Related categories
Subcategories:History/traditions: Philosophical Methods
811 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 811
Material to categorize
  1. Kwame Anthony Appiah (2010). Philosophy in and Out of the Armchair. In T. J. Smiley, Jonathan Lear & Alex Oliver (eds.), The Force of Argument: Essays in Honor of Timothy Smiley. Routledge.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Francisco Valle Arroyo (1980). La Negación En la Psicolingüística Experimental. El Basilisco: Revista de Filosofía, Ciencias Humanas, Teoría de la Ciencia y de la Cultura 9:3-8.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. L. K. B. (1958). Modus Operandi. Review of Metaphysics 11 (3):516-516.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. R. B. (1956). Postulates and Implications. Review of Metaphysics 9 (4):702-702.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. R. J. B. (1967). The Linguistic Turn. Review of Metaphysics 21 (1):170-170.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Margaret Cavendish & Eileen O'neill (2004). Observations Upon Experimental Philosophy. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):175-177.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Jason Costanzo (2013). Philosophical Devices: Proofs, Probabilities, Possibilities, and Sets. Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Metapsychology Online Reviews 17 (30).
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Martin Curd (2013). The Future of Philosophy of Science: Armchair Philosophers Need Not Apply. [REVIEW] Metascience 22 (1):159-164.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. J. T. Desaguliers, William Innys, Thomas Longman, T. Shewell & Charles Hitch (1745). A Course of Experimental Philosophy. Printed for W. Innys, T. Longman and T. Shewell, and C. Hitch, in Pater-Noster Row; and M. Senex, in Fleetstreet.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. J. T. Desaguliers, John Senex, William Innys, Richard Manby & John Osborn (1734). A Course of Experimental Philosophy. Printed for John Senex; W. Innys and Richard Manby; and John Osborn and Thomas Longman.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Sarah J. L. Edwards (2014). Experimental Treatments for Ebola. Research Ethics 10 (3):126-128.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Anton Ford (2015). The Arithmetic of Intention. American Philosophical Quarterly 52 (2):129-143.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. José Fröbes (1945). Tratado de Psicologia Empirica y Experimental. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 1 (2):233-235.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. María G. Navarro (2014). Fotografía de un método. Revista Cronopio 51 (12 june).
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Sandra Harding (1987). The Method Question. Hypatia 2 (3):19 - 35.
    A continuing concern of many feminists and non-feminists alike has been to identify a distinctive feminist method of inquiry. This essay argues that this method question is misguided and should be abandoned. In doing so it takes up the distinctions between and relationships among methods, methodologies and epistemologies; proposes that the concern to identify sources of the power of feminist analyses motivates the method question; and suggests how to pursue this project.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Michael Heyd (1987). The New Experimental Philosophy: A Manifestation of “Enthusiasm” or an Antidote to It? [REVIEW] Minerva 25 (4):423-440.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Henry Jackman, Uncorrected Proof.
    While engaged in the analysis of philosophically central concepts, analytic philosophers have traditionally relied extensively on their own intuitions about when such concepts can be correctly applied. Intuitions have, however, come under increasingly critical scrutiny of late, and if they turned out not to be a reliable tool for the proper analysis of our concepts, then a radical reworking of analytic philosophy’s methodology would be in order. One influential line of criticism against the use of intuition argues that they only (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. W. D. Joske (1961). Intuitions and Objectivity. Philosophy 36 (137):215 - 217.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Joshua Knobe & Erica Preston‐Roedder (2009). The Ordinary Concept of Valuing. Philosophical Issues 19 (1):131-147.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Edouard Machery & Elizabeth O'Neill (eds.) (2014). Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy. Routledge.

    Experimental philosophy is one of the most active and exciting areas in philosophy today. In Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy, Elizabeth O’Neill and Edouard Machery have brought together twelve leading philosophers to debate four topics central to recent research in experimental philosophy. The result is an important and enticing contribution to contemporary philosophy which thoroughly reframes traditional philosophical questions in light of experimental philosophers’ use of empirical research methods, and brings to light the lively debates within experimental philosophers’ intellectual community. (...)

    • Language (Edouard Machery & Genoveva Martí)
    • Consciousness (Brian Fala, Adam Arico, and Shaun Nicols & Justin Sytsma)
    • Free Will and Responsibility (Joshua Knobe & Eddy Nahmias and Morgan Thompson)
    • Epistemology and the Reliability of Intuitions (Kenneth Boyd and Jennifer Nagel & Joshua Alexander and Jonathan Weinberg).

    Preliminary descriptions of each chapter, annotated bibliographies for each controversy, and a supplemental guide to further controversies in experimental philosophy (with bibliographies) help provide clearer and richer views of these live controversies for all readers.

