Bookmark and Share

Max Horkheimer

Edited by Chad Kautzer (University of Colorado at Denver)
Related categories
Siblings:
56 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 56
  1. John Abromeit (2011). Max Horkheimer and the Foundations of the Frankfurt School. Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: Introduction; 1. Coming of age in Wilhelmine Germany; 2. Student years in Frankfurt; 3. A materialist interpretation of the history of modern philosophy; 4. The beginnings of a critical theory of contemporary society; 5. Horkheimer's integration of psychoanalysis into his theory of contemporary society; 6. Horkheimer's concept of materialism in the early 1930s; 7. The anthropology of the bourgeois epoch; 8. Reflections on dialectical logic in the mid-1930s; Excursus I. The theoretical foundations of Horkheimer's split with (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Darrell Arnold (2013). John Abromeit , Max Horkheimer and the Foundations of the Frankfurt School . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 33 (2):93-95.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jorge Ávila (2013). Max Horkheimer: Teoría tradicional y teoría crítica. La singularidad epistemológica para la transformación de la sociedad. Estudios de Filosofía 10:73-87.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Andreas Balog (1990). Society as an "Accidental Product of Human Activities." Max Horkheimer's Social Theory and Critique. Philosophy and Social Criticism 16 (2):127-141.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Sara Beardsworth (2005). Benjamin, Horkheimer, and Adorno. Idealistic Studies 35 (1):61-72.
    The paper considers what united and divided Benjamin and Horkheimer-Adorno in terms of their respective confrontations with the question of what it is to articulate the past historically. It presents their shared self-consciousness of the difficult task of responding critically to a problem conceived of as the entanglement of the concept of history with domination. For the problem imbues conceptualization itself and therefore threatens the value of the authoritative statements made in their own critical reflection on it. I show that (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. J. C. Berendzen (2010). Suffering and Theory: Max Horkheimer's Early Essays and Contemporary Moral Philosophy. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (9):1019-1037.
    Max Horkheimer does not generally receive the scholarly attention given to other ‘Frankfurt School’ figures. This is in part because his early work seems contradictory, or unphilosophical. For example, Horkheimer seems, at various points (to use contemporary metaethical terms), like a constructivist, a moral realist, or a moral skeptic, and it is not clear how these views cohere. The goal of this article is to show that the contradictions regarding moral theory exist largely on the surface, and that one can (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. J. C. Berendzen, Max Horkheimer. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. J. C. Berendzen (2008). Postmetaphysical Thinking or Refusal of Thought? Max Horkheimer's Materialism as Philosophical Stance. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (5):695 – 718.
    Frankfurt School critical theory has long opposed metaphysical philosophy because it ignores suffering and injustice. In the face of such criticism, proponents of metaphysics (for example Dieter Henrich) have accused critical theory of not fully investigating the questions is raises for itself, and falling into partial metaphysical positions, despite itself. If one focuses on Max Horkheimer's early essays, such an accusation seems quite fitting. There he vociferously attacks metaphysics, but he also develops a theory that pushes toward metaphysical questions. His (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Stephan Bleier (forthcoming). Horkheimer, Adorno, Foucault. Semiotics:573-577.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Hauke Brunkhorst (2000). Enlightenment of Rationality: Remarks on Horkheimer and Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment. Constellations 7 (1):133-140.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Fred Dallmayr (1987). Reading Horkheimer Reading Vico. New Vico Studies 5:57-62.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Günter Figal (1983). Selbsterhaltung und Selbstverzicht. Zur Kritik der neuzeitlichen Subjektivität bei Max Horkheimer und Walter Benjamin. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 37 (2):161 - 179.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Gianluca Giachery (2012). Indignazione Morale E Profezia Pedagogica: L'Ultimo Horkheimer. Ibis.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Ilan Gur-Ze'ev (1999). Walter Benjamin and Max Horkheimer: From Utopia to Redemption. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 8 (1):119-155.
