 | 1 — 100 / 871 |  |
Can Machines Think?
The Turing Test
- Varol Akman & Patrick Blackburn (2000). Editorial: Alan Turing and Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (4):391-395.
- G. Alper (1990). A Psychoanalyst Takes the Turing Test. Psychoanalytic Review 77:59-68.
- John Barresi (1987). Prospects for the Cyberiad: Certain Limits on Human Self-Knowledge in the Cybernetic Age. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 17 (March):19-46.
- Hanoch Ben-Yami (2005). Behaviorism and Psychologism: Why Block's Argument Against Behaviorism is Unsound. Philosophical Psychology 18 (2):179-186.
- Ned Block (1981). Psychologism and Behaviorism. Philosophical Review 90 (1):5-43.
- Paul Richard Blum, Michael Polanyi: Can the Mind Be Represented by a Machine? Existence and Anthropology.
- Selmer Bringsjord (2000). Animals, Zombanimals, and the Total Turing Test: The Essence of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Logic Language and Information 9 (4):397-418.
- Selmer Bringsjord, P. Bello & David A. Ferrucci (2001). Creativity, the Turing Test, and the (Better) Lovelace Test. Minds and Machines 11 (1):3-27.
- Selmer Bringsjord, Clarke Caporale & Ron Noel (2000). Animals, Zombanimals, and the Total Turing Test. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (4).
- Andrew Clifton, Blind Man's Bluff and the Turing Test.
- B. Jack Copeland (2000). The Turing Test. Minds and Machines 10 (4):519-539.
- L. Crockett (1994). The Turing Test and the Frame Problem: AI's Mistaken Understanding of Intelligence. Ablex.
- Dr Louis J. Cutrona, Jr, Zombies in Searle's Chinese Room: Putting the Turing Test to Bed.
- B. Edmonds, The Constructability of Artificial Intelligence (as Defined by the Turing Test).
- Bruce Edmonds (2000). The Constructability of Artificial Intelligence (as Defined by the Turing Test). Journal of Logic Language and Information 9 (4):419-424.
- Gerald J. Erion (2001). The Cartesian Test for Automatism. Minds and Machines 11 (1):29-39.
- Luciano Floridi (2005). Consciousness, Agents and the Knowledge Game. Minds and Machines 15 (3):415-444.
- Luciano Floridi & Mariarosaria Taddeo (2009). Turing's Imitation Game: Still an Impossible Challenge for All Machines and Some Judges––an Evaluation of the 2008 Loebner Contest. Minds and Machines 19 (1).
- Luciano Floridi, Mariarosaria Taddeo & Matteo Turilli (2008). Turing’s Imitation Game: Still an Impossible Challenge for All Machines and Some Judges. Minds and Machines 19 (1):145-150.
- Robert French (2000). The Turing Test: The First Fifty Years. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (3):115-121.
- Robert French (1996). The Inverted Turing Test: How a Mindless Program Could Pass It. Psycoloquy 7 (39).
- Robert M. French (2000). Peeking Behind the Screen: The Unsuspected Power of the Standard Turing Test. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12 (3):331-340.
- Robert M. French (1990). Subcognition and the Limits of the Turing Test. Mind 99 (393):53-66.
- Keith Gunderson (1964). The Imitation Game. Mind 73 (April):234-45.
- Stevan Harnad (2006). The Annotation Game: On Turing (1950) on Computing, Machinery, and Intelligence. In Robert Epstein & G. Peters (eds.), [Book Chapter] (in Press). Kluwer.
- Stevan Harnad (2006). The Annotation Game: On Turing (1950) on Computing, Machinery, and Intelligence. In Robert Epstein & Grace Peters (eds.), [Book Chapter] (in Press). Kluwer.
- Stevan Harnad (1995). Does Mind Piggyback on Robotic and Symbolic Capacity? In H. Morowitz & J. Singer (eds.), The Mind, the Brain, and Complex Adaptive Systems. Addison Wesley.
- Stevan Harnad (1994). Levels of Functional Equivalence in Reverse Bioengineering: The Darwinian Turing Test for Artificial Life. Artificial Life 1 (3):93-301.
