This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
138 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 138
  1. Hans Aarsleff (1982). From Locke to Saussure Essays on the Study of Language and Intellectual History. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  2. Hans Aarsleff (1975). Schulenburg's Leibniz Als Sprachforscher, with Some Observations on Leibniz and the Study of Language. Studia Leibnitiana 7 (1):122 - 134.
    This book is the best and most comprehensive treatment we have of Leibniz' study of natural languages, on the same high level of scholarship, knowledge, and insight as the essay Sigrid von der Schulenburg published in 1937. With its rich detail and source references, it is indispensable both to Leibniz scholars and to students of the history of the study of language. The editor's careful indices make it possible to use the book also as a work of reference. The reviewer (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. B. Abbott & L. Hauser, Realism, Model Theory, and Linguistic Semantics.
    George Lakoff (in his book Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things(1987) and the paper "Cognitive semantics" (1988)) champions some radical foundational views. Strikingly, Lakoff opposes realism as a metaphysical position, favoring instead some supposedly mild form of idealism such as that recently espoused by Hilary Putnam, going under the name "internal realism." For what he takes to be connected reasons, Lakoff also rejects truth conditional model-theoretic semantics for natural language. This paper examines an argument, given by Lakoff, against realism and MTS. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. E. Agazzi (1985). R. Raggiunti, "Presupposti filosofici della linguistica di Chomsky". [REVIEW] Epistemologia 8 (2):351.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Guillermo Quintás Alonso (1971). Lingüística Cartesiana, de N. Chomsky. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):159-161.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Simone Aurora (2015). A Forgotten Source in the History of Linguistics: Husserl's Logical Investigations. Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique 11 (5).
    In appearance, Husserl’s writings seem not to have had any influence on linguistic research, nor does what the German philosopher wrote about language seem to be worth a place in the history of linguistics. The purpose of the paper is exactly to contrast this view, by reassessing both the position and the role of Husserl’s early masterpiece — the Logical Investigations — within the history of linguistics. To this end, I will focus mainly on the third (On the theory of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Jody Azzouni (2013). Inconsistency in Natural Languages. Synthese 190 (15):3175-3184.
    An argument for Trivialism, the view that natural languages are logically inconsistent, is provided that does not rely on contentious empirical assumptions about natural language terms such as “and” or “or.” Further, the view is defended against an important objection recently mounted against it by Thomas Hofweber.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Emmon Bach & Wynn Chao (2012). The Metaphysics of Natural Language (S). In Ruth M. Kempson, Tim Fernando & Nicholas Asher (eds.), Philosophy of Linguistics. North Holland 175.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Alex Barber (2008). Sentence Realization Again. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):233-240.
    Against criticism from Georges Rey I defend both my earlier account of sentence realization and my objection to his own ‘folie-a-deux’ account. The latter has two components, one sceptical (sentences and other standard linguistic entities are rarely if ever realized [‘produced’, ‘tokened’, ‘uttered’]) and the other optimistic (this is a benign outcome since communication is unaffected by our being mistaken in assuming that they are realized). Both components are flawed, notwithstanding Rey’s defence. My non-sceptical account of sentence realization avoids the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10. Alex Barber (ed.) (2005). Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Elsevier.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Alex Barber & Robert Stainton (eds.) (2009). Concise Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Language and Linguistics. Elsevier.
    [Publisher's description] -/- * Authoritative review of this dynamic field placed in an interdisciplinary context * Approximately 175 articles by leaders in the field * Compact and affordable single-volume format -/- The application of philosophy to language study, and language study to philosophy, has experienced demonstrable intellectual growth and diversification in recent decades. This work comprehensively analyzes and evaluates many of the most interesting facets of this vibrant field. An edited collection of articles taken from the award-winning Encyclopedia of Language (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Edison Barrios (2012). Linguistic Knowledge and Cognitive Integration. Critica 44 (130):35-67.
    Según la Propositional Attitude View (PAV), un hablante es competente en su idioma en virtud de poseer actitudes proposicionales cuyo contenido es su gramática interna. En este artículo desarrollo una objeción a PAV, llamada �el reto de la integración�, originalmente propuesto por Stich (1978) y Evans (1981), y que está constituido por dos premisas: (1) las actitudes proposicionales se caracterizan por su integración inferencial, y (2) los estados que contienen información gramatical no están inferencialmente integrados. En este artículo considero y (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. K. Jon Barwise & Richmond H. Thomason (1988). Logic and Linguistics Meeting, Stanford, 1987. Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (4):1275-1282.
  14. John T. Bendor-Samuel (2006). Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero (2006). Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Harry M. Bracken (1970). Chomsky's Language and Mind. Dialogue 9 (2):236-247.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Sylvain Bromberger (1993). On What We Know We Don't Know: Explanation, Theory, Linguistics, and How Questions Shape Them. University of Chicago Press.
