This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
38 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
  1. Gary Jan Aichele (1990). Legal Realism and Twentieth-Century American Jurisprudence the Changing Consensus.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Andrew Altman (1986). Legal Realism, Critical Legal Studies, and Dworkin. Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (3):205-235.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3. Ian Carlo Dapalla Benitez (2015). A Critique of Critical Legal Studies' Claim of Legal Indeterminacy. Lambert Academic Publishing.
    This paper challenges the Critical Legal Studies (CLS) claims of legal indeterminacy. It shall use a legal formalist logic and language as its main assertion, further maintaining that the CLS claims is only grounded in ambiguity and confusion. CLS is a legal theory that challenges and overturns accepted norms and standards in legal theory and practice. They maintained that law in the historical and contemporary society has an alleged impartiality, and it is used as a tool of privilege and power (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Jes Bjarup (2005). The Philosophy of Scandinavian Legal Realism. Ratio Juris 18 (1):1-15.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5. Jes Bjarup (1999). Scandinavian Legal Realism. In Christopher B. Gray (ed.), The Philosophy of Law: An Encyclopedia. Garland Pub.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Jan M. Brockman (2009). Law in Life, Life in Law : Llewellyn's Legal Realism Revisited. In Francis J. Mootz (ed.), On Philosophy in American Law. Cambridge University Press
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Ianm Broekman (2009). 2 Law in Life, Life in Law: Llewellyn's Legal Realism Revisited. In Francis J. Mootz (ed.), On Philosophy in American Law. Cambridge University Press 11.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Thom Brooks (2007). Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism: Dworkin and Hegel on Legal Theory. Georgia State University Law Review 23 (3):513-60.
    In this article, I argue that - despite the absence of any clear influence of one theory on the other - the legal theories of Dworkin and Hegel share several similar and, at times, unique positions that join them together within a distinctive school of legal theory, sharing a middle position between natural law and legal positivism. In addition, each theory can help the other in addressing certain internal difficulties. By recognizing both Hegel and Dworkin as proponents of a position (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Wouter de Been (2008). Legal Realism Regained: Saving Realism From Critical Acclaim. Stanford Law Books.
    Legal Realism Regained presents a comparison between the legal realists, a group of pragmatic legal theorists from the 1920s and 1930s, and critical legal studies, a movement of postmodern legal theory during the end of the twentieth century. The book argues for a return to legal realism and the classical pragmatism of John Dewey and William James and for a rejection of the postmodern critique of critical legal studies. It discusses the two movements with respect to three topics: their view (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Judith W. Decew (1985). Realities About Legal Realism. Law and Philosophy 4 (3):405 - 422.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Neil Duxbury (1996). Legal Realism for Legal Realists. Ratio Juris 9 (2):198-203.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Eric Engle, Knight's Gambit to Fool's Mate: Beyond Legal Realism.
    Hume has been misinterpreted and never said ought cannot be derived from is. Outlines legal realism. Points out errors of realism.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. C. Faraco (2014). Tra saggezza e realismo politico: machiavellismi di Suárez. HELIOPOLIS.
  14. William W. Fisher, Morton J. Horwitz & Thomas Reed (1993). American Legal Realism. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  15. C. J. Friedrich (1964). Karl Llewellyn's Legal Realism in Retrospect:Jurisprudence: Realism in Theory and Practice Karl Llewellyn. Ethics 74 (3):201-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Chibin Fu (2005). Xian Shi Zhu Yi Fa Xue =. Fa Lü Chu Ban She.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Edwin Norman Garlan (1941). Legal Realism and Justice. F.B. Rothman.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Michael Steven Green (2011). Leiter on the Legal Realists. Law and Philosophy 30 (4):381-418.
    In this essay reviewing Brian Leiter’s recent book Naturalizing Jurisprudence, I focus on two positions that distinguish Leiter’s reading of the American legal realists from those offered in the past. The first is his claim that the realists thought the law is only locally indeterminate – primarily in cases that are appealed. The second is his claim that they did not offer a prediction theory of law, but were instead committed to a standard positivist theory. Leiter’s reading is vulnerable, because (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. David E. Ingersoll (1966). Karl Llewellyn, American Legal Realism, and Contemporary Legal Behavioralism. Ethics 76 (4):253-266.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Harry W. Jones (1966). Legal Realism and Natural Law. In Martin P. Golding (ed.), The Nature of Law. New York, Random House
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21. Robin Bradley Kar (2009). Review of Brian Leiter, Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (7).
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Milton R. Konvitz (1941). Book Review:Legal Realism and Justice. Edwin N. Garlan. [REVIEW] Ethics 52 (1):121-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Matthew H. Kramer (2009). Brian Leiter: Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (1):107-110.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Werner Krawietz (2001). The Concept of Law Revised-Directives and Norms in the Perspectives of a New Legal Realism. Ratio Juris 14 (1):34-46.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25. John-Michael Kuczynski (2010). Morality, Politics, and Law. Kendall Hunt Publishing.
    It is argued (a) that laws are assurances of protections of rights and (b) that governments are protectors of rights. Lest those assurances be empty and thus not really be assurances at all, laws must be enforced and governments must therefore have the power to coerce. For this reason, the government of a given region tends to have, as Max Weber put it, a "monopoly on power" in that region. And because governments are power-monopolizers, it is tempting to think that (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Brian Leiter (2007). Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
    Introduction: From legal realism to naturalized jurisprudence -- A note on legal indeterminacy -- Part I. American legal realism and its critics -- Rethinking legal realism: toward a naturalized jurisprudence (1997) -- Legal realism and legal positivism reconsidered (2001) -- Is there an "American" jurisprudence? (1997) -- Postscript to Part I: Interpreting legal realism -- Part II. Ways of naturalizing jurisprudence -- Legal realism, hard positivism, and the limits of conceptual analysis (1998, 2001) -- Why Quine is not a postmodernist (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  27. Brian Leiter (2005). American Legal Realism. In Martin P. Golding & William A. Edmundson (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Blackwell Pub.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  28. Brian Leiter (2001). Legal Realism and Legal Positivism Reconsidered. Ethics 111 (2):278-301.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  29. Michael Martin (1997). Legal Realism American and Scandinavian.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Randall C. Morris (2006). Whitehead and Legal Realism. Process Studies 35 (1):95-107.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. David Hyman Moskowitz (1963). Some Aspects of American Legal Realism.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Hans Oberdiek (1998). Michael Martin, Legal Realism: American and Scandinavian. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 18:209-211.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Hans Oberdiek (1998). Michael Martin, Legal Realism: American and Scandinavian Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 18 (3):209-211.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Karl Olivecrona (1971). Law as Fact. London,Stevens.
  35. V. Rodriguez-Blanco (2008). Review: Brian Leiter: Naturalising Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. [REVIEW] Mind 117 (468):1091-1094.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Wilfrid E. Rumble Jr (1965). The Paradox of American Legal Realism. Ethics 75 (3):166-178.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37. Peter Suber (1998). The Case of the Speluncean Explorers: Nine New Opinions. Routledge.
    _The Case of the Speluncean Explorers, _written in 1949 by Lon Fuller, is the most famous fictitious legal case of all time. Describing a case of trapped travellers who are forcd to cannibalize one of their team, it is used on courses in philosophy of law and Jurisprudence to show how their trial upon rescue touches on key concepts in philosophy and legal theory such as utilitarianism and naturalism. _The Case of the Speluncean Explorers: Nine New opinions_ includes a reprint (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Bruce Wardhaugh, From Natural Law to Legal Realism.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography