This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:History/traditions: Negation
108 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 108
  1. F. J. Adelmann (1972). Another Negation of Negation. Studies in East European Thought 12 (3):270-281.
    In discussing questions of free will, Soviet philosophers fail to distinguish conditions from causes. This makes them unable to understand the very opponents they like to criticize.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ignacio Angelelli (1983). Logical Negation. Review of Metaphysics 36 (4):925-926.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Leó Apostel (1973). Negation. Leuven,Nauwelaerts.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jay David Atlas (1980). A Note on a Confusion of Pragmatic and Semantic Aspects of Negation. Linguistics and Philosophy 3 (3):411 - 414.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Arnon Avron (2005). A Non-Deterministic View on Non-Classical Negations. Studia Logica 80 (2-3):159 - 194.
    We investigate two large families of logics, differing from each other by the treatment of negation. The logics in one of them are obtained from the positive fragment of classical logic (with or without a propositional constant ff for “the false”) by adding various standard Gentzen-type rules for negation. The logics in the other family are similarly obtained from LJ+, the positive fragment of intuitionistic logic (again, with or without ff). For all the systems, we provide simple semantics which is (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. A. J. Ayer (1952). Negation. Journal of Philosophy 49 (26):797-815.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Tista Bagchi, Quantification, Negation, and Focus: Challenges at the Conceptual-Intentional Semantic Interface.
    Quantification, Negation, and Focus: Challenges at the Conceptual-Intentional Semantic Interface Tista Bagchi National Institute of Science, Technology, and Development Studies (NISTADS) and the University of Delhi Since the proposal of Logical Form (LF) was put forward by Robert May in his 1977 MIT doctoral dissertation and was subsequently adopted into the overall architecture of language as conceived under Government-Binding Theory (Chomsky 1981), there has been a steady research effort to determine the nature of LF in language in light of structurally (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Archie J. Bahm (1961). Meanings of Negation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 22 (2):179-184.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Tomás Barrero (2015). Aserción, expresión y acción. Una lectura de J.L. Austin. Dianoia: Anuario de Filosofía 74 (LX):81-107.
    This paper offers a new interpretation of John Austin’s views both on assertion and on adverbs, as result of which an expressivist thesis concerning the semantics for action sentences is advanced. First, Austin’s analysis of assertion based on various, specific assertive forces and his remarks on adverbs are systematically connected in order to obtain assertive schemata for action sentences. Finally, those schemata are put to work as the expression of inferential commitments implicit in argumentative practices of different sorts (exculpatory, justificatory (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jon Barwise (1991). Review: Laurence R. Horn, A Natural History of Negation. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):1103-1104.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Michael Beeson, Robert Veroff & Larry Wos (2005). Double-Negation Elimination in Some Propositional Logics. Studia Logica 80 (2-3):195 - 234.
    This article answers two questions (posed in the literature), each concerning the guaranteed existence of proofs free of double negation. A proof is free of double negation if none of its deduced steps contains a term of the formn(n(t)) for some term t, where n denotes negation. The first question asks for conditions on the hypotheses that, if satisfied, guarantee the existence of a double-negation-free proof when the conclusion is free of double negation. The second question asks about the existence (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Filippo Beghelli & Tim Stowell (1997). Distributivity and Negation: The Syntax of Each and Every. In Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking. Kluwer. 71--107.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. W. Russell Belding (1971). Intuitionistic Negation. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 12 (2):183-187.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Jean-Yves Béziau (1994). Théorie Legislative de la Négation Pure. Logique Et Analyse 147 (148):209-225.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Diane Blakemore (1989). Denial and Contrast: A Relevance Theoretic Analysis of But. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (1):15 - 37.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Robyn Carston, Metalinguistic Negation and Echoic Use.
    What I hope to achieve in this paper is some rather deeper understanding of the semantic and pragmatic properties of utterances which are said to involve the phenomenon of metalinguistic negation[FN1]. According to Laurence Horn, who has been primarily responsible for drawing our attention to it, this is a special non-truthfunctional use of the negation operator, which can be glossed as 'I object to U' where U is a linguistic utterance. This is to be distinguished from descriptive truthfunctional negation which (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Robyn Carston (1998). Negation, `Presupposition' and the Semantics/ Pragmatics Distinction. Journal of Linguistics 34:309-350.
