This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
133 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 133
  1. Sybol Anderson (2012). Heikki Ikäheimo and Arto Laitinen (Eds), Recognition and Social Ontology. Critical Horizons 13 (1):134 - 137.
    Heikki Ikäheimo and Arto Laitinen (eds), Recognition and Social Ontology Content Type Journal Article Category Book Review Pages 134-137 Authors Sybol Cook Anderson, St. Mary's College of Maryland, USA Journal Critical Horizons: A Journal of Philosophy & Social Theory Online ISSN 1568-5160 Print ISSN 1440-9917 Journal Volume Volume 13 Journal Issue Volume 13, Number 1 / 2012.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Sybol Cook Anderson (2012). Heikki Ikäheimo and Arto Laitinen (Eds), Recognition and Social Ontology (Leiden, EJ Brill, 2011), ISBN 978-90-04-20290-0 (Hbk), 398 Pp. US $182.00. [REVIEW] Critical Horizons 13 (1):134-137.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Caroline T. Arruda (2016). What We Can Intend: Recognition and Collective Intentionality. Southern Journal of Philosophy 54 (1):5-26.
    The concept of recognition has played a role in two debates. In political philosophy, it is part of a communitarian response to liberal theories of distributive justice. It describes what it means to respect others’ right to self-determination. In ethics, Stephen Darwall argues that it comprises our judgment that we owe others moral consideration. I present a competing account of recognition on the grounds that most accounts answer the question of why others deserve recognition without answering the question of what (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Simone Aurora (2014). Territory and Subjectivity: The Philosophical Nomadism of Deleuze and Canetti. Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 18:01-26.
    The paper’s purpose consists in pointing out the importance of the notion of “territory”, in its different accepted meanings, for the development of a theory and a practice of subjectivity both in deleuzean and canettian thought. Even though they start from very different perspectives and epistemic levels, they indeed produce similar philosophical effects, which strengthen their “common” view and the model of subjectivity they try to shape. More precisely, the paper focuses on the deleuzean triad of territorialisation, deterritorialisation, reterritorialisation, with (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Jordan Bartol (2008). Is Intercultural Critique Possible?: An Examination of Recognition Theory. Lyceum 10.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Z. Bauman (2001). The Great War of Recognition. Theory, Culture and Society 18 (2-3):137-150.
    With the removal of the ‘final state’ vision from the perception of historical process recasts the coexistence of differences as a perpetual condition of modernity. Given that ‘difference’ masks all too often inequality, perpetuity of the ‘wars of recognition’ is therefore a likely prospect, since the instability of all extant and emerging power settings triggers reconnaissance-through-battle. The politics of recognition, though, tends to be viewed and practiced, wrongly, as an alternative rather than complement of distributive justice, thereby inflaming rather than (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Noell Birondo (2016). Review of Cillian McBride, Recognition. [REVIEW] Studies in Social and Political Thought 25:260-264.
    It is a personal matter, a point of autobiography, but it illustrates something that beats in the heart of Cillian McBride’s compact and quietly ambitious book, that I cannot myself choose to value, that I cannot myself choose to esteem, racial or homophobic bigotry. Hence bigots cannot justifiably demand that I recognize the alleged value of their bigotry; nor can they demand such recognition from society more generally, esteem being tied in this way to sincere evaluation. Although a failure to (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. A. Brinton (2012). Association and Recognition in Authoritarian Societies: A Theoretical Beginning. European Journal of Political Theory 11 (3):324-347.
    This paper presents a theoretical sketch for how the existence of civic associations in authoritarian regimes might be analysed. By relating the concepts of ‘civil society’ and ‘recognition’, I explore how associations are a potential locus of mutual recognition in any society, democratic or undemocratic. While there are many theorizations of both civil society and recognition in relation to democratic political contexts, normative theories seeking to explain the existence of associations in authoritarian societies are less robustly developed. Recognition, more specifically (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Dipesh Chakrabarty (2007). History and the Politics of Recognition. In Keith Jenkins, Sue Morgan & Alun Munslow (eds.), Manifestos for History. Routledge
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Francesco Chiesa & Enzo Rossi (forthcoming). Contested Identities and Spatial Marginalization: The Case of Roma and Gypsy-Travelers in Wales. In Stefano Moroni & David Weberman (eds.), Space and Pluralism.
