This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.

P. F. Strawson

Related categories
Siblings:
173 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 100 / 173
  1. Varol Akman & Ferda N. Alpaslan, Strawson on Intended Meaning and Context.
    Strawson proposed in the early seventies an attractive threefold distinction regarding how context bears on the meaning of `what is said' when a sentence is uttered. The proposed scheme is somewhat crude and, being aware of this aspect, Strawson himself raised various points to make it more adequate. In this paper, we review the scheme of Strawson, note his concerns, and add some of our own. However, our main point is to defend the essence of Strawson's approach and to recommend (...)
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: cogprints.org cs.bilkent.edu.tr   | Scholar | More options ...
  2. Peter Alexander, A. J. Ayer, P. F. Strawson, G. P. Henderson, John M. Hems, Roy Harris, Anthony Kenny, Ninian Smart, K. C. Barclay, Mary Hesse & A. C. Lloyd (1966). New Books. Mind 75 (299):442-461.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org mind.oxfordjournals.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  3. James W. Austin (1978). Russell's Cryptic Response to Strawson. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (4):531-537.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  4. Lewis Baldacchino (1984). Strawson on the Antinomy. Mind 93 (369):91-97.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org mind.oxfordjournals.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  5. Peter Brian Barry (2011). Saving Strawson: Evil and Strawsonian Accounts of Moral Responsibility. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):5-21.
    Almost everyone allows that conditions can obtain that exempt agents from moral responsibility—that someone is not a morally responsible agent if certain conditions obtain. In his seminal Freedom and Resentment, Peter Strawson denies that the truth of determinism globally exempts agents from moral responsibility. As has been noted elsewhere, Strawson appears committed to the surprising thesis that being an evil person is an exempting condition. Less often noted is the fact that various Strawsonians—philosophers sympathetic with Strawson’s account of moral responsibility—at (...)
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: springerlink.com dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  6. Kathy Behrendt (2007). Reasons to Be Fearful: Strawson, Death and Narrative. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 82 (60):133-.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  7. Jonathan Bennett (1968). Strawson on Kant. Philosophical Review 77 (3):340-349.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  8. Isaiah Berlin, P. F. Strawson, R. Rhees, F. E. Sparshott, Michael Scriven, R. F. Holland, Jonathan Harrison, H. G. Alexander, C. A. Mace, J. L. Evans, D. A. Rees, W. Mays, C. K. Grant, Basil Mitchell & G. C. J. Midgley (1952). New Books. Mind 61 (243):405-439.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: mind.oxfordjournals.org jstor.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  9. Rod Bertolet (1982). Russell and Strawson, Indexical and Improper Descriptions. Theoria 48 (2):90-98.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  10. A. L. Bezuidenhout (2001). The Philosophy of P. F. Strawson. Philosophical Review 110 (3):460-465.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  11. J. I. Biro (1979). Kant and Strawson on Transcendental Synthesis. The New Scholasticism 53 (4):486-501.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  12. Gunnar Björnsson (2008). Strawson on 'If' and ⊃. South African Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):24-35.
    This paper is concerned with Sir Peter Strawson’s critical discussion of Paul Grice’s defence of the material implication analysis of conditionals. It argues that although Strawson’s own ‘consequentialist’ suggestion concerning the meaning of conditionals cannot be correct, a related and radically contextualist account is able to both account for the phenomena that motivated Strawson’s consequentialism, and to undermine the material implication analysis by providing a simpler account of the processes that we go through when interpreting conditionals.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: hdl.handle.net   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  13. David Bloor (1970). Explanation and Analysis in Strawson's 'Persons'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):2-9.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: tandfonline.com dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  14. M. C. Bradley (1986). Geach and Strawson on Negating Names. Philosophical Quarterly 36 (142):16-28.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  15. D. H. M. Brooks (1985). Strawson, Hume, and the Unity of Consciousness. Mind 94 (October):583-86.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org mind.oxfordjournals.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  16. James F. Brown (1971). In Defense of Strawson's "Referring". The Journal of Critical Analysis 3 (1):1-8.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  17. Brian Bruya (2001). Strawson and Prasad on Determinism and Resentment. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research 18 (3):198-216.
