This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Subcategories:
641 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 641
Material to categorize
  1. C. Adamo (2004). Reading McDowell: On Mind and World Ed. By Nicholas H. Smith. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 25 (1):185-196.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Zed Adams (2012). Seeing is Knowing. Review of Metaphysics 66 (1):61-88.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Liliana Albertazzi (2011). On Seeing: Remarks on Metzger's Laws of Seeing. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 21 (4):581-595.
    Nowadays cognitive science often views sensorial presentations and mental presentations as mutually exclusive, and they are also given separate treatment by neurophysiologists and by cognitive scientists, and some phenomena (like anomalous surfaces or various types of imagery) are reduced to either the former or the latter. Since no adequate methods for its investigation have been developed, the level of perceptual experiences analysed by Gestaltists and magnificently illustrated by Metzger in his Laws of Seeing remains unexplored. Starting from Metzger’s analyses the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. D. Z. Andriopoulos (1976). Sense and Perception in Greek Philosophy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (2):280-282.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. David M. Armstrong (1976). Immediate Perception. In R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend & M. Wartofsky (eds.), Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos. Reidel 23--35.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Edward Wilson Averill (1996). Perception. Philosophical Books 37 (3):200-202.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. M. B. (1982). Perception and Cognition. Review of Metaphysics 35 (4):903-905.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Ralph Baergen (1993). The Influence of Cognition Upon Perception: The Empirical Story. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (1):13 – 23.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Kalyankumar Bagchi (1983). Man-in-Nature as a Phenomenological Datum. Analecta Husserliana 14:229.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. O. Balaban (1998). Mind and the World. By John McDowell. The European Legacy 3:117-117.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Michael Barber (2007). Radical Reflection: Brandom and McDowell on Perception. Modern Schoolman 84 (2-3):245-265.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Susan Blackmore (2015). The Implausibility of Astral Bodies and Astral Worlds. In Keith Augustine & Michael Martin (eds.), The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life After Death. Rowman & Littlefield 393-403.
    Astral body views posit that an exotic double with a definite location in space—an astral or ethereal body—leaves the normal biological body during out-of-body experiences or after death. In this paper the severe difficulties confronting such a view are reviewed, difficulties concerning not only the nature of the double which travels, but the nature of the world in which it travels. Three exhaustive possibilities are considered: that a physical double travels in the physical world; that a nonphysical double travels in (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Ned Block (2002). Behaviorism Revisited. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):977-978.
    O'Regan and Noe declare that the qualitative character of experience is constituted by the nature of the sensorimotor contingencies at play when we perceive. Sensorimotor contingencies are a highly restricted set of input-output relations. The restriction excludes contingencies that don’t essentially involve perceptual systems. Of course if the ‘sensory’ in ‘sensorimotor’ were to be understood mentalistically, the thesis would not be of much interest, so I assume that these contingencies are to be understood non-mentalistically. Contrary to their view, experience is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. B. Bourdon (1898). La perception monoculaire de la profondeur. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 46:124 - 145.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Andrew Bowie (1996). John McDowell's Mind and World, and Early Romantic Epistemology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 50 (197):515-554.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16. Myron L. Braunstein (1971). Perception of Rotation in Figures with Rectangular and Trapezoidal Features. Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (1):25.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Bill Brewer (2011). In Perception. In Johannes Roessler, Hemdat Lerman & Naomi Eilan (eds.), Perception, Causation, and Objectivity. Oxford University Press 68.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. M. F. Burnyeat (1999). Knowledge is Perception. In Gail Fine (ed.), Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology. OUP Oxford
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Leonard Samuel Carrier (1967). The Objects of Perception and Belief. Dissertation, Stanford University
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Eros Moreira de Carvalho (2014). Internismo Sem Intelectualismo E Sem Reflexividade. Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia 55 (129):153-172.