    In this collection of essays, Bromberger explores the centrality of questions and predicaments they create in scientific research. He discusses the nature of explanation, theory, and the foundations of linguistics.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  18. Mario Bunge (1984). Philosophical Problems in Linguistics. Erkenntnis 21 (2):107-173.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Deborah Cameron (1985). Feminism and Linguistic Theory. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  20. Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jefery Pelletier (2000). Philosophy and Linguistics K. Murasugi and R. Stainton, Editors Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998, Ix + 285 Pp., $65.00. [REVIEW] Dialogue 39 (03):605-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Rudolf Carnap (1959). E. Relations Between Semantics and Syntax. In Introduction to Semantics and Formalization of Logic. Harvard University Press 202-228.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Robyn Carston & Diane Blakemore, Introduction: Neil Smith's Linguistics.
    Neil Smith has worked across the full range of the discipline of linguistics and explored its interfaces with other disciplines. In all this work he has maintained a commitment to a mentalist approach to the study of language and communication. The aim of this Special Issue is to honour his work and commitment with a collection of papers which brings together work by phonologists, syntacticians, psycholinguists, and pragmatists who share this interest in language as a central component of the human (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Siobhan Chapman (2000). Philosophy for Linguists: An Introduction. Routledge.
    Philosophy for Linguists provides students with a clear, concise introduction to the main topics in the philosophy of language. Focusing on what linguists need to know and how philosophy relates to modern linguistics, the book is structured around key branches of linguistics: semantics, pragmatics, and language acquisition. Assuming no prior knowledge of philosophy, Siobhan Chapman traces the history and development of ideas in the philosophy of language and outlines the contributions of specific philosophers. The book is highly accessible and includes: (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Nick Chater & Morten H. Christiansen (2007). Two Views of Simplicity in Linguistic Theory: Which Connects Better with Cognitive Science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (8):324-326.
  25. John Collins (2014). Representations Without Representa: Content and Illusion in Linguistic Theory. In Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Semantics and Beyond: Philosophical and Linguistic Inquiries. De Gruyter 27-64.
  26. John Collins (2013). The Philosophy of Generative Linguistics, by Peter Ludlow. Mind 122 (488):1150-1156.
  27. John Collins (2007). Review of Devitt 2006b. [REVIEW] Mind 116:416-23.
  28. John Collins, Robert J. Matthews, Barry C. Smith & Brian Epstein (2008). Philosophy of Linguistics. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (22).
  29. James W. Common (1970). II. Categories, Grammar, and Semantics. Inquiry 13 (1-4):297-307.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Adam M. Croom (2013). How to Do Things with Slurs: Studies in the Way of Derogatory Words. Language and Communication 33:177-204.
    This article provides an original account of slurs and how they may be differentially used by in-group and out-group speakers. Slurs are first distinguished from other terms and their role in social interaction is discussed. A new distinction is introduced between three different uses of slurs : the paradigmatic derogatory use, non-paradigmatic derogatory use, and non-paradigmatic non-derogatory use. I then account for their literal meaning and explain how a family-resemblance conception of category membership can clarify our understanding of the various (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31. Elena Clare Cuffari, Ezequiel Di Paolo & Hanne De Jaegher (2015). From Participatory Sense-Making to Language: There and Back Again. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14 (4):1089-1125.
    The enactive approach to cognition distinctively emphasizes autonomy, adaptivity, agency, meaning, experience, and interaction. Taken together, these principles can provide the new sciences of language with a comprehensive philosophical framework: languaging as adaptive social sense-making. This is a refinement and advancement on Maturana’s idea of languaging as a manner of living. Overcoming limitations in Maturana’s initial formulation of languaging is one of three motivations for this paper. Another is to give a response to skeptics who challenge enactivism to connect “lower-level” (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  32. D. D. Buzzetti & M. Ferriani (eds.) (1987). Speculative Grammar, Universal Grammar, and Philosophical Analysis of Language. John Benjamins.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Marcel Danesi (1992). The Sapirean Paradigm in Linguistics. New Vico Studies 10:53-63.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. A. Das Gupta (1984). An Ambiguity in the Paradigm: A Critique of Cartesian Linguistics. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 14 (3):351-366.
  35. Marcelo Dascal (1971). About the Idea of a Generative Grammar in Leibniz. Studia Leibnitiana 3 (4):272 - 290.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Hayley G. Davis (2003). Rethinking Linguistics. Routledgecurzon.
