This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Most recently added entries found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 98
  1. added 2015-05-27
    Gerald Lang (forthcoming). Legitimating Torture? Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-19.
    Steinhoff defends the moral and legal permissibility of torture in a limited range of circumstances. This article criticizes Steinhoff’s arguments. The analogy between ordinary defensive violence and defensive torture which Steinhoff argues for is partly spoiled by the presence, within defensive torture, of opportunistic harm, in addition to eliminative harm. Steinhoff’s arguments that the mere legalization of defensive torture would not metastasize into a more full-fledged institutionalization of torture are also found wanting. As a minimal form of institutionalization, the mere (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. added 2015-05-26
    Emmanuel Melissaris (forthcoming). Posthumous ‘Punishment’: What May Be Done About Criminal Wrongs After the Wrongdoer’s Death? Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-17.
    The commission of criminal wrongs is occasionally revealed after the wrongdoer’s death. In such cases, there seems to be a widely-shared intuition, which also frequently motivates many people’s actions, that the dead should still be blamed and that some response, not only stemming from civil society but also the state, to the criminal wrong is necessary. This article explores the possibility of posthumous blame and punishment by the state. After highlighting the deficiencies of the pure versions of retributivism and general (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. added 2015-05-26
    Alasdair Cochrane (forthcoming). Prison on Appeal: The Idea of Communicative Incarceration. Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-18.
    In the classic abolitionist text, Prison on Trial, Thomas Mathieson argues that imprisonment cannot be justified by appeal to any standard punitive aim: rehabilitation, deterrence, incapacitation, or retribution. The aim of this paper is to give prison an ‘appeal hearing’: to examine whether it can be justified by a set of punitive aims not considered by Mathieson. In particular, it asks whether imprisonment can be justified by the ‘communicative’ theory of punishment proposed by Antony Duff. Duff sees imprisonment as having (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. added 2015-05-25
    Jason Bainbridge (forthcoming). The Call to Do Justice”: Superheroes, Sovereigns and the State During Wartime. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique:1-19.
    This paper maps superheroes as signifiers of substantive justice and their relationship with the state across two Coverian nomoi, World War II and the “war on terror”. It is argued that the central concern of most superhero narratives is justice, exploring both what it means and how it can best be articulated. This “call to do justice” becomes even more important during wartime where superheroes become agitators for cultural change, appropriating the sovereign decision during states of exception even as they (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. added 2015-05-23
    Cesare Pinelli (2015). Machiavelli, Guicciardini and the “Governo Largo. Ratio Juris 28 (2):267-285.
    Niccolò Machiavelli's support for what he calls governo largo, or popular government, is usually contrasted with the diffidence towards it of Francesco Guicciardini, the Florentine aristocrat. The article argues that both these authors grounded their vision on Polybius' theory of “mixed government,” though adapting it in different directions. In examining this difference, the article reaches the conclusion that it concerns far less the degree of popular participation in political decision-making and government than the value that Machiavelli and Guicciardini respectively ascribe (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. added 2015-05-23
    Nicola Riva (2015). Equal Chances and Equal Options: Two Conceptions of Equality of Opportunity. Ratio Juris 28 (2):293-306.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. added 2015-05-23
    Mortimer N. S. Sellers (2015). Niccolò Machiavelli: Father of Modern Constitutionalism. Ratio Juris 28 (2):216-225.
    Niccolò Machiavelli is the father of modern constitutionalism. Constitutionalism began anew in the modern world with the study of the ancient republics and it was Machiavelli who inaugurated this revived science of politics. Five hundred years after the composition of Il Principe and the Discorsi we are still working out the implications of applying reason to the structures of law and government in pursuit of justice and the common good. Modern constitutionalism and ancient republicanism share three central beliefs: first, that (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. added 2015-05-23
    Andreas Follesdal (2015). Machiavelli at 500: From Cynic to Vigilant Supporter of International Law. Ratio Juris 28 (2):242-251.
    Machiavelli's 500-year-old treatise The Prince outlined the central features of the realist tradition in international relations. His premises led him to question the likelihood of efficacious and stable international law and international courts, a skepticism that has present-day proponents. Machiavelli's reluctance was due to a combination of features of human nature and a focus on anarchic features of the relations among states. This article challenges these assumptions and implications: Other interpretations of human nature are closer to Machiavelli's text, and current (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. added 2015-05-23
    James Rocha (2015). The Homophobic Sexual Harassment Claim and Sexuality Discrimination. Ratio Juris 28 (2):204-215.
