This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
26 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
  1. Vinod Acharya (2012). Nobility and Decadence: The Vulnerabilities of Nietzsche's Strong Type. Phaenex 7 (1):130-161.
    This paper argues that for Nietzsche it is only when the strong type decays on its own terms that it is possible for a weak type to come into dominance by inverting the values of the strong. It sets right a latent inconsistency in Deleuze’s work, Nietzsche and Philosophy , which traces back the origin of decadence to the subterranean struggle between reactive forces. I show that Deleuze’s reading runs contrary to his own contention that for Nietzsche the negative is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Mark Alfano (forthcoming). Virtue in Nietzsche's Drive Psychology. In Tom Stern (ed.), The New Cambridge Companion to Nietzsche. Cambridge University Press
  3. Mark Alfano (2015). How One Becomes What One is Called: On the Relation Between Traits and Trait-Terms in Nietzsche. Journal of Nietzsche Studies 46 (1):261-269.
    Despite the recent surge of interest in Nietzsche’s moral psychology and his conceptions of character and virtue in particular, little attention has been paid to his treatment of the relation between character traits and the terms that designate them. In this paper, I argue for an interpretation of this relation: Nietzsche thinks there is a looping effect between the psychological disposition named by a character trait-term and the practice of using that term.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. R. Lanier Anderson (2005). Nietzsche on Truth, Illusion, and Redemption. European Journal of Philosophy 13 (2):185–225.
  5. Edward Andrew (1999). The Cost of Nietzschean Values. New Nietzsche Studies 3 (3-4):63-76.
  6. Edward Andrew (1975). A Note on the Unity of Theory and Practice in Marx and Nietzsche. Political Theory 3 (3):305-316.
  7. Keith Ansell-Pearson (2010). Nietzsche's Animal Philosophy: Culture, Politics, and the Animality of the Human Being (Review). Journal of Nietzsche Studies 40:82-84.
  8. Tom Bailey (2003). Nietzsche's Conscience: Six Character Studies From the Genealogy. [REVIEW] New Nietzsche Studies 5 (3/4/1/2):213-215.
  9. Maudemarie Clark & Monique Wonderly (2015). The Good of Community. In Nietzsche on Ethics and Politics. Oxford University Press 184-202.
    This chapter argues against a new and perhaps more benign way of classifying Nietzsche as a political conservative. It also adds to the argument that even though Nietzsche is seen as more leftist than he appears, he is not an egalitarian. It does so by making an extended and detailed case against Julian Young’s claim that the flourishing of the community is Nietzsche’s highest value. The final section suggests that Nietzsche’s view might nevertheless be able to accommodate richer notions of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Andrew Jason Cohen (1999). In Defense of Nietzschean Genealogy. Philosophical Forum 30 (4):269–288.
    Using Alasdair MacIntyre as a foil, I defend what I take to be a viable Nietzschean genealogical account, showing that a proper perspectivism is neither perniciously subjectivist nor absolutist. I begin by arguing against MacIntyre’s assertion that genealogists are committed to the view that rationality requires neutrality and that as there is no neutrality, there is no rationality. I then continue by offering something of a reconstruction of Nietzsche’s view, designed partly to clarify the error pinpointed in MacIntyre’s arguments, but (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Martin Drenthen (2009). Nietzsche and the Paradox of Environmental Ethics. New Nietzsche Studies 5 (1/2):12-25.
    In this paper, I offer a systematic inquiry into the significance of Nietzsche's philosophy to environmental ethics. Nietzsche's philosophy of nature is, I believe, relevant today because it makes explicit a fundamental ambiguity that is also characteristic of our current understanding of nature. I show how the current debate between traditional environmental ethics and postmodern environmental philosophy can be interpreted as a symptom of this ambiguity. I argue that, in light of Nietzsche's critique of morality, environmental ethics is a highly (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Aaron Harper (2015). Nietzsche's Thumbscrew: Honesty as Virtue and Value Standard. Journal of Nietzsche Studies 46 (3):367-390.
    Much has been made of the apparent tensions in Nietzsche’s ethical and metaethical views. In this essay I examine a kind of value standard available to Nietzsche that is present in his work. I offer an interpretation of honesty as both a Nietzschean virtue and a means of ethical assessment. Despite Nietzsche’s well-known criticisms of truth, he upholds honesty as the only remaining virtue of his free spirits. Honesty has been treated in the literature primarily in the contexts of truth (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Patrick Hassan (2016). Nietzsche on Human Greatness. Journal of Value Inquiry:1-18.
    In this paper, I take it to be uncontroversial that increasingly into his philosophical career, Nietzsche believed human greatness to be an appropriately valuable goal, at least for certain types of people. But while Nietzsche's repeated paradigms of greatness include figures as seemingly diverse as Beethoven, Goethe, Shakespeare, Cesare Borgia, Julius Caesar, it is unclear precisely what great-making property (or properties) Nietzsche considers these figures to share. I consider two possible approaches which have shaped the terrain of the secondary literature (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Donovan Miyasaki, Nietzsche's Incompatibilism.
  15. Donovan Miyasaki (2014). A Nietzschean Case for Illiberal Egalitarianism. In Barry Stocker & Manuel Knoll (eds.), Nietzsche as Political Philosopher. De Gruyter 155-170.
    This paper draws on Friedrich Nietzsche’s work to defend the (admittedly non-Nietzschean) conclusion that a non-liberal egalitarian society is superior in two ways: first, as a moral ideal, it does not rest on questionable claims about essential human equality and, second, such a society would provide the optimal psychological and political conditions for individual wellbeing, social stability, and cultural achievement. I first explain Nietzsche’s distinction between forms of egalitarianism: noble and slavish. The slavish form promotes equality, defined negatively as the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Peter Durno Murray (1999). IV: The Basis in Pleasure. In Nietzsche's Affirmative Morality: A Revaluation Based in the Dionysian World-View. De Gruyter 141-168.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Peter Durno Murray (1999). Nietzsche's Affirmative Morality: A Revaluation Based in the Dionysian World-View. Walter De Gruyter.
    This book argues that Nietzsche bases his affirmative morality on the model of individual responsiveness to otherness which he takes from the mythology of Dionysus. The subject is not free to choose to avoid such responding to the demands of the other. Nietzsche finds that the basic mode of responding is pleasure. This feeling, as a basis for morality, underlies the morality which is true to the earth and the major concepts of "will to power", "eternal return", and "amor fati". (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Daniel Nica (2015). Nietzsche and Foucault on Self-Creation: Two Different Projects. Annals of the University of Bucharest. Philosophy Series 64 (1):21-41.
    This paper aims to highlight some major differences between the ethics of “self-becoming”, as it was sketched by Friedrich Nietzsche, and the so-called “aesthetics of existence”, which was developed in Michel Foucault’s late work. Although the propinquity between the two authors is a commonplace in Foucauldian exegesis, my claim is that the two projects of self-creation are dissimilar in four relevant aspects. To support my thesis I will use Foucault’s four-part ethical framework through which I will analyze each of the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Mattia Riccardi (forthcoming). Nietzsche on Free Will. In Griffith, N. Levy & K. Timpe (eds.), Routledge Companion to Free Will. Routledge
  20. Vasti Roodt (2008). Nietzsche and/or Arendt? In H. Siemens & V. Roodt (ed.), Nietzsche, Power and Politics. De Gruyter 373-391.
  21. Alan D. Schrift (1999). Nietzsche For Democracy. Southern Journal of Philosophy 37 (Supplement):167-173.
  22. Ivan Soll (1986). The Hopelessness of Hedonism and the Will to Power. International Studies in Philosophy 18 (2):97-112.
  23. Gabriel Zamosc (forthcoming). Nietzschean Wholeness. In Paul Katsafanas (ed.), Routledge Philosophy Minds: Nietzsche. Routledge
  24. Gabriel Zamosc (2016). La relación entre la Ciencia y el Ideal Ascético en 'La Genealogía' de Nietzsche. Bajo Palabra 2 (2):69-81.
    RESUMEN -/- En este ensayo propongo una interpretación de la relación entre la ciencia y el Ideal Ascético en La Genealogía de la Moral, que busca explicar la enigmática alianza entre ambos que Nietzsche establece al final del tercer tratado de la mencionada obra. Según Nietzsche, contrario a lo que se cree, la ciencia moderna no es realmente un antagonista del Ideal Ascético sino más bien su forma más reciente y más noble. Argüiré que, para Nietzsche, el Ideal Ascético ha (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Gabriel Zamosc (2014). Review of Christa Davis Acampora's "Contesting Nietzsche". [REVIEW] Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica 53 (135):129-135.
  26. Jolanta Żelazna (2006). Fascynacja, projekcja, resentyment a zagadnienie ocen moralnych. Uwagi dotyczące zjawiska resentymentu w ujęciu Schelera, Nietzschego i tzw. psychologii głębi. Ruch Filozoficzny 3 (3):437-457.