About this topic
Summary Operationalism is the view that the meaning of scientific concepts is to be given in terms of the operations which govern the application of such concepts.  The principal advocate of operationalism was the Nobel-prize winning physicist Percy Bridgman (1882-1961) who developed the approach primarily with respect to physical concepts, such as length, space and time.  Outside physics, operationalism had some influence in the development of behavioural psychology.  With its emphasis on the operations employed in the application of a concept, operationalism resembles the logical positivist's verificationist view of meaning, though it focuses on the meaning of individual words rather than sentences.  Now widely rejected, one of the main problems with operationalism is that the use of different operations for measuring the same magnitude generates different concepts, so that no unified concept of a magnitude exists if multiple means of measuring the magnitude exist.
Key works A classic reference for operationalism is Bridgman 1980.  See also Bridgman 1938, which responds to Lindsay 1937.
Introductions Chang 2010; Benjamin 1937.
  Show all references
Related categories
Siblings:
23 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
  1. Ernest W. Adams (1996). Topology, Empiricism, and Operationalism. The Monist 79 (1):1--20.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. A. Cornelius Benjamin (1954). A Definition of "Empiricism&Quot;. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 15 (2):171-179.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. A. Cornelius Benjamin (1942). The Unholy Alliance of Positivism and Operationalism. Journal of Philosophy 39 (23):617-625.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. A. Cornelius Benjamin (1937). The Operational Theory of Meaning. Philosophical Review 46 (6):644-649.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Mark H. Bickhard, The Tragedy of Operationalism.
    Operational definitions were a neo-Machean development that connected with the positivism of Logical Positivism. Logical Positivism failed, with the failure of operational definitions being just one of multiple and multifarious failures of Logical Positivism more broadly. Operationalism, however, has continued to seduce psychology more than half a century after it was repudiated by philosophers of science, including the very Logical Positivists who had first taken it seriously. It carries with it a presupposed metaphysics that is false in virtually all of (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. George Boas & Albert E. Blumberg (1931). Some Remarks in Defense of the Operational Theory of Meaning. Journal of Philosophy 28 (20):544-550.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. P. W. Bridgman (1949). The Operational Aspect of Meaning. Synthese 8 (1):251 - 259.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. P. W. Bridgman (1938). Operational Analysis. Philosophy of Science 5 (2):114-131.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Hasok Chang, Operationalism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. C. S. Chihara & J. A. Fodor (1967). Operationalism and Ordinary Language. In Harold Morick (ed.), Wittgenstein and the Problem of Other Minds. Humanities Press. 35-62.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. C. Chihara & Jerry A. Fodor (1965). Operationalism and Ordinary Language: A Critique of Wittgenstein. American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (October):281-95.
    This paper explores some lines of argument in wittgenstein's post-Tractatus writings in order to indicate the relations between wittgenstein's philosophical psychology, On the one hand, And his philosophy of language, His epistemology, And his doctrines about the nature of philosophical analysis on the other. The authors maintain that the later writings of wittgenstein express a coherent doctrine in which an operationalistic analysis of confirmation and language supports a philosophical psychology of a type the authors call "logical behaviorism." they also maintain (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Charles Chihara (1973). Operationalism and Ordinary Language Revisited. Philosophical Studies 24 (3):137 - 157.
    In "human beings", "studies in the philosophy of wittgenstein" (ed. By p winch), J cook presents a radical solution to the problem of other minds and then suggests that this treatment of the problem is to be found in the writings of wittgenstein. According to cook's interpretation, Wittgenstein's analysis of the problem does not involve in any essential way any special doctrines about criteria, Nor does it commit him to any form of behaviorism. In the course of arguing these theses, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. D. A. Gillies (1972). Operationalism. Synthese 25 (1-2):1 - 24.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Frank E. Hartung (1942). Operationalism: Idealism or Realism? Philosophy of Science 9 (4):350-355.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. L. S. Hearnshaw (1941). Psychology and Operationalism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 19 (April):44-57.
  16. Mary Hesse (1952). Operational Definition and Analogy in Physical Theories. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2 (8):281-294.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. R. B. Lindsay (1937). A Critique of Operationalism in Physics. Philosophy of Science 4 (4):456-470.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Ernest Nagel (1942). Operational Analysis as an Instrument for the Critique of Linguistic Signs. Journal of Philosophy 39 (7):177-189.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. A. A. Pechenkin (2000). Operationalism as the Philosophy of Soviet Physics: The Philosophical Backgrounds of L. I. Mandelstam and His School. Synthese 124 (3):407-432.
    This article is dedicated to the philosophy ofscience which was developed by the outstanding Soviet physicist and leader of a powerful scientificcommunity, L. I. Mandelstam. It is shown that thisphilosophy can be summed up under the heading operationalism. A comparison with the paradigmaticoperationalism of Percy Bridgman is undertaken andthe German positivist roots of Mandelstam's philosophyare indicated. The final section reconstructs the principle ofexpedient idealization, the principle which was putforward by Mandelstam's disciples in the spirit of hisoperationalism to solve problems of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Hugh G. Petrie (1971). A Dogma of Operationalism in the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 1 (1):145-160.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. David M. Rosenthal (1994). First-Person Operationalism and Mental Taxonomy. Philosophical Topics 22 (1/2):319-349.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. G. Schlesinger (1959). P. W. Bridgman's Operational Analysis: The Differential Aspect. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9 (36):299-306.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. J. O. Wisdom (1971). Four Contemporary Interpretations of the Nature of Science. Foundations of Physics 1 (3):269-284.
    Instrumentalism is an approach to science that treats a theory as a tool and only as a tool for computation; it dispenses with the concept of truth.Conventionalism treats a theory as true by convention if it forms a pattern of observations from which correct predictions can be made.Operationalism denies meaning to the concepts of a theory unless they can be defined operationally. It is argued in this paper that truth-value is indispensable to science, because a theory can be rejected only (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation