question of how law and morality are related. The legal positivist, insisting on the separation of the two, explicates the concept of law independently of morality. The author challenges this view, arguing that there are, first, conceptually necessary connections between law and morality and, second, normative reasons for including moral elements in the concept of law.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Lloredo Alix & M. Luis (2012). Rudolf von Jhering y El Paradigma Positivista: Fundamentos Ideológicos y Filosóficos de Su Pensamiento Jurídico. Dykinson.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. James F. P. Allan (2009). Tom Campbell and Democratic Legal Positivism. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 34 (2009):283-293.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Antonia Nieto Alonso (2008). El Derecho Del Paciente a Ser Dueño de Su Destino: Consentimiento Informado y Documento de Instrucciones Previas. In Salomé Adroher Biosca (ed.), Los Avances Del Derecho Ante Los Avances de la Medicina. Thomson/Aranzadi.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Marta García Alonso (2007). Tutela e insurrección en los orígenes del derecho de resistencia. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 33 (1):5-23.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Edward Alphen (1993). Kelsen and Hruschka: Concepts of Imputation. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 6 (2):163-178.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Raquel Tanarro Alvarez (2008). El retorno de la población refugiada palestina: la vulneración de un derecho. Critica 58 (951):8-10.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Kalyvas Andreas (2006). The Basic Norm and Democracy in Hans Kelsen's Legal and Political Theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (5).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. H. Andrés (1969). Teoría general deI derecho público eclesiástico. Augustinianum 9 (2):409-409.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Francisco Javier Ansuátegui Roig (2006). Positivismo Jurídico y Sistemas Mixtos. In Ramos Pascua, José Antonio, Rodilla González & A. M. (eds.), El Positivismo Jurídico a Examen: Estudios En Homenaje a José Delgado Pinto. Caja Duero.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. H. Aoi (2007). Significance and Limits of Principles-Oriented Legal Thinking. In Josep J. Moreso (ed.), Legal Theory: Legal Positivism and Conceptual Analysis: Proceedings of the 22nd Ivr World Congress, Granada 2005, Volume I = Teoría Del Derecho: Positivismo Jurídico y Análisis Conceptual. Franz Steiner Verlag.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. R. Z. Apostol (1988). Legal Positivism and the Private Sphere. Social Philosophy Today 1:125-137.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Ignacio Ara Pinilla (2006). El Desenfoque Letal Del Positivismo Jurídico. In Ramos Pascua, José Antonio, Rodilla González & A. M. (eds.), El Positivismo Jurídico a Examen: Estudios En Homenaje a José Delgado Pinto. Caja Duero.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Arturo Ardao (1968). Espiritualismo y Positivismo En El Uruguay. Universidad de la República.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Roberto Ardigò & Emilio Gavirati (1910). An Inconsistent Preliminary Objection Against Positivism, Tr. By E. Gavirati.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Sven Arntzen (2008). Kant on the Moral Condition of Law: Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism. In Valerio Hrsg V. Rohden, Ricardo Terra & Guido Almeida (eds.), Recht Und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. 1--195.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Jesús María Asurmedi (1981). Sofonías y Jerusalén: Análisis estadístico. Salmanticensis 28 (1):153-169.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. José María Atencia (1991). Positivismo y Neopositivismo. Logos 25:143-154.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Iep Author, Validity, Legal.
    Legal Validity Legal validity governs the enforceability of law, and the standard of legal validity enhances or restricts the ability of the political ruler to enforce his will through legal coercion. Western law adopts three competing standards of legal validity. Each standard emphasizes a different dimension of law (Berman 1988, p. 779), and each has […].
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Brenda Baker (1994). Andrei Marmor, Interpretation and Legal Theory. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 14:410-413.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Brenda M. Baker (1997). Inclusive Legal Positivism W. J. Waluchow Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994, X + 290 Pp., References, Table of Cases, Index, $75.50. [REVIEW] Dialogue 36 (04):868-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Brenda M. Baker (1994). Andrei Marmor, Interpretation and Legal Theory Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 14 (6):410-413.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Stephen W. Ball (1984). Bibliographical Essay / Legal Positivism, Natural Law, and the Hart/Dworkin Debate. Criminal Justice Ethics 3 (2):68-85.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Manuel Alberto Montoro Ballesteros (1999). Notas sobre la teoría del derecho: ¿Una meditación tardía? Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 33:279-288.