    In this paper we analyse the connection between the contested ethno-cultural labelling of Gipsy-Travellers in Wales and their position of social marginalisation, with special reference to spatial issues, such as the provision of campsites and public housing. Our main aim is to show how the formal and informal (mis)labelling of minority groups leads to a number of morally and politically questionable outcomes in their treatment on the part of political authorities. Our approach combines a close reading of official policy documents, (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Will Colish (2009). Doing Justice To Recognition. Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 4 (2):4-15.
    The traditional role of justice is to arbitrate where the good will of people is not enough, if even present, to settle a dispute between the concerned parties. It is a procedural approach that assumes a fractured relationship between those involved. Recognition, at first glance, would not seem to mirror these aspects of justice. Yet recognition is very much a subject of justice these days. The aim of this paper is to question the applicability of justice to the practice of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Rory J. Conces (2007). The Role of the Hyperintellectual in Civil Society Building and Democratization in the Balkans. Studies in East European Thought 59 (3):195-214.
  13. Julie Connolly (2010). Love in the Private: Axel Honneth, Feminism and the Politics of Recognition. Contemporary Political Theory 9 (4):414-433.
    Axel Honneth distinguishes between recognitive practices according to the social domain in which they occur and this allows him to theorise the relationship between power and recognition. 'Love-based recognition', which suggests the centrality of recognition to the relationships that nurture us in the first instance, is located in the family. Honneth argues that relationships encompassed by this category are pre-political, thereby repeating the distinction between the public and the private common to much political theory. This article explores the structure of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Maeve Cooke (1997). Authenticity and Autonomy: Taylor, Habermas, and the Politics of Recognition. Political Theory 25 (2):258-288.
  15. Rosemary J. Coombe (1993). Tactics of Appropriation and the Politics of Recognition in Late Modern Democracies. Political Theory 21 (3):411-433.
  16. Glen S. Coulthard (2007). Subjects of Empire: Indigenous Peoples and the |[Lsquo]|Politics of Recognition|[Rsquo]| in Canada. Contemporary Political Theory 6 (4):437.
    Over the last 30 years, the self-determination efforts and objectives of Indigenous peoples in Canada have increasingly been cast in the language of 'recognition' — recognition of cultural distinctiveness, recognition of an inherent right to self-government, recognition of state treaty obligations, and so on. In addition, the last 15 years have witnessed a proliferation of theoretical work aimed at fleshing out the ethical, legal and political significance of these types of claims. Subsequently, 'recognition' has now come to occupy a central (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  17. Harry Coverston (2008). Commentary On Nancy Nicol's 'Politics Of The Heart: Recognition Of Homoparental Families'. Florida Philosophical Review 1 (1):164-169.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Ruth Cox (2010). Simon Thompson, The Political Theory of Recognition: A Critical Introduction (Cambridge: Polity, 2006), Paperback, Isbn 9780745627625, 256 Pages, $22.95/£16.99/A$55.95. [REVIEW] Critical Horizons 8 (1).
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Simon Cushing (2007). Reaching for My Gun: Why We Shouldn't Hear the Word "Culture" in Normative Political Theory. 1st Global Conference: Multiculturalism, Conflict and Belonging.
    Culture is a notoriously elusive concept. This fact has done nothing to hinder its popularity in contemporary analytic political philosophy among writers like John Rawls, Will Kymlicka, Michael Walzer, David Miller, Iris Marion Young, Joseph Raz, Avishai Margalit and Bikhu Parekh, among many others. However, this should stop, both for the metaphysical reason that the concept of culture, like that of race, is itself either incoherent or lacking a referent in reality, and for several normative reasons. I focus on the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Kevin S. Decker (2012). Perspectives and Ideologies: A Pragmatic Use for Recognition Theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (2):215-226.
