This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
220 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 220
  1. Varol Akman & Ferda N. Alpaslan, Strawson on Intended Meaning and Context.
    Strawson proposed in the early seventies an attractive threefold distinction regarding how context bears on the meaning of `what is said' when a sentence is uttered. The proposed scheme is somewhat crude and, being aware of this aspect, Strawson himself raised various points to make it more adequate. In this paper, we review the scheme of Strawson, note his concerns, and add some of our own. However, our main point is to defend the essence of Strawson's approach and to recommend (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Peter Alexander, A. J. Ayer, P. F. Strawson, G. P. Henderson, John M. Hems, Roy Harris, Anthony Kenny, Ninian Smart, K. C. Barclay, Mary Hesse & A. C. Lloyd (1966). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 75 (182):442-461.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. James W. Austin (1978). Russell's Cryptic Response to Strawson. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (4):531-537.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Lewis Baldacchino (1984). Strawson on the Antinomy. Mind 93 (369):91-97.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Nandita Bandyopadhyay (1988). Being, Meaning, and Proposition: A Comparative Study of Bhartṛhari, Russell, Frege, and Strawson. Sanskrit Pustak Bhandar.
  6. Peter Brian Barry (2011). Saving Strawson: Evil and Strawsonian Accounts of Moral Responsibility. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):5-21.
    Almost everyone allows that conditions can obtain that exempt agents from moral responsibility—that someone is not a morally responsible agent if certain conditions obtain. In his seminal Freedom and Resentment, Peter Strawson denies that the truth of determinism globally exempts agents from moral responsibility. As has been noted elsewhere, Strawson appears committed to the surprising thesis that being an evil person is an exempting condition. Less often noted is the fact that various Strawsonians—philosophers sympathetic with Strawson’s account of moral responsibility—at (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Jonathan Bennett (1968). Strawson on Kant. Philosophical Review 77 (3):340-349.
  8. Isaiah Berlin, P. F. Strawson, R. Rhees, F. E. Sparshott, Michael Scriven, R. F. Holland, Jonathan Harrison, H. G. Alexander, C. A. Mace, J. L. Evans, D. A. Rees, W. Mays, C. K. Grant, Basil Mitchell & G. C. J. Midgley (1952). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 61 (243):405-439.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Rod Bertolet (1982). Russell and Strawson, Indexical and Improper Descriptions. Theoria 48 (2):90-98.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. A. L. Bezuidenhout (2001). The Philosophy of P. F. Strawson. Philosophical Review 110 (3):460-465.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. J. I. Biro (1979). Kant and Strawson on Transcendental Synthesis. New Scholasticism 53 (4):486-501.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Gunnar Björnsson (2008). Strawson on 'If' and ⊃. South African Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):24-35.
    This paper is concerned with Sir Peter Strawson’s critical discussion of Paul Grice’s defence of the material implication analysis of conditionals. It argues that although Strawson’s own ‘consequentialist’ suggestion concerning the meaning of conditionals cannot be correct, a related and radically contextualist account is able to both account for the phenomena that motivated Strawson’s consequentialism, and to undermine the material implication analysis by providing a simpler account of the processes that we go through when interpreting conditionals.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. David Bloor (1970). Explanation and Analysis in Strawson's 'Persons'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):2-9.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. M. C. Bradley (1986). Geach and Strawson on Negating Names. Philosophical Quarterly 36 (142):16-28.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. D. H. M. Brooks (1985). Strawson, Hume, and the Unity of Consciousness. Mind 94 (October):583-86.
  16. Clifford Brown (2006). Peter Strawson. Mcgill-Queen's University Press.
    Peter Strawson's work has radically altered the philosophical concept of analysis, returned metaphysics to centre stage in Anglo-American philosophy, and transformed the framework for subsequent interpretations of Kantian philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. James F. Brown (1971). In Defense of Strawson's "Referring". Journal of Critical Analysis 3 (1):1-8.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Stuart Brown (ed.) (2005). The Dictionary of Twentieth Century British Philosophers. Thoemmes Continuum.
  19. Brian Bruya (2001). Strawson and Prasad on Determinism and Resentment. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research 18 (3):198-216.
    P. F. Strawson's influential article "Freedom and Resentment" has been much commented on, and one of the most trenchant commentaries is Rajendra Prasad's, "Reactive Attitudes, Rationality, and Determinism." In his article, Prasad contests the significance of the reactive attitude over a precise theory of determinism, concluding that Strawson's argument is ultimately unconvincing. In this article, I evaluate Prasad's challenges to Strawson by summarizing and categorizing all of the relevant arguments in both Strawson's and Prasad's pieces. -/- Strawson offers four types (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Norman Burstein (1971). Strawson on the Concept of a Person. Mind 80 (319):449-452.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Patrick H. Byrne (2001). Connective Analysis: Aristotle and Strawson. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (3):405 – 423.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. John J. Callanan (2011). Making Sense of Doubt: Strawson's Anti-Scepticism. Theoria 77 (3):261-278.
    Strawson's philosophical attitude towards scepticism is frequently thought to have undergone a significant shift from the “strong” or “robust” employment of transcendental arguments in Individuals to a more “modest” understanding of the efficacy of such arguments in Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties. I argue that this interpretation is based upon a misunderstanding of the function of transcendental arguments in Strawson's earlier works. Examining the continuity of Strawson's modest naturalistic approach to scepticism can offer some insight as to the continuing overestimation (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Scott Campbell (2000). Strawson, Parfit and Impersonality. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):207-225.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Quassim Cassam, Foreword to Strawson's Scepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties.
