This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Subcategories:
1483 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 1483
Material to categorize
  1. Kuanysh Abeshev (2014). On the Existence of Universal Numberings for Finite Families of D.C.E. Sets. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 60 (3):161-167.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Diana Ackerman (1981). Two Paradoxes of Analysis. Journal of Philosophy 78 (11):733-735.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Felicia Ackerman (1992). Analysis and its Paradoxes. In Edna Ullmann-Margalit (ed.), The Scientific Enterprise. Kluwer 169--178.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Seiki Akama & Sadaaki Miyamoto (2008). Curry and Fitch on Paradox. Logique Et Analyse 203:271-283.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Victor Allis & Teunis Koetsier (1991). On Some Paradoxes of the Infinite. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):187-194.
    In the paper below the authors describe three super-tasks. They show that although the abstract notion of a super-task may be, as Benacerraf suggested, a conceptual mismatch, the completion of the three super-tasks involved can be defined rather naturally, without leading to inconsistency, by means of a particular kinematical interpretation combined with a principle of continuity.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  6. Alan Ross Anderson (1970). Review: B. Meltzer, The Third Possibility; B. Meltzer, I. J. Good, Two Forms of the Prediction Paradox; William H. Halberstadt, In Defence of Euclid: A Reply to B. Meltzer. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (3):458-459.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Miroslava Anđelković (1997). Predictor Paradox. Theoria 40 (4):121-126.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. A. J. Ayer (1973). On a Supposed Antinomy. Mind 82 (325):125-126.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  9. L. K. B. (1958). Le Formalisme Logico-Mathématique Et le Problème du Non-Sens. Review of Metaphysics 12 (1):143-143.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Guillermo Badía (2013). Mundos posibles y paradojas. Areté. Revista de Filosofía 25 (2):219-229.
    Robert Adams' definition of a possible world is paradoxical according to Selmer Bringsjord, Patrick Grim and, more recently, Cristopher Menzel. The proofs given by Bringsjord and Grim relied crucially on the Powerset Axiom; Christoper Menzel showed that, while this continued tobe the case, there was still hope for Adams' definition, but Menzel he undustedan old russellian paradox in order to prove that we could obtain the same paradoxical consequences without appealing to any other set theory than the Axiomof Separation. Nevertheless, (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Maya Bar-Hillel & Avishai Margalit (1985). Gideon's Paradox — a Paradox of Rationality. Synthese 63 (2):139 - 155.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. William H. Baumer (1965). Invalidly Invalidating a Paradox. Philosophical Quarterly 15 (61):350-352.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. J. C. Beall (2009). Knowability and Possible Epistemic Oddities. In Joe Salerno (ed.), New Essays on the Knowability Paradox. Oxford University Press 105--125.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  14. J. C. Beall (2007). Prolegomenon to Future Revenge. In Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford University Press
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15. Jean Paul Van Bendegem (1994). Ross' Paradox Is an Impossible Super-Task. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):743 - 748.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Jean Paul Van Bendegem (1987). Zeno's Paradoxes and the Tile Argument. Philosophy of Science 54 (2):295 - 302.
    A solution of the Zeno paradoxes in terms of a discrete space is usually rejected on the basis of an argument formulated by Hermann Weyl, the so-called tile argument. This note shows that, given a set of reasonable assumptions for a discrete geometry, the Weyl argument does not apply. The crucial step is to stress the importance of the nonzero width of a line. The Pythagorean theorem is shown to hold for arbitrary right triangles.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Jean Paul Bendegevanm (1987). Zeno's Paradoxes and the Tile Argument. Philosophy of Science 54 (2):295-.
