Related categories
Subcategories:History/traditions: Moral Responsibility
1220 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 1220
Material to categorize
  1. Johan A. M. Aerts (ed.) (2005). Identiteit En Verantwoordelijkheid: Over Religie, Zingeving En Levensbeschouwing. Damon.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Robert Albin (2004). A Chronicle of the Decline of Rationality: Ethics in the Practice of Journalism. HaKibutz HaMeuchad & Sapir College Publishing.
    The book examines the ethical aspect of journalistic activity in an attempt to understand and render explicit the values which guide journalists in their work, but it emphasizes the point that while such values reflect society's existing professional mores, this particular profession is also placed in such a way as to shape the consciousness and values of those who consume its working product. The central question of this work has to do with the ethical implications of journalistic activity, and more (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Linda Alcoff, Debra B. Bergoffen & Merold Westphal (1997). Remembrance and Responsibility. Depaul University.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Larry Alexander (2010). Criminal and Moral Responsibility and the Libet Experiments. In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Lynn Nadel (eds.), Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet. Oup Usa. 204.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. C. Fred Alford (1992). Responsibility Without Freedom. Theory and Society 21 (2):157-181.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Molly Aloian (2010). Live It-- Responsibility. Crabtree Pub..
    What is responsibility? -- Responsibility for familiy -- Responsibility for people in trouble -- Responsibility in big business -- Responsibility for other children -- Being responsible for the future -- Encouraging -- Responsible behavior.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Roman Altshuler (2012). The Origins of Responsibility. By François Raffoul. (Indiana UP, 2010. Pp. Xiv + 341.). [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 62 (246):217-220.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Kenneth M. Amaeshi, Onyeka K. Osuji & Paul Nnodim (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility in Supply Chains of Global Brands: A Boundaryless Responsibility? Clarifications, Exceptions and Implications. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 81 (1):223 - 234.
    Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is increasingly becoming a popular business concept in developed economies. As typical of other business concepts, it is on its way to globalization through practices and structures of the globalized capitalist world order, typified in Multinational Corporations (MNCs). However, CSR often sits uncomfortably in this capitalist world order, as MNCs are often challenged by the global reach of their supply chains and the possible irresponsible practices inherent along these chains. The possibility of irresponsible practices puts global (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Roger T. Ames, Thomas M. Chappell, M. David Eckel, Anna Lännström, Margaret R. Miles, Andrea Nightingale, Bhikhu Parekh, Steven C. Rockefeller, David Roochnik, Alfred I. Tauber & Michael Zank (2007). Responsibility. Lexington Books.
    In this book philosophers, scholars of religion, and activists address the theme of responsibility. Barbara Darling-Smith brings together an enlightening collection of essays that analyze the ethics of responsibility, its relational nature, and its global struggle.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Martin Marchman Andersen (2014). What Does Society Owe Me If I Am Responsible for Being Worse Off? Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (1):271-286.
    Luck egalitarians need to address the question of cost-responsibility: If an individual is responsible for being worse off than others, then what benefits, if any, is that individual uniquely cost-responsible for? By applying luck egalitarianism to justice in health I discuss different answers to this question inspired by two different interpretations of luck egalitarianism, namely ‘standard luck egalitarianism’ and ‘all luck egalitarianism’, respectively. Even though I argue that the latter is more plausible than the former, I ultimately suggest and defend (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Peter Angelos (1995). The Moral Responsibility of the Physician: A Philosophical Examination. Dissertation, Boston University
    Little attention has been paid to what is meant by "the moral responsibility of the physician" even though specific responsibilities are frequently discussed. This dissertation examines physician responsibility through the concepts of action theory. Responsibility is taken to be a relation between two agents and a condition signified by R $\epsilon$ N, where based on a norm system N, agent x is in relation to agent y responsible for condition u with respect to w. When determining if an agent is (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Roberto R. Aramayo & María José Guerra (eds.) (2007). Los Laberintos de la Responsabilidad. Plaza y Valdes.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Steven Arkonovich (forthcoming). Review: Luck, Value, & Committment. [REVIEW] Journal of Moral Philosophy.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. John E. Atwell (1980). Schopenhaurer's Account of Moral Responsibility. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 61 (4):396.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Annette C. Baier (1993). How Can Individualists Share Responsibility? Political Theory 21 (2):228-248.
  16. Thomas Baldwin (1979). Foresight and Responsibility. Philosophy 54 (209):347 - 360.
    Where a man foresaw that through its consequences his action would violate a law, is he for that reason to be judged responsible for the violation of the law? The principle that such a man is responsible, and thus that foresight is sufficient for responsibility, has long been accepted in both legal and moral theory. But in recent years anxieties about this principle have been expressed by both philosophers and lawyers. What one commonly finds in older books, both legal and (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. B. Barry (1997). The Politics of Free Will. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 59 (4):615 - 630.