    ‘Recognition’ is a normative concept denoting the ascription of positive status to a group or an individual by (an) other(s). In its larger meaning, it carries the implication that when a group or an individual can justifiably expect such a positive status-ascription, its denial (misrecognition) is unjustified and unethical. I discuss the role that the concept of recognition can play at the intersection of two philosophies, pragmatism and contemporary critical theory. My perspective is one that embraces the ‘pragmatic turn’ in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Jean-Philippe Deranty (2006). Repressed Materiality: Retrieving the Materialism in Axel Honneth's Theory of Recognition. Critical Horizons 7 (1):113-140.
    The origins of Axel Honneth's theory of recognition lie in his earlier project to correct the conceptual confusions and empirical shortcomings of historical materialism for the purpose of an adequate post-Habermasian critical social theory. Honneth proposed to accomplish this project, most strikingly, by reconnecting critical social theory with one of its repressed philosophical sources, namely anthropological materialism. In its mature shape, however, recognition theory operates on a narrow concept of interaction, which seems to lose sight of the material mediations with (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Linda Timmel Duchamp (1988). Desperately Seeking Approval: The Importance of Distinguishing Between Approval and Recognition. Hypatia 3 (2):163 - 164.
    Victoria Davion confuses seeking approval with the desire for recognition of and respect for one's difference. Ironically, when she asserts that the desire to please others provides an incentive to do well (and thus constitutes a positive aspect of competition) Davion undermines her argument that competition enhances one's sense of self. Rather than enhancing one's sense of self, striving to win approval from others sabotages one's ability to rely on her own judgment and take moral responsibility for herself.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23. Carolin Emcke (2000). Between Choice and Coercion: Identities, Injuries, and Different Forms of Recognition. Constellations 7 (4):483-495.
  24. Matt Ferkany (2009). Recognition, Attachment, and the Social Bases of Self-Worth. Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (3):263-283.
    Recognition theorists have claimed that a culturally egalitarian societal environment is a crucial social basis of a sense of self-worth. In doing so they have often drawn on noncogntivist social-psychological theorizing. This paper argues that this theorizing does not support the recognition theorist's position. It is argued that attachment theory, together with recent empirical evidence, support a more limited vision of self-worth's social bases according to which associational ties, basic rights and liberties, and economic and educational opportunity are what really (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Estelle Ferrarese (2009). "Gabba-Gabba, We Accept You, One of Us": Vulnerability and Power in the Relationship of Recognition. Constellations 16 (4):604-614.
    No Current Hegelian theories of recognition assume a concept of the subject as always being available for harming. This emphasis placed on vulnerability, whose validity is not being called into question as such here, leave a certain number of elements on the nature of the harm threatening the person expecting recognition unclarified, especially the fact that it cannot be perpetrated without the victim being aware. At the same time, it fails to address the nature of the relationship of recognition, omitting (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26. Rainer Forst (2007). First Things First Redistribution, Recognition and Justification. European Journal of Political Theory 6 (3):291-304.
    This article analyses the debate between Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth in a dialectical fashion. Their controversy about how to construct a critical theory of justice is not just one about the proper balance between `redistribution' and `recognition', it also involves basic questions of social ontology. Differing both from Fraser's `twodimensional' view of `participatory parity' and from Honneth's `monistic' theory of recognition, the article argues for a third view of `justificatory monism and diagnosticevaluative pluralism', also called the `first-things-first' approach. According (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  27. Nancy Fraser (2005). Mapping the Feminist Imagination:From Redistribution to Recognition to Representation. Constellations 12 (3):295-307.
  28. Nancy Fraser (2000). Why Overcoming Prejudice is Not Enough: A Rejoinder to Richard Rorty. Critical Horizons 1 (1):21-28.
