This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
296 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 296
  1. Varol Akman & Ferda N. Alpaslan, Strawson on Intended Meaning and Context.
    Strawson proposed in the early seventies an attractive threefold distinction regarding how context bears on the meaning of `what is said' when a sentence is uttered. The proposed scheme is somewhat crude and, being aware of this aspect, Strawson himself raised various points to make it more adequate. In this paper, we review the scheme of Strawson, note his concerns, and add some of our own. However, our main point is to defend the essence of Strawson's approach and to recommend (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Peter Alexander, A. J. Ayer, P. F. Strawson, G. P. Henderson, John M. Hems, Roy Harris, Anthony Kenny, Ninian Smart, K. C. Barclay, Mary Hesse & A. C. Lloyd (1966). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 75 (182):442-461.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. James W. Austin (1978). Russell's Cryptic Response to Strawson. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (4):531-537.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Susana Badiola (2006). Notas sobre una verdad evidente en tributo a P. F. Strawson. Notes on a Self-evident Truth in Tribute to P. F. Strawson. Logos: Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica 39:143-160.
    In his intellectual autobiography, P. F. Strawson singles out one particular truism as fundamental to his entire philosophical career. The deceptively simple truth is twofold: first, that the bearers of truth and falsity are not linguistic elements, and second, that what is at stake in our use of language is not the words that we use, but what we mean them to say. This essay, written as a tribute to the late Strawson, explores the theoretical implications of this self-evident truth, (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Christiane Bailey (2014). Le double sens de la communauté morale : la considérabilité morale et l’agentivité morale des autres animaux. Les Ateliers de l'Éthique / the Ethics Forum 9 (3):31-67.
    Christiane Bailey | : Distinguant deux sens de « communauté morale », cet article soutient que certains animaux appartiennent à la communauté morale dans les deux sens : ils sont des patients moraux dignes de considération morale directe et équivalente, mais également des agents moraux au sens où ils sont capables de reconnaître, d’assumer et d’adresser aux autres des exigences minimales de bonne conduite et de savoir-vivre. Au moyen de la notion d’« attitudes réactives » développée par Peter F. Strawson, (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Lewis Baldacchino (1984). Strawson on the Antinomy. Mind 93 (369):91-97.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Nandita Bandyopadhyay (1988). Being, Meaning, and Proposition: A Comparative Study of Bhartṛhari, Russell, Frege, and Strawson. Sanskrit Pustak Bhandar.
  8. Peter Brian Barry (2011). Saving Strawson: Evil and Strawsonian Accounts of Moral Responsibility. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):5-21.
    Almost everyone allows that conditions can obtain that exempt agents from moral responsibility—that someone is not a morally responsible agent if certain conditions obtain. In his seminal Freedom and Resentment, Peter Strawson denies that the truth of determinism globally exempts agents from moral responsibility. As has been noted elsewhere, Strawson appears committed to the surprising thesis that being an evil person is an exempting condition. Less often noted is the fact that various Strawsonians—philosophers sympathetic with Strawson’s account of moral responsibility—at (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Jonathan Bennett (1968). Strawson on Kant. Philosophical Review 77 (3):340-349.
  10. Isaiah Berlin, P. F. Strawson, R. Rhees, F. E. Sparshott, Michael Scriven, R. F. Holland, Jonathan Harrison, H. G. Alexander, C. A. Mace, J. L. Evans, D. A. Rees, W. Mays, C. K. Grant, Basil Mitchell & G. C. J. Midgley (1952). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 61 (243):405-439.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Rod Bertolet (1982). Russell and Strawson, Indexical and Improper Descriptions. Theoria 48 (2):90-98.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. A. L. Bezuidenhout (2001). The Philosophy of P. F. Strawson. Philosophical Review 110 (3):460-465.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Pr Bhat (2004). Wittgenstein, Strawson and Suresh Chandra on Ascription. In R. C. Pradhan (ed.), The Philosophy of Suresh Chandra. Icpr, New Delhi 167.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. J. I. Biro (1979). Kant and Strawson on Transcendental Synthesis. New Scholasticism 53 (4):486-501.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Gunnar Björnsson (2008). Strawson on 'If' and ⊃. South African Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):24-35.
    This paper is concerned with Sir Peter Strawson’s critical discussion of Paul Grice’s defence of the material implication analysis of conditionals. It argues that although Strawson’s own ‘consequentialist’ suggestion concerning the meaning of conditionals cannot be correct, a related and radically contextualist account is able to both account for the phenomena that motivated Strawson’s consequentialism, and to undermine the material implication analysis by providing a simpler account of the processes that we go through when interpreting conditionals.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. David Bloor (1970). Explanation and Analysis in Strawson's 'Persons'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):2-9.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. M. C. Bradley (1986). Geach and Strawson on Negating Names. Philosophical Quarterly 36 (142):16-28.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. D. H. M. Brooks (1985). Strawson, Hume, and the Unity of Consciousness. Mind 94 (October):583-86.
  19. Clifford Brown (2006). Peter Strawson. Mcgill-Queen's University Press.
    Peter Strawson's work has radically altered the philosophical concept of analysis, returned metaphysics to centre stage in Anglo-American philosophy, and transformed the framework for subsequent interpretations of Kantian philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. James F. Brown (1971). In Defense of Strawson's "Referring". Journal of Critical Analysis 3 (1):1-8.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Stuart Brown (ed.) (2005). The Dictionary of Twentieth Century British Philosophers. Thoemmes Continuum.
