- Bird Alexander (1997). The Logic in Logicism. Dialogue 36:341–60.
- Alice Ambrose (1933). A Controversy in the Logic of Mathematics. Philosophical Review 42 (6):594-611.
- Irving H. Anellis (1987). Russell and Engels: Two Approaches to a Hegelian Philosophy of Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica (2):151-179.
- Irving H. Anellis (1987). Russell's Earliest Interpretation of Cantorian Set Theory, 1896–1900. Philosophia Mathematica (1):1-31.
- G. A. Antonelli (2010). Notions of Invariance for Abstraction Principles. Philosophia Mathematica 18 (3):276-292.
- Alexander Bird (1997). The Logic in Logicism. Dialogue 36 (02):341--60.
- George Boolos (1990). The Standard of Equality of Numbers. In George Boolos (ed.), Meaning and Method: Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam. Cambridge University Press.
- George S. Boolos (ed.) (1990). Meaning and Method: Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam. Cambridge University Press.
- Andrew Boucher, Who Needs (to Assume) Hume's Principle?
- Andrew Boucher, Who Needs (to Assume) Hume's Principle? July 2006.
- Otavio Bueno (2010). Logicism Revisited. Principia 5 (1-2):99-124.
- Rudolf Carnap (1983). The Logicist Foundations of Mathematics. In Paul Benacerraf & Hilary Putnam (eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings. Cambridge University Press.
- R. T. Cook (2012). RICHARD G. HECK, Jr. Frege's Theorem. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2011. ISBN 978-0-19-969564-5. Pp. Xiv + 307. Philosophia Mathematica 20 (3):346-359.
- Roy T. Cook & Philip A. Ebert (2005). Abstraction and Identity. Dialectica 59 (2):121–139.
- Boudewijn de Bruin (2008). Wittgenstein on Circularity in the Frege-Russell Definition of Cardinal Number. Philosophia Mathematica 16 (3):354-373.
- William Demopoulos (ed.) (1995). Frege's Philosophy of Mathematics. Harvard University Press.
- William Demopoulus & William Bell (1993). Frege's Theory of Concepts and Objects and the Interpretation of Second-Order Logict. Philosophia Mathematica 1 (2):139-156.
- Michael A. E. Dummett (1991). Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics. Harvard University Press.
- P. A. Ebert (2011). Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock. A Critical Introduction to the Philosophy of Gottlob Frege. Aldershot, Hampshire, and Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate Publishing, 2006. Isbn 978-0-7546-5471-1. Pp. X+157. [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica 19 (3):363-367.
- Philip A. Ebert & Marcus Rossberg (2009). Neo-Logicism -- A Friendly Letter of Complaint. In H. Leitgeb A Hieke (ed.), Reduction – Abstraction – Analysis. Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.
- Philip A. Ebert & Stewart Shapiro (2009). The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Synthese 170 (3):415 - 441.
- Fernando Ferreira & Kai F. Wehmeier (2002). On the Consistency of the Δ11-CA Fragment of Frege's Grundgesetze. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (4):301-311.
- José Ferreirós (2009). Hilbert, Logicism, and Mathematical Existence. Synthese 170 (1):33 - 70.
- Gottlob Frege (1980). The Foundations of Arithmetic: A Logico-Mathematical Enquiry Into the Concept of Number. Northwestern University Press.
- Sébastien Gandon (2008). Which Arithmetization for Which Logicism? Russell on Relations and Quantities in The Principles of Mathematics. History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (1):1-30.
- Bonnie Gold & Roger Simons (eds.) (2008). Proof and Other Dilemmas: Mathematics and Philosophy. Mathematical Association of America.
- N. Griffin (forthcoming). Review of B. Linsky, The Evolution of Principia Mathematica: Bertrand Russell's Manuscripts and Notes for the Second Edition. [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica.
- Bob Hale (2000). Reals by Abstractiont. Philosophia Mathematica 8 (2):100--123.
- Bob Hale (1999). Frege's Philosophy of Mathematics. Philosophical Quarterly 49 (194):92–104.
- William H. Hanson (1990). Second-Order Logic and Logicism. Mind 99 (393):91-99.
- William S. Hatcher (1982). The Logical Foundations of Mathematics. Pergamon Press.
- Richard G. Heck Jr (ed.) (1997). Language, Truth, and Logic. Oxford University Press.
- Richard Heck (2011). Ramified Frege Arithmetic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (6):715-735.
- Richard Heck (2011). The Logic of Frege's Theorem. In Frege's Theorem. Oxford University Press.
- Richard Heck (2005). Julius Caesar and Basic Law V. Dialectica 59 (2):161–178.
- Richard Heck (2000). Cardinality, Counting, and Equinumerosity. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (3):187-209.
- Richard Heck (1999). Grundgesetze der Arithmetic I §10. Philosophia Mathematica 7 (3):258-292.
- Richard Heck (1993). Critical Notice of Michael Dummett, Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics. Philosophical Quarterly 43:223-33.
- Claire Hill (2002). W. Demopoulos (Ed.), Frege's Philosophy of Mathematics, and W. W. Tait (Ed.), Early Analytic Philosophy, Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein, Essays in Honor of Leonard Linsky. [REVIEW] Synthese 133 (3).
- Harold T. Hodes (1984). Logicism and the Ontological Commitments of Arithmetic. Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):123-149.
- Ivan Kasa (2010). A Puzzle About Ontological Commitments: Reply to Ebert. Philosophia Mathematica 18 (1):102-105.
- L. H. Kauffman (2012). The Russell Operator. Constructivist Foundations 7 (2):112-115.
- G. Landini (2011). Logicism and the Problem of Infinity: The Number of Numbers. Philosophia Mathematica 19 (2):167-212.