    Em seu livro, "Perception as a Capacity for Knowledge" (2011), John McDowell defende que a garantia fornecida pela percepção é infalível. Para tanto, é preciso entender o papel que a razão tem na constituição de estados perceptivos genuínos. Por meio dela, posicionamos estes estados no espaço lógico das razões. Assim, não só fazemos do estado perceptivo um episódio de conhecimento, mas também obtemos conhecimento de como chegamos a este conhecimento. McDowell sustenta que esta condição para o conhecimento, a posse da (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Alon Chasid (forthcoming). Imaginatively-Colored Perception. Southern Journal of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Jennifer Church (2013). Possibilities of Perception. OUP Oxford.
    Jennifer Church presents a new account of perception, which shows how imagining alternative perspectives and possibilities plays a key role in creating and validating experiences of self-evident objectivity. She explores the nature of moral perception and aesthetic perception, and argues that perception can be both literal and substantive.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Andy Clark, Cognitive Complexity and the Sensorimotor Frontier.
    What is the relation between perceptual experience and the suite of sensorimotor skills that enable us to act in the very world we perceive? The relation, according to ‘sensorimotor models’ (O’Regan and Noe¨ 2001, Noe¨ 2004) is tight indeed. Perceptual experience, on these accounts, is enacted via skilled sensorimotor activity, and gains its content and character courtesy of our knowledge of the relations between (typically) movement and sensory stimulation. I shall argue that this formulation is too extreme, and that it (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24. Andy Clark & Josefa Toribio, Commentary on J.K O'Regan and A Noe: A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness.
    O'Regan and Noe present a wonderfully detailed and comprehensive defense of a position whose broad outline we absolutely and unreservedly endorse. They are right, it seems to us, to stress the intimacy of conscious content and embodied action, and to counter the idea of a Grand Illusion with the image of an agent genuinely in touch, via active exploration, with the rich and varied visual scene. This is an enormously impressive achievement, and we hope that the comments that follow will (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Andy Clark & Josefa Toribio, Sensorimotor Chauvinism?” Commentary on O'Reagan, J. Kevin and Noë, Alva, “A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness”.
    While applauding the bulk of the account on offer, we question one apparent implication viz, that every difference in sensorimotor contingencies corresponds to a difference in conscious visual experience.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. James Wilfred Clark (1957). Wolfgang Koehler's Conception of Direct Experience. Dissertation, University of Michigan
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Andrew Cullison (2013). Seemings and Semantics. In Chris Tucker (ed.), Seemings and Justification: New Essays on Dogmatism and Phenomenal Conservatism. OUP Usa 33.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. C. D. (1963). Phenomenology of Perception. Review of Metaphysics 16 (4):805-805.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Manuel de Pinedo (1997). Mind and World, de John McDowell. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):115-117.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Dr G. Dinani (unknown). Simple Knowledge and Composite Knowledge. Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 23.
    Thought and knowledge represent the most obvious aspects of man's identity. There are fundamental differences between human thought and what is called animal perception. In the meaning of thought, the1-There is another Nizam al-Din Ahmad mentioned in biographies, who is one of Fayd's grandchildren, and died in 1160 H. Care should be taken to not confuse thisNizam al-Din Ahmad with Mulla Sadra's son perception of perception and the knowledge of knowledge are also embedded and this is what we can call (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Randall Dipert (1987). David Kelley's "Evidence of the Senses: A Realist Theory of Perception. [REVIEW] Reason Papers 12:57-70.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Theodore M. Drange (2015). Conceptual Problems Confronting a Totally Disembodied Afterlife. In Keith Augustine & Michael Martin (eds.), The Myth of an Afterlife. Rowman & Littlefield 329-333.
    This paper presents and defends an argument for the conclusion that a personal afterlife in the absence of any sort of body at all is not conceptually possible. The main idea behind the argument is that there would be no way for the identities of people in a bodiless state to be established, either by others or by themselves. The argument raises a significant challenge to explaining just how someone in a totally disembodied afterlife could ever be identified—a challenge that (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Farhang Erfani (2007). Committed Perception. Philosophy Today 51 (3):320-329.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. William Fish (2004). Perception. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (3):532 – 535.