    It is widely believed that, if human behaviour is subject to universal causation, people cannot be responsible for their actions. However, the excuses that are normally accepted do not invoke causation, so they would still be limited in scope even if all action had causal antecedents. Diminished responsibility due to (temporary or permanent) mental defect does involve reference to causation, but not to the fact of causation — rather, to the kind of causation. Again, therefore, universal causation does not threatenresponsibility (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Harry H. Bash (1964). Determinism and Avoidability in Sociohistorical Analysis. Ethics 74 (3):186-200.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. E. L. Beardsley (1958). 'Excusing Conditions' and Moral Responsibility. In Sidney Hook (ed.), Determinism and Freedom in the Age of Modern Science. Collier-Macmillan. 133--137.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Paul Benson (2001). Culture and Responsibility: A Reply to Moody-Adams. Journal of Social Philosophy 32 (4):610–620.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Paul Benson (1990). The Moral Importance of Free Action. Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (1):1-18.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Dieter Birnbacber (2001). Philosophical Foundations of Responsibility. In Ann Elisabeth Auhagen & Hans Werner Bierhoff (eds.), Responsibility: The Many Faces of a Social Phenomenon. Routledge.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Petersson Björn (forthcoming). Co-Responsibility and Causal Involvement. Philosophia.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Charles V. Blatz (1972). Accountability and Answerability. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 2 (2):101–120.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Jeffrey Blustein (2000). On Taking Responsibility for One’s Past. Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (1):1–19.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Suzanne Bouclin (2007). Joseph Keim-Campbell, Michael O'Rourke and David Shier, Eds. Law and Social Justice Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 27 (4):275-277.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Michael Boylan (2009). Institutions, Actors, and Moral Accountability. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2):335-345.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Michael Boylan (2002). Why Blame the Organization? Philosophy Now 39:44-44.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. W. Bradter (1984). Conflicts of World-View in the Question of Scientists Personal Moral Responsibility. Filosoficky Casopis 32 (3):300-303.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. James B. Brady (1973). Status Responsibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 33 (3):408-411.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. James B. Brady (1970). The Doctrine of Mens Rea: A Study in Legal and Moral Responsibility. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. M. Braham & M. van Hees (2012). An Anatomy of Moral Responsibility. Mind 121 (483):601-634.
    This paper examines the structure of moral responsibility for outcomes. A central feature of the analysis is a condition that we term the ‘avoidance potential’, which gives precision to the idea that moral responsibility implies a reasonable demand that an agent should have acted otherwise. We show how our theory can allocate moral responsibility to individuals in complex collective action problems, an issue that sometimes goes by the name of ‘the problem of many hands’. We also show how it allocates (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Matthew Braham & Martin Van Hees, Responsibility in Games.
    SOCREAL 2010: 2nd International Workshop on Philosophy and Ethics of Social Reality. Sapporo, Japan, 2010-03-27/28. Session 3: Responsibility and Collective Agency.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Michael E. Bratman (1995). Review of Action, Intention, and Reason by Robert Audi. [REVIEW] Ethics 105 (4):927-.
  35. Berit Brogaard & Barry Smith (2005). On Luck, Responsibility and the Meaning of Life. Philosophical Papers 34 (3):443-458.
    A meaningful life, we shall argue, is a life upon which a certain sort of valuable pattern has been imposed by the person in question?a pattern which involves in serious ways the person having an effect upon the world. Meaningfulness is thus a special kind of value which a human life can bear. Two interrelated difficulties face ths proposal. One concerns responsiblity: how are we to account for the fact that a life that satisfies the above criteria can have more (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Bruce Wallace Brotherston (1929). The Conception of Responsibility. International Journal of Ethics 39 (4):469-480.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Alexander Brown (2005). If We Value Individual Responsibility, Which Policies Should We Favour? Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):23–44.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Thomas Brucia (2005). Freedom, Will, and Responsibility. Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 13.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Dale E. Burrington (1999). Blameworthiness. Journal of Philosophical Research 24:505-527.
    In a way that harks back to Anglo-American philosophy of the 1950s and 1960s, this essay contends that the traditional “free will” problem is a spurious problem generated by systematic misuse of the terms employed in discussing moral responsibility. Illustrations of these misuses from sources old and new are provided, mainly in the footnotes. Attention is called to the proper use of the terms, which allows us to frame the questions pertinent to the determination of someone’s moral responsibility for a (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. D. C. (1964). Aristotle's Conception of Moral Weakness. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 18 (1):186-186.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Cheshire Calhoun (1989). Responsibility and Reproach. Ethics 99 (2):389-406.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Antonio Camerano (2012). Erranza Delle Etiche: Responsabilità E Generazioni Future. Pagnini.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. J. Campbell, M. O'Rourke & H. Silverstein (eds.) (2010). Action, Ethics, and Responsibility. MIT Press.
    Leading philosophers explore responsibility from a variety of perspectives, including metaphysics, action theory, and philosophy of law.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Robert Campbell (1984). Duress and Responsibility for Action. Journal of Applied Philosophy 1 (1):133-140.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Andre Santos Campos (2013). Responsibility and Justice in Aristotle's Non-Voluntary and Mixed Actions. Journal of Ancient Philosophy 7 (2):100.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Peter Cane (2003). Responsibility in Law and Morality. Mind 112 (446):328-331.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Justin Capes (2014). Gut-Wrenching Choices and Blameworthiness. Journal of Value Inquiry 48 (4):577-585.
    While there is no shortage of disagreement about what is required for blameworthiness, it has traditionally been assumed that freely doing what you know to be wrong all things considered, despite being aware that it is within your power to do the right thing instead, suffices. Let us refer to this traditional assumption as the sufficiency thesis. The sufficiency thesis is plausible, but it is not beyond dispute. Reflection on certain situations in which a person can do the right thing (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. A. Cappelen, E. Sørensen & B. Tungodden, Responsibility for What? Fairness and Individual Responsibility.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Robert F. Card (2005). Individual Responsibility Within Organizational Contexts. Journal of Business Ethics 62 (4):397 - 405.
    Actions within organizational contexts should be understood differently as compared with actions performed outside of such contexts. This is the case due to the agentic shift, as discussed by social psychologist Stanley Milgram, and the role that systemic factors play in shaping the available alternatives from which individuals acting within institutions choose. The analysis stemming from Milgram's experiments suggests not simply that individuals temporarily abdicate their moral agency on occasion, but that there is an erosion of agency within organizations. The (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. John W. Carroll (1987). Intending and Blameworthiness. Philosophia 17 (4):393-409.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1220