- Stevan Harnad (1992). The Turing Test is Not a Trick: Turing Indistinguishability is a Scientific Criterion. 3 (4):9-10.
- Stevan Harnad (1991). Other Bodies, Other Minds: A Machine Incarnation of an Old Philosophical Problem. 1 (1):43-54.
- Stevan Harnad & Itiel Dror (2006). Distributed Cognition: Cognizing, Autonomy and the Turing Test. Pragmatics and Cognition 14 (2):14.
- Larry Hauser (2001). Look Who's Moving the Goal Posts Now. Minds and Machines 11 (1):41-51.
- Larry Hauser (1993). Reaping the Whirlwind: Reply to Harnad's Other Bodies, Other Minds. Minds and Machines 3 (2):219-37.
- Jose Hernandez-Orallo (2000). Beyond the Turing Test. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (4):447-466.
- Dale Jacquette (1993). A Turing Test Conversation. Philosophy 68 (264):231-33.
- Charles Karelis (1986). Reflections on the Turing Test. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 16 (July):161-72.
- Justin Leiber (2006). Turing's Golden: How Well Turing's Work Stands Today. Philosophical Psychology 19 (1):13-46.
- Justin Leiber (2001). Turing and the Fragility and Insubstantiality of Evolutionary Explanations: A Puzzle About the Unity of Alan Turing's Work with Some Larger Implications. Philosophical Psychology 14 (1):83-94.
- Justin Leiber (1995). On Turing's Turing Test and Why the Matter Matters. Synthese 104 (1):59-69.
- Justin Leiber (1989). Shanon on the Turing Test. Journal of Social Behavior 19 (June):257-259.
- Robert S. Lockhart (2000). Modularity, Cognitive Penetrability and the Turing Test. Psycoloquy.
- W. Mays (1952). Can Machines Think? Philosophy 27 (April):148-62.
- Donald Michie (1993). Turing's Test and Conscious Thought. Artificial Intelligence 60:1-22.
- Mary Midgley (1995). Zombies and the Turing Test. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (4):351-352.
- P. Millar (1973). On the Point of the Imitation Game. Mind 82 (October):595-97.
- Peter Millican & A. Clark (1996). Machines and Thought. Oxford University Press.
- Peter Millican & A. Clark (1996). Machines and Thought, The Legacy of Alan Turing. Oup.
- Robert W. Mitchell & James R. Anderson (1998). Primate Theory of Mind is a Turing Test. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):127-128.
- James H. Moor (2001). The Status and Future of the Turing Test. Minds and Machines 11 (1):77-93.
- James H. Moor (1978). Explaining Computer Behavior. Philosophical Studies 34 (October):325-7.
- James H. Moor (1976). An Analysis of the Turing Test. Philosophical Studies 30 (4).
- Shaun Nichols & Stephen P. Stich (1994). Folk Psychology. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science.
- Gualtiero Piccinini (2000). Turing's Rules for the Imitation Game. Minds and Machines 10 (4):573-582.
- R. Purthill (1971). Beating the Imitation Game. Mind 80 (April):290-94.
- William J. Rapaport, Review of The Turing Test: Verbal Behavior As the Hallmark of Intelligence.
- William J. Rapaport (2000). How to Pass a Turing Test: Syntactic Semantics, Natural-Language Understanding, and First-Person Cognition. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 9 (4):467-490.
- William J. Rapaport (2000). How to Pass a Turing Test. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (4).
- Ian Ravenscroft, Folk Psychology as a Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- Robert C. Richardson (1982). Turing Tests for Intelligence: Ned Block's Defense of Psychologism. Philosophical Studies 41 (May):421-6.
- K. A. Mohyeldin Said (1990). Modelling the Mind. Oxford University Press.
- Geoffrey Sampson (1973). In Defence of Turing. Mind 82 (October):592-94.
- Y. Sato & T. Ikegami (2004). Undecidability in the Imitation Game. Minds and Machines 14 (2):133-43.
- A. P. Saygin & I. Cicekli (2000). Turing Test: 50 Years Later. Minds and Machines 10 (4):463-518.
