This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
70 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 70
  1. F. M. Akeroyd (1991). A Practical Example of Grue. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (4):535-539.
    This article describes a practical example of the predicate grue, examining the economic relationship between the percentage rate of unemployment and the percentage change of money wage rates known as the simple Phillips curve which exhibited regular behaviour before 1969 and erratic behaviour thereafter. It is proposed that such practical examples of grue from the real world be redescribed as regulatic. i.e. regular before time t and erratic thereafter. In the instance of a scientific model or theory being falsified it (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. J. E. J. Altham (1968). A Note on Goodman's Paradox. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):257.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. S. F. Barker & Peter Achinstein (1960). On the New Riddle of Induction. Philosophical Review 69 (4):511-522.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Lukas Bielik (2013). Goodman's Riddle (Unsuccessfully?) Resolved: A Respond to R. Maco. Filozofia 68 (4):343-350.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Lukas Bielik (2013). On the Presentation of the Raven Paradox and the New Riddle of Induction. A Reply to Eugen Zelenak. Organon F 20 (2):251-261.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Lukas Bielik (2011). " The New Riddle of Induction" and Testing of Qualities. Filozofia 66 (8):746-754.
    The paper deals with the New Riddle of Induction set forth by N. Goodman in his Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. The problem is introduced through the definition of grue-predicate. The relation between the grue-hypothesis and empirical evidence is examined. Goodman’s underlying thesis about the neutrality of empirical evidence is undermined. The intelligibility of the idea that disjunctive properties such as Grue can be observed and seen is questioned. A solution of Goodman’s riddle is outlined by means of the definition of (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Elodie Boublil (2013). 8 Of the Vision and the Riddle. In Christine Daigle & Élodie Boublil (eds.), Nietzsche and Phenomenology: Power, Life, Subjectivity. Indiana University Press. 141.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Richard S. G. Brown, The Riddle as Argument: Zarathustra's Riddle and the Eternal Return.
    While it seems to be evident that the vision of the eternal return of the same is the solution to the riddle mentioned in "On the vision and the riddle," exactly what constitutes the riddle is anything but clear. Li ke all good riddles the solution demands a paradigm shift. Nietzsche's riddle is solved by a radical rethinking of the concept of time, from a straight line to a circle. I give a detailed account of how Nietzsche's riddle is formulated (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. F. Thomas Burke (2002). Qualities, Universals, Kinds, and the New Riddle of Induction. In F. Thomas Burke, D. Micah Hester & Robert B. Talisse (eds.), Dewey's Logical Theory: New Studies and Interpretations. Vanderbilt University Press.
    The limited aim here is to explain what John Dewey might say about the formulation of the grue example. Nelson Goodman’s problem of distinguishing good and bad inductive inferences is an important one, but the grue example misconstrues this complex problem for certain technical reasons, due to ambiguities that contemporary logical theory has not yet come to terms with. Goodman’s problem is a problem for the theory of induction and thus for logical theory in general. Behind the whole discussion of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Tom Burke (2002). And the New Riddle of Induction. In F. Thomas Burke, D. Micah Hester & Robert B. Talisse (eds.), Dewey's Logical Theory: New Studies and Interpretations. Vanderbilt University Press. 225.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. James Cargile (1970). On Goodman's Riddle of Induction. Ratio 12 (2):144.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Timothy Chambers (1999). Is Goodman's Solution of Hume's Riddle Too Strong? Dialogos 34 (74):63-70.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. D. Chart (2000). Discussion. Schulte and Goodman's Riddle. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (1):147-149.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Fabio Ciaramelli (2005). The Riddle of the Pre-Original. In Claire Elise Katz & Lara Trout (eds.), Emmanuel Levinas. Routledge. 1--67.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. F. John Clenndinen (1996). Mired in Grue. Metascience 5 (1):86-94.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Ramesh M. Dave (1981). Is'akshara'an Unsolved Riddle? In Sahajānanda (ed.), New Dimensions in Vedanta Philosophy. Bochasanwasi Shri Aksharpurushottam Sanstha. 1--132.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Scott DeVito (1997). A Gruesome Problem for the Curve-Fitting Solution. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):391-396.
    This paper is a response to Forster and Sober's [1994] solution to the curve-fitting problem. If their solution is correct, it will provide us with a solution to the New Riddle of Induction as well as provide a basis for choosing realism over conventionalism. Examining this solution is also important as Forster and Sober incorporate it in much of their other philosophical work (see Forster [1995a, b, 1994] and Sober [1996, 1995, 1993]). I argue that Forster and Sober's solution is (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Crawford L. Elder (1990). Goodman's “New Riddle” — a Realist's Reprise. Philosophical Studies 59 (2):115 - 135.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Catherine Z. Elgin (ed.) (1997). Nelson Goodman's New Riddle of Induction. Garland Pub..
