Bookmark and Share

Ontology of Mathematics

Edited by Rafal Urbaniak (University of Ghent, University of Gdansk)
Assistant editors: Sam Roberts, Pawel Pawlowski
About this topic
Summary Ontology of mathematics is concerned with the existence and nature of objects that mathematics is about. An important phenomenon in the field is the need of balancing between epistemological and ontological challenges. For instance, prima facie, the ontologically simplest option is to postulate the existence of abstract mathematical objects (like numbers or sets) to which mathematical terms refer. Yet, explaining how we, mundane beings, can have knowledge of such aspatial and atemporal objects, turns out to be quite difficult. The ontologically parsimonious alternative is to deny the existence of such objects. But then, one has to explain what it is that makes mathematical theories true (or at least, correct) and how we can come to know mathematical facts. Various positions arise from various ways of addressing questions of these two sorts. 
Key works Many crucial papers are included in the following anthologies: Benacerraf & Putnam 1983, Hart 1996 and Shapiro 2005.
Introductions A good introductory survey is Horsten 2008. A readable introduction to philosophy of mathematics is Shapiro 2000. A nice, albeit somewhat biased survey of ontological options can be found in the first few chapters of Chihara 1990. A very nice introduction to the development of foundations of mathematics and the interaction between foundations, epistemology and ontology of mathematics is Giaquinto 2002.
  Show all references
Related categories
Subcategories:History/traditions: Ontology of Mathematics
1416 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 1416
Material to categorize
  1. T. Arrigoni (2000). Realism in the Philosophy of Mathematics: A Critical Discussion. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 92 (3-4):627-646.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. F. Barker Stephen (1969). 'Realism as a Philosophy of Mathematics. In Kurt Gödel, Jack J. Bulloff, Thomas C. Holyoke & Samuel Wilfred Hahn (eds.), Foundations of Mathematics. New York, Springer.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Stephen F. Barker (1969). Realism as a Philosophy of Mathematics. In Kurt Gödel, Jack J. Bulloff, Thomas C. Holyoke & Samuel Wilfred Hahn (eds.), Journal of Symbolic Logic. New York, Springer. 1--9.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. John Bell, Dissenting Voices.
    Continuous entities are accordingly distinguished by the feature that—in principle at least— they can be divided indefinitely without altering their essential nature. So, for instance, the water in a bucket may be indefinitely halved and yet remain water. Aristotle nowhere to my knowledge defines discreteness as such but we may take the notion as signifying the opposite of continuity—that is, incapable of being indefinitely divided into parts. Thus discrete entities, typically, cannot be divided without effecting a change in their nature: (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. George Berkeley & Douglas Michael Jesseph (1992). De Motu ; and, the Analyst.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. David Bostock (1981). Logic and Arithmetic, Vol. II--Rational and Irrational Numbers. Mind 90 (359):473-475.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Harold Chapman Brown (1914). Concepts and Existence. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 11 (13):355-357.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Jessica Carter (2005). Motivations for Realism in the Light of Mathematical Practice. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):17-29.
    The aim of this paper is to identify some of the motivations that can be found for taking a realist position concerning mathematical entities and to examine these motivations in the light of a case study in contemporary mathematics. The motivations that are found are as follows: (some) mathematicians are realists, mathematical statements are true, and finally, mathematical statements have a special certainty. These claims are compared with a result in algebraic topology stating that a certain sequence, the so-called Mayer-Vietoris (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Charles Castonguay (1972). Meaning and Existence in Mathematics. New York,Springer-Verlag.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Peter Clark (2009). Mathematical Entities. In Robin Le Poidevin (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics. Routledge.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Keith J. Devlin (2000). The Math Gene How Mathematical Thinking Evolved and Why Numbers Are Like Gossip.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. F. Y. Edgeworth (1881). Mathematical Psychics. Mind 6 (24):581-583.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Gottlob Frege (1953). The Foundations of Arithmetic a Logico-Mathematical Enquiry Into the Concept of Number. English Translation by J.L. Austin. [REVIEW]
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Gottlob Frege (1879/1997). Begriffsschrift: Eine Der Arithmetische Nachgebildete Formelsprache des Reinen Denkens. L. Nebert.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Haim Gaifman (2012). On Ontology and Realism in Mathematics. Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (3):480-512.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. M. Giaquinto (1980). On Mathematical Realism.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Kurt Gödel (1944). Russell's Mathematical Logic. In Solomon Feferman, John Dawson & Stephen Kleene (eds.), Journal of Symbolic Logic. Northwestern University Press. 119--141.
  18. David Gooding (1992). The Procedural Turn; or, Why Do Thought Experiments Work? In R. Giere & H. Feigl (eds.), Cognitive Models of Science. University of Minnesota Press. 45-76.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Nelson Goodman (1983). Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Harvard University Press.