    A solution of the zeno paradoxes in terms of a discrete space is usually rejected on the basis of an argument formulated by hermann weyl, The so-Called tile argument. This note shows that, Given a set of reasonable assumptions for a discrete geometry, The weyl argument does not apply. The crucial step is to stress the importance of the nonzero width of a line. The pythagorean theorem is shown to hold for arbitrary right triangles.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Jose Luis Bermudez (2009). Truth, Indefinite Extensibility, and Fitch's Paradox. In Joe Salerno (ed.), New Essays on the Knowability Paradox. Oxford University Press
    A number of authors have noted that the key steps in Fitch’s argument are not intuitionistically valid, and some have proposed this as a reason for an anti-realist to accept intuitionistic logic (e.g. Williamson 1982, 1988). This line of reasoning rests upon two assumptions. The first is that the premises of Fitch’s argument make sense from an anti-realist point of view – and in particular, that an anti-realist can and should maintain the principle that all truths are knowable. The second (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19. Jose Bernadete (1964). Infinity: An Essay in Metaphysics. Clarendon Press.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20. Katalin BimbÓ (2006). 1. Curry-Type Paradoxes. Logique Et Analyse 49.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. J. Blau & U. Blau (1995). Epistemic Paradoxes. 1. Dialectica 49 (2-4):169-193.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Jorge Bosch (1972). ``The Examination Paradox and Formal Prediction&Quot. Logique Et Analyse 15:505-525.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  23. D. Bostock (2011). Note on Heterologicality. Analysis 71 (2):252-259.
    1. For simplicity, let the domain of our first-level quantifiers, ‘∀ x’ and so on, be words, and in particular just those words which are adjectives. And let the adjective ‘heterological’ be abbreviated just to As is well known, one cannot legitimately stipulate that Why not? Well, the obvious answer is that if is supposed to be an adjective, then this alleged stipulation would imply the contradiction But contradictions cannot be true, and it is no use stipulating that they shall (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Jacques Bouet (1983). Existe-t-il un modèle d'univers dépourvu de paradoxes ? Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 88 (3):385 - 392.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Luc Bovens & Wlodek Rabinowicz (2005). De doctrinale paradox. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 97 (1).
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Steven J. Brams (1981). A Resolution of the Paradox of Omniscience. Bowling Green Studies in Applied Philosophy 3:17-30.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Mimma Bresciani Califano (ed.) (2008). Paradossi E Disarmonie Nelle Scienze E Nelle Arti. L. S. Olschki.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Berit Brogaard (2009). On Keeping Blue Swans and Unknowable Facts at Bay : A Case Study on Fitch's Paradox. In Joe Salerno (ed.), New Essays on the Knowability Paradox. Oxford University Press
    (T5) ϕ → ◊Kϕ |-- ϕ → Kϕ where ◊ is possibility, and ‘Kϕ’ is to be read as ϕ is known by someone at some time. Let us call the premise the knowability principle and the conclusion near-omniscience.2 Here is a way of formulating Fitch’s proof of (T5). Suppose the knowability principle is true. Then the following instance of it is true: (p & ~Kp) → ◊K(p & ~Kp). But the consequent is false, it is not possible to know (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Johnw Burgess (2009). Can Truth Out? In Joe Salerno (ed.), New Essays on the Knowability Paradox. Oxford University Press
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  30. Michael B. Burke (2000). The Impossibility of Superfeats. Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):207-220.
    Is it logically possible to perform a "superfeat"? This is, is it logically possible to complete, in a finite time, an infinite sequence of distinct acts? In opposition to the received view, I argue that all superfeats have kinematic features that make them logically impossible.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31. Michael B. Burke (2000). The Staccato Run: A Contemporary Issue in the Zenonian Tradition. Modern Schoolman 78 (1):1-8.
    The “staccato run,” in which a runner stops infinitely often while running from one point to another, is a prototype of the “superfeat” (or "supertask”), that is, a feat involving the completion in a finite time of an infinite sequence of distinct, physically individuated acts. There is no widely accepted demonstration that superfeats are impossible logically, but I argue here, contra Grunbaüm, that they are impossible dynamically. Specifically, I show that the staccato run is excluded by Newton’s three laws of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  32. Michael B. Burke (1999). Benardete's Paradox. Sorites 11:82-85.