    A cognitive pragmatic approach is taken to some long-standing problem cases of negation, the so-called presupposition denial cases. It is argued that a full account of the processes and levels of representation involved in their interpretation typically requires the sequential pragmatic derivation of two different propositions expressed. The first is one in which the presupposition is preserved and, following the rejection of this, the second involves the echoic (metalinguistic) use of material falling in the scope of the negation. The semantic (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Roberto Casati & Achille C. Varzi (2000). True and False: An Exchange. In André Chapuis & Anil Gupta (eds.), Circularity, Definition, and Truth. Indian Council of Philosophical Research. 365-370.
    Classically, truth and falsehood are opposite, and so are logical truth and logical falsehood. In this paper we imagine a situation in which the opposition is so pervasive in the language we use as to threaten the very possibility of telling truth from falsehood. The example exploits a suggestion of Ramsey’s to the effect that negation can be expressed simply by writing the negated sentence upside down. The difference between ‘p’ and ‘~~p’ disappears, the principle of double negation becomes trivial, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Lung-ock Chung, Investigation Into Certain Implication-Negation Fragments of Propositional Logic.
    In this paper, we study the completeness property of some implication-negation fragments of propositional logics. By the phrase implication-negation fragment of a propositional logic, we understand the system consisting of all the theses which have implication and/or negation as their sole connectives in the said logic. This means, that we have to find a means to isolate, so to speak, all these theses and then axiomatize the resultant system. Our method of proof is by constructing a Gentzen type Sequenzen Kalkul (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Romane Clark (1953). More on Negation. Philosophical Studies 4 (6):81 - 87.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Roy T. Cook & Jon Cogburn (2000). What Negation is Not: Intuitionism and ‘0&Equals;1’. Analysis 60 (265):5-12.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Stephen Crain, Children's Command of Negation.
    Poverty -of-stimulus arguments have taken new ground recently, augmented by experimental findings from th e study of child language. In this paper, we briefly review two variants of the poverty-of-stimulus argument that have received empirical support from studies of child language; then we examine a third argument of this kind in more detail. The case under discussion involves the structural notion of c-command as it pertains to children’s interpretation of disjunction in the scope of negation.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Daniel Dahlstrom (2010). Negation and Being. Review of Metaphysics 64 (2):247-271.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Rick Dale & Nicholas D. Duran (2011). The Cognitive Dynamics of Negated Sentence Verification. Cognitive Science 35 (5):983-996.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Charles B. Daniels (1990). A Note on Negation. Erkenntnis 32 (3):423 - 429.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Adhar Chandra Das (1942). Negative Fact, Negation and Truth. [Calcutta]University of Calcutta.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Johan J. de Iongh, H. C. M. de Swart & L. J. M. Bergman (eds.) (1995). Perspectives on Negation: Essays in Honour of Johan J. De Iongh on His 80th Birthday. Tilburg University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Michael De (2013). Empirical Negation. Acta Analytica 28 (1):49-69.
    An extension of intuitionism to empirical discourse, a project most seriously taken up by Dummett and Tennant, requires an empirical negation whose strength lies somewhere between classical negation (‘It is unwarranted that. . . ’) and intuitionistic negation (‘It is refutable that. . . ’). I put forward one plausible candidate that compares favorably to some others that have been propounded in the literature. A tableau calculus is presented and shown to be strongly complete.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. George Englebretsen (1981). Logical Negation. Van Gorcum.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. J. E. Fenstad (1989). The Justification of Negation as Failure. In Jens Erik Fenstad, Ivan Timofeevich Frolov & Risto Hilpinen (eds.), Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science Viii: Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Moscow, 1987. Sole Distributors for the U.S.A. And Canada, Elsevier Science.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Egbert Fortuin (2014). Deconstructing a Verbal Illusion: The 'No X is Too Y to Z' Construction and the Rhetoric of Negation. Cognitive Linguistics 25 (2):249-292.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Amy Franklin & Anastasia Giannakidou (2011). Negation, Questions, and Structure Building in a Homesign System. Cognition 118 (3):398-416.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Joseph S. Fulda (2005). A Pragmatic, Truth-Functional Solution to a Logical Difficulty with Biconditionals Absent in Conditionals. Journal of Pragmatics 37 (9/12):1419-1425/2120.
    Solves what is sometimes, but not always, referred to as the third paradox of material implication. Readers downloading this piece should please also download the corrigendum. Note that "pragmatic" is here used in its original sense of context-sensitive, that is, adjacency. (This comment is made in response to an article in a student journal published in the western U.S. which claimed that I said that because something involves translation it must be pragmatic; that is so, in the original sense; only (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Richard Gale (1976). Problems of Negation and Nonbeing,'. American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph 10:1-116.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Richard M. Gale (1976). Negation and Non-Being. Blackwell.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Vibha Gaur (1990). The Navya-Nyāya Logic: With Special Reference to Raghunātha and Mathurānātha. Bharatiya Vidya Prakashan.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Stamatios Gerogiorgakis (2012). Privations, Negations and the Square: Basic Elements of a Logic of Privations. In Jean-Yves Beziau & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Around and beyond the Square of Opposition. Birkhäuser-Springer. 229--239.