    . (shrink)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Edouard Machery & Elizabeth O'Neill (eds.) (2014). Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy. Routledge.

    Experimental philosophy is one of the most active and exciting areas in philosophy today. In Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy, Elizabeth O’Neill and Edouard Machery have brought together twelve leading philosophers to debate four topics central to recent research in experimental philosophy. The result is an important and enticing contribution to contemporary philosophy which thoroughly reframes traditional philosophical questions in light of experimental philosophers’ use of empirical research methods, and brings to light the lively debates within experimental philosophers’ intellectual community. (...)

    • Language (Edouard Machery & Genoveva Martí)
    • Consciousness (Brian Fala, Adam Arico, and Shaun Nicols & Justin Sytsma)
    • Free Will and Responsibility (Joshua Knobe & Eddy Nahmias and Morgan Thompson)
    • Epistemology and the Reliability of Intuitions (Kenneth Boyd and Jennifer Nagel & Joshua Alexander and Jonathan Weinberg).

    Preliminary descriptions of each chapter, annotated bibliographies for each controversy, and a supplemental guide to further controversies in experimental philosophy (with bibliographies) help provide clearer and richer views of these live controversies for all readers.

    . (shrink)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Peter G. Mantle (2002). Experimental Mycotoxic Nephropathies and Balkan Endemic Nephropathy. Facta Universitatis 9:64-65.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Lydia McGrew (1998). Psychology for Armchair Philosophers. Idealistic Studies 28 (3):145-155.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Matthew E. Moore (2002). Archimedean Intuitions. Theoria 68 (3):185-204.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Allen B. Moran (2011). He Became Poor. Review of Metaphysics 64 (3):634-636.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Émile Namer (1965). Le copernicanisme expérimental de Galilée (I). Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 155:217 - 228.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Émile Namer (1965). Le copernicanisme expérimental de Galilée (II). Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 155:359 - 378.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. C. M. O'H. (1928). Armchair Philosophy. Modern Schoolman 4 (8):137-137.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. José Ortega Y. Gasset (2006). Nueva medicina experimental. Teorema 25 (2):1-8.
    The article focuses on the ideas of psychiatrist Sigmund Freud and his theories and ideas on human thought and desire. It is suggested that even though some consider Freud as a genius regarding ideas of the unconscious mind, others believe that it was just propaganda. Included in the article are opinions on many of Freud's ideas on dreams, personality, conflict, repressions and the unconscious. The author questions whether or not Freud's ideas will continue to be used in science in the (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Marek Pepliński (2014). Filozofowanie a prawda o człowieku. Filo-Sofija 14 (3/26):85-98.
    Philosophizing and the True Knowledge of Human Being -/- The article presents the principles and method of classical philosophy. This kind of philosophy, developed mainly in ancient and medieval times, is still viable and interesting today. What is more important, it can be used as grounds for academic philosophy. Doing so provides a philosopher with resources for autonomy in her philosophical inquiry as well as the usefulness and application of its results for various cultural, social, and political tasks. The last (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Marek Pepliński (2014). Filozofowanie a prawda o człowieku. Filo-Sofija 14 (3/26):85-98.
    Philosophizing and the True Knowledge of Human Being -/- Abstract -/- The article presents the principles and method of classical philosophy. This kind of philosophy, developed mainly in ancient and medieval times, is still viable and interesting today. What is more important, it can be used as grounds for academic philosophy. Doing so provides a philosopher with resources for autonomy in her philosophical inquiry as well as the usefulness and application of its results for various cultural, social, and political tasks. (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Marek Pepliński (2014). Filozofowanie a prawda o człowieku. Filo-Sofija 14 (3/26):85-98.
    Philosophizing and the True Knowledge of Human Being -/- Abstract -/- The article presents the principles and method of classical philosophy. This kind of philosophy, developed mainly in ancient and medieval times, is still viable and interesting today. What is more important, it can be used as grounds for academic philosophy. Doing so provides a philosopher with resources for autonomy in her philosophical inquiry as well as the usefulness and application of its results for various cultural, social, and political tasks. (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Ilídio de Sousa Ribeiro (1955). Curso de Psicologia Experimental. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 11 (1):105-105.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Eleanor Rosch (2000). The Brain Between Two Paradigms: Can Biofunctionalism Join Wisdom Intuitions to Analytic Science? Journal of Mind and Behavior 21 (1-2):189-203.
