Bookmark and Share

Pyrrhonian Skepticism

Edited by Diego E. Machuca (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas)
Assistant editor: Krista Hyde (Saint Louis University)
About this topic
Summary Pyrrhonism is the most prominent and influential form of skepticism in the history of Western philosophy. It was an important philosophical movement in the Hellenistic and Imperial periods, had a tremendous impact on modern philosophy, and some of its arguments continue to be a central topic of discussion in the contemporary scene. This form of skepticism does not deny the possibility of knowledge or justified belief tout court or in a specific area, but recommends across-the-board suspension of judgment. This subcategory covers works that examine the philosophical aspects of ancient Pyrrhonism and/or discuss Pyrrhonian skepticism in relation to current epistemological discussions.
Key works Fogelin 1994 offers an “updated” version of Sextus Empiricus's Pyrrhonism so as to make it applicable to contemporary debates about justification. Sinnott-Armstrong 2004 is a Festschrift for Robert Fogelin. While some of the essays either compare his neo-Pyrrhonism with its ancient ancestor or refer to this interpretation of certain modern and contemporary philosophers, others critically examine his neo-Pyrrhonism as expounded in Fogelin 1994Sinnott-Armstrong 2006 defends a moderate moral skepticism, characterized as Pyrrhonian, that is based on the notion of "contrast class."
Introductions Machuca 2011 Machuca 2011
  Show all references
Related categories
Siblings:
210 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 210
  1. James Allen (2010). Pyrrhonism and Medicine. In Richard Arnot Home Bett (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism. Cambridge University Press. 232.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Hayden Weir Ausland (1989). On the Moral Origin of the Pyrrhonian Philosophy. Elenchos 10:359-434.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Alan Bailey (2002). Sextus Empiricus and Pyrrhonean Scepticism. Oxford University Press.
    Alan Bailey offers a clear and vigorous exposition and defence of the philosophy of Sextus Empiricus, one of the most influential of ancient thinkers, the father of philosophical scepticism. The subsequent sceptical tradition in philosophy has not done justice to Sextus: his views stand up today as remarkably insightful, offering a fruitful way to approach issues of knowledge, understanding, belief, and rationality. Bailey's refreshing presentation of Sextus to a modern philosophical readership rescues scepticism from the sceptics.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Alan Bailey (1990). Pyrrhonean Scepticism and the Self-Refutation Argument. Philosophical Quarterly 40 (158):27-44.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. J. Barnes (2006). Review: Pyrrhonian Skepticism. [REVIEW] Mind 115 (457):166-169.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jonathan Barnes (2003). Review: Sextus Empiricus and Pyrrhonean Scepticism. [REVIEW] Mind 112 (447):496-499.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Jonathan Barnes (2001). Against the Sceptics A. Haltenhoff: Kritik der akademischen Skepsis. Ein Kommentar zu Cicero , Lucullus 1–62 . (Studien zur klassischen Philologie 113.) Pp. 226. Berlin, etc.: Peter Lang, 1998. Paper, DM 29. ISBN: 3-631-33440-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 51 (01):46-.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Jonathan Barnes (1991). Leo Groarke: Greek Scepticism: Anti-Realist Trends in Ancient Thought. (McGill-Queen's Studies in the History of Ideas.) Pp. Xv + 176. Montreal & Kingston, London and Buffalo: McGill–Queen's University Press, 1990. £33.20. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (02):500-501.
  9. Jonathan Barnes (1990). The Toils of Scepticism. Cambridge University Press.
    In the works of Sextus Empiricus, scepticism is presented in its most elaborate and challenging form. This book investigates - both from an exegetical and from a philosophical point of view - the chief argumentative forms which ancient scepticism developed. Thus the particular focus is on the Agrippan aspect of Sextus' Pyrrhonism. Barnes gives a lucid explanation and analysis of these arguments, both individually and as constituent parts of a sceptical system. For, taken together, these forms amount to a formidable (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jonathan Barnes (1988). Scepticism and Relativity. Philosophical Studies 32:1-31.
  11. Rachel Barney (1992). Appearances and Impressions. Phronesis 37 (3):283-313.
    Pyrrhonian sceptics claim, notoriously, to assent to the appearances without making claims about how things are. To see whether this is coherent we need to consider the philosophical history of ‘appearance’(phainesthai)-talk, and the closely related concept of an impression (phantasia). This history suggests that the sceptics resemble Plato in lacking the ‘non-epistemic’ or ‘non-doxastic’ conception of appearance developed by Aristotle and the Stoics. What is distinctive about the Pyrrhonian sceptic is simply that the degree of doxastic commitment involved in his (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. William Berkson (1979). Skeptical Rationalism. Inquiry 22 (1-4):281 – 320.
    To improve our methods of rational inquiry and decision-making we need to recognize that such methods should guide but not fully determine the choices of individuals. Failure to acknowledge the essential incompleteness of rational methods made the methods of Classical Rationalism quite impractical and opened them to skeptical refutation. Mitigated Skepticism and Fideism failed to correct the error, and as a result put undesirable limits on rational inquiry. When the guiding character of rational methods is recognized, existing methods of scientific (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Jessica Berry (2011). Nietzsche and the Ancient Skeptical Tradition. Oxford University Press.
    Introduction : reading Nietzsche skeptically -- Nietzsche and the Pyrrhonian tradition -- Skepticism in Nietzsche's early work : the case of "on truth and lie" -- The question of Nietzsche's "naturalism" -- Perspectivism and Ephexis in interpretation -- Skepticism and health -- Skepticism as immoralism.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Jessica N. Berry (2011). The Demands of Reason: An Essay on Pyrrhonian Scepticism (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (1):116-117.
    Professional philosophy is overdue for a Pyrrhonian revival. For too long, the skeptic has been either overlooked or regarded as an object of pity (for the feebleness of his arguments) or contempt (for his appearing to thumb his nose at the canons of reason and morality). Even among the most learned and philosophically astute commentators, those who would be best positioned to develop a philosophically sophisticated and compelling interpretation of Pyrrhonism, it has found few defenders, many detractors, and has generally (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Jessica N. Berry (2006). Skepticism in Nietzsche's Earliest Work. International Studies in Philosophy 38 (3):33-48.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. R. Bett (2003). Sextus Empiricus and Pyrrhonean Scepticism. Philosophical Review 112 (1):100-102.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Richard Bett (2013). A Sceptic Looks at Art (but Not Very Closely): Sextus Empiricus on Music. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 3 (3):155-181.
    The paper examines Sextus Empiricus’ Against the Musicians , one of the least studied portions of Sextus’ surviving work, against the background of the more general question why he has so little to say on questions that for us would fall under aesthetics. The structure and goals of the book are considered, along with some puzzles about the consistency of his aims. Each of the two main parts is then analyzed separately, including a comparison between the first part and Philodemus’ (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Richard Bett (2013). Ancient Scepticism. In Roger Crisp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Richard Bett (2007). Sceptic Optics? Apeiron 40 (1):95 - 121.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Richard Bett (1994). Sextus's Against the Ethicists: Scepticism, Relativism or Both? Apeiron 27 (2):123 - 161.
  21. Richard Bett (1993). Greek Scepticism. Ancient Philosophy 13 (1):243-252.
  22. Richard Arnot Home Bett (ed.) (2010). The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism. Cambridge University Press.
    This volume offers a comprehensive survey of the main periods, schools, and individual proponents of scepticism in the ancient Greek and Roman world.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Richard Arnot Home Bett (2000). Pyrrho, His Antecedents, and His Legacy. Oxford University Press.
    Richard Bett presents a ground-breaking study of Pyrrho of Elis, who lived in the late fourth and early third centuries BC and is the supposed originator of Greek scepticism. In the absence of surviving works by Pyrrho, scholars have tended to treat his thought as essentially the same as the long subsequent sceptical tradition which styled itself "Pyrrhonism." Bett argues, on the contrary, that Pyrrho's philosophy was significantly different from this later tradition, and offers the first detailed account of that (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Indrani Bhattacharjee, Pyrrhonian and Naturalistic Themes in the Final Writings of Wittgenstein.
    The following inquiry pursues two interlinked aims. The first is to understand Wittgenstein's idea of non-foundational certainty in the context of a reading of On Certainty that emphasizes its Pyrrhonian elements. The second is to read Wittgenstein's remarks on idealism/radical skepticism in On Certainty in parallel with the discussion of rule-following in Philosophical Investigations in order to demonstrate an underlying similarity of philosophical concerns and methods. I argue that for the later Wittgenstein, what is held certain in a given context (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Martijn Blaauw (2008). Contesting Pyrrhonian Contrastivism. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):471–477.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Inga Bostad (2011). The Life and Learning of Arne Naess: Scepticism as a Survival Strategy. Inquiry 54 (1):42-51.
    ABSTRACT It is obvious that Arne Naess had his most important philosophical experience, and quite possibly made his most significant achievement, in confrontation with the variety of philosophical scepticism known as Pyrrhonism. Naess maintained, however, that he did not defend scepticism as a philosophical position, and he was concerned to distinguish Pyrrhonism from the inverse form of dogmatism often associated with the term ?scepticism?. Naess was primarily preoccupied with the practical implications of this radical form of scepticism, in which he (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. George Boys-Stones (2000). SCEPTICISM R. J. Hankinson: The Sceptics . Pp. Viii + 376. London and New York: Routledge, 1998 (First Published 1995). Paper, £17.99. ISBN: 0-415-18446-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (01):155-.
