- Lorraine Besser-Jones (forthcoming). The Role of Practical Reason in an Empirically Informed Moral Theory. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice.
- Curtis Brown (1986). Overriding Reasons and Reasons to Be Moral. Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (2):173-187.
- Ruth Chang (2004). All Things Considered. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):1–22.
- Ruth Chang (2002). Making Comparisons Count. Routledge.
- Ruth Chang (2001). Against Constitutive Incommensurability or Buying and Selling Friends. Noûs 35 (s1):33 - 60.
- David Copp & David Sobel (2002). Desires, Motives, and Reasons: Scanlon's Rationalistic Moral Psychology. Social Theory and Practice 28 (2):243-76.
- Jonathan Dancy (2002). Practical Reality. Oxford University Press.
- Jonathan Dancy (1993). Moral Reasons. Blackwell.
- Stephen L. Darwall (2006). The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Harvard University Press.
- Stephen L. Darwall (1983). Impartial Reason. Cornell University Press.
- Daan Evers (forthcoming). Weight for Stephen Finlay. Philosophical Studies:-.
- Daan Evers (2009). Humean Agent-Neutral Reasons? Philosophical Explorations 12 (1):55 – 67.
- P. S. Greenspan (1975). Conditional Oughts and Hypothetical Imperatives. Journal of Philosophy 72 (10):259-276.
- Patricia Greenspan (2010). Making Room for Options : Moral Reasons, Imperfect Duties, and Choice. In Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.), Moral Obligation. Cambridge University Press.
- Patricia Greenspan (2007). Practical Reasons and Moral 'Ought'. In Russell Schafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. II.
- Ulrike Heuer (2010). Wrongness and Reasons. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (2).
- Vaughn E. Huckfeldt (2007). Categorical and Agent-Neutral Reasons in Kantian Justifications of Morality. Philosophia 35 (1):23-41.
- Leonard Kahn (2011). Moral Blameworthiness and the Reactive Attitudes. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (2):131-142.
- Stephen Kearns & Daniel Star (forthcoming). Reasons, Facts-About-Evidence, and Indirect Evidence. Analytic Philosophy.
- Stephen Kearns & Daniel Star (forthcoming). Weighing Reasons. Journal of Moral Philosophy.
- Stephen Kearns & Daniel Star (2009). Reasons as Evidence. Oxford Studies in Metaethics 4:215-42.
- Stephen Kearns & Daniel Star (2008). Reasons: Explanations or Evidence? Ethics 119 (1):31-56.
- Clayton Littlejohn (2009). ‘Ought’, ‘Can’, and Practical Reasons. American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (4):363-73.
- Nicholas Maxwell (2007). The Disastrous War Against Terrorism: Violence Versus Enlightenment. In Albert W. Merkidze (ed.), Terrorism Issues: Threat Assessment , Consequences and Prevention.
- Tristram McPherson (2012). Mark Schroeder's Hypotheticalism: Agent-Neutrality, Moral Epistemology, and Methodology. Philosophical Studies 157 (3):445-453.
- Thomas Nagel (1970). The Possibility of Altruism. Oxford Clarendon Press.
- Douglas W. Portmore, Chapter 5: Dual-Ranking Act-Consequentialism: Reasons, Morality, and Overridingness.
- Douglas W. Portmore, Moral Reasons, Overridingness, and Supererogation.
- Douglas W. Portmore (2008). Are Moral Reasons Morally Overriding? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (4):369 - 388.
- Peter Albert Railton (2003). Facts, Values, and Norms: Essays Toward a Morality of Consequence. Cambridge University Press.
- Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen (1999). Particularism and Principles. Theoria 65 (2-3):114-126.
- Hanno Sauer (forthcoming). Psychopaths and Filthy Desks. Are Emotions Necessary and Sufficient for Moral Judgment? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice.
- Charles Sayward & Wayne Wasserman (1990). Nagel, Internalism, and Relativism. Journal of Philosophical Research 1990:310-319.
- T. M. Scanlon, Structural Irrationality.
- T. M. Scanlon (2003). Précis of What We Owe to Each Other. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):159–161.
- Russ Shafer-Landau (2009). A Defence of Categorical Reasons. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt2):189-206.
- Russ Shafer-Landau (2006). Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Vol. 3. Oxford University Press.
- John Skorupski (2010). The Domain of Reasons. Oxford University Press.
- Holly M. Smith (2010). The Moral Clout of Reasonable Beliefs. In Mark Timmons (ed.), Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, Vol. I. Oxford University Press.
- Michael Smith (1997). In Defense of "the Moral Problem": A Reply to Brink, Copp, and Sayre-McCord. Ethics 108 (1):84-119.
- Daniel Star (2010). Moral Skepticism for Foxes. Boston University Law Review 90:497-508.
- Daniel Star (2010). Review of Terence Cuneo, The Normative Web: An Argument for Moral Realism (OUP, 2007). [REVIEW] Mind 119 (473):210-215.
- Herman E. Stark (2004). Reasons Without Principles. Inquiry 47 (2):143 – 167.
- Bart Streumer (forthcoming). Review of David Sobel and Steven Wall (Eds.), Reasons for Action. [REVIEW] Analysis Reviews.
- Matthew Talbert (2008). Blame and Responsiveness to Moral Reasons: Are Psychopaths Blameworthy? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (4):516-535.
- Attila Tanyi (2012). The Case for Authority. In S. Schleidgen (ed.), Should we always act morally? Essays on Overridingness. Tectum.
- Craig Taylor (2001). Moral Incapacity and Huckleberry Finn. Ratio 14 (1):56–67.
- Craig Taylor (1995). Moral Incapacity. Philosophy 70 (272):273 - 285.
- Sergio Tenenbaum (2006). Direction of Fit and Motivational Cognitivism. In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics. Oxford University Press.
- John J. Tilley (2008). Reasons, Rational Requirements, and the Putative Pseudo-Question “Why Be Moral?”. Synthese 161 (2):309 - 323.
- John J. Tilley (2006). Is "Why Be Moral?" A Pseudo-Question?: Hospers and Thornton on the Amoralist's Challenge. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):549-66.
- John J. Tilley (1997). Motivation and Practical Reasons. Erkenntnis 47 (1):105-127.
- Mark van Roojen (2011). Review of Joshua Gert, Brute Rationality: Normativity and Human Action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (2):543-546.
- Mark Van Roojen (1995). Review of Dancy's Moral Reasons. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 45 (178):118-120.
- Eric Vogelstein (2011). Morality, Reasons, and Sentiments. Philosophical Studies 155 (3):421-432.
|
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
Email
|
RSS feed
|
|