    Biofunctionalism appears to be a pioneering effort to formulate a portrait of the body&endash;mind which acknowledges intuitions we have about human functioning that go beyond the analytic approach of the cognitive sciences but that can yet remain within the worldview and methods of the analytic portrait. The intuitions are : wholeness, interdependent causality, present temporality, effortless action, realness, panoramic knowing, and value. Such themes are most fully developed in the meditative and contemplative traditions of the world. Biofunctionalism is evaluated both (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. D. Rose (ed.) (forthcoming). Advances in Experimental Philosophy and Metaphysics. Bloomsbury.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Leo S. Schumacher (1952). Philosophy and Experimental Physics: Comment. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 26:61.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Hanna Scolnicov (2012). The Experimental Plays of Harold Pinter. University of Delaware Press.
    Scolnicov highlights Harold Pinter as an experimental playwright who attempted to free the theatre from the legacy of realism, causality, and motivation.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Ernest Sosa (2008). How Are Experiments Relevant to Intuitions? In Joshua Knobe & Shaun Nichols (eds.), Experimental Philosophy. Oup Usa.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. H. Wallach & M. Henle (1941). An Experimental Analysis of the Law of Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology 28 (4):340.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Kenneth R. Westphal (2010-11). ‘Analytic Philosophy and the Long Tail of Scientia: Hegel and the Historicity of Philosophy’. The Owl of Minerva 42 (1-2):1–18.
    Rejection of the philosophical relevance of history of philosophy remains pronounced within contemporary analytic philosophy. The two main reasons for this rejection presuppose that strict deduction is both necessary and sufficient for rational justification. However, this justificatory ideal of scientia holds only within strictly formal domains. This is confirmed by a neglected non-sequitur in van Fraassen’s original defence of ‘Constructive Empiricism’. Conversely, strict deduction is insufficient for rational justification in non-formal, substantive domains of inquiry. In non-formal, substantive domains, rational justification (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
Conceptual Analysis
  1. Felicia Ackerman (1990). Analysis, Language, and Concepts: The Second Paradox of Analysis. Philosophical Perspectives 4:535-543.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Kristoffer Ahlstrom (2009). Intuitions in Epistemology: Towards a Naturalistic Alternative. Studia Philosophica Estonica 2 (2):15-34.
    The present paper revisits the main methodological problems with conceptual analysis and considers two attempts to rectify them in terms of prototypes and reflective equilibria, respectively. Finding both wanting for the purposes of epistemological analysis, a naturalistic alternative is then sketched that explores the positive implications of aforementioned problems for the demarcation of the respective roles of intuitions and empirical investigation within three epistemological domains, viz., the evaluation of epistemological hypotheses, the amelioration of epistemic practices, and the construction of a (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij (2012). Review of Colin McGinn, Truth by Analysis: Games, Names, and Philosophy (OUP 2012). [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Hieke Alexander & Leitgeb Hannes (eds.) (2009). Reduction, Abstraction, Analysis. Ontos Verlag.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. David Plunkett Alexis Burgess (2013). Conceptual Ethics II. Philosophy Compass 8 (12):1102-1110.
    Which concepts should we use to think and talk about the world, and to do all of the other things that mental and linguistic representation facilitates? This is the guiding question of the field that we call ‘conceptual ethics’. Conceptual ethics is not often discussed as its own systematic branch of normative theory. A case can nevertheless be made that the field is already quite active, with contributions coming in from areas as diverse as fundamental metaphysics and social/political philosophy. In (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Torin Alter & Russell Daw (2001). Free Acts and Robot Cats. Philosophical Studies 102 (3):345-57.
    (H1) ‘Free action’ is subject to the causal theory of reference and thus that (H2) The essential nature of free actions can be discovered only by empirical investigation, not by conceptual analysis. Heller’s proposal, if true, would have significant philosophical implications. Consider the enduring issue we will call the Compatibility Issue (hereafter CI): whether the thesis of determinism is logically compatible with the claim that..
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. C. Anthony Anderson (1993). Analyzing Analysis. Philosophical Studies 72 (2-3):199 - 222.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. G. E. M. Anscombe & P. F. Strawson (1994). Analysis and Metaphysics. Philosophical Quarterly 44 (177):528.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Robert Audi (1983). The Applications of Conceptual Analysis. Metaphilosophy 14 (2):87–106.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Magdalena Balcerak Jackson (2013). Conceptual Analysis and Epistemic Progress. Synthese 190 (15):3053-3074.
    This essay concerns the question of how we make genuine epistemic progress through conceptual analysis. Our way into this issue will be through consideration of the paradox of analysis. The paradox challenges us to explain how a given statement can make a substantive contribution to our knowledge, even while it purports merely to make explicit what one’s grasp of the concept under scrutiny consists in. The paradox is often treated primarily as a semantic puzzle. However, in “Sect. 1” I argue (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 811