This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Subcategories:
78 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 78
Material to categorize
  1. Harold Alderman (1972). Nietzsche's Masks. International Philosophical Quarterly 12 (3):365-388.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. David B. Allison (ed.) (1977/1985). The New Nietzsche: Contemporary Styles of Interpretation. MIT Press.
    The fifteen essays, written by such eminent scholars as Derrida, Heidegger, Deleuze, Klossowski, and Blanchot, focus on the Nietzschean concepts of the Will to ...
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
Nietzsche: Will to Power
  1. R. Lanier Anderson (2012). The Will to Power in Science and Philosophy. In Helmut Heit, Günter Abel & Marco Brusotti (eds.), Nietzsches Wissenschaftsphilosophie. De Gruyter
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Ciano Aydin (2007). Nietzsche on Reality as Will to Power: Toward an "Organization–Struggle" Model. Journal of Nietzsche Studies 33 (1):25-48.
  3. Tom Bailey (2003). Nietzsche: His Philosophy of Contradictions and the Contradictions of His Philosophy (Review). Journal of Nietzsche Studies 25 (1):95-100.
  4. Charles Bambach (2013). Nietzsche and Antiquity: His Reaction and Response to the Classical Tradition Ed. By Paul Bishop (Review). Journal of Nietzsche Studies 44 (1):113-115.
    The hermeneutic thicket surrounding the question of Nietzsche and the Greeks is both dense and forbidding. Every attempt to pose this question confronts a wide range of difficult issues. Who is “Nietzsche”? Which “Greeks”? What range of concerns? methods? disciplinary boundaries? How to think the relation between the early Nietzsche of the Basel years and the later Nietzsche post-Zarathustra? Where to turn for help in working through the palimpsest of interpretations that have formed the Nietzschebild in our time? To simply (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Charles Bambach (2003). Nietzsehe's Philosophy of the Etemal Recurrence of the Same. New Nietzsche Studies 5 (3/4/1/2):208-213.
  6. Frank Chouraqui (2013). Originary Dehiscence: An Invitation to Explore the Resonances Between the Philosophies of Nietzsche and Merleau-Ponty. In Christine Daigle & Élodie Boublil (eds.), Nietzsche and Phenomenology: Power, Life, Subjectivity. Indiana University Press 177-194.
    This paper seeks to provide a basis for a fruitful correspondence between the projects of Nietzsche and Merleau-Ponty. It argues that both philosophers are committed to an ontology of relation and they both regards any terms to these relations as being hypostases of a horizontal movement. This commits them to very parallel views of history, politics, and perception.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Martin Heidegger (1979/1991). Nietzsche. Harpersanfrancisco.
    A landmark discussion between two great thinkers, vital to an understanding of twentieth-century philosophy and intellectual history.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   34 citations  
  8. Donovan Miyasaki (forthcoming). Feeling, Not Freedom: Nietzsche Against Agency. Journal of Nietzsche Studies 47 (2).
    This paper argues that, although Nietzsche’s rejection of free will leaves no room for a morally substantial, compatibilist conception of freedom of agency, freedom nevertheless plays an important role in his positive moral philosophy, since Nietzsche’s higher human types are characterized by a heightened feeling of freedom—a qualitative affect without deeper substance. Moreover, because the feeling of freedom is increased by resistance, it requires a limitation of practical freedom—a relative constraint of ability, strength, and activity rather than their absolute promotion. (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Thomas Mormann (2015). Moritz Schlicks Vorlesungen über Nietzsche und Schopenhauer. [REVIEW] Journal of General Philosophy of Science 46 (2): 419 - 423.
  10. Wolfgang Müller-Lauter (1982). Das willenswesen und der übermensch ein beitrag zu heideggers Nietzsche-interpretationen. Nietzsche-Studien 10 (1):132.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Wolfgang Müller-Lauter (1974). Nietzsches lehre vom willen zur macht. Nietzsche-Studien 3 (1):1.
  12. Tammy Nyden (1998). Salvation in a Naturalized World: The Role of the Will and Intellect in the Philosophies of Nietzsche and Spinoza. NASS (North American Spinoza Society) Monograph 7:17-31.
  13. David Rowe (2012). The Eternal Return of the Same: Nietzsche's "Valueless" Revaluation of All Values. Parrhesia 15:71-86.