- Gregory Landini (2012). Frege's Notations: What They Are and How They Mean. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Gregory Landini (2006). Frege's Cardinals as Concept-Correlates. Erkenntnis 65 (2):207 - 243.
- Michael Levin (1992). Still a Horse-Race. History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (1):111-114.
- Sten Lindström & Erik Palmgren (2009). Introduction: The Three Foundational Programmes. In Sten Lindström, Erik Palmgren, Krister Segerberg & Viggo Stoltenberg-Hansen (eds.), Logicism, Intuitionism and Formalism: What has become of them? Springer.
- Sten Lindström, Erik Palmgren, Krister Segerberg & Viggo Stoltenberg-Hansen (eds.) (2009). Logicism, Intuitionism, and Formalism - What has Become of Them? Springer.
- Øystein Linnebo (2009). Frege's Context Principle and Reference to Natural Numbers. In Sten Lindström (ed.), Logicism, Intuitionism, and Formalism: What Has Become of Them. Springer.
- Øystein Linnebo (2009). Introduction. Synthese 170 (3).
- Øystein Linnebo (2009). Bad Company Tamed. Synthese 170 (3):371 - 391.
- Øystein Linnebo (2008). The Nature of Mathematical Objects. In Bonnie Gold & Roger Simons (eds.), Proof and Other Dilemmas: Mathematics and Philosophy. Mathematical Association of America.
- Øystein Linnebo (2006). Mending the Master: John P. Burgess, Fixing Frege. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2005. ISBN 0-691-12231-8. Pp. XII + 257. [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica 14 (3):338-400.
- Øystein Linnebo (2006). Mending the Master (Critical Notice of John Burgess's Fixing Frege). Philosophia Mathematica 14 (3):338-351.
- Øystein Linnebo (2005). To Be is to Be an F. Dialectica 59 (2):201–222.
- Øystein Linnebo (2004). Frege's Proof of Referentiality. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 45 (2):73-98.
- Øystein Linnebo (2004). The Limits of Abstraction. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):653 – 656.
- Øystein Linnebo (2004). Predicative Fragments of Frege Arithmetic. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10 (2):153-174.
- Bernard Linsky (2011). The Evolution of Principia Mathematica: Bertrand Russell's Manuscripts and Notes for the Second Edition. Cambridge University Press.
- Bernard Linsky & Edward N. Zalta (2006). What is Neologicism? Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12 (1):60-99.
- Fraser MacBride (2003). Speaking with Shadows: A Study of Neo-Logicism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (1):103-163.
- Fraser Macbride (2000). On Finite Humet. Philosophia Mathematica 8 (2):150-159.
- Gideon Makin (1996). Why the Theory of Descriptions? Philosophical Quarterly 46 (183):158-167.
- Nicholas Maxwell (2010). Wisdom Mathematics. Friends of Wisdom Newsletter (6):1-6.
- Colin McGinn (1993). Logic, Mind and Mathematics. Philosophical Issues 4:101-118.
- B. Michael (2006). Joan Weiner. Frege Explained: From Arithmetic to Analytic Philosophy. Chicago: Open Court, 2004. Pp. Xvi + 179. ISBN 0-8126-9460-0 (Pbk). [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica 15 (1):126-128.
- Alex Oliver (1994). Dummett and Frege on the Philosophy of Mathematics. Inquiry 37 (3):349 – 392.
- Gianluigi Oliveri (2009). Stefano Donati. I Fondamenti Della Matematica Nel Logicismo di Bertrand Russell [the Foundations of Mathematics in the Logicism of Bertrand Russell]. Philosophia Mathematica 17 (1):109-113.
- John Ongley (2013). Russell: A Guide for the Perplexed. Continuum.
- Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (forthcoming). Hume's Principle and Entitlement: On the Epistemology of the Neo-Fregean Programme. In Philip Ebert & Marcus Rossberg (eds.), Abstractionism. Oxford University Press.
- Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2009). Solving the Caesar Problem Without Categorical Sortals. Erkenntnis 71 (2):141 - 155.
- Michael Potter (1999). Intuition and Reflection in Arithmetic: Michael Potter. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73 (1):63–73.
- Ian Proops (2006). Russell’s Reasons for Logicism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):267-292.
- W. V. Quine (1990). The Logic of Sequences: A Generalization of Principia Mathematica. Garland Pub..
- Francisco A. Rodríguez-Consuegra (1991). The Mathematical Philosophy of Bertrand Russell: Origins and Development. Birkhäuser Verlag.
- Marcus Rossberg & Philip A. Ebert (2007). What is the Purpose of Neo-Logicism? Traveaux de Logique 18:33-61.
- Stewart Shapiro (2000). Introduction to Special Issue Abstraction and Neo-Logicism. Philosophia Mathematica 8 (2):97-99.
- Mark Steiner (1975). Mathematical Knowledge. Cornell University Press.
- Yuval Steinitz (1994). Russell's Reductionism Revisited. Grazer Philosophische Studien 48:117-122.
- Richard Tieszen (1990). Frege and Husserl on Number. Ratio 3 (2):150-164.
- A. Urquhart (forthcoming). Review of S. Gandon, Russell's Unknown Logicism: A Study in the History and Philosophy of Mathematics. [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica.
- Kai F. Wehmeier (1999). Consistent Fragments of Grundgesetze and the Existence of Non-Logical Objects. Synthese 121 (3):309-328.
- Alfred North Whitehead & Bertrand Russell (1962/1997). Principia Mathematica, to *56. Cambridge University Press.
- Edward N. Zalta (2000). Neo-Logicism? An Ontological Reduction of Mathematics to Metaphysics. Erkenntnis 53 (1-2):219-265.
|
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
Email
|
RSS feed
|
|