    Graham Priest has focused attention on an intriguing but neglected paradox posed by José Benardete in 1964. Benardete viewed the paradox as a threat to the intelligibility of the spatial and temporal continua and offered several different versions of it. Priest has selected one of those versions and formalized it. Although Priest has succeeded nicely in sharpening the paradox, the version he chose to formalize has distracting and potentially problematic features that are absent from some of Benardete's other versions. I (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Michael B. Burke (1984). The Infinitistic Thesis. Southern Journal of Philosophy 22 (3):295-305.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34. Linda Claire Burns (forthcoming). Vagueza: a metáfora de frege e o paradoxo sorites. Critica.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. James Cargile (1990). SAINSBURY, R. M. Paradoxes. [REVIEW] Philosophy 65:106.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. James Cargile (1979). Paradoxes, a Study in Form and Predication. Cambridge University Press.
    These are not just tricks or puzzles, but are intimately connected with some of the liveliest and most basic philosophical disputes about logical form, ...
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  37. Alonzo Church (2009). Referee Reports on Fitch's "Definition of Value". In Joe Salerno (ed.), New Essays on the Knowability Paradox. Oxford University Press 13--20.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  38. Michael Clark (2012). Paradoxes From A to Z, 3rd Ed. Routledge.
    This third edition is revised throughout, and adds nine new paradoxes that have important bearings in areas such as law, logic, ethics and probability.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Michael Clark (2009/2012). Spanish (2009), Italian (2011), Turkish (2011), German (2012) and French (2012) Translations of Paradoxes From A to Z, 2nd Ed. Editorial Gredos, S.A./Raffaello Cortina Editore.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Michael Clark (2007). Paradoxes From A to Z, 2nd Ed. Routledge.
    This essential guide to paradoxes takes the reader on a lively tour of puzzles that have taxed thinkers from Zeno to Galileo and Lewis Carroll to Bertrand Russell. Michael Clark uncovers an array of conundrums, such as Achilles and the Tortoise, Theseus' Ship, Hempel's Raven, and the Prisoners' Dilemma, taking in subjects as diverse as knowledge, ethics, science, art and politics. Clark discusses each paradox in non-technical terms, considering its significance and looking at likely solutions.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Michael Clark (2004/2006). Italian (2004) and Greek (2006) Translations of Paradoxes From A to Z. Raffaello Cortina Editore/Enalios.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Michael Clark (2004). Paradox 7: The Unexpected Examination. Think 3 (7):109-111.
    In this regular series Michael Clark, editor of the journal Analysis, presents a number of the most intriguing philosophical paradoxes. Here we examine the paradox of the unexpected examination.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Michael Clark (2002-2004). Extracts From Paradoxes From A to Z. Think (1-9).
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Michael Clark (2002). Paradoxes From A to Z. Routledge.
    This essential guide to paradoxes takes the reader on a lively tour of puzzles that have taxed thinkers from Zeno to Galileo ...
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   23 citations  
  45. Michael Clark (1989). A Paradox of Conditional Probability. Analysis 49 (1):16 - 21.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Michael Clark (1975). Utterer's Meaning and Implications About Belief. Analysis 35 (3):105 - 108.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Jeffrey Cobb (2002). Kuczynski on Partial Knowledge and the Paradox of Analysis. Metaphilosophy 33 (5):597-601.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Jeffrey Lamont Cobb (1987). The Paradox of Analysis. Dissertation, Brown University
    Chapters 1-5 develop and criticize a solution to the paradox of analysis based on some recent work in the theory of reference and the analysis of propositional attitudes. This solution holds that the analysandum and analysans in a true analysis are the same property, and that sentences like: being a male sibling analyzes being a brother; and being a brother analyzes being a brother, express the same proposition. It holds that the property referent of "being a brother" and "being a (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Nino Cocchiarella (1973). Whither Russell's Paradox of Predication? In Milton Karl Munitz (ed.), Logic and Ontology. New York,New York University Press 133--158.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. D. G. Collingridge (1971). Pucettts 'Paradox'. Philosophy 46 (176):158-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1483