    This book deals with the need to rethink the aims and methods of contemporary linguistics. Orthodox linguists' discussions of linguistic form fail to exemplify how language users become language makers. Integrationist theory is used here as a solution to this basic problem within general linguistics. The book is aimed at an interdisciplinary readership, comprising those engaged in study, teaching and research in the humanities and social sciences, including linguistics, philosophy, sociology and psychology.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Géraud de Cordemoy (1972). A Philosophicall Discourse Concerning Speech and a Discourse Written to a Learned Friar by Gerauld de Cordemoy. Scholars Facsimiles & Reprints.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Florian Demont-Biaggi (2014). Rules and Dispositions in Language Use. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Human language is not arbitrary. But how is its use constrained? Are there rules or general human dispositions that govern it? Rules and Dispositions in Language Use explains how correct language use is indeed governed by both rules and general human dispositions. It does so by bringing together themes from Ludwig Wittgenstein and Noam Chomsky, which for many years have been thought to be incompatible. -/- Opening with a fresh discussion of Saul Kripke's work on rule-following and meaning, the question (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Dave Elder‐Vass (2014). Debate: Seven Ways to Be A Realist About Language. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 44 (3):249-267.
    There are many differing ways to be a realist about language. This paper seeks to classify some of these and to examine the implications of each for the study of language. The principle of classification it adopts is that we may distinguish between realisms on the basis of what exactly it is that they take to be real. Examining in turn realisms that ascribe reality to the external world in general, to causal mechanisms, to innate capacities, to linguistic signs, to (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40. Brian Epstein (2008). The Internal and the External in Linguistic Explanation. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (22):77-111.
    Chomsky and others have denied the relevance of external linguistic entities, such as E-languages, to linguistic explanation, and have questioned their coherence altogether. I discuss a new approach to understanding the nature of linguistic entities, focusing in particular on making sense of the varieties of kinds of “words” that are employed in linguistic theorizing. This treatment of linguistic entities in general is applied to constructing an understanding of external linguistic entities.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Maite Ezcurida, Robert J. Stainton & Christopher Viger (eds.) (2005). New Essays in the Philosophy of Language of Mind. University of Calgary Press.
    This volume contains fourteen essays discussing recent issues in the philosophy of language and the philosophy of mind. The collection is arranged into three sections: one on language, one on the intersection of language and mind, and a final section on mind. The topics include the context-sensitivity of semantics, anaphora, proper names, the nature of understanding, folk psychology and the Theory of Mind, self-awareness, the structure of the human mind and the extent to which it is modular, among others.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. L. Fontainedevisscher (1988). Linguistics and the Human-Sciences-Redefining Linguistics with Hagege, Claude. Revue Philosophique De Louvain 86 (71):378-392.
  43. Lia Formigari (1985). Militant Linguistics and Philosophy of Reforms in Italy. Topoi 4 (2):207-213.
    Theory of language is an important factor in the plans of political and educational reform drawn by Italian philosophers of the eighteenth century. Analysis of language is a technique they often resort to when discussing the foundations of political philosophy and the ways and means of social communication. Interesting suggestions concerning philosophy of language can be found in the works of writers on political economy and philosophy of jurisprudence (Antonio Genovesi, Gaetano Filangieri, Cesare Beccaria, Melchiorre Gioia, Gian Domenico Romagnosi, among (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Bruce W. Fraser (2001). Syntax, Semantics, and the Justification of Linguistic Methodology: An Investigation Into the Source and Nature of the Disagreement Between Noam Chomsky and W. V. O. Quine. [REVIEW] Dissertation, Boston University
    This study investigates the ways in which Noam Chomsky and W. V. O. Quine view the relationship between formal grammars and natural languages, how their respective philosophical commitments shape their views, and whether or not we, their readers, have a basis for adjudicating between differences of opinion about the nature of grammar. I first argue that a popular reading of Quine's position which turns on his allegiance to behaviorism is problematic and based on a misconception. Quine's behaviorism must be distinguished (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Bruce Freed (1987). Fred D'Agostino, Chomsky's System of Ideas. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 7:394-396.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Riccardo Fusaroli & Kristian Tylen (2012). Carving Language for Social Coordination: A Dynamical Approach. Interaction Studies 13 (1):103-124.
    Human social coordination is often mediated by language. Through verbal dialogue, people direct each other's attention to properties of their shared environment, they discuss how to jointly solve problems, share their introspections, and distribute roles and assignments. In this article, we propose a dynamical framework for the study of the coordinative role of language. Based on a review of a number of recent experimental studies, we argue that shared symbolic patterns emerge and stabilize through a process of local reciprocal linguistic (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  47. G. (1976). Noam Chomsky: A Philosophic Overview. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 30 (2):349-350.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Leon Galis (1966). The 'Rules of Use' Theory as a Semantic Theory of Meaning. Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. J. Garcia Cafarena (1977). Improntas Filosoficas En la Lingüistica de Noam Chomsky y Su Concepcion Del Uso Creativo Del Lenguaje. Humanitas. Anuario Del Centro de Estudios Humanisticos Mexico 18:227-241.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Brendan S. Gillon (2007). Pāṇini's Aṣṭādhyāyī and Linguistic Theory. Journal of Indian Philosophy 35 (5-6):445-468.
1 — 50 / 138