    In his new foreword to this edition, Hilary Putnam forcefully rejects these nativist claims.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Nelson Goodman (1972). Seven Strictures on Similarity. In Problems and Projects. Bobs-Merril.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Nelson Goodman (1961). About. Mind 70 (277):1-24.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Nelson Goodman (1951). The Structure of Appearance. Harvard University Press.
  23. Nelson Goodman (1946). A Query on Confirmation. Journal of Philosophy 43 (14):383-385.
  24. Nelson Goodman & Henry Leonard (1940). The Calculus of Individuals and its Uses. Journal of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):45-55.
  25. Robert Bates Graber (1989). Mathematical Naturalism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):427-441.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Gg Granger (1988). The Concepts of Natural Mathematical Entities. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 42 (167):474-499.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Thomas Greenwood (1954). Aristotle on Mathematical Constructibility. The Thomist 17:84.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Andrzej Grzegorczyk (1964). A Note on the Theory of Propositional Types. Fundamenta Mathematicae 54 (3):27-29.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Andrzej Grzegorczyk (1955). The Systems of Leśniewski in Relation to Contemporary Logical Research. Studia Logica 3 (1):77-95.
  30. Anil Gupta (1982). Truth and Paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (1):1-60.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Lindsey Hair (2006). OntOlOgy and Appearing: dOcumentary Realism as a Mathematical thOught. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 2 (1-2):241-262.
    This paper exposes the relation between the different mathematical orientations, on the one hand, and the modes of documentary film on the other. When we take, with Badiou, mathematics as ontology, and mathematical orientations as orientations to Being, we find in the structural similarity of mathematics and documentary an equivalence: between modes of documentaryand mathematical-ontological decisions, regarding the inscription of 'what is'. From here we move to consider Badiou's notion of 'in-appearing' through a reading of Alain Resnais' documentary Night and (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Leon Henkin (1963). A Theory of Propositional Types. Fundamenta Mathematicae 52:323-334.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Leon Henkin (1950). Completeness in the Theory of Types. Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):81-91.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Desmond Henry (1969). Le'sniewski's Ontology and Some Medieval Logicians. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 10 (3):324-326.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Reuben Hersh (2008). Mathematical Practice as a Scientific Problem. In Bonnie Gold & Roger Simons (eds.), Proof and Other Dilemmas: Mathematics and Philosophy. Mathematical Association of America. 95--108.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Hans G. Herzberger (1970). Paradoxes of Grounding in Semantics. Journal of Philosophy 67 (6):145-167.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Henry Hiz (1977). Descriptions in Russell's Theory and Ontology. Studia Logica 36 (4):271-283.
  38. Laurence R. Horn, Contradiction. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Edward Hussey (1991). Aristotle on Mathematical Objects. Apeiron 24 (4):105 - 133.
  40. Caroline Jullien (2012). From the Languages of Art to Mathematical Languages, and Back Again. Enrahonar: Quaderns de Filosofía 49:91-106.
    Mathematics stand in a privileged relationship with aesthetics: a relationship that follows two main directions. The first concerns the introduction of mathematical considerations into aesthetic discourse. For instance, it is common to mention the mathematical architecture of certain artistic productions. The second leads from aesthetics to mathematics. In this case, the question is that of the role and meaning that aesthetic considerations may assume in mathematics. It is indeed a widely held view among mathematicians, of whatever socio-historical context, not only (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. H. P. K. (1967). Problems in the Philosophy of Mathematics. Review of Metaphysics 21 (1):172-173.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. H. P. K. (1967). Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis. Review of Metaphysics 20 (4):716-716.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. L. O. Kattsoff (1973). On the Nature of Mathematical Entities. International Logic Review 7:29-45.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Tom Keagy (1994). A Case for Realism in Mathematics. The Monist 77 (3):329-344.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. A. B. Kempe (1896). Mathematical Form, The Theory Of. The Monist 7:453.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Bart Van Kerkhove & Jean Paul Van Bendegem (2005). Mathematical Practice and Naturalist Epistemology: Structures with Potential for Interaction. Philosophia Scientiae 9:61-78.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Cassius J. Keyser (1906). Mathematical Emancipations. The Monist 16 (1):65-83.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Cassius Jackson Keyser (1929). The Pastures of Wonder the Realm of Mathematics and the Realm of Science. Columbia University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Cassius Jackson Keyser (1924). Mathematical Philosophy, a Study of Fate and Freedom Lectures for Educated Laymen. Dutton.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Lilianne Rivka Kfia (1994). Realism in Mathematics. Review of Metaphysics 47 (3):628-629.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1416