    P. F. Strawson's influential article "Freedom and Resentment" has been much commented on, and one of the most trenchant commentaries is Rajendra Prasad's, "Reactive Attitudes, Rationality, and Determinism." In his article, Prasad contests the significance of the reactive attitude over a precise theory of determinism, concluding that Strawson's argument is ultimately unconvincing. In this article, I evaluate Prasad's challenges to Strawson by summarizing and categorizing all of the relevant arguments in both Strawson's and Prasad's pieces. -/- Strawson offers four types (...)
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  18. Norman Burstein (1971). Strawson on the Concept of a Person. Mind 80 (319):449-452.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org mind.oxfordjournals.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  19. Patrick H. Byrne (2001). Connective Analysis: Aristotle and Strawson. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (3):405 – 423.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: informaworld.com taylorandfrancis.metapress.com tandfonline.com dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  20. John J. Callanan (2011). Making Sense of Doubt: Strawson's Anti-Scepticism. Theoria 77 (3):261-278.
    Strawson's philosophical attitude towards scepticism is frequently thought to have undergone a significant shift from the “strong” or “robust” employment of transcendental arguments in Individuals to a more “modest” understanding of the efficacy of such arguments in Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties. I argue that this interpretation is based upon a misunderstanding of the function of transcendental arguments in Strawson's earlier works. Examining the continuity of Strawson's modest naturalistic approach to scepticism can offer some insight as to the continuing overestimation (...)
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: dx.doi.org doi.wiley.com   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  21. Scott Campbell (2000). Strawson, Parfit and Impersonality. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):207-225.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  22. Quassim Cassam, Foreword to Strawson's Scepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties.
    In that book I had two different, though not unrelated aims. The first chapter was concerned with traditional scepticisms about, e.g., the external world and induction. In common with Hume and Wittgenstein (and even Heidegger) I argued that the attempt to combat such doubts by rational argument was misguided: for we are dealing here with the presuppositions, the framework, of all human thought and enquiry. In the other chapters my target was different. It was that species of naturalism which tended (...)
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | More options ...
  23. Charles E. Caton (1959). Strawson on Referring. Mind 68 (272):539-544.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org mind.oxfordjournals.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  24. Suresh Chandra (1981). Wittgenstein and Strawson on the Ascription of Experiences. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41 (3):280-298.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  25. Andrew Chignell (2004). Review of H.J. Glock (Ed), Strawson and Kant. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (8).
    A review of Hans-Johann Glock's edited volume. -/- .
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  26. David Coder (1972). Strawson, Particulars, No-Subject' and 'No-Ownership'. Philosophical Studies 23 (5):335 - 342.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  27. James W. Cornman (1964). Strawson's “Person”. Theoria 30 (3):145-156.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  28. Jocelyne Couture (1988). Analyse Et Métaphysique Peter F. Strawson Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1985. 149 P. Dialogue 27 (02):361-.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  29. S. C. Coval (1964). Persons and Criteria in Strawson. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24 (3):406-409.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  30. Charles B. Daniels (1967). Immediate Knowledge: Ayer, Strawson, and Shoemaker. Theoria 33 (3):176-188.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  31. Kim Davies (1982). The Concept of Experience and Strawson's Transcendental Deduction. Analysis 42 (1):16-19.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  32. Marion Deckert (1973). Quine, Strawson and Logical Truth. Philosophical Studies 24 (1):52 - 56.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  33. Chauncey Downes (1965). Husserl and the Coherence of the Other Minds Problem. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 26 (December):253-259.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  34. M. Durrant (1966). Mr. Strawson on the Notion of 'Predicate'. Philosophy 41 (155):79 - 84.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  35. Patrick Fleming (2004). Kant and Strawson on the Objectivity Thesis. Idealistic Studies 34 (2).
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  36. Manfred Gawlina (2004). Kant, Ein Atheist? Ein Strawson-Schüler Liest Das Opus Postumum. Kant-Studien 95 (2):235-237.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  37. P. T. Geach (1963). Mr. Strawson on Symbolic and Traditional Logic. Mind 72 (285):125-128.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org mind.oxfordjournals.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  38. Alan Gewirth (1957). Book Review:The Revolution in Philosophy. A. J. Ayer, W. C. Kneale, G. A. Paul, D. F. Pears, P. F. Strawson, G. J. Warnock, R. A. Wollheim. Ethics 67 (2):146-.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  39. Hans-Johann Glock (2003). Strawson and Kant. Oxford University Press.
