Related categories
Siblings:
247 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 247
  1. R. Lanier Anderson (2005). Neo-Kantianism and the Roots of Anti-Psychologism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (2):287 – 323.
  2. Richard E. Aquila (2003). Hans Vaihinger and Some Recent Intentionalist Readings of Kant. Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2):231-250.
    BRENTANO'S APPROPRIATION OF THE Scholastic notion of intentionality, and of what Brentano called "the intentional (or mental) inexistence of an object," was early on exploited in a reading of Kant's theory of objects and appearances. Apparently the first systematic attempt was undertaken by Hans Vaihinger. However, Vaihinger's is radically different from more recent intentionalist readings of Kant. Albeit not in every respect, I propose that a return to this aspect of Vaihinger's approach supports a rewarding advance on such readings. After (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3. Gerhard Arlt (1985). Subjektivität Und Wissenschaft Zur Psychologie des Subjekts Bei Natorp Und Husserl.
  4. Gary Backhaus (1999). Introduction to the Neo-Kantian Problematics. In Tm Powers & P. Kamolnick (ed.), From Kant to Weber: Freedom and Culture in Classical German Social Theory. 59.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5. Gary Backhaus (1999). The Neo-Kantian Predicament. In Tm Powers & P. Kamolnick (ed.), From Kant to Weber: Freedom and Culture in Classical German Social Theory.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Jules A. Baisnée (1940). De Kant aux Postkantiens. New Scholasticism 14 (4):420-424.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Jeffrey Andrew Barash (ed.) (2008). The Symbolic Construction of Reality: The Legacy of Ernst Cassirer. University of Chicago Press.
    Following this work, Cassirer extended his insights to encompass a broad spectrum of philosophical themes: from investigations into Western epistemological and ...
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Bernard Barsotti, David Reggio & Eduardo Rêgo (2005). The "Non-Kantianism" of Bachelard. Angelaki 10 (2):89 – 102.
    The spiritual movement of Kantianism remains sound. La Philosophie du non 106 Kantianism has left the employment of the categories incoherent. La Philosophie du non 67.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Bruno Bauch (1915). Schlussbemerkung zu meiner Diskussion mit A. Messer. Kant-Studien 20 (1-3):302-304.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Bruno Bauch (1915). Idealismus und Realismus in der Sphäre des philosophischen Kritizismus. Kant-Studien 20 (1-3):97-116.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Bruno Bauch (1914). Über den Begriff des Naturgesetzes. Kant-Studien 19 (1-3):303-337.
  12. Bruno Bauch (1912). Nachruf, nach den am Sarge im Namen der Kant-Gesellschaft gesprochenen Worten. Kant-Studien 17 (1-3):5-8.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Bruno Bauch (1909). Zwei Gedenkschriften zu D. Fr. Strauss' hundertstem Geburtstage. Kant-Studien 14 (1-3):68-80.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Bruno Bauch (1907). Eine neue Ausgabe der Werke Nietzsches. Kant-Studien 12 (1-3):432-435.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Bruno Bauch (1906). Chamberlains „Kant“. Kant-Studien 11 (1-3):153-195.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Bruno Bauch (1904). Die Persönlichkeit Kants. Kant-Studien 9 (1-3):196-210.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Bruno Bauch (1904). Luther Und Kant. Kant-Studien 9 (1-3):351-492.
  18. Manfred Baum (1996). Klaus Reich (1906-1996). Kant-Studien 87 (2):129-131.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Peter Baumanns (1966). Der kritische Weg in der philosophie Nicolai hartmanns. Kant-Studien 57 (1-4):296-308.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. B. Bavink (1927). Raum, Zeit und Kausalität im System des kritischen Realismus. Kant-Studien 32 (1-3):264-272.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Thora Ilin Bayer (2006). Art as Symbolic Form: Cassirer on the Educational Value of Art. Journal of Aesthetic Education 40 (4):51-64.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Beck Beck (1955). CASSIRER'S Kant's First Critique. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 16:248.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Lewis White Beck (1951). On Professor Margenau's Kantianism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 11 (4):568-573.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Rainer Beer (1991). Materials on the 'Neo-Kantianism' Discussion. Philosophy and History 24 (1/2):31-32.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Ernst Behler (1986). Henry Crabb Robinson und Kant. Ein Beitrag zur Kantrezeption innerhalb der europäischen Romantik. Kant-Studien 77 (1-4):289-315.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Frederick Beiser (2014). The Genesis of Neo-Kantianism, 1796-1880. OUP Oxford.
    Neo-Kantianism was an important movement in German philosophy of the late 19th century: Frederick Beiser traces its development back to the late 18th century, and explains its rise as a response to three major developments in German culture: the collapse of speculative idealism; the materialism controversy; and the identity crisis of philosophy.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Frederick Beiser (2012). Review: Makkreel & Luft (Eds), Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (1):145-146.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Frederick Beiser (2009). Normativity in Neo-Kantianism: Its Rise and Fall. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (1):9 – 27.
    This article discusses the historical background to the concept of normativity which has a wide use in contemporary philosophy. It locates the origin of that concept in the Southwestern Neo-Kantian school, the writings of Windelband, Rickert and Lask. The Southwestern school made the concept of normativity central to epistemology, ethics and the interpretation of German idealism. It was their solution to the threats of psycologism and historicism. However, Windelband, Rickert and Lask found difficulties with the concept which eventually forced them (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  29. Frederick Beiser (2008). Emil Lask and Kantianism. Philosophical Forum 39 (2):283-295.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Frederick Beiser (2008). Historicism and Neo-Kantianism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (4):554-564.