    A challenger of traditions and boundaries A pivotal figure in 20th-century philosophy, Nelson Goodman has made seminal contributions to metaphysics, epistemology, aesthetics, and the philosophy of language, with surprising connections that cut across traditional boundaries. In the early 1950s, Goodman, Quine, and White published a series of papers that threatened to torpedo fundamental assumptions of traditional philosophy. They advocated repudiating analyticity, necessity, and prior assumptions. Some philosophers, realizing the seismic effects repudiation would cause, argued that philosophy should retain the familiar (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. L. S. F. (1958). The Riddle of Life. Review of Metaphysics 12 (2):321-321.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Haskell Fain (1967). The Very Thought of Grue. Philosophical Review 76 (1):61-73.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Branden Fitelson, Goodman's “Grue” Argument in Historical Perspective.
    The talk is mainly defensive. I won’t offer positive accounts of the “paradoxical” cases I will discuss (but, see “Extras”). I’ll begin with Harman’s defense of classical deductive logic against certain (epistemological) “relevantist” arguments.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Branden Fitelson (2008). Goodman's "New Riddle". Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (6):613 - 643.
    First, a brief historical trace of the developments in confirmation theory leading up to Goodman's infamous "grue" paradox is presented. Then, Goodman's argument is analyzed from both Hempelian and Bayesian perspectives. A guiding analogy is drawn between certain arguments against classical deductive logic, and Goodman's "grue" argument against classical inductive logic. The upshot of this analogy is that the "New Riddle" is not as vexing as many commentators have claimed (especially, from a Bayesian inductive-logical point of view). Specifically, the analogy (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Branden Fitelson (2001). Studies in Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison
    According to Bayesian confirmation theory, evidence E (incrementally) confirms (or supports) a hypothesis H (roughly) just in case E and H are positively probabilistically correlated (under an appropriate probability function Pr). There are many logically equivalent ways of saying that E and H are correlated under Pr. Surprisingly, this leads to a plethora of non-equivalent quantitative measures of the degree to which E confirms H (under Pr). In fact, many non-equivalent Bayesian measures of the degree to which E confirms (or (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. MR Forster (1999). Model Selection in Science: The Problem of Language Variance. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (1):83-102.
    Recent solutions to the curve-fitting problem, described in Forster and Sober ([1995]), trade off the simplicity and fit of hypotheses by defining simplicity as the paucity of adjustable parameters. Scott De Vito ([1997]) charges that these solutions are 'conventional' because he thinks that the number of adjustable parameters may change when the hypotheses are described differently. This he believes is exactly what is illustrated in Goodman's new riddle of induction, otherwise known as the grue problem. However, the 'number of adjustable (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. W. Freitag (2015). I Bet You'll Solve Goodman's Riddle. Philosophical Quarterly 65 (259):254-267.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Roger L. Geiger (2008). The Riddle of the Valley. Minerva 46 (1):127-132.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. D. Goldstick (1989). The Meaning of “Grue”. Erkenntnis 31 (1):139 - 141.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Nelson Goodman (2000). The New Riddle of Induction. In Sven Bernecker & Fred I. Dretske (eds.), Knowledge: Readings in Contemporary Epistemology. Oup Oxford.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. I. Hacking (1993). Goodman New Riddle is Pre-Humian+ New-Riddle-of-Induction. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 47 (185):229-243.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Ian Hacking (1993). On Kripke's and Goodman's Uses of 'Grue'. Philosophy 68 (265):269-295.
    Kripke's lectures, published as Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language , posed a sceptical problem about following a rule, which he cautiously attributed to Wittgenstein. He briefly noticed an analogy between his new kind of scepticism and Goodman's riddle of induction. ‘Grue’, he said, could be used to formulate a question not about induction but about meaning: the problem would not be Goodman's about induction—‘Why not predict that grass, which has been grue in the past, will be grue in the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Mary Hesse (1969). Ramifications of 'Grue'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (1):13-25.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Kevin D. Hoover (1980). Abduction and the New Riddle of Induction. The Monist 63 (3):329-341.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Rami Israel (2004). Two Interpretations of ‘Grue’– or How to Misunderstand the New Riddle of Induction. Analysis 64 (284):335–339.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Frank Jackson (1998). Mind, Method, and Conditionals: Selected Essays. Routledge.
    This collection brings together some of Frank Jackson's most influential essays on mind, action, conditionals, method in metaphysics, and ethics. These have each been revised for this edition, and are presented along with his challenge to orthodoxy on the new riddle of induction.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Frank Jackson (1975). Grue. Journal of Philosophy 72 (5):113-131.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Frank Jackson & Robert Pargetter (1980). Confirmation and the Nomological. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):415 - 428.
    We argue that it is a mistake to approach goodman's new riddle of induction by demarcating projectible from non-Projectible predicates and hypotheses, And put forward an alternative way of looking at the whole question.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Bredo Johnsen (1979). Russell's New Riddle of Induction. Philosophy 54 (207):87 - 97.