    In sexual harassment law scholarship, it is often argued that the reasonable person standard should give way to a reasonable victim standard. Yet, this latter standard may unintentionally invite homophobic employees to attempt to use a reasonable homophobe standard to charge gay supervisors with harassment merely for being openly gay at work. In response, I argue that we currently act on an unjustifiable distinction whereby we treat sexuality behavior as necessarily sexualized only for GLBTQ behavior. By disallowing this discriminatory treatment, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. added 2015-05-23
    Benjamin Sachs (2015). The Crime of Self‐Solicitation. Ratio Juris 28 (2):180-203.
    I hold that we could justifiably criminalize some threats, on account of the fact that issuing them renders one more likely to commit a crime. But I also point out that if we criminalize some threat-issuing, we will de facto criminalize some warning-issuing, which is unjust. So we ought not to criminalize any threat-issuing. Instead, we should criminalize rendering oneself more likely to commit a crime. This would allow us to punish all the threat-issuers we should want to punish. It (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. added 2015-05-23
    Marco Geuna (2015). Machiavelli and the Problem of Dictatorship. Ratio Juris 28 (2):226-241.
    Machiavelli is the first modern political thinker who pays great attention to the magistracy of dictatorship. “Dictatorial authority,” as he puts it, is fundamental to the survival and prosperity of republics: It is the magistracy, the “ordinary mode,” to which they turn to deal with “extraordinary accidents,” political and military emergencies. Machiavelli's gaze is cast both on the Ancient and the Modern world: Although he concentrates on the Roman magistracy, he also pays attention to magistracies of the modern world that (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. added 2015-05-23
    Richard L. Lippke (2015). The Presumption of Innocence in the Trial Setting. Ratio Juris 28 (2):159-179.
    The starting frame with which jurors begin trials and the approach which they should take toward the presentation of evidence by the prosecution and defense are distinguished. A robust interpretation of the starting frame, according to which jurors should begin trials by presuming the material innocence of defendants, is defended. Alternative starting frames which are less defendant-friendly are shown to cohere less well with the notion that criminal trials should constitute stern tests of the government's case against those it has (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. added 2015-05-23
    John P. McCormick (2015). Of Tribunes and Tyrants: Machiavelli's Legal and Extra‐Legal Modes for Controlling Elites. Ratio Juris 28 (2):252-266.
    This essay examines the two means by which Machiavelli thought republics could address the political problem of predatory socio-economic elites: Healthy republics, he proposes explicitly, should consistently check the “insolence of the nobles” by establishing constitutional offices like the Roman tribunes of the plebeians; corrupt republics, he suggests more subtly, should completely eliminate overweening oligarchs via the violent actions of a tyrannical individual. Roman-styled tribunes, wielding veto, legislative and accusatory authority, contain the oppressive behavior of socio-economic elites during normal republican (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. added 2015-05-23
    Gilbert E. Plumer (2000). A Review of the LSAT Using Literature on Legal Reasoning. Law School Admission Council Computerized Testing Report 97 (8):1-19.
    Research using current literature on legal reasoning was conducted with the goals of (a) determining what skills are most important in good legal reasoning according to such literature, (b) determining the extent to which existing Law School Admission Test item types and subtypes are designed to assess those skills, and (c) suggesting test specifications or new or refined item types and formats that could be developed in the future to assess any important skills that appear [by (a) and (b)] to (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. added 2015-05-21
    Luis Gómez Romero (forthcoming). The Jurisprudence of Ratatouille: The Rat in the Machine, or, the Equivocal Taste of Égaliberté. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique:1-24.
    This article traces commonalities between the practices of visual animation and modern law through a political and jurisprudential reading of the animated film Ratatouille . It contends that Ratatouille’s treatment of the ontological and anthropological problem of the human soul not only addresses the philosophical complexities inherent to animation, but also the ideological and material conditions that currently govern the practice of égaliberté in contemporary liberal democracies.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. added 2015-05-20
    John Danaher (forthcoming). Common Knowledge, Pragmatic Enrichment and Thin Originalism. Jurisprudence.
    The meaning of an utterance is often enriched by the pragmatic context in which it is uttered. This is because in ordinary conversations we routinely and uncontroversially compress what we say, safe in the knowledge that those interpreting us will “add in” the content we intend to communicate. Does the same thing hold true in the case of legal utterances like “This constitution protects the personal rights of the citizen” or “the parliament shall have the power to lay and collect (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. added 2015-05-20
    Kimberley Brownlee (forthcoming). What’s Virtuous About the Law? Legal Theory:1-17.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. added 2015-05-19
    Ricardo Restrepo Echavarría (2014). Independencia judicial y democracia en Ecuador. In Ricardo Restrep (ed.), Pugna de poderes, crisis orgánica e independencia judicial. IAEN. 121-155.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. added 2015-05-18
    Steven Sverdlik, Deterrent Punishment in Utilitarianism.
    This is a presentation of the utilitarian approach to punishment. It is meant for students. The first section discusses Bentham's psychological hedonism. The second briefly criticizes it. The third section explains abstractly how utilitarianism would determine of the right amount of punishment. The fourth section applies the theory to some cases, and brings out how utilitarianism could favor punishments more or less severe than the lex talionis.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. added 2015-05-14
    Jillian Kramer (forthcoming). Mapping Terra Nullius: Hindmarsh, Wik and Native Title Legislation in Australia. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique:1-22.
    In this paper, I argue that the Hindmarsh and Wik cases stand as crucial case studies that evidence the ongoing production of terra nullius within contemporary Australian contexts. They bring into focus the critical importance the signifiers of property, capitalist ‘productivity’ and legality within the settler-colonial state. Alongside notions of ‘civility,’ discourses surrounding ‘economic productivity’ and ‘equality before the law’ are consistently mobilised in these cases to assert white sovereignty. In contradistinction to the discourses that construct Indigenous people’s relation to (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. added 2015-05-14
    Joshua A. Miller & Daniel Harold Levine (2015). Reprobation as Shared Inquiry: Teaching the Liberal Arts in Prison. Radical Philosophy Review 18 (2).
    Respect for victims requires that we have social systems for punishing and condemning (reproving) serious crimes. But, the conditions of social marginalization and political subordination of the communities from which an overwhelming number of prisoners in the United States come place serious barriers in the face of effective reprobation. Mass incarceration makes this problem worse by disrupting and disrespecting entire communities. While humanities education in the prisons is far from a total solution, it is one way to make reprobation meaningful, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. added 2015-05-11
    Adam Kolber (2014). Will There Be a Neurolaw Revolution? Indiana Law Journal 89:807-845.
    The central debate in the field of neurolaw has focused on two claims. Joshua Greene and Jonathan Cohen argue that we do not have free will and that advances in neuroscience will eventually lead us to stop blaming people for their actions. Stephen Morse, by contrast, argues that we have free will and that the kind of advances Greene and Cohen envision will not and should not affect the law. I argue that neither side has persuasively made the case for (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. added 2015-05-11
    Adam Kolber (2014). Smooth and Bumpy Laws. California Law Review 102:655-690.
    Modest differences in conduct can lead to wildly different legal outcomes. A person deemed slightly negligent when harming another may owe millions of dollars. Had the person been just a bit more cautious, he would owe nothing. Similarly, when self-defense is deemed slightly negligent, a person may spend several years in prison. Had the person been just a bit more cautious, he would have no criminal liability at all. Though the law must draw difficult lines, the lines need not have (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. added 2015-05-11
    Marek Piechowiak (2010). Prawnonaturalny charakter klauzuli dobra wspólnego [Natural–Law Character of a Common Good Claus in the Polish Constitution]. In Agnieszka Choduń & Stanisław Czepita (eds.), W poszukiwaniu dobra wspólnego. Księga jubileuszowa Profesora Macieja Zielińskiego. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. 597-611.
    W NINIEJSZYM opracowaniu analizuję klauzulę dobra wspólnego zawartą w art. 1 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z 2 kwietnia 1997 r., zmierzając do uwyraźnienia, w jakim sensie można mówić o jej prawnonaturalnym charakterze (zatem i do zarysowania możliwych znaczeń zwrotu "prawnonaturalny charakter klauzuli dobra wspólnego") oraz do ujawnienia „momentów" prawnonaturalnych, które mogą wchodzić w grę przy interpretacji tej klauzuli.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. added 2015-05-11
    Marek Piechowiak (2008). Arthur Kaufmann – hermeneutyka prawnicza [Arthur Kaufmann – Legal Hermeneutics]. In Jerzy Zajadło (ed.), Przyszłość dziedzictwa. Robert Alexy, Ralf Dreier, Jürgen Habermas, Otfried Höffe, Arthur Kaufmann, Niklas Luhmann, Otta Weinberger: portrety filozofów prawa. Arche. 135-167.