    Kant is generally regarded as the greatest modern philosopher. But that analytic philosophers treat him as a central voice in contemporary debates is largely due to Sir Peter Strawson, the most eminent philosopher living in Britain today. In this collection, leading Kant scholars and analytic philosophers, including Strawson himself, for the first time assess his relation to Kant. The essays raise questions about how philosophy should deal with its past, what kind of insights it can achieve, and whether we can (...)
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  40. M. Glouberman (1976). Doctrine and Method in the Philosophy of P. F. Strawson. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 36 (3):364-383.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  41. M. Glouberman (1975). Strawson's Hidden Realism. The Journal of Critical Analysis 5 (4):135-145.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  42. H. P. Grice & P. F. Strawson (1956). In Defense of a Dogma. Philosophical Review 65 (2):141-158.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  43. Dorothy Grover (2000). The Philosophy of P. F. Strawson. International Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1):105-107.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  44. W. K. C. Guthrie, Ian Hacking, Graham Bird, D. R. Cousin, Martha Kneale, Cora Diamon, R. W. Hepburn, J. L. Ackrill & P. F. Strawson (1966). New Books. Mind 75 (298):293-308.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org mind.oxfordjournals.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  45. Peter Hacker (2002). II-Strawson's Concept of a Person. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (1):21-40.
    Strawson's concept of a person is examined and evaluated.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  46. Bob Hale (1979). Strawson, Geach and Dummett on Singular Terms and Predicates. Synthese 42 (2):275 - 295.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  47. S. N. Hampshire (1948). Mr. Strawson on Necessary Propositions and Entailment Statements. Mind 57 (227):354-357.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: mind.oxfordjournals.org jstor.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  48. Ross Harrison (1970). Strawson on Outer Objects. Philosophical Quarterly 20 (July):213-221.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  49. Alan Hausman (1969). IV. Strawson on the Traditional Logic. Inquiry 12 (1-4):254-259.
    In his Introduction to Logical Theory, Strawson argues that Aristotelian logic can be given a successful interpretation into ordinary English, but not into the symbolism of Principia Mathematica, on the grounds that Aristotelian logic and ordinary English share something absent in PM, namely, the doctrine of presupposition. It is argued that Strawson is mistaken. PM does justice to the logical rules of Aristotelian logic and also has a fully articulated doctrine of presupposition.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: tandfonline.com dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  50. W. Dean Hazelton (1976). Strawson and Persons and Their Bodies. Philosophical Studies 30 (2):137 - 141.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  51. Jane Heal (1974). Essays on J. L. Austin By Sir Isaiah Berlin, L. W. Forguson, D. F. Pears, G. Pitcher, J. R. Searle, P. F. Strawson and G. J. Warnock Clarendon Press, 1973, 190 Pp. £3.00. Philosophy 49 (188):219-.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  52. Hinshaw Jr (1957). Book Review:The Revolution in Philosophy A. J. Ayer, W. C. Kneale, G. A. Paul, D. F. Pears, P. F. Strawson, G. J. Warnock, R. A. Wollheim. Philosophy of Science 24 (4):366-.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  53. Hinshaw Jr (1957). Book Review:The Revolution in Philosophy A. J. Ayer, W. C. Kneale, G. A. Paul, D. F. Pears, P. F. Strawson, G. J. Warnock, R. A. Wollheim. Philosophy of Science 24 (4):366-.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  54. Herbert Hochberg (1976). Strawson, Scepticism, and Metaphysics. Theoria 42 (1-3):20-43.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  55. Herbert Hochberg (1970). Strawson, Russell, and the King of France. Philosophy of Science 37 (3):363-384.