  15. Ilan Gur-Ze’Ev (2005). Adorno and Horkheimer: Diasporic Philosophy, Negative Theology, and Counter-Education. Educational Theory 55 (3):343-365.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Clodie Hamel (2010). L'odyssée d'Adorno Et Horkheimer. Ollendorff & Desseins.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. M. Horkheimer (1964). Theism and Atheism. Diogenes 12 (48):39-52.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. M. Horkheimer & V. A. Velen (1966). On the Concept of Freedom. Diogenes 14 (53):73-81.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Max Horkheimer (2011). Odpowiedzialność i studia. Kronos 2 (2).
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Max Horkheimer (2007). Tęsknota za całkowicie Innym . Rozmowa z Helmutem Gumniorem (1970). Kronos 1 (1):13-27.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Max Horkheimer (2004/1985). Eclipse of Reason. Continuum.
    In this book, Horkheimer surveys and demonstrates the gradual ascendancy of Reason in Western philosophy, its eventual total application to all spheres of life, ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Max Horkheimer (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Stanford University Press.
    Dialectic of Enlightenment is undoubtedly the most influential publication of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. Written during the Second World War and circulated privately, it appeared in a printed edition in Amsterdam in 1947. "What we had set out to do," the authors write in the Preface, "was nothing less than to explain why humanity, instead of entering a truly human state, is sinking into a new kind of barbarism." Yet the work goes far beyond a mere critique of (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Max Horkheimer (1987). Vico and Mythology. New Vico Studies 5:63-76.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Max Horkheimer (1983). Uzupełnienie. Colloquia Communia 7 (2):65-70.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Max Horkheimer (1983). List Do S. Fischer Verlag. Colloquia Communia 7 (2):71-74.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Max Horkheimer (1983). Teoria tradycyjna a teoria krytyczna. Colloquia Communia 7 (2):39-64.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Max Horkheimer (1974/1985). Critique of Instrumental Reason: Lectures and Essays Since the End of World War Ii. Continuum.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Max Horkheimer (1974). Critique of Instrumental Reason. New York,Seabury Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Max Horkheimer (1973). Dialectic of Enlightenment. Allen Lane.
    This is a new, improved translation of the most influential publication of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Max Horkheimer (1972/1982). Critical Theory: Selected Essays. Continuum Pub. Corp..
    These essays, written in the 1930s and 1940s, represent a first selection in English from the major work of the founder of the famous institute for Social ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Martin Jay (1973). Max Horkheimer (1895-1973). Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47:219 - 220.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Martin Jay (1973). The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923-1950. University of California Press.
  33. John F. Kavanaugh (1975). "The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research 1923-1950," by Martin Jay; "Critical Theory," by Max Horkheimer; "Dialectic of Enlightenment," by Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adomo; "Negative Dialectics," by Theodor W. Adorno; "The Jargon of Authenticity," by Theodor W. Adorno; and "The Critique of Domination," by Trent Schroyer. [REVIEW] The Modern Schoolman 52 (4):427-432.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. J. D. Mabbott (1948). Eclipse of Reason. By Max Horkheimer, Director of the Institute of Social Research, Columbia University. (New York: Oxford University Press. 1947. Pp. 187. Price $2.75. [16s.]. [REVIEW] Philosophy 23 (87):368-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. A. Marinopoulou (2008). The Concept of the Political in Max Horkheimer and Jurgen Habermas. Nissos Academic Pub..