    In this paper I argue that Nietzsche should be understood as a “thorough-going nihilist”. Rather than broaching two general projects of destroying current values and constructing new ones, I argue that Nietzsche should be understood only as a destroyer of values. I do this by looking at Nietzsche’s views on nihilism and the role played by Nietzsche’s cyclical view of time, or his doctrine of the eternal recurrence of the same. I provide a typology of nihilisms, as they are found (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Ivan Soll (1986). The Hopelessness of Hedonism and the Will to Power. International Studies in Philosophy 18 (2):97-112.
  15. Stefan Lorenz Sorgner (2007). Metaphysics Without Truth: On the Importance of Consistency Within Nietzsche's Philosophy. Marquette University Press.
  16. Arnold Zuboff (1980). Nietzsche and Eternal Recurrence. In Robert C. Solomon (ed.), Nietzsche: A Collection of Critical Essays. 343-357.
    I critically examine Nietzsche’s argument in The Will to Power that all the detailed events of the world are repeating infinite times (on account of the merely finite possible arrangements of forces that constitute the world and the inevitability with which any arrangement of force must bring about its successors). Nietzsche celebrated this recurrence because of the power of belief in it to bring about a revaluation of values focused wholly on the value of one’s endlessly repeating life. Belief in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
Nietzsche: Eternal Recurrence
  1. David B. Allison (2007). Nietzsche's Life Sentence. New Nietzsche Studies 7 (3-4):141-150.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Thomas J. J. Altizer (1994). Nietzsche and Asian Thought. International Studies in Philosophy 26 (1):130-131.
  3. S. M. Amadae (2004). Nietzsche's Thirst For India. Idealistic Studies 34 (3):239-262.
    This essay represents a novel contribution to Nietzschean studies by combining an assessment of Friedrich Nietzsche’s challenging uses of “truth” and the “eternal return” with his insights drawn from Indian philosophies. Specifically, drawing on Martin Heidegger’s Nietzsche, I argue that Nietzsche’s critique of a static philosophy of being underpinning conceptual truth is best understood in line with the Theravada Buddhist critique of “self ” and “ego” as transitory. In conclusion, I find that Nietzsche’s “eternal return” can be understood as a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Keith Ansell-Pearson (2006). The Eternal Return of the Overhuman: The Weightiest Knowledge and the Abyss of Light. Journal of Nietzsche Studies 30 (1):1-21.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Charles Bambach (2003). Nietzsehe's Philosophy of the Etemal Recurrence of the Same. New Nietzsche Studies 5 (3/4/1/2):208-213.
  6. Nandita Biswas Mellamphy (2011). The Three Stigmata of Friedrich Nietzsche: Political Physiology in the Age of Nihilism. Palgrave Macmillan.
  7. Peter Bornedal (2006). Different Kinds of Ecstasy: Review of Three Recent Works on ‚Eternal Recurrence'. [REVIEW] Nietzsche-Studien 35 (1):343-356.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Peter Bornedal (2006). Eternal Recurrence in Inner-Mental-Life. Nietzsche-Studien 35 (1):104-165.
    The essay introduces an interpretation of Nietzsche's Eternal-Recurrence-Thought distinct from traditional 'cosmological' as well as 'ethical' interpretations. The interpretation suggests that eternal recurrence is a conceptualization of intellectual and volitional processes. External recurrence is understood as a concept articulating peculiarities about mental processes related to knowledge and pleasure.Der Aufsatz stellt ein Interpretation von Nietzsches Gedanken der Ewigen Wiederkunft vor, die weder 'kosmologisch' noch 'ethisch' sein möchte. Diese Interpretation hält die Ewige Wiederkunft für eine Konzeptualisierung von Verstandes- und Willensakten. Der Begriff (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Philippe Gagnon (2011). Nietzsche's Eternal Return of the Same. Twin Cities Review of Political Philosophy 1:25-26.
    In this shorter piece, at the instigation of a former philosophy student, I accepted to contribute alongside two other writers to the "Expert Help" rubric, and attempted to explain the genesis in Nietzsche's mind of the conception of the eternal recurrence. I lay stress on both the internal contradiction that the solitary of Sils-Maria was trying to resolve and the secret desire that this cherished and embraced rather than demonstrated theory be true in the face of conflicting evidence, and I (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Martin Heidegger (1979/1991). Nietzsche. Harpersanfrancisco.