  28. George Boys-Stones (1997). Sceptical Ethics. The Classical Review 47 (02):292-.
  29. Charles Brittain (2003). The Scepticism Of Sextus. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 53 (2):326-328.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Charles Brittain (2003). The Scepticism of Sextus A. Bailey: Sextus Empiricus and Pyrrhonean Scepticism . Pp. XVI + 302. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002. Cased. Isbn: 0-19-823852-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 53 (02):326-.
  31. Ben Bronner (2013). Assertions Only? Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):44-52.
    It is standardly believed that the only way to justify an assertion in the face of a challenge is by making another assertion. Call this claim ASSERTIONS ONLY. Besides its intrinsic interest, ASSERTIONS ONLY is relevant to deciding between competing views of the norms that govern reasoned discourse. ASSERTIONS ONLY is also a crucial part of the motivation for infinitism and Pyrrhonian skepticism. I suggest that ASSERTIONS ONLY is false: I can justify an assertion by drawing attention to something that (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Otávio Bueno (2009). Sosa on Skepticism. Metaphilosophy 40 (2):195-202.
    Abstract: Ernest Sosa has recently articulated an insightful response to skepticism and, in particular, to the dream argument. The response relies on two independent moves. First, Sosa offers the imagination model of dreaming according to which no assertions are ever made in dreams and no beliefs are involved there. As a result, it is possible to distinguish dreaming from being awake, and the dream argument is blocked. Second, Sosa develops a virtue epistemology according to which in appropriately normal conditions our (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Myles Burnyeat & Michael Frede (1997). The Original Sceptics: A Controversy. Hackett.
  34. Börje Bydén (2002). To Every Argument There Is a Counter—Argument”: Theodore Metochites' Defence of Scepticism (Semeiosis 61). In Katerina Ierodiakonou (ed.), Byzantine Philosophy and its Ancient Sources. Clarendon Press. 183--217.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Sarah Byers (2003). Sextus Empiricus and Pyrrhonean Scepticism. [REVIEW] International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (3):391-392.
  36. Damian Caluori (2007). The Scepticism of Francisco Sanchez. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89 (1):30-46.
    The Renaissance sceptic and medical doctor Francisco Sanchez has been rather unduly neglected in scholarly work on Renaissance scepticism. In this paper I discuss his scepticism against the background of the ancient distinction between Academic and Pyrrhonian scepticism. I argue that Sanchez was a Pyrrhonist rather than, as has been claimed in recent years, a mitigated Academic sceptic. In keeping with this I shall also try to show that Sanchez was crucially influenced by the ancient medical school of empiricism, a (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Luca Castagnoli (2007). La Sala (R.) Die Züge des Skeptikers. Der dialektische Charakter von Sextus Empiricus' Werk. (Hypomnemata 160.) Pp. 204. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2005. Cased, €49.90. ISBN: 978-3-525-25259-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 57 (02):370-372.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Venant Cauchy (1950). The Nature and Genesis of the Skeptic Attitude. Modern Schoolman 27 (3):203-221.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Suhas Chaudhuri (1976). Pyrrhonian, Skepticism and Epoche. Indian Philosophical Quarterly 3 (2):235-244.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Stephen Rl Clark (2013). Living the Pyrrhonian Way1. In S. Campbell & P. Bruno (eds.), The Science, Politics, and Ontology of Life-Philosophy. Bloomsbury.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Paul Coates (1996). Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification. Philosophical Books 37 (3):188-190.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Juan Comesaña (2005). Review of Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Pyrrhonian Skepticism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (6).
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. A. Corti (2010). The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism. [REVIEW] Elenchos 31 (2):345-351.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Garrett Cullity (2008). Pyrrhic Pyrrhonism. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):720-731.
    Journal compilation © 20098 The Editors of The Philosophical Quarterly.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. John Dillon (1992). The Toils of Scepticism. Philosophical Studies 33:328-331.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Gail Fine (2003). Sextus and External World Skepticism. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy:341-85.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Gail Fine (2000). Skeptical Dogmata: Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Méthexis 13:81-105.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Gail Fine (1996). Scepticism, Existence, and Belief: A Discussion of RJ Hankinson, The Sceptics. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy:273-90.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Luciano Floridi (2010). The Rediscovery and Posthumous Influence of Scepticism. In Richard Arnot Home Bett (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism. Cambridge University Press. 267.
  50. Luciano Floridi (1996). Scepticism and the Foundation of Epistemology: A Study in the Metalogical Fallacies. E.J. Brill.
    This sceptical challenge - known as the "problem of the criterion - is one of the major issues in the history of epistemology, and this volume provides its ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 210