    It is argued that Strawson's celebrated attacks on Russell's views about proper names and descriptions are misleading and unfounded. An attempt is made to show that Strawson's alternative views are philosophically more problematic than Russell's. It is also argued that, properly stated, Russell's analyses do not do violence to ordinary usage and that attempts to justify Strawson's analysis on the ground that it fits better with ordinary usage are mistaken.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org journals.uchicago.edu dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  56. Max O. Hocutt (1974). Armstrong and Strawson on 'Disembodied Existence'. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 35 (September):46-59.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  57. David Holdcroft (1975). Subject and Predicate in Logic and Grammar By P. F. Strawson Methuen, 1974, Vii + 144 Pp., £3.50 Cloth, £1.50 Paper. Philosophy 50 (194):481-.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  58. Ted Honderich, P. F. Strawson: Freedom and Resentment.
    The doyen of living English philosophers, by these reflections, took hold of and changed the outlook of a good many other philosophers, if not quite enough. He did so, essentially, by assuming that talk of freedom and responsibility is talk not of facts or truths, in a certain sense, but of our attitudes. His more explicit concern was to look again at the question of whether determinism and freedom are consistent with one another -- by shifting attention to certain personal (...)
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | More options ...
  59. Peter Hutcheson (1985). Vindicating Strawson. Philosophical Topics 13 (2):175-183.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  60. E. H. Hutten, A. Watson, H. Hudson, R. G. Durrant, D. H. Monro, P. F. Strawson, A. N. Prior, E. J. Lemmon, J. L. Evans, R. N. Smart, G. M. Matthews, S. Körner, William Gerber & W. G. Roll (1959). New Books. Mind 68 (271):405-431.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org mind.oxfordjournals.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  61. Lindsay Kelland (2011). Free Will and Reactive Attitudes: Perspectives on P. F. Strawson's 'Freedom and Resentment' , Edited by Michael McKenna and Paul Russell. Philosophical Papers 39 (1):135-140.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: informaworld.com informaworld.com tandf.informaworld.com dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  62. Angus Kerr-Lawson (1987). Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties Peter Strawson New York: Columbia University Press, 1985. Pp. Vii, 98. $24.30. Dialogue 26 (02):388-.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  63. William Kneale (1954). Introduction to Logical Theory. By P. F. Strawson. (Methuen. 1952. Pp. X + 266. 15s. Net.). Philosophy 29 (108):78-.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  64. Herbert Lamm (1967). Book Review:The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant's "Critique of Pure Reason." P. R. Strawson; Kant's Analytic. Jonathan Bennett; Kant's Solution for Verification in Metaphysics. D. P. Dryer; Kant's Philosophical Correspondence, 1759-99. Arnulf Zweig. Ethics 78 (1):89-.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  65. Thomas A. Long (1965). Strawson and the Pains of Others. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 43 (May):73-77.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: taylorandfrancis.metapress.com informaworld.com ingentaconnect.com tandfonline.com dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  66. William G. Lycan (1970). Transformational Grammar and the Russell-Strawson Dispute. Metaphilosophy 1 (4):335–337.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: interscience.wiley.com dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  67. D. L. C. Maclachlan (1993). Strawson and the Argument for Other Minds. Journal of Philosophical Research 18:149-157.
    The classical argument for the existence of other minds begins by ascribing states of consciousness to oneself, and argues to the existence of other conscious beings on the basis of an analogy in bodily constitution and behavior. P. F. Strawson attacks the foundation of this argument. “One can ascribe states of consciousness to oneself only if one can ascribe them to others. One can ascribe them to others only if one can identify other subjects of experience.” My thesis is that (...)
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  68. Jacek Malinowski (2006). On the Formalization of Strawson's Presupposition. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):111-118.
    In this paper we analyze the Strawson's notion of presupposition proposed in his book Introduction to Logical Theory. Strawsonian notion of presupposition is dependent on the notion of logical entailment. We make use of the theory of logical consequence operation as a general framework to show that it is impossible to find a logical consequence operation which mirrors the philosophical intuitions of the Strawson's notions of presupposition. The aim of this paper is to present in details the philosophical backgrounds of (...)
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  69. J. L. Martin (1974). Has Strawson Refuted Scepticism About Other Minds? Philosophy 49 (190):420 - 428.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  70. H. E. Matthews (1969). Strawson on Transcendental Idealism. Philosophical Quarterly 19 (76):204-220.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  71. Michael S. McKenna (2005). Where Frankfurt and Strawson Meet. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29 (1):163-180.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: blackwell-synergy.com ingentaconnect.com dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  72. Thaddeus Metz (2008). The Nature of Reactive Practices:Exploring Strawson’s Expressivism. South African Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):226-240.