    A landmark discussion between two great thinkers, vital to an understanding of twentieth-century philosophy and intellectual history.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   34 citations  
  11. Nadeem J. Z. Hussain, Eternal Recurrence and Nihilism: Adding Weight to the Unbearable Lightness of Action.
    (Version 2.4) I have argued elsewhere for ascribing an error theory about all normative and evaluative judgements to Nietzsche. Such a nihilism brings with it a puzzle: how could we—or at least the select few of us being addressed by Nietzsche—continue in the face of this nihilism? This is a philosophical puzzle and so, defeasibly, an interpretive puzzle. If there is no theory it would make sense for Nietzsche to have about how the select few could go on, then this (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Wolfgang Müller-Lauter (1998). Nietzsche und Heidegger als nihilistische Denker. Nietzsche-Studien 27 (1):52-81.
  13. Wolfgang Müller-Lauter (1982). Das willenswesen und der übermensch ein beitrag zu heideggers Nietzsche-interpretationen. Nietzsche-Studien 10 (1):132.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. David Rowe (2012). The Eternal Return of the Same: Nietzsche's "Valueless" Revaluation of All Values. Parrhesia 15:71-86.
    In this paper I argue that Nietzsche should be understood as a “thorough-going nihilist”. Rather than broaching two general projects of destroying current values and constructing new ones, I argue that Nietzsche should be understood only as a destroyer of values. I do this by looking at Nietzsche’s views on nihilism and the role played by Nietzsche’s cyclical view of time, or his doctrine of the eternal recurrence of the same. I provide a typology of nihilisms, as they are found (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Stefan Lorenz Sorgner (2007). Metaphysics Without Truth: On the Importance of Consistency Within Nietzsche's Philosophy. Marquette University Press.
  16. Robert D. Stolorow (2010). Heidegger's Nietzsche, the Doctrine of Eternal Return, and the Phenomenology of Human Finitude. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 41 (1):106-114.
    Nietzsche’s doctrine of the eternal return of the same, seen through the lens of Heidegger’s interpretation, captures the groundlessness of existence in a technological world devoid of normative significance. The author contends that the temporality depicted poetically in the thought of eternal return is the traumatic temporality of human finitude, to which Nietzsche was exposed at the age of 4 when the death of his father shattered his world. Nietzsche’s metaphysical position is seen as a metaphorical window into the phenomenology (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Robert D. Stolorow & George E. Atwood (2013). The Tragic and the Metaphysical in Philosophy and Psychoanalysis. The Psychoanalytic Review 100 (3):405-421.
    This article elaborates a claim, first introduced by Wilhelm Dilthey, that metaphysics represents an illusory flight from the tragedy of human finitude. Metaphysics, of which psychoanalytic metapsychologies are a form, transforms the unbearable fragility and transience of all things human into an enduring, permanent, changeless reality, an illusory world of eternal truths. Three “clinical cases” illustrate this thesis in the work and lives of a philosopher and two psychoanalytic theorists: Friedrich Nietzsche and his metaphysical doctrine of the eternal return of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Gabriel Zamosc (2015). Life, Death, and Eternal Recurrence in Nietzsche's Zarathustra. The Agonist 8 (1&2).
    -/- This paper offers a preliminary interpretation of Nietzsche’s doctrine of Eternal Recurrence, according to which the doctrine constitutes a parable that, speaking of what is permanent in life, praises and justifies all that is impermanent. What is permanent, what always recurs, is the will to power or to self-overcoming that is the fundamental engine of all life. The operating mechanism of such a will consists in prompting the living to undergo transformations or transitory deaths, after which this fundamental engine (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Arnold Zuboff (1980). Nietzsche and Eternal Recurrence. In Robert C. Solomon (ed.), Nietzsche: A Collection of Critical Essays. 343-357.
    I critically examine Nietzsche’s argument in The Will to Power that all the detailed events of the world are repeating infinite times (on account of the merely finite possible arrangements of forces that constitute the world and the inevitability with which any arrangement of force must bring about its successors). Nietzsche celebrated this recurrence because of the power of belief in it to bring about a revaluation of values focused wholly on the value of one’s endlessly repeating life. Belief in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
Nietzsche: Critique of Traditional Metaphysics
  1. Christa Davis Acampora (1997). Peter Berkowitz, Nietzsche: The Ethics of An Immoralist. [REVIEW] Man and World 30 (4):490-496.
  2. Tom Bailey (2003). Nietzsche: His Philosophy of Contradictions and the Contradictions of His Philosophy (Review). Journal of Nietzsche Studies 25 (1):95-100.
  3. Johannes Balthasar (1990). Metaphysics, Art and Language in Early Works of Nietzsche. Philosophy and History 23 (2):116-116.