    This article treats the conflict between historicism and neo-Kantianism in the late nineteenth century by a careful examination of the writings of Wilhelm Windelband, the leader of the Southwestern neo-Kantians. Historicism was a profound challenge to the fundamental principles of Kant’s philosophy because it seemed to imply that there are no universal and necessary principles of science, ethics or aesthetics. Since all such principles are determined by their social and historical context, they differ with each culture and epoch. Windelband attempted (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Tony Bennett (1985). Really Useless 'Knowledge': A Political Critique of Aesthetics. Thesis Eleven 12 (1):28-52.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. J. Benrubi (1925). Kant, Maine de Biran und die philosophische Bewegung der Gegenwart. Kant-Studien 30 (1-2):453-463.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Hugo Bergmann (1928). Über einige philosophische argumente gegen die relativitätstheorie. Kant-Studien 33 (1-2):387-404.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Rudolf Bernet (2009). The Hermeneutics of Perception in Cassirer, Heidegger, and Husserl. In Rudolf A. Makkreel & Sebastian Luft (eds.), Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy. Indiana University Press
  35. L. Bertolini (1986). The Concepts of Apriori and History in the Early Writings of Cohen, Hermann. Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 41 (2):265-281.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. A. Biehl (1904). Helmholfz in Seinem Verhältnis Zu Kant. Kant-Studien 9 (1-3):261-285.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  37. Graham Bird (2007). Review: Friedman, A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger; Alweiss, The World Unclaimed: A Challenge to Heidegger's Critique of Husserl. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 12 (2):161-163.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. L. Boi (1996). Non-Euclidean Geometry, the Philosophical Problem of Space, and the Origins of the Transcendental: Helmholtz and Kant, the Neo-Kantians, Einstein, Poincare, and Mach. Kant-Studien 87 (3):257-289.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Luciano Boi (1996). Les géométries non euclidiennes, le problème philosophique de l'espace et la conception transcendantale; Helmholtz et Kant, les néo-kantiens, Einstein, Poincaré et Mach. Kant-Studien 87 (3):257-289.
  40. Daniel Breazeale (2003). Two Cheers for Post-Kantianism: A Response to Karl Ameriks. Inquiry 46 (2):239 – 259.
    Karl Ameriks has recently devoted an entire volume to defending what he calls "orthodox" Kantianism against what he judges to be the "errors" of such post-Kantian idealists as K. L. Reinhold and J. G. Fichte and to exposing what he claims is the frequently unnoticed but always deleterious influence of post-Kantianism upon certain prominent strands of contemporary philosophy. In response, this paper challenges Ameriks' interpretation of Kantianism itself and of the "post-Kantian project", as well as his construal of transcendental idealism. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Andrew Brook (2004). Kant, Cognitive Science and Contemporary Neo-Kantianism. Journal of Consciousness Studies 11 (10-11):10-11.
    Through nineteenth-century intermediaries, the model of the mind developed by Immanuel Kant has had an enormous influence on contemporary cognitive research. Indeed, Kant could be viewed as the intellectual godfather of cognitive science. In general structure, Kant's model of the mind shaped nineteenth-century empirical psychology and, after a hiatus during which behaviourism reigned supreme , became influential again toward the end of the twentieth century, especially in cognitive science. Kantian elements are central to the models of the mind of thinkers (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Matthew R. Broome (2009). Philosophy as the Science of Value: Neo-Kantianism as a Guide to Psychiatric Interviewing. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 15 (2):107-116.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43. Fabien Capeillères (2009). To Reach for Metaphysics : Mile Boutroux's Philosophy of Science. In Rudolf A. Makkreel & Sebastian Luft (eds.), Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy. Indiana University Press
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Milic Capek (1958). Reichenbach's Early Kantianism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 19 (1):86-94.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  45. Taylor Carman (2010). Heidegger's Anti-Neo-Kantianism. Philosophical Forum 41 (1):131-142.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Tom Casier (1999). From Neo-Kantianism to Logicism: Vvedenskij's Mature Years. Studies in East European Thought 51 (1):1-33.
    In the first two decades of the century Vvedenskij developed and defended what he took to be an original argument in support of the impossibility of metaphysical knowledge. This argument, which he hailed as a "proof," involved an examination of the four laws of thought alone. As it made no appeal to the highly technical analyses found in Kant's first Critique, Vvedenskij considered it to be more efficient and thereby effective than Kant's own arguments. Although Vvedenskij's estimation of his accomplishment (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. E. Cassirer (1912). Hermann Cohen und die Erneuerung der Kantischen Philosophie. Kant-Studien 17 (1-3):252-273.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  48. Ernst Cassirer (2005). Hermann Cohen and the Renewal of Kantian Philosophy. Angelaki 10 (1):95 – 108.
    (2005). Hermann Cohen and the Renewal of Kantian philosophy2. Angelaki: Vol. 10, continental philosophy and the sciences the german traditionissue editor: damian veal, pp. 95-108.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  49. Ernst Cassirer (1981). Kant's Life and Thought. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
  50. Ernst Cassirer (1942). The Influence of Language Upon the Development of Scientific Thought. Journal of Philosophy 39 (12):309-327.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 247