    Arthura Kaufmanna filozofia prawa wyrasta przede wszystkim z neokantyzmu aksjologicznego reprezentowanego przez „późnego” Gustava Radbrucha, którego uważał on za najważniejszego ze swych nauczycieli, oraz z hermeneutyki filozoficznej Hansa-Georga Gadamera. W późniejszym okresie znaczący wpływ na Kaufmanna wywarł Charles S. Peirce, którego pracami posiłkował się opracowując problematykę analogii (wiążąc ją z opracowanym przez Pierca zagadnieniem abdukcji) oraz ontologii relacji. Niektóre wątki poglądów Kaufmanna nawiązują do egzystencjalizmu Karla Jaspersa oraz antropologii Karla Löwitha. Obecne są także inspiracje tomistyczne i arystotelesowskie. Jest to filozofia (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. added 2015-05-08
    Janny H. C. Leung (forthcoming). Recent Publications Issue 28-3. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique:1-2.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. added 2015-05-04
    Larry Alexander (2014). Hart and Punishment for Negligence. In C. G. Pulman (ed.), Hart on Responsibility.
  28. added 2015-05-04
    Gideon Yaffe (2014). Hart's Choices. In C. G. Pulman (ed.), Hart on Responsibility.
  29. added 2015-05-04
    Erasmus Mayr (2014). Hart, Punishment and Excusing Conditions. In C. G. Pulman (ed.), Hart on Responsibility.
  30. added 2015-05-01
    Christopher Heath Wellman (forthcoming). Procedural Rights. Legal Theory:1-21.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. added 2015-05-01
    Steven Sverdlik (forthcoming). The Permissibility of Deterrence. In Christian Seidel (ed.), Consequentialism: New Directions, New problems? Oxford University Press.
    Many philosophers argue that is morally objectionable in principle to punish people in order to deter others from committing crimes. Such punishment is said to treat the offender simply as a means to benefit others. This Kantian argument rests on a certain reading of the Formula of Humanity. However, the central concept in that formula is not ‘treating a person simply as a means’, but rather ‘treating a person as an end’. This conclusion speaks against the moral principle that Victor (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. added 2015-04-30
    Merten Reglitz (forthcoming). Political Legitimacy Without a (Claim-) Right to Rule. Res Publica:1-17.
    In the contemporary philosophical literature, political legitimacy is often identified with a right to rule. However, this term is problematic. First, if we accept an interest theory of rights, it often remains unclear whose interests justify a right to rule : either the interest of the holders of this right to rule or the interests of those subject to the authority. And second, if we analyse the right to rule in terms of Wesley Hohfeld’s characterization of rights, we find disagreement (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. added 2015-04-27
    Kevin Reuter, Lara Kirfel, Raphael van Riel & Luca Barlassina (2014). The Good, the Bad, and the Timely: How Temporal Order and Moral Judgment Influence Causal Selection. Frontiers in Psychology 5:1-10.
    Causal selection is the cognitive process through which one or more elements in a complex causal structure are singled out as actual causes of a certain effect. In this paper, we report on an experiment in which we investigated the role of moral and temporal factors in causal selection. Our results are as follows. First, when presented with a temporal chain in which two human agents perform the same action one after the other, subjects tend to judge the later agent (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. added 2015-04-26
    Lucas Thorpe (2015). Sayyid Qutb and Aquinas: Liberalism, Natural Law and the Philosophy of Jihad. Heythrop Journal 56 (3).
  35. added 2015-04-25
    Douglas Husak (2014). A Framework for Punishment: What is the Insight of Hart's 'Prolegomenon'? In C. G. Pulman (ed.), Hart on Responsibility.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. added 2015-04-25
    Karin Boxer (2014). Hart's Senses of 'Responsibility'. In C. G. Pulman (ed.), Hart on Responsibility.
  37. added 2015-04-25
    Helen Steward (2014). Causing Things and Doing Things. In C. G. Pulman (ed.), Hart on Responsibility.
  38. added 2015-04-25
    Matthew Matravers & Arina Cocoru (2014). Revisiting the Hart/Wootton Debate on Responsibility. In C. G. Pulman (ed.), Hart on Responsibility.
  39. added 2015-04-25
    Matthew H. Kramer (2014). Legal Responses to Consensual Sexuality Among Adults: Through and Beyond the Harm Principle. In C. G. Pulman (ed.), Hart on Responsibility.
  40. added 2015-04-20
    Marc Herbermann (2014). The Thorny Path to Eternal Peace. E-Logos Electronic Journal for Philosophy (21):1-38.
    The following essay introduces the idea of eternal peace as Immanuel Kant conceptualised it and how it relates to the contemporary global society. Kant's political philosophy still covers a wide range of current issues. He envisioned, for example, „a center of federative union for other States to attach themselves to“ as a precondition for perpetual peace. We can ask in how far the EU can serve as such a role model. Kant firmly believes that a peace guaranteeing federation should consist (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. added 2015-04-18
    Torben Spaak (2015). Realism About the Nature of Law. Ratio Juris 28 (2):n/a-n/a.
    Legal realism comes in two main versions, namely American legal realism and Scandinavian legal realism. In this article, I shall be concerned with the Scandinavian realists, who were naturalists and non-cognitivists, and who maintained that conceptual analysis is a central task of legal philosophers, and that such analysis must proceed in a naturalist, anti-metaphysical spirit. Specifically, I want to consider the commitment to ontological naturalism and non-cognitivism on the part of the Scandinavians and its implications for their view of the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. added 2015-04-18
    Jeffrey J. Rachlinski (2015). Does Empirical Legal Studies Shed More Heat Than Light? The Case of Civil Damage Awards. Ratio Juris 28 (2):n/a-n/a.
    Empirical investigation of legal systems is emerging as a leading trend in both the social sciences and the legal academy in the early twenty-first century. Law reviews are now filled with studies reporting empirical data. Because empirical investigation of law commonly seeks to inform contentious social and political debates, however, its research often fuels more debate than it resolves. Partisans on both sides of contentious issues now cite the same body of research to support their reform efforts. However, social science (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. added 2015-04-17
    Adam Hosein (forthcoming). Freedom, Sex Roles, and Anti-Discrimination Law. Law and Philosophy:1-33.
    In this paper I consider the role of freedom in the justification of prohibitions on discrimination. As a case study, I focus mainly on U.S. constitutional and employment law and, in particular, restrictions on sex-stereotyping. I present a new argument that freedom can play at least some important role in justifying these restrictions. Not just any freedom, I claim: the Millian freedom to challenge existing stereotypes and contribute to social change. This ‘social change account’, I argue, can be a useful (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. added 2015-04-17
    Robert A. Wilson, Eugenics as Wrongful. Eugenics Archives.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. added 2015-04-15
    Benjamin S. Yost (2015). Punishment, Desert, and Equality: A Levinasian Analysis. In Lisa Guenther, Geoffrey Adelsberg & Zeman Scott (eds.), Death and Other Penalties: Philosophy in a Time of Mass Incarceration. Fordham UP.
  46. added 2015-04-14
    Kenneth M. Ehrenberg (2015). Less Evidence, Better Knowledge. McGill Law Journal 60 (2):173-214.
    In his 1827 work Rationale of Judicial Evidence, Jeremy Bentham famously argued against exclusionary rules such as hearsay, preferring a policy of “universal admissibility” unless the declarant is easily available. Bentham’s claim that all relevant evidence should be considered with appropriate instructions to fact finders has been particularly influential among judges, culminating in the “principled approach” to hearsay in Canada articulated in R. v. Khelawon. Furthermore, many scholars attack Bentham’s argument only for ignoring the realities of juror bias, admitting universal (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. added 2015-04-13
    Paolo Silvestri (2008). Il normativo nell’homo œconomicus, il normativo dell’homo œconomicus [The normative in the homo oeconomicus, the normative of the homo oeconomicus]. In Enzo Di Nuoscio & Paolo Heritier (eds.), Le culture di Babele. Saggi di antropologia filosofico-giuridica. Medusa. 173-192.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. added 2015-04-11
    Samantha Besson (2015). International Law's Relative Authority: A Review of Nicole Roughan, Authorities: Conflicts, Cooperation, and Transnational Legal Theory. [REVIEW] Jurisprudence 6 (1):169-176.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. added 2015-04-11
    Mark Greenberg (2015). Explaining the Asymmetry Between Mistakes of Law and Mistakes of Fact. Jurisprudence 6 (1):95-111.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. added 2015-04-11
    Bernd Ludwig (2015). Sympathy for the Devil? Personality and Legal Coercion in Kant's Doctrine of Law. Jurisprudence 6 (1):25-44.
    The central concept in Kant's Doctrine of Law is the concept of a person . This very concept is intimately connected with Kant's theory of transcendental freedom and thus with his Transcendental Idealism. Hence the conceptual framework of the Doctrine of Law and with it the 'Universal Principle of Right' are inseparably connected to Kant's critical moral philosophy and require especially the moral law as their foundation. But nevertheless this does not entail that legal coercion requires the personality of those (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 98