    I try to explain the difference between three kinds of negation: external negation, negation of the predicate and privation. Further I use polygons of opposition as heuristic devices to show that a logic which contains all three mentioned kinds of negation must be a fragment of a Łukasiewicz-four-valued predicate logic. I show, further, that, this analysis can be elaborated so as to comprise additional kinds of privation. This would increase the truth-values in question and bring fragments of (more generally speaking) (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Anastasia Giannakidou, On Metalinguistic Comparatives and Negation in Greek.
    In this paper, we identify a paradigm of metalinguistic comparatives in Greek headed by the preposition para. Para clauses are lexically distinct from other comparatives clauses in Greek (headed by apo, apoti). Building on earlier intuitions, we propose a semantics of metalinguistic MORE as a contrast between two propositions in terms of how appropriate of preferred they are by some individual. Syntactically, metalinguistic comparison appears to behave like a co-ordinate structure with ellipsis in the para-clause. Our account is extended to (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Anastasia Giannakidou, UNTIL, Aspect, and Negation: A Novel Argument for Two Untils.
    The puzzle of English until is well-known. Karttunen 1974 argues that until is ambiguous between a durative and a punctual negative polarity (NPI) meaning. Mittwoch 1977 claims that there is no ambiguity and that the two meanings are due to scope differences: NPI-until is in fact until above negation. Mittwoch’s account relies crucially on the assumption that negation is an aspectual operator that ‘stativizes’ verb meanings (a position recently argued for in de Swart 1996, and de Swart and Molendijk 1999; (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Jeremy Gilbert (2009). Multitude: Between Innovation and Negation. [REVIEW] Radical Philosophy 154.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Jeremy Gilbert (2009). Paolo Virno, Multitude: Between Innovation and Negation. Radical Philosophy 154:62.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Michael Glanzberg (2009). Descriptions, Negation, and Focus. In Robert Stainton & Christopher Viger (eds.), Compositionality, Context, and Semantic Values: Essays in Honor of Ernie Lepore. Springer.
    One of the mainstays of the theory of definite descriptions since Russell (1905) has been their interaction with negation. In particular, Russellians, who advocate the view that definite descriptions are a kind of quantifier, point to these interactions as evidence in favor of the their view. The argument runs roughly as follows.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. B. S. Gower (1971). Conditionals. Mind 80 (319):418-420.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. P. J. H. (1968). The Navya-Nyäya Doctrine of Negation. Review of Metaphysics 22 (1):149-149.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Jonathan Harrison (1974). Mr. Gower on Conditionals. Mind 83 (329):103-105.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Jonathan Harrison (1968). Unfulfilled Conditionals and the Truth of Their Constituents. Mind 77 (307):372-382.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Marjorie Hass (2000). Negation and Difference. Philosophy Today 44 (9999):112-118.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. F. H. Heinemann (1943). The Meaning of Negation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 44:127 - 152.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Jaakko Hintikka (2002). Negation in Logic and in Natural Language. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (5-6):585-600.
    In game-theoretical semantics, perfectlyclassical rules yield a strong negation thatviolates tertium non datur when informationalindependence is allowed. Contradictorynegation can be introduced only by a metalogicalstipulation, not by game rules. Accordingly, it mayoccur (without further stipulations) onlysentence-initially. The resulting logic (extendedindependence-friendly logic) explains several regularitiesin natural languages, e.g., why contradictory negation is abarrier to anaphase. In natural language, contradictory negationsometimes occurs nevertheless witin the scope of aquantifier. Such sentences require a secondary interpretationresembling the so-called substitutionalinterpretation of quantifiers.This interpretation is sometimes impossible,and (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Marco Hollenberg (1997). An Equational Axiomatization of Dynamic Negation and Relational Composition. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 6 (4):381-401.
    We consider algebras on binary relations with two main operators: relational composition and dynamic negation. Relational composition has its standard interpretation, while dynamic negation is an operator familiar to students of Dynamic Predicate Logic (DPL) (Groenendijk and Stokhof, 1991): given a relation R its dynamic negation R is a test that contains precisely those pairs (s,s) for which s is not in the domain of R. These two operators comprise precisely the propositional part of DPL.This paper contains a finite equational (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 108