    I aim to answer the questions of whether reactive practices such as gratitude and punishment are inherently expressive, and, if so, in what respect. I distinguish seven ways in which one might plausibly characterize reactive practices as essentially expressive in nature, and organise them so that they progress in a dialectical order, from weakest to strongest. I then critically discuss objections that apply to the strongest conception, questioning whether it coheres with standard retributive understandings of why, when and where the (...)
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  73. Barry Miller (1981). Strawson on Existence as a Predicate. Philosophical Papers 10 (2):93-99.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: tandfonline.com dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  74. George W. Miller (1966). Strawson's Classification of Metaphysical Systems. Inquiry 9 (1-4):185-192.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: tandfonline.com dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  75. Peter Millican, Statements and Modality Strawson, Quine and Wolfram.
    Over a period of more than twenty years, Sybil Wolfram gave lectures at Oxford University on Philosophical Logic, a major component of most of the undergraduate degree programmes. She herself had been introduced to the subject by Peter Strawson, and saw herself as working very much within the Strawsonian tradition. Central to this tradition, which began with Strawson's seminal attack on Russell's theory of descriptions in ‘On Referring' (1950), is the distinction between a sentence and what is said by a (...)
    Reading list   |  Discussion (2)  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | More options ...
  76. J. M. E. Moravcsik (1976). Strawson on Predication. Journal of Philosophy 73 (12):329-348.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  77. James Moulder (1973). Flew, Strawson and Locke's Parrot. Philosophy 48 (184):183 - 185.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  78. Norton Nelkin (1972). Mr. Roberts on Strawson. Mind 81 (323):405-406.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org mind.oxfordjournals.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  79. Edward J. Nell (1968). Strawson, Particulars and Space. Philosophy of Science 35 (2):187-189.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org journals.uchicago.edu dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  80. Thomas E. Patton (1978). Replies and Discussion on Strawson' Substitute for Scope. Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (2).
    Strawson has recently developed a style of semantic subject-predicate analysis which, applied to certain sentences, rivals a standard account that turns on the notion of scope. His account depends on three notions: (i) complex, derivative properties, (ii) predicate-negation, and (iii) substantiation—an alleged semantic function having particular-specification as a special case. As I further develop it, the suspicion energes that his account simply is the scope account in disguise. I show that it is rather an untenable rival, placing the blame on (...)
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  81. Robert L. Phillips (1965). Mr. Aune on Strawson. Mind 74 (296):588-589.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org mind.oxfordjournals.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  82. W. V. Quine (1953). Mr. Strawson on Logical Theory. Mind 62 (248):433-451.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: mind.oxfordjournals.org jstor.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  83. A. M. Quinton, P. H. Nowell-Smith, William Kneale, Stephen Toulmin, T. R. Miles, P. F. Strawson, D. W. Hamlyn, J. Harrison, Richard Robinson, A. C. Crombie, R. Peters, E. C. Mossner, A. M. Honoré & W. J. Rees (1954). New Books. Mind 63 (252):546-576.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: mind.oxfordjournals.org jstor.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  84. Murali Ramachandran, Descriptions and Presuppositions: Strawson Vs. Russell.
    A Russellian theory of (definite) descriptions takes an utterance of the form ‘The F is G’ to express a purely general proposition that affirms the existence of a (contextually) unique F: there is exactly one F [which is C] and it is G. Strawson, by contrast, takes the utterer to presuppose in some sense that there is exactly one salient F, but this is not part of what is asserted; rather, when the presupposition is not met, the utterance simply fails (...)
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | More options ...
  85. Charles L. Reid (1971). A Note on Strawson Truth and Knowledge. The Journal of Critical Analysis 3 (3):113-117.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  86. Jay F. Rosenberg (1978). On Strawson: Sounds, Skepticism, and Necessity. Philosophia 8 (November):405-419.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: springerlink.com dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  87. Gregory A. Ross (1974). Strawson's Metaphysical Grammar. Southern Journal of Philosophy 12 (3):371-390.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  88. Bertrand Russell (1957). Mr. Strawson on Referring. Mind 66 (263):385-389.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org mind.oxfordjournals.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  89. Mark Sacks (2005). Sartre, Strawson and Others. Inquiry 48 (3):275-299.