    Misrecognition, taken seriously as unjust social subordination, cannot be remedied by eliminating prejudice alone. In this rejoinder to Richard Rorty, it is argued that a politics of recognition and a politics of redistribution can and should be combined. However, an identity politics that displaces redistribution and reifies group differences is deeply flawed. Here, instead, an alternative 'status' model of recognition politics is offered that encourages struggles to overcome status subordination and fosters parity of participation. Integrating this politics of recognition with (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Lauren Freeman (2009). Recognition Reconsidered: A Re-Reading of Heidegger’s Being and Time §26. Philosophy Today 53 (1):85-89.
    This article argues that notwithstanding Martin Heidegger’s explicit intentions to the contrary, his existential analysis in Being and Time provides more than the mere conditions for the possibility of ethics. More specifically, Heidegger’s account of solicitude, where he distinguishes between leaping in for and leaping ahead of the other, can be read as an account of recognition that has normative implications. This account is developed in light of both Charles Taylor and Axel Honneth’s positions on recognition. It is concluded that (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30. Dustin Garlitz (2015). Cultural Studies. In Janet M. Bennett (ed.), The Sage Encyclopedia of Intercultural Competence. Sage
  31. Louis Groarke (1999). The Politics of Recognition and the Master State: Taylor and de Koninck on the Canadian Federation. Maritain Studies/Etudes Maritainiennes 15.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Fuat Gursozlu (2013). The Multicultural Mystique: The Liberal Case Against Diversity, by H. E. Baber. Teaching Philosophy 36 (3):300-303.
  33. Matthew Hann (2011). Rights, Race, and Recognition. Contemporary Political Theory 10 (1):129.
  34. Ejvind Hansen (2010). Recognition as a Reference Point for a Concept of Progress in Critical Theory. Critical Horizons 10 (1):99-117.
    In this paper I discuss the recent attempt of Axel Honneth of establishing a robust notion of progress through reference to recognitive structures. I claim that two strategies can be found in his writings for founding such a claim. On the one hand he tries to found the notion of progress on how differentiated the recognitive structures are. On the other hand he tries to found it on certain empirically revealed anthropological and psychological constants. I argue that both strategies fail. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Mark Hardy (2013). Equality and Diversity: Value Incommensurability and the Politics of Recognition. Ethics and Social Welfare 7 (1):104-106.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Benjamin Harrison & Roger Fuller (forthcoming). Recognition and Redistribution. Critical Review.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Volker Heins (2010). Of Persons and Peoples: Internationalizing the Critical Theory of Recognition. Contemporary Political Theory 9 (2):149.
    Although Axel Honneth's critical theory of recognition continues to resonate among political theorists, its relationship to the debate on political and moral cosmopolitanism remains unclear. The paper aims to fill this gap by defining a few guideposts to a ‘recognition-theoretical’ conception of the international. My argument is that Honneth's theory oscillates between a liberal-cosmopolitan model of the global spread of human rights and an alternative model that is closer to the anti-cosmopolitanism of the late Rawls. Both models reflect certain assumptions (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Volker Heins (2009). The Place of Property in the Politics of Recognition. Constellations 16 (4):579-592.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Steffen Herrmann (2011). Anerkennung von Alteritat. [REVIEW] Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie 36 (1):107-116.
    Buchbesprechung: Steffen K. Herrmann: Anerkennung von Alterität (zu Thomas Bedorf, Verkennende Anerkennung. Über Identität und Politik).
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Bonnie Honig (2011). "[Un]Dazzled by the Ideal?": Tully's Politics and Humanism in Tragic Perspective. Political Theory 39 (1):138-144.
  41. Axel Honneth (2006). The Work of Negativity - a Psychoanalytical Revision of the Theory of Recognition. Critical Horizons 7 (1):101-111.