  36. Anastasia Marinopoulou (2007). Some Social Perspectives of the Notions of the Political and Politics in Max Horkheimer and Jürgen Habermas. Philosophical Inquiry 29 (1-2):112-131.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Raymond A. Morrow (1995). Benhabib, Seyla, Wolfgang Bonß, and John Mccole, Eds., On Max Horkheimer: New Perspectives. Mit Press, Cambridge, Ma, 1993. Pp. 533. $40.00. Horkheimer, Max. Between Philosophy and Social Science: Selected Early Writings. Translated by G. Frederick Hunter, Matthew S. Kramer, and John Torpey. Mit Press, Cambridge, Ma, 1993. Pp. 460. $40.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (4):479-484.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Glenn Negley (1947). Book Review:Eclipse of Reason. Max Horkheimer. [REVIEW] Ethics 58 (1):75-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. John O'Neill & Thomas Uebel (2004). Horkheimer and Neurath: Restarting a Disrupted Debate. European Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):75–105.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Michael R. Ott (2001). Max Horkheimer's Critical Theory of Religion: The Meaning of Religion in the Struggle for Human Emancipation. University Press of America.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Michael A. Principe (2013). Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer , Towards a New Manifesto, Trans. Rodney Livingstone . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 33 (3):171–173.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. L. Ray (1980). Book Reviews : The Frankfurt School: The Critical Theories of Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno. By Zoltan Tar. Foreword by Michael Landmann. New York, Toronto: John Wiley, 1977. Pp. Xx + 243. $19.15. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 10 (1):111-116.
  43. Nicholas Reynolds (2009). Family, Inner Life, and the Amusement Industry. Radical Philosophy Review 12 (1/2):1-19.
    I critically engage Max Horkheimer’s “Art and Mass Culture” from Critical Theory. I split Horkheimer’s essay into three parts, which correspond to the three sections of my essay. The first section details the objective historical conditions that have lead up to Horkheimer’s diagnosis. The second section describes the change in consciousness that corresponds to these conditions, and the third section outlines Horkheimer’s critique of Mortimer Adler and art that belongs to “the amusement industry.” I describe the basic elements of Horkheimer’s (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Mark G. Roman (1979). "Dawn and Decline: Notes 1926-1931 and 1950-1960," by Max Horkheimer, Trans. Michael Shaw. The Modern Schoolman 56 (4):383-384.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Ivanaldo Oliveira dos Santos (2010). Rodrigo Duarte, Adorno/Horkheimer & A Dialética do Esclarecimento. Princípios 9 (11-12):272-273.
    Resenha do livro de: Rodrigo Duarte, Adorno/Horkheimer & A dialetica do esclarecimento. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 2002. Colecao Filosofia Passa-a-passo 4. 70 paginas.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Y. Sherratt (2000). Adorno and Horkheimer's Concept of 'Enlightenment'. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (3):521 – 544.
    (2000). ADORNO AND HORKHEIMER'S CONCEPT OF ‘ENLIGHTENMENT’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy: Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 521-544. doi: 10.1080/096087800442165.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Marco Solinas (2010). Review of Bert van den Brink and David Owen (eds.), Recognition and Power. Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory. [REVIEW] Iride (59):223-224.
  48. Peter M. R. Stirk (1992). Max Horkheimer: A New Interpretation. Barnes & Noble.
    Introduction Max Horkheimer was born on February in Stuttgart. By the time he died, on 7 July in Nuremberg, he had played a decisive role in launching and ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Attila Tanyi (2009). A Frankfurti Iskola és 1968 (The Frankfurt School and 1968). Fordulat 3 (2):9-33.
    The aim of the paper is to investigate the connection between the Frankfurt School and the events of 1968. Accordingly, the paper focuses only on those important members of the School whose philosophical, ideological or practical influence on the events is clearly detectable. This means dealing with four thinkers in three sections: the influence of Adorno and Horkheimer is treated in the same section, whereas the work of Marcuse and Habermas is examined in separate sections. The three sections represent three (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. H. Turker (2013). Horkheimer's Criticism of Husserl. Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (7):619-635.
    This article focuses on Max Horkheimer’s criticism of Husserl’s phenomenology in basic philosophical matters such as method, theory, logic, truth, metaphysics, etc. Horkheimer objects to Husserl’s conception of philosophy as a mathesis universalis and of science as relativistic research. However, he finds Husserl’s criticism of scientific rationalism the most important step for the legitimacy of philosophy. According to him, Husserl’s method is intended to be a science of apriority. But his understanding of apriority is static, is radically abstract, and overlooks (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 56