Related categories
Siblings:
33 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
  1. Jonathan Bennett (1960). Moral Argument. Mind 69 (276):544-549.
    The thesis is advanced by R. M. Hare that a judgment on an action or state of affairs is a moral judgment only if the person who makes it accepts some universal moral principle which, together with some true statement about the non-moral characteristics of the situation originally judged, entails the original judgment.1 Instances of this thesis would take some such form as saying that someone who says ‘You ought not to have done what you did’ cannot be expressing a (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. J. W. Roxbee Cox (1986). From Universal Prescriptivism to Utilitarianism. Philosophical Quarterly 36 (142):1-15.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Norman O. Dahl (1987). A Prognosis for Universal Prescriptivism. Philosophical Studies 51 (3):383 - 424.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Keith Dowling (1992). Hare's Route From Universal Prescriptivism to Utilitarianism. Philosophical Papers 21 (1):65-81.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. James Dreier (1996). Book Review: The Moral Problem by Michael Smith. [REVIEW] Mind 105 (418):363-367.
  6. John Eriksson (2009). Homage to Hare: Ecumenism and the Frege‐Geach Problem. Ethics 120 (1):8-35.
    The Frege‐Geach problem is probably the most serious worry for the prospects of any kind of metaethical expressivism. In a recent article, Ridge suggests that a new version of expressivism, a view he calls ecumenical expressivism, can avoid the Frege‐Geach problem.1 In contrast to pure expressivism, ecumenical expressivism is the view that moral utterances function to express not only desire‐like states of mind but also beliefs with propositional content. Whereas pure expressivists’ solutions to the Frege‐Geach problem usually have rested on (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Fred Feldman (1984). Hare's Proof. Philosophical Studies 45 (2):269 - 283.
  8. Harry J. Gensler (1984). How Incomplete is Prescriptivism? Mind 93 (369):103-107.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Harry J. Gensler (1976). The Prescriptivism Incompleteness Theorem. Mind 85 (340):589-596.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. David Haight (1971). Naturalism, Prescriptivism, and Their Reconciliation. Journal of Value Inquiry 5 (3):212-218.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Gerard J. Hughes & J. S. (1973). Prescriptivism in Theory and in Practice: The Moral Philosophy of R. M. Hare. Heythrop Journal 14 (2):136–146.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Thomas Hurka (1982). The Speech Act Fallacy Fallacy. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (3):509-526.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. William Lyons (1972). Is Hare's Prescriptivism Morally Neutral? Ethics 82 (3):259-261.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. J. C. Mackenzie (1968). Prescriptivism and Rational Behaviour. Philosophical Quarterly 18 (73):310-319.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. C. D. MacNiven (1964). Hare's Universal Prescriptivism. Dialogue 3 (02):191-198.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Geoffrey Madell (1965). Hare's Prescriptivism. Analysis 26 (2):37 - 41.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. H. J. McCloskey (1979). Universalized Prescriptivism and Utilitarianism: Hare's Attempted Forced Marriage. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 13 (1):63-76.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. James W. McGray (1990). Universal Prescriptivism and Practical Skepticism. Philosophical Papers 19 (1):37-51.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. James W. McGray (1986). From Universal Prescriptivism to Utilitarianism. Philosophy Research Archives 12:79-86.
    This paper is a critique of R.M. Hare’s argument that rational universal prescriptions are equivalent to utilitarian judgments. The problem with Hare’s argument is his restrictive model of rationality. He succeeds in proving that awareness of certain facts is essential to making a fully rational universal prescription. But he fails to prove that other facts, such as the ultimate separateness of persons, are irrelevant. Once such facts are taken seriously, the utilitarian implication is invalidated.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Denise Meyerson (1979). Against Prescriptivism in Ethics. Philosophical Papers 8 (2):72-74.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Mark T. Nelson (1996). The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Moral Argument. Religious Studies 32 (1):15-26.
    The Clarke/Rowe version of the Cosmological Argument is sound only if the Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) is true, but many philosophers, including Rowe, think that there is not adequate evidence for the principle of sufficient reason. I argue that there may be indirect evidence for PSR on the grounds that if we do not accept it, we lose our best justification for an important principle of metaethics, namely, the Principle of Universalizability. To show this, I argue that all the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Ingmar Persson (1983). Hare on Universal Prescriptivism and Utilitarianism. Analysis 43 (1):43 - 49.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Vincent C. Punzo (1980). The Normative Function of Reason as Reflectivity: An Alternative to Hare's Prescriptivism. Review of Metaphysics 33 (3):593 - 613.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. T. M. Reed (1969). The Implications of Prescriptivism. Philosophical Quarterly 19 (77):348-351.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen (2006). Dislodging Butterflies From the Supervenient. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 9:103-112.
    Applied to evaluative properties the supervenience thesis is customarily understood as expressing two intuitions: (i) the idea that there is some kind of dependence between the (supervenient) value of an object and some (or all) of the natural properties of the object; (ii) the idea that if you assert that x is valuable and if you agree that y is relevantly similar to x, with regard to natural properties, you must be prepared to assert that y too is valuable. It (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Krzysztof Saja (2008). Język a Utylitaryzm. Filozofia Moralna Richarda M. Hare'a. Aureus.
  27. Harry S. Silverstein (1970). Prescriptivism and Akrasia. Philosophical Studies 21 (6):81 - 85.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Hillel Steiner (1973). Moral Conflict and Prescriptivism. Mind 82 (328):586-591.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. James P. Sterba (1976). Prescriptivism and Fairness. Philosophical Studies 29 (2):141 - 148.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Stephen B. Torrance (1981). Prescriptivism and Incompleteness. Mind 90 (360):580-585.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Mark van Roojen (2010). A Fork in the Road for Expressivism. Ethics 120 (2):357-381.
    This is a review essay discussing Mark Schroeder's book, Being For.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Henry Veatch (1970). Good Reasons and Prescriptivism in Ethics a Metaethical Incompatibility? Ethics 80 (2):102-111.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Eddy M. Zemach (1976). Why Prescriptivism in Aesthetics is Wrong. Metaphilosophy 7 (3-4):191-205.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation