About this topic
Summary "Realism" comes in many philosophical guises. One sort of realism concerns whether certain entities exist, or whether they exist independent of our minds. Realism in this metaphysical sense arises for numerous subject matters: everyday material objects, concepts, universals, mathematical objects, moral values, unobservable theoretical entities, and so on. Michael Dummett characterizes realism and anti-realism in semantic terms, suggesting that the fundamental issue is not about the existence of entities, but rather about whether statements of some specified class (such as mathematics or ethics) can have an objective truth value, independently of our means of knowing it.
Key works The diversity of realisms is discussed e.g. in Devitt 1991, Miller 2008, and Raatikainen 2014. A good systematic discussion of  realism about the external world as opposed to phenomenalism and idealism can be found in Locke 1967; see also Armstrong 1961. An already classic collection of articles for and against realism about unobservable theoretical entities, i.e. "scientific realism", is Leplin 1984. An influential recent defense is Psillos 1999; see also Devitt 1991. The realism/antirealism issue was recasted in semantic terms in Dummett 1978, 1993; see also Wright 1993Miller 2006 and Shieh 1998 are useful discussions. Devitt 1983 is a well-known critique of the Dummettian anti-realism.  
Introductions On the variety of realisms: Miller 2008; on scientific realism: Chakravartty 2013, Devitt 2005; on semantic realism and anti-realism: Miller 2006.
  Show all references
Related categories
Subcategories:History/traditions: Realism and Anti-Realism
1256 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 1256
Material to categorize
  1. Paul Abela (1993). Empirical Realism Kant's Contribution to the Realist/Anti-Realist Debate.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Juan José Acero (2011). Origins of Objectivity. Theoria 26 (3):373-376.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Saiyid Zafar Al-Hasan (1928). Realism an Attempt to Trace its Origin and Development in its Chief Representatives. The University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Virgil C. Aldrich (1982). Making Something of Something. Review of Metaphysics 36 (2):303 - 317.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Samuel Alexander (1914). The Basis of Realism. [Oxford University Press].
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6. Keith Algozin (1989). Metaphysics: The Elements. By Bruce Aune. Modern Schoolman 66 (2):153-155.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Barry Allen (1994). Realism with a Human Face. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24 (4):665-688.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Emmanuel Alloa (2015). Produktiver Schein. Phänomenotechnik zwischen Wissenschaft und Ästhetik. Zeitschrift für Ästhetik Und Allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft 60 (2):169-182.
    The notion of ‘phenomenotechnique’ which Gaston Bachelard introduced in the 1930’s has enjoyed popularity among historians of science who used it in order to insist upon the technical and social mediateness of scientific facts. In the wake of the current triumphal return to epistemological ‘realism,’ the idea of phenomenotechnique has been dismissed as an alleged relic of ‘constructivism.’ The article advocates for a different reading of ‘phenomenotechnique,’ which, rather than insisting on the fabrication of the scientific fact, highlights the intrinsic (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Daniel Durante Pereira Alves (2011). Logic is Metaphysics. Principia 15 (1):31-42.
    Analisando alguns aspectos das posições de dois filósofos cujas abordagens são reconhecidamente divergentes, W. O. Quine e M. Dummett, pretendemos sustentar um contundente ponto de acordo entre eles: a ideia de que nossos princípios lógicos constituem nossos princípios sobre o que há, e portanto, que lógica é metafísica. DOI: 10.5007/1808-1711.2011v15n1p3.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. David Leech Anderson (1987). The Realism-Idealism Debate: Theoretical and Practical. Dissertation, Harvard University
    The thesis of this dissertation is that "the realism-idealism debate" is both a theoretical and a practical dispute. The practical dimension has been largely ignored because the deficiencies in the theoretical positions have gone unnoticed. As theoretical doctrines, realism and idealism are best interpreted as semantic theories specifying the conditions in virtue of which our statements are true and false. As semantic doctrines, however, both realism and idealism are false. Neither semantic theory is consistent with other philosophical positions to which (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. John Anderson (1926). The Knower and the Known. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 27:61 - 84.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Ulysses T. Araña (2009). Yes to Realism! No to Non-Naturalism! Kritike: An Online Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):98.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. D. M. Armstrong (1988). Reply to Van Fraassen. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 66 (2):224 – 229.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14. Robert L. Arrington (1991). Rationalism, Realism and Relativism. Mind 100 (1):137-139.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15. Max Ascoli (forthcoming). Realism Versus the Constitution. Social Research.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. R. P. T. Aylett (1982). The Nature of Realism in Grimmelshausen's Simplicissimus Cycle of Novels.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. R. J. B. (1968). Realism. Review of Metaphysics 21 (4):747-747.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. R. J. B. (1968). Realism. Review of Metaphysics 21 (4):747-747.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. M. Baç (2011). The Controversy Over Res in Philosophy of Science and the Mysteries of Ontological Neutrality. Filozofia 66:141-153.
    Clarification of the terms ‘realism’ and ‘antirealism’ has always been a challenging task for philosophers of science, epistemologists, and metaphysicians. The first part of my paper offers a certain classification and critical exposition of realisms in philosophy of science. Next, I take up the issue of finding a middle or natural ground between realism and antirealism. Arthur Fine’s Natural Ontological Attitude is ge- nerally considered as a highly interesting and promising attempt at combining the strengths of the two sides of (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Murat Baç (2004). Can Realists Know That They Know? Acta Analytica 19 (32):65-90.
    Realists typically suppose that nonepistemic truth is an independent condition on propositional knowledge. Few philosophers, however, have seriously questioned the meta-epistemic consequences of combining alethic and epistemic variants of realism. In this paper I aim to show that the truth condition in the customary definition of knowledge presents an important problem for the realist at higher epistemic levels. According to my argument, traditional epistemic-logical analyses of metaknowledge fail because of their extensionalism and certain presuppositions they have about the satisfaction of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. J. B. Baillie (1909). Prof. Laurie's Natural Realism; II. The Ontology of Natural Realism. Mind 18:184.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. George A. Barrow (1919). A Defect in the Argument for Realism. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 16 (13):337-347.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Michael Baur (1993). Radical Realism. Review of Metaphysics 47 (2):379-380.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Charles A. Baylis (1963). A Criticism of Lovejoy's Case for Epistemological Dualism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 23 (4):527-537.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. John Marshall Bellwoar (1997). A Realist Theory of Understanding. Dissertation, Brown University
    Realist theories of explanation in the analytic tradition have generally ignored the epistemic side of explanation, namely, understanding. The project I pursue in this dissertation is formulating a theory of understanding that fits with most realist approaches to explanation. One of the main motivations for pursuing such a project is to determine whether and how the explanatory virtues--the characteristics of simplicity, unity, scope, etc.--can be fit with the general realist program. After presenting and arguing for my account of understanding, I (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. John Bengson (forthcoming). Grasping the Third Realm. Oxford Studies in Epistemology 5.
    Some things we can know just by thinking about them: for example, that identity is transitive, that Gettier’s Smith does not know that the man who will get the job has ten coins in his pockets, that the ratio between two and six holds also between one and three, that it is wrong to wantonly torture innocent sentient beings, and various other things that simply strikeus, intuitively, as true when we consider them. The question is how : how can we (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  27. Ted Benton (2004). 16 Realism About the Value of Nature? In Andrew Collier, Margaret Scotford Archer & William Outhwaite (eds.), Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier. Routledge 239.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28. George Berger (1976). Realism and Complex Entities. Philosophical Studies 30 (2):95 - 103.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29. Roy Bhaskar (2004). 1 A Considerable Realist. In Andrew Collier, Margaret Scotford Archer & William Outhwaite (eds.), Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier. Routledge 1.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Michel Bitbol (2001). Non-Representationalist Theories of Knowledge and Quantum Mechanics. SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):37-61.
    Quantum Mechanics has imposed strain on traditional (dualist and representationalist) epistemological conceptions. An alternative was offered by Bohr and Heisenberg, according to whom natural science does not describe nature, but rather the interplay between nature and ourselves. But this was only a suggestion. In this paper, a systematic development of the Bohr-Heisenberg conception is outlined, by way of a comparison with the modern self-organizational theories of cognition. It is shown that a perfectly consistent non-representationalist (and/or relational) reading of quantum mechanics (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  31. Michel Bitbol (1998). Some Steps Towards a Transcendental Deduction of Quantum Mechanics. Philosophia Naturalis 35:253-280.
    The two major options on which the current debate on the interpretation of quantum mechanics relies, namely realism and empiricism, are far from being exhaustive. There is at least one more position available, which is metaphysically as agnostic as empiricism, but which shares with realism a committment to considering the structure of theories as highly significant. The latter position has been named transcendentalism after Kant. In this paper, a generalized version of Kant's method is used. This yields a reasoning that (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  32. Simon Blackburn (2002). Realism: Deconstructing the Debate. Ratio 15 (2):111–133.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  33. Simon Blackburn (1989). Manifesting Realism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 14 (1):29-47.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  34. Simon Blackburn (1980). Truth, Realism, and the Regulation of Theory. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1):353-372.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  35. Guido Bonino, Greg Jesson & Javier Cumpa (eds.) (2014). Defending Realism: Ontological and Epistemological Investigations. De Gruyter.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Frangois Bonsack (1989). Prolegomena to a Realist Epistemology. Dialectica 43 (1‐2):67-81.
    SummaryAfter exposing certain confusions , 1 give a sketch of a non‐metaphysical realism which involves the construction of a world‐O, mainly by means of criteria of invariance and of independence of variables.This world‐O facilitates description of the relationships of sensations among themselves and with actions. It includes the subject objectivized with his subjectivity , which makes it possible to describe without difficulty the relationship between this subject and the world. This realism reconstructs as it were realism from an idealist standpoint, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. John E. Boodin (1907). The New Realism. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 4 (20):533-542.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Marko Bosnic (2014). “New” Realism As A Problem Of Method. Meta:280-304.
    The development of the discussion on “Speculative Realism” and “Speculative Materialism” is very well documented. However, in order to better understand the overall project of this “New Realism” it is helpful to draw light to the genealogy and context in which the problem evolved in. In this paper, I map out a genealogy of the complex problem of “New Realism” in order to understand what it is that is “new” about this realism. The central argument of the paper is that (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Stephen J. Boulter (2000). Could Aquinas Reject Semantic Realism? Reply to de Anna. Philosophical Quarterly 50 (201):515-518.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. William F. Bristow (2002). Are Kant's Categories Subjective? Review of Metaphysics 55 (3):551-580.
    Argues that there is a significant respect in which Kant's categories are to be understood as subjective, namely, in the sense that they are to be understood as the self-legislated rules of our understanding. Argues that the subjectivism of Kant's idealism, by which is meant the relativization of knowledge of objects to our standpoint, is a consequence of the subjectivity of the categories, on this interpretation of their subjectivity. On the reading opposed here, Kant's subjectivism is strictly a consequence of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. D. H. M. Brooks (1985). Realism and Reference. Philosophical Papers 14 (1):36-42.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Anthony Brueckner (1998). Realism, Best Explanation, and Cognitive Command. Philosophical Papers 27 (1):69-78.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Marco Buzzoni (2000). On Allan Franklin's Conjectural Realism. Epistemologia 23 (1):77-98.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. V. C. C. (1956). Objectivity. Review of Metaphysics 9 (4):702-702.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Francesco F. Calemi (forthcoming). Linceo e la presbiopia ontologica. Considerazioni sul nominalismo di Achille Varzi. Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho.
    According to Varzi's nominalism properties are typical examples of ontological hallucinations. In this brief paper I'll focus on an interesting argument that Varzi puts forward against the Realists’ tenet according to which predicates have properties as ontological correlates. I’ll argue that even if Varzi's argument is not convincing, the metalinguistic nominalism he espouses has sufficient resources to meet the realists' challenge concerning the phenomenon of predication. Furthermore, I'll make some methodological remarks about the relationship holding between the «dot quote» analysis (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. H. G. Callaway (1996). Review: Carl R. Hausman, Charles S. Peirce's Evolutionary Philosophy. [REVIEW] Dialectica 50 (No. 2):153-161.
    Carl Hausman is a former editor of The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, a revival of one of the first American philosophy journals, where Peirce published some of his early work; and Hausman has devoted a good deal of his career to Peirce scholarship. He interprets Peirce’s thought “as a fallibilistic foundationalism that affirms a unique realism according to which what is real is a dynamic, evolving extramental condition.” The theme is an interesting one partly in view of the many recent (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Charles E. Cardwell (1972). A Note on Putnam and the Transitivity of the Real. Philosophical Studies 23 (6):414 - 417.
    Professor Putnam's argument that future happenings are already real is clarified and examined. It is argued that, contrary to other claims in the literature, Putnam's premises are consistent, but that the field of the relation R on which he bases his conclusion is such that the conclusion does not in fact follow.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Everett Carter (1954). Howells and the Age of Realism. Lippincott.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  49. Louis Caruana, Minimal Realism.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Thomas Case (1889). Physical Realism. Mind 14 (54):267-271.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1256