- Ayse P. Saygin, Ilyas Cicekli & Varol Akman (2000). Turing Test: 50 Years Later. Minds and Machines 10 (4):463-518.
- Paul Schweizer (1998). The Truly Total Turing Test. Minds and Machines 8 (2):263-272.
- James F. Sennett, The Ice Man Cometh: Lt. Comander Data and the Turing Test.
- Benny Shanon (1989). A Simple Comment Regarding the Turing Test. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 19 (June):249-56.
- Stuart M. Shieber (2007). The Turing Test as Interactive Proof. Noûs 41 (4):686–713.
- Stuart M. Shieber (2004). The Turing Test: Verbal Behavior As the Hallmark of Intelligence. MIT Press.
- Stuart M. Shieber (1994). Lessons From a Restricted Turing Test. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 37:70-82.
- Douglas F. Stalker (1978). Why Machines Can't Think: A Reply to James Moor. Philosophical Studies 34 (3):317-20.
- Susan G. Sterrett (2002). Nested Algorithms and the Original Imitation Game Test: A Reply to James Moor. Minds and Machines 12 (1):131-136.
- Susan G. Sterrett (2000). Turing's Two Tests for Intelligence. Minds and Machines 10 (4):541-559.
- John G. Stevenson (1976). On the Imitation Game. Philosophia 6 (March):131-33.
- Cristi Stoica, Turing Test, Easy to Pass; Human Mind, Hard to Understand.
- Saul Traiger (2000). Making the Right Identification in the Turing Test. Minds and Machines 10 (4):561-572.
- Alan M. Turing (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind 59 (October):433-60.
- Peter Turney, Answering Subcognitive Turing Test Questions: A Reply to French.
- S. Watt (1996). Naive Psychology and the Inverted Turing Test. Psycoloquy 7 (14).
- Blay Whitby (1996). Why the Turing Test is Ai's Biggest Blind Alley. In Peter Millican & A. Clark (eds.), Machines and Thought, The Legacy of Alan Turing. Oup.
- Sean Zdenek (2001). Passing Loebner's Turing Test: A Case of Conflicting Discourse Functions. Minds and Machines 11 (1):53-76.
Godelian arguments
- Damjan Bojadziev (1997). Mind Versus Godel. In Matjaz Gams & M. Wu Paprzycki (eds.), Mind Versus Computer. IOS Press.
- G. Lee Bowie (1982). Lucas' Number is Finally Up. Journal of Philosophy Logic 11 (August):279-85.
- David L. Boyer (1983). R. Lucas, Kurt Godel, and Fred Astaire. Philosophical Quarterly 33 (April):147-59.
- Selmer Bringsjord & H. Xiao (2000). A Refutation of Penrose's New Godelian Case Against the Computational Conception of Mind. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12.
- Peter Carruthers & Peter K. Smith (1996). Theories of Theories of Mind. Cambridge University Press.
- David J. Chalmers (1996). Minds, Machines, and Mathematics. Psyche 2:11-20.
- C. T. K. Chari (1963). Further Comments on Minds, Machines and Godel. Philosophy 38 (April):175-8.
- C. Chihara (1972). On Alleged Refutations of Mechanism Using Godel's Incompleteness Results. Journal of Philosophy 69 (September):507-26.
- Jack Copeland (1998). Turing's o-Machines, Searle, Penrose, and the Brain. Analysis 58 (2):128-138.
- Daniel C. Dennett (1989). Murmurs in the Cathedral: Review of R. Penrose, The Emperor's New Mind. Times Literary Supplement (September) 29.
- Daniel C. Dennett (1978). Brainstorms. MIT Press.
- Taner Edis (1998). How Godel's Theorem Supports the Possibility of Machine Intelligence. Minds and Machines 8 (2):251-262.
- S. Feferman (1996). Penrose's Godelian Argument. Psyche 2:21-32.
- H. Gaifman (2000). What Godel's Incompleteness Result Does and Does Not Show. Journal of Philosophy 97 (8):462-471.
 | 1 — 100 / 871 |  |
|
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
Email
|
RSS feed
|
|