    This paper pursues two questions derived from psychoanalysis that are central to the theory of recognition: must the image or force of negativity classically derived from Freud necessarily be thought of as an elementary component of human beings equipped with drives? Or, can this image or force of negativity be conceptualised as an unavoidable result of the unfolding processes of internalised socialisation? The first question is pursued in a consideration of its legacy for the older representatives of the Frankfurt School, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Axel Honneth (2001). Recognition: Invisibility: On the Epistemology of 'Recognition': Axel Honneth. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75 (1):111–126.
  43. Axel Honneth (1992). Integrity and Disrespect: Principles of a Conception of Morality Based on the Theory of Recognition. Political Theory 20 (2):187-201.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  44. Axel Honneth & Titus Stahl (2013). Wandel der Anerkennung. Überlegungen Aus Gerechtigkeitstheoretischer Perspektive. In Axel Honneth, Ophelia Lindemann & Stephan Voswinkel (eds.), Strukturwandel der Anerkennung. Campus
    How are changes in the social order of recognition to be evaluated normatively? We argue that the conventional means of liberal philosophical theories of justice are insufficient to answer this question. This is for three reasons: First, relations of recognition are neither basic rights nor distributable goods, but rather constitutive for the meaning of those rights and goods which constitute the object domain of distributive theories of justice. Second, relations of recognition provide the framework for many questions of justice, outside (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Kimberly Hutchings (2002). Retrieving Experience: Subjectivity and Recognition in Feminist Politics. Contemporary Political Theory 1 (2):250.
  46. Heikki Ikäheimo (2009). A Vital Human Need Recognition as Inclusion in Personhood. European Journal of Political Theory 8 (1):31-45.
    Why is recognition of such an importance for humans? Why should lack of recognition motivate people to fight or work for recognition? In this article, I first discuss shortly Axel Honneth's somewhat psychologizing strategy for answering these questions, and suggest that the psychological harms of lack of recognition pointed out by Honneth are neither sufficient nor necessary for motivation to fight or work for recognition to arise. According to the alternative that I then spell out, recognition and lack of it (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  47. Heikki Ikäheimo & Arto Laitinen (2011). Recognition and Social Ontology: An Introduction. In Heikki Ikäheimo & Arto Laitinen (eds.), Recognition and Social Ontology. Brill 1-24.
    This is an introduction to a collection on social ontology and mutual recognition.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48. Heikki Ikäheimo & Arto Laitinen (2010). Esteem for Contributions to the Common Good : The Role of Personifying Attitudes and Instrumental Value. In Michel Seymour (ed.), The Plural States of Recognition. Palgrave MacMillan 98-121.
    Social esteem, based on contributions the common good, or to the good of others, is an important phenomenon, and following Axel Honneth, it can be seen as an important subspecies of interpersonal recognition, side by side with respect and love. In this paper we will contrast two accounts of this phenomenon, hoping that this kind of cross-illumination will prove useful by clarifying a number of conceptual questions and options that one needs to be conscious of indiscussions about esteem as a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. James Jardine (2015). Stein and Honneth on Empathy and Emotional Recognition. Human Studies 38 (4):567-589.
    My aim in this paper is to make use of Edith Stein’s phenomenological analyses of empathy, emotion, and personhood to clarify and critically assess the recent suggestion by Axel Honneth that a basic form of recognition is affective in nature. I will begin by considering Honneth’s own presentation of this claim in his discussion of the role of affect in recognitive gestures, as well as in his notion of ‘elementary recognition,’ arguing that while his account contains much of value it (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. David Haekwon Kim (2002). Asian American Philosophers: Absence, Politics, and Identity. American Philosophical Association Newsletter 1 (2):25-28.
    Less than one percent of U.S. philosophers are Asian American. This essay contends that the low percentage cannot be fully explained by considerations of demographics, immigration, and "Asian culture." Completeness of explanation requires reference to racial politics and Orientalism in their historic and national dynamics. It also requires reference to various kinds of identity derogation specific to the academy and to philosophy, in particular. The essay concludes with reflection on how the "model minority" discourse adds another layer of complication to (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 133