    Book Information Perception. Perception Barry Maund , Chesham : Acumen Publishing , 2003 , 240 , £12.95 ( paper ) By Barry Maund. Acumen Publishing. Chesham. Pp. 240. £12.95 (paper:).
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Jeffrey Foss (1986). Perception and Cognition. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (2):303-322.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Vittorio Gallese, Laila Craighero, Luciano Fadiga & Leonardo Fogassi (1999). Perception Through Action. Psyche 5.
    The Visual Brain in Action by Milner and Goodale provides a new conceptual account of how the brain processes visual information. Milner and Goodale make two major points: The dorsal stream processes visual information for motor purposes; Action and perception are two completely separate domains, the latter being an exclusive property of the ventral stream. In the first part of this review we will summarize some recent neurophysiological data shedding new light on the "pragmatic" role of the visual information processed (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37. A. C. Genova (2003). Review of Reading McDowell on Mind and World. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38. Nancy Louise Gifford (1979). "Taking" as Perceptual Evidence. Dissertation, Brown University
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. S. Glendenning (forthcoming). John McDowell, Mind and World. Radical Philosophy.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Kathrin Gliier (2012). Perception and Intermediaries. In Gerhard Preyer (ed.), Donald Davidson on Truth, Meaning, and the Mental. Oxford University Press 192.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Marjorie Grene (1970). Sense-Perception: Philosophy's Step-Child? In Erwin W. Straus & Richard Marion Griffith (eds.), Aisthesis and Aesthetics. Pittsburgh, Pa.,Duquesne University Press 13.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. L. Gunnarsson (2005). Reading McDowell: On Mind and World. Philosophical Review 114 (4):540-544.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. P. J. H. (1971). Dignäga, On Perception. Review of Metaphysics 24 (4):747-747.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. D. W. Hamlyn (1985). Heil, J., "Perception and Cognition". [REVIEW] Mind 94:297.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Bruce A. Jannusch (1970). A Re-Evaluation of H. H. Price's Theory of Perception. Dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Rasmus Thybo Jensen (2009). Motor Intentionality and the Case of Schneider. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (3):371-388.
    I argue that Merleau-Ponty’s use of the case of Schneider in his arguments for the existence of non-conconceptual and non-representational motor intentionality contains a problematic methodological ambiguity. Motor intentionality is both to be revealed by its perspicuous preservation and by its contrastive impairment in one and the same case. To resolve the resulting contradiction I suggest we emphasize the second of Merleau-Ponty’s two lines of argument. I argue that this interpretation is the one in best accordance both with Merleau-Ponty’s general (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  47. Dima Amso & Johnson & P. Scott (2009). Building Object Knowledge From Perceptual Input. In Bruce M. Hood & Laurie R. Santos (eds.), The Origins of Object Knowledge. OUP Oxford
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Michael Jonik, 'The Maze of Phenomena': Perception and Particular Knowledge in Thoreau's Journal.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Geert Keil (2003). Über den Homunkulus-Fehlschluß. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 57 (1):1 - 26.
    Ein Homunkulus im philosophischen Sprachgebrauch ist eine postulierte menschenähnliche Instanz, die ausdrücklich oder unausdrücklich zur Erklärung der Arbeitsweise des menschlichen Geistes herangezogen wird. Als Homunkulus-Fehlschluß wird die Praxis bezeichnet, Prädikate, die auf kognitive oder perzeptive Leistungen einer ganzen Person zutreffen, auch auf Teile von Personen oder auf subpersonale Vorgänge anzuwenden, was typischerweise zu einem Regreß führt. Der vorliegende Beitrag erörtert den Homunkulus-Fehlschluß zunächst in argumentationstheoretischer Hinsicht und stellt dabei ein Diagnoseschema auf. Dann werden zwei Anwendungsfelder erörtert: Instanzenmodelle der Psyche (Platon, (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. M. Kneale (1953). MONCRIEFF, M. M. - The Clairvoyant Theory of Perception. [REVIEW] Mind 62:279.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 641