    The most innovative and important parts of Bertrand Russell's Human Knowledge were the result of his first attempt in three decades to come to grips with the problem of induction, or, more generally, ‘non-demonstrative inference’. My purpose here is to argue that that work constituted giant progress on the problem; if I succeed, something will have been done to restore this work to its proper place in the history of philosophy and, correlatively, to rearrange that history.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. I. A. Kieseppä (2001). Statistical Model Selection Criteria and the Philosophical Problem of Underdetermination. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (4):761 - 794.
    I discuss the philosophical significance of the statistical model selection criteria, in particular their relevance for philosophical problems of underdetermination. I present an easily comprehensible account of their simplest possible application and contrast it with their application to curve-fitting problems. I embed philosophers' earlier discussion concerning the situations in which the criteria yield implausible results into a more general framework. Among other things, I discuss a difficulty which is related to the so-called subfamily problem, and I show that it has (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Robert Kowalenko (2012). Reply to Israel on the New Riddle of Induction. Philosophia 40 (3):549-552.
    Israel 2004 claims that numerous philosophers have misinterpreted Goodman’s original ‘New Riddle of Induction’, and weakened it in the process, because they do not define ‘grue’ as referring to past observations. Both claims are false: Goodman clearly took the riddle to concern the maximally general problem of “projecting” any type of characteristic from a given realm of objects into another, and since this problem subsumes Israel’s, Goodman formulated a stronger philosophical challenge than the latter surmises.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Ak L. (1983). On Grue and Bleen. Bulletin of the Santayana Society 1 (1):12-16.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Dean Lubin (2012). Goodman's New Riddle of Induction. Open Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):61-63.
    In this paper, I consider Goodman’s new riddle of induction and how we should best respond to it. Noticing that all the emeralds so far observed are green, we infer that all emeralds are green. However, all emeralds so far observed are also grue, so we could also infer that they are grue. Only one of these inductive inferences or projections could, however, be valid. For the hypothesis that all emeralds are green predicts that the next observed emerald will be (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Edward H. Madden (1958). The Riddle of Induction. Journal of Philosophy 55 (17):705-718.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Floyd Merrell (2007). Toward a Concept of Pluralistic, Inter-Relational Semiosis. Sign Systems Studies 35 (1-2):9-68.
    Brief consideration of (1) Peirce’s ‘logic of vagueness’, (2) his categories, and (3) the concepts of overdetermination and underdetermination, vagueness and generality, and inconsistency and incompleteness, along with (4) the abrogation of classical Aristotelian principles of logic, bear out the complexity of all relatively rich sign systems. Given this complexity, there is semiotic indeterminacy, which suggests sign limitations, and at the same time it promises semiotic freedom, giving rise to sign proliferation the yield of which is pluralistic, inter-relational semiosis. This (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. John Moreland (1976). On Projecting Grue. Philosophy of Science 43 (3):363-377.
    This paper attempts to place Goodman's "New Riddle of Induction" within the context of a subjectivist understanding of inductive logic. It will be argued that predicates such as 'grue' cannot be denied projectible status in any a priori way, but must be considered in the context of a situation of inductive support. In particular, it will be argued that questions of projectibility are to be understood as a variety of questions about the ways a given sample is random. Various examples (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Rita Nolan, The Unnaturalness of Grue'.
    A category of non-standard predicates was introduced by Goodman (1954) while attempting to recast the old riddle of induction in terms amenable to solution within confirmation theory. The New Riddle proved as intractable as the old one but the category of predicates, "mutant" ones, may assist us in understanding cognitive development from neonate vacuity to linguisticallyinformed rational inquiry. This paper proposes a naturalistic explanation of why we tend to reject grue-type predicates as proper bases for induction. Its conclusion is that (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. John D. Norton (2006). How the Formal Equivalence of Grue and Green Defeats What is New in the New Riddle of Induction. Synthese 150 (2):185 - 207.
    That past patterns may continue in many different ways has long been identified as a problem for accounts of induction. The novelty of Goodman’s ”new riddle of induction” lies in a meta-argument that purports to show that no account of induction can discriminate between incompatible continuations. That meta-argument depends on the perfect symmetry of the definitions of grue/bleen and green/blue, so that any evidence that favors the ordinary continuation must equally favor the grue-ified continuation. I argue that this very dependence (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. John D. Norton, The Formal Equivalence of Grue and Green and How It Undoes the New Riddle of Induction.
    The hidden strength of Goodman's ingenious "new riddle of induction" lies in the perfect symmetry of grue/bleen and green/blue. The very same sentence forms used to define grue/bleen in terms of green/blue can be used to define green/blue in terms of grue/bleen by permutation of terms. Therein lies its undoing. In the artificially restricted case in which there are no additional facts that can break the symmetry, grue/bleen and green/blue are merely notational variants of the same facts; or, if they (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Linda C. Palmer (2013). An Old Approach to a New Riddle – Kantian Purposiveness and Goodman’s Projectibility. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter. 185-196.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Scot Peterson (1995). Douglas Stalker, Ed., Grue! The New Riddle of Induction Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 15 (3):211-213.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 70