    In that book I had two different, though not unrelated aims. The first chapter was concerned with traditional scepticisms about, e.g., the external world and induction. In common with Hume and Wittgenstein (and even Heidegger) I argued that the attempt to combat such doubts by rational argument was misguided: for we are dealing here with the presuppositions, the framework, of all human thought and enquiry. In the other chapters my target was different. It was that species of naturalism which tended (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Charles E. Caton (1959). Strawson on Referring. Mind 68 (272):539-544.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Suresh Chandra (1981). Wittgenstein and Strawson on the Ascription of Experiences. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41 (3):280-298.
  27. Andrew Chignell (2004). Review of H.J. Glock (Ed), Strawson and Kant. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (8).
    A review of Hans-Johann Glock's edited volume. -/- .
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. David Coder (1972). Strawson, Particulars, No-Subject' and 'No-Ownership'. Philosophical Studies 23 (5):335 - 342.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. James W. Cornman (1964). Strawson's “Person”. Theoria 30 (3):145-156.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Jocelyne Couture (1988). Analyse et métaphysique Peter F. Strawson Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1985. 149 p. Dialogue 27 (02):361-.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. S. C. Coval (1964). Persons and Criteria in Strawson. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24 (3):406-409.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Charles B. Daniels (1967). Immediate Knowledge: Ayer, Strawson, and Shoemaker. Theoria 33 (3):176-188.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Kim Davies (1982). The Concept of Experience and Strawson's Transcendental Deduction. Analysis 42 (1):16-19.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Marion Deckert (1973). Quine, Strawson and Logical Truth. Philosophical Studies 24 (1):52 - 56.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Chauncey Downes (1965). Husserl and the Coherence of the Other Minds Problem. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 26 (December):253-259.
  36. M. Durrant (1966). Mr. Strawson on the Notion of 'Predicate'. Philosophy 41 (155):79 - 84.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Terence Rajivan Edward (2012). Descriptive Metaphysics, Revisionary Metaphysics, Anti-Metaphysics. Ethos 5 (2):36-43.
    This paper observes that P. F. Strawson’s distinction between descriptive and revisionary metaphysics is a baffling one from the perspective of traditional metaphysics. If one thinks of metaphysics as the study of the fundamental nature of reality, it is bewildering to divide up metaphysics in this way. The paper then tries to show how the distinction is no longer bewildering if we deny that such study is possible.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Patrick Fleming (2004). Kant and Strawson on the Objectivity Thesis. Idealistic Studies 34 (2):173-180.
    In the Transcendental Deductions, Kant attempts to establish the necessary applicability of the categories to what is encountered in experience. As I see it, the argument is intended to deduce two distinct, but, in Kant’s eyes, interrelated, claims. The first is that it is a necessity that experience be of an objective world. Call this rough idea the objectivity thesis. The second thesis is that the categoriesapply only to mere appearances, that is, the world insofar as we structure it. Call (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Danny Frederick (2011). P. F. Strawson on Predication. Polish Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):39-57.
    Strawson offers three accounts of singular predication: a grammatical, a category and a mediating account. I argue that the grammatical and mediating accounts are refuted by a host of counter-examples and that the latter is worse than useless. In later works Strawson defends only the category account. This account entails that singular terms cannot be predicates; it excludes non-denoting singular terms from being logical subjects, except by means of an ad hoc analogy; it depends upon a notion of identification that (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Manfred Gawlina (2004). Kant, ein Atheist? Ein Strawson-Schüler liest das Opus postumum. Kant Studien 95 (2):235-237.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. P. T. Geach (1963). Mr. Strawson on Symbolic and Traditional Logic. Mind 72 (285):125-128.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Alan Gewirth (1957). Book Review:The Revolution in Philosophy. A. J. Ayer, W. C. Kneale, G. A. Paul, D. F. Pears, P. F. Strawson, G. J. Warnock, R. A. Wollheim. [REVIEW] Ethics 67 (2):146-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Hans-Johann Glock (ed.) (2003). Strawson and Kant. Oxford University Press.
    Kant is generally regarded as the greatest modern philosopher. But that analytic philosophers treat him as a central voice in contemporary debates is largely due to Sir Peter Strawson, the most eminent philosopher living in Britain today. In this collection, leading Kant scholars and analytic philosophers, including Strawson himself, for the first time assess his relation to Kant. The essays raise questions about how philosophy should deal with its past, what kind of insights it can achieve, and whether we can (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. M. Glouberman (1976). Doctrine and Method in the Philosophy of P. F. Strawson. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 36 (3):364-383.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. M. Glouberman (1975). Strawson's Hidden Realism. Journal of Critical Analysis 5 (4):135-145.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. H. P. Grice & P. F. Strawson (1956). In Defense of a Dogma. Philosophical Review 65 (2):141-158.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Dorothy Grover (2000). The Philosophy of P. F. Strawson. International Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1):105-107.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. W. K. C. Guthrie, Ian Hacking, Graham Bird, D. R. Cousin, Martha Kneale, Cora Diamon, R. W. Hepburn, J. L. Ackrill & P. F. Strawson (1966). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 75 (298):293-308.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Peter Hacker (2002). II-Strawson's Concept of a Person. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (1):21-40.
    Strawson's concept of a person is examined and evaluated.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.) (1998). The Philosophy of P.F. Strawson. Open Court.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 220