  22. Brian Bruya (2001). Strawson and Prasad on Determinism and Resentment. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research 18 (3):198-216.
    P. F. Strawson's influential article "Freedom and Resentment" has been much commented on, and one of the most trenchant commentaries is Rajendra Prasad's, "Reactive Attitudes, Rationality, and Determinism." In his article, Prasad contests the significance of the reactive attitude over a precise theory of determinism, concluding that Strawson's argument is ultimately unconvincing. In this article, I evaluate Prasad's challenges to Strawson by summarizing and categorizing all of the relevant arguments in both Strawson's and Prasad's pieces. -/- Strawson offers four types (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Norman Burstein (1971). Strawson on the Concept of a Person. Mind 80 (319):449-452.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Patrick H. Byrne (2001). Connective Analysis: Aristotle and Strawson. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (3):405 – 423.
  25. John J. Callanan (2011). Making Sense of Doubt: Strawson's Anti-Scepticism. Theoria 77 (3):261-278.
    Strawson's philosophical attitude towards scepticism is frequently thought to have undergone a significant shift from the “strong” or “robust” employment of transcendental arguments in Individuals to a more “modest” understanding of the efficacy of such arguments in Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties. I argue that this interpretation is based upon a misunderstanding of the function of transcendental arguments in Strawson's earlier works. Examining the continuity of Strawson's modest naturalistic approach to scepticism can offer some insight as to the continuing overestimation (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Scott Campbell (2000). Strawson, Parfit and Impersonality. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):207-225.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Quassim Cassam, Foreword to Strawson's Scepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties.
    In that book I had two different, though not unrelated aims. The first chapter was concerned with traditional scepticisms about, e.g., the external world and induction. In common with Hume and Wittgenstein (and even Heidegger) I argued that the attempt to combat such doubts by rational argument was misguided: for we are dealing here with the presuppositions, the framework, of all human thought and enquiry. In the other chapters my target was different. It was that species of naturalism which tended (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. C. A. Caton (1959). Strawson on Referring. Mind 68:539.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Charles E. Caton (1959). Strawson on Referring. Mind 68 (272):539-544.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Suresh Chandra (1981). Wittgenstein and Strawson on the Ascription of Experiences. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41 (3):280-298.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Andrew Chignell (2004). Review of H.J. Glock (Ed), Strawson and Kant. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (8).
  32. David Coder (1972). Strawson, Particulars, No-Subject' and 'No-Ownership'. Philosophical Studies 23 (5):335 - 342.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Daniel H. Cohen (1993). Peter F. Strawson "Analysis and Metaphysics". International Journal of Philosophical Studies:385.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. James W. Cornman (1964). Strawson's “Person”. Theoria 30 (3):145-156.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Jocelyne Couture (1988). Analyse et métaphysique Peter F. Strawson Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1985. 149 p. Dialogue 27 (02):361-.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Jocelyne Couture (1988). PETER F. STRAWSON, "Analyse Et Métaphysique". [REVIEW] Dialogue 27 (2):361.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. S. C. Coval (1964). Persons and Criteria in Strawson. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24 (3):406-409.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Cale John Crowley (1976). Strawson's Theory of the Person in "Individuals.". Dissertation, University of Notre Dame
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Charles B. Daniels (1967). Immediate Knowledge: Ayer, Strawson, and Shoemaker. Theoria 33 (3):176-188.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Kim Davies (1982). The Concept of Experience and Strawson's Transcendental Deduction. Analysis 42 (1):16-19.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Maximilian de Gaynesford (2003). Kant and Strawson on the First Person. In Hans-Johann Glock (ed.), Strawson and Kant. Clarendon Press
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Marion Deckert (1973). Quine, Strawson and Logical Truth. Philosophical Studies 24 (1):52 - 56.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Chauncey Downes (1965). Husserl and the Coherence of the Other Minds Problem. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 26 (December):253-259.
  44. H. H. Dubs (1952). STRAWSON, Introduction to Logical Theory. [REVIEW] Hibbert Journal 51:311.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. M. Durrant (1966). Mr. Strawson on the Notion of 'Predicate'. Philosophy 41 (155):79 - 84.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. M. Durrant (1966). Mr Strawson on the Notion of ‘Predicate’: PHILOSOPHY. Philosophy 41 (155):79-84.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Michael Durrant (1975). Freedom and Resentment, and Other Essays. Philosophical Books 16 (1):28-32.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Terence Rajivan Edward (2012). Descriptive Metaphysics, Revisionary Metaphysics, Anti-Metaphysics. Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 5 (2):36-43.
    This paper observes that P. F. Strawson’s distinction between descriptive and revisionary metaphysics is a baffling one from the perspective of traditional metaphysics. If one thinks of metaphysics as the study of the fundamental nature of reality, it is bewildering to divide up metaphysics in this way. The paper then tries to show how the distinction is no longer bewildering if we deny that such study is possible.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Pietro Emanuele (1989). Logica E Linguaggio Nel Pensiero di Strawson. Herder.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Stephen A. Erickson (1969). Review: Strawson, Bounds of Sense. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 7 (3).
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 296