    This paper compares the treatment of other minds in Strawson and Sartre. Both discussions are presented here as transcendental arguments, and some striking parallels between them are brought out. However the primary significance of the alignment lies in the difference that emerges between two forms of transcendental proof, with the phenomenological treatment in Sartre promising to yield a stronger conclusion than Strawson's argument. The paper goes some way towards bringing out this difference.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: informaworld.com taylorandfrancis.metapress.com ingentaconnect.com tandfonline.com dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  90. Charles Sayward (1978). Strawson on Categories. Journal of Critical Analysis 7 (3):83-87.
    A type theory constructed with reference to a particular language will associate with each monadic predicate P of that language a class of individuals C(P) of which it is categorically significant to predicate P (or which P spans, for short). The extension of P is a subset of C(P), which is a subset of the language’s universe of discourse. The set C(P) is a category discriminated by the language. The relation 'is spanned by the same predicates as' divides the language’s (...)
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: pdcnet.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  91. George Schlesinger (1981). Strawson on Induction. Philosophia 10 (3-4):199-208.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: springerlink.com dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  92. Dennis Schulting (2008). On Strawson on Kantian Apperception. South African Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):257-271.
    Strawson famously argues that Kant’s argument for the necessary conditions of experience can only be retained once freed from a priori synthesis. Strawson claims that a purely ‘analytical connexion’ between experience and the object of experience is conceptually inferable from a thoroughly analytic premise concerning the capacity for self-ascription of representations. In this paper, I take issue with the way in which Strawson construes the analyticity of the principle of self-ascription or what Kant calls the principle of transcendental apperception. More (...)
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  93. Seth Shabo (forthcoming). Incompatibilism and Personal Relationships: Another Look at Strawson's Objective Attitude. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-17.
    In the context of his highly influential defence of compatibilism, P. F. Strawson introduced the terms ‘reactive attitude’ and ‘objective attitude’ to the free-will lexicon. He argued, in effect, that relinquishing such reactive attitudes as resentment and moral indignation isn’t a real possibility for us, since doing so would commit us to exclusive objectivity, a stance incompatible with ordinary interpersonal relationships. While most commentators have challenged Strawson’s link between personal relationships and the reactive attitudes, Tamler Sommers has recently taken up (...)
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: informaworld.com tandf.informaworld.com tandfonline.com dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  94. Nancy D. Simco (1971). Strawson's Ontology in Individuals. Southern Journal of Philosophy 9 (4):423-432.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  95. David Skrbina (2006). Realistic Panpsychism - Commentary on Strawson. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (10-11):151-157.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: ingentaconnect.com   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  96. Smart (2006). Ockhamist Comments on Strawson. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (s 10-11):158-162.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: ingentaconnect.com hdl.handle.net   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  97. T. J. Smiley (1967). Mr. Strawson on the Traditional Logic. Mind 76 (301):118-120.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org mind.oxfordjournals.org dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  98. Joel Smith (forthcoming). Strawson on Other Minds. In Joel Smith & Peter Sullivan (eds.), Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism. OUP.
    I critically discuss Strawson's transcendental argument against other minds scepticism, and look at the prospects for a naturalised version of it.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  99. Andrew Sneddon (2005). Moral Responsibility: The Difference of Strawson, and the Difference It Should Make. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (3):239-264.
    P.F. Strawson’s work on moral responsibility is well-known. However, an important implication of the landmark “Freedom and Resentment” has gone unnoticed. Specifically, a natural development of Strawson’s position is that we should understand being morally responsible as having externalistically construed pragmatic criteria, not individualistically construed psychological ones. This runs counter to the contemporary ways of studying moral responsibility. I show the deficiencies of such contemporary work in relation to Strawson by critically examining the positions of John Martin Fischer and Mark (...)
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: springerlink.com ingentaconnect.com jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
  100. Paul Snowdon, Peter Frederick Strawson. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
1 — 100 / 173