    El autor trata de hacer balance, treinta años después, de lo que ha significado en el panorama del pensamiento jurídico la aparición de la Teoría del Derecho (Legal Theory, Rechtstheorie). El autor estudia los supuestos y razones del nacimiento de la Teoría del Derecho, como intento de superación de las limitaciones e insuficiencias del iusnaturalismo, del iuspositivismo y de su Teoría General del Derecho, así como de la Filosofía del Derecho postpositivista. Tras analizar el programa de la Teoría del Derecho (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Manuel Alberto Montoro Ballesteros (1975). Significado y funación de la teoría fundamental del derecho. Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 15:215-246.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Manuel Alberto Montoro Ballesteros (1972). Notas sobre el realismo jurídico escandinavo: derecho, efectividad e imperativismo jurídicos en Karl Olivecrona. Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 12:65-106.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Z. Bankowski (1989). Institutional Legal Positivism? Rechtstheorie 20 (3):289-302.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Pietro Barcellona (1989). Estado de derecho, igualdad formal y poder económico: apuntes sobre formalismo jurídico y orden económico. Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 29:45-62.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Randy E. Barnett (1978). Toward a Theory of Legal Naturalism. Journal of Libertarian Studies 2 (2):97.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Michael Baur (2005). In Defense of Finnis on Natural Law Legal Theory. Vera Lex 6 (1/2):35-56.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Marciano Sánchez Bayle (2012). El derecho a la protección de la salud. Critica 62 (981):82-85.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Anthony Beck (1989). Legal Language and Legal Institutions, a Response to Jerzy Wr�Blewski. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 2 (1):17-28.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Rodger Beehler (1990). Legal Positivism, Social Rules, Andriggs V.Palmer. Law and Philosophy 9 (3):285 - 293.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Raymond A. Belliotti (1990). Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy: The Influence of H. L. A. Hart. [REVIEW] International Studies in Philosophy 22 (3):105-107.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Gustav Bergmann & Lewis Zerby (1945). The Formalism in Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law. Ethics 55 (2):110-130.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Stefano Bertea (2007). A Critique of Inclusive-Positivism. Archiv Fuer Rechts-Und Sozialphilosphie 93 (1):67-81.
    In this paper, I present a critique of inclusive positivism. Inclusive positivism is an untenable position, I argue, because the connection between law and critical morality is conceptual and thus more than merely an accident or a possibility: at the foundation of law we find social facts, but we also and importantly find moral evaluations. This thesis is supported by an argument showing in essence that law cannot exist apart from justification and that justification is a morally coloured practice. For (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. André Berten (2002). Emmanuel Picavet, Kelsen Et Hart. La Norme Et la Conduite. Revue Philosophique De Louvain 100 (1-2):271-272.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Martin A. Bertman (1984). A Defense of Legal Positivism. Journal of Value Inquiry 18 (3):219-226.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Arturo Berumen Campos (2010). El Derecho Como Sistema de Actos de Habla: Elementos Para Una Teoría Comunicativa Del Derecho. Unam, Facultad de Derecho.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Deryck Beyleveld & Roger Brownsword (1999). Methodological Syncretism in Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law. In Stanley L. Paulson (ed.), Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes. Oup Oxford.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. J. E. Bickenbach (1985). MJ Detmold, The Unity of Law and Morality: A Refutation of Legal Positivism Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 5 (6):244-246.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Uta Bindreiter (2007). On Positivism and Other Isms. Archiv Fuer Rechts-Und Sozialphilosphie 93 (3):321-344.
    This paper is concerned with the term positivist. Adducing a well-known Swedish debate where the meaning of this term is manifestly coloured by the speakers' participation in particular discourses, the author argues that the term is ultimately a discursive construct, unsuited to the needs of legal theoreticians in quest of clarity.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Uta Bindreiter (2005). The Modality of Kelsen's Sollsatz. Rechtstheorie 21:167-178.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Uta Bindreiter (2002). Why Grundnorm?: A Treatise on the Implications of Kelsen's Doctrine. Kluwer Law International.
    Who presupposes Kelsen's basic norm? Is it possible to defend the presupposition in a way that is convincing? And what difference does the presupposition make? Endeavouring to highlight the role of basic assumptions in the law, the author argues that the verb "to presuppose', with Kelsen, has not only a conceptual but also a normative dimension; and that the expression 'presupposing the basic norm'is adequate in so far as it marks the descriptive-normative nature of utterances made in specifically legal speech-situations.Addressed (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 452