  4. Harold Bloom (ed.) (1987). Friedrich Nietzsche. Chelsea House Publishers.
  5. Brian Bowles (1999). Sloughing One's Skin. Southwest Philosophy Review 15 (2):25-38.
    Nietzsche's perspectivism can be seen as a two-leveled cure for dogmatism. On the one hand, perspectivism amounts to the dismissal of the metaphysical world and the acknowledgement of the esential incompleteness of all knowledge insofar as knowledge is only and always perspectival. On the other hand, perspectivism is an affirmation of the central role the affects play in all interpretations of the world; consequently, it presents itself as a summary rejection of the notion of disinterested contemplation or knowledge. Nietzsche's theory (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Manuel Dries (2008). Nietzsche's Critique of Staticism. In M. Dries (ed.), Nietzsche on Time and History. Walter de Gruyter
    Why are we still intrigued by Nietzsche? This chapter argues that sustained interest stems from Nietzsche’s challenge to what we might call the ‘staticism’ inherent in our ordinary experience. Staticism can be defined, roughly speaking, as the view that the world is a collection of enduring, re-identifiable objects that change only very gradually and according to determinate laws. The chapter discusses Nietzsche’s rejection of remnants of staticism in Hegel and Schopenhauer (1). It outlines why Nietzsche deems belief in any variant (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Ingeborg Heidemann (1962). Nietzsches kritik der metaphysik. Kant-Studien 53 (1-4):507-543.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Erman Kaplama (2010). Introduction to Cosmological Aesthetics: The Kantian Sublime and Nietzschean Dionysian. International Journal of the Humanities 8 (2):69-84.
    This paper is founded on a close reading of Kant’s Opus Postumum in order both to explore the essential motivation that drove Kant to write a last comprehensive magnum opus and, by doing so, to show the essential link between his aesthetics and the idea of Übergang, the title of this last work. For this work contains not only his dynamical theory of matter defining motion as preliminary to the notions of space and time, and the advanced version of his (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Wolfgang Müller-Lauter (1974). Nietzsches lehre vom willen zur macht. Nietzsche-Studien 3 (1):1.
  10. Justin Remhof (2015). Nietzsche on Objects. Nietzsche-Studien 44 (1).
    Nietzsche was persistently concerned with what an object is and how different views of objects lead to different views of facts, causality, personhood, substance, truth, mathematics and logic, and even nihilism. Yet his treatment of objects is incredibly puzzling. In many passages he assumes that objects such as trees and leaves, tables and chairs, and dogs and cats are just ordinary entities of experience. In other places he reports that objects do not exist. Elsewhere he claims that objects exist, but (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Ariela Tubert (2015). Nietzsche's Existentialist Freedom. Journal of Nietzsche Studies 46 (3):409-424.
    Following Robert C. Solomon’s Living with Nietzsche, I defend an interpretation of Nietzsche’s views about freedom that are in line with the existentialist notion of self-creation. Given Nietzsche’s emphasis on the limitations on human freedom, his critique of the notion of causa sui (self-creation out of nothing), and his critique of morality for relying on the assumption that we have free will, it may be surprising that he could be taken seriously as an existentialist—existentialism characteristically takes freedom and self-creation to (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
Nietzsche: Time, Being and Becoming
  1. S. M. Amadae (2004). Nietzsche's Thirst For India. Idealistic Studies 34 (3):239-262.
    This essay represents a novel contribution to Nietzschean studies by combining an assessment of Friedrich Nietzsche’s challenging uses of “truth” and the “eternal return” with his insights drawn from Indian philosophies. Specifically, drawing on Martin Heidegger’s Nietzsche, I argue that Nietzsche’s critique of a static philosophy of being underpinning conceptual truth is best understood in line with the Theravada Buddhist critique of “self ” and “ego” as transitory. In conclusion, I find that Nietzsche’s “eternal return” can be understood as a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Frank Chouraqui (2013). Originary Dehiscence: An Invitation to Explore the Resonances Between the Philosophies of Nietzsche and Merleau-Ponty. In Christine Daigle & Élodie Boublil (eds.), Nietzsche and Phenomenology: Power, Life, Subjectivity. Indiana University Press 177-194.
    This paper seeks to provide a basis for a fruitful correspondence between the projects of Nietzsche and Merleau-Ponty. It argues that both philosophers are committed to an ontology of relation and they both regards any terms to these relations as being hypostases of a horizontal movement. This commits them